[leaf-devel] Git Repository link from Bering-uClibc project page

Hi kp, I just noticed that the Git Repository link from http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/ is pointing at the leaf/leaf Git repository and now it should really point at leaf/bering-uclibc instead. It's not urgent but please would you correct when you get chance. Thanks, davidMbrooke

Re: [leaf-devel] problem compiling buildenv with ubuntu 11.04

On 3 Jul 2011, at 14:30, Mike Noyes wrote: On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 10:17 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Freitag, 1. Juli 2011, 15:52:49 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:52 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: -snip- I was running into a similar problem when changing to the new

Re: [leaf-devel] problem compiling buildenv with ubuntu 11.04

On 4 Jul 2011, at 23:20, Mike Noyes wrote: On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 23:37 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: Hi David on 04.07.2011 21:06, david M brooke wrote: ... Hi Mike, My build host is running Fedora 15 for x86_64. Works fine. Happy to share the logfile from a clean build if that is any

Re: [leaf-devel] complete rebuild findings

On 5 Jul 2011, at 19:07, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: David, I think ticket #48 can be solved quickly. Will you take care of? Hi kp, Yes, I will fix. dMb -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is

[leaf-devel] Ohloh FOSS Directory Entry for LEAF Project

Hi, In case anyone is not aware, the Ohloh directory of Free and Open Source Software (http://www.ohloh.net/) has an entry for the LEAF Project that Mike created some time ago, see http://www.ohloh.net/p/leaf. One nice feature is that Ohloh does some analysis on source code retrieved from

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

On 17 Dec 2011, at 18:56, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Does any of the telephony applications (yate, asterisk) do need ISDN support? Asterisk does not need ISDN and I don't think yate does either (though I haven't checked). Otherwise it may removed from the kernel. kp I think it is OK to

Re: [leaf-devel] SF podcast

On 6 Jan 2012, at 23:19, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 06.01.2012 18:39, schrieb Mike Noyes: Everyone, SF staff interview regarding LEAF. http://sourceforge.net/blog/podcast-leaf/ David and others that helped, Thanks for attending to this. :-) Well done David. (I wonder what

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering uClibc 4.x and Avahi

Hi Yves, Compile is fine for me - I did a complete re-build from scratch (tools/buildall.sh) to check my changes and everything was green. Maybe I have missed something which affects your build environment but not mine (I build on 64-bit Fedora 16). I am CCing the leaf-devel list: Andrew, kp

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - Successful build of ARM toolchain

On 2 Apr 2012, at 17:04, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 01.04.2012 00:14, schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi all, I *finally* got my ARM toolchain to compile! Seems there are some issues with NPTL on ARM (both for uClibc 0.9.32.1 and 0.9.33) so I have reverted to the new pthread implementation for now

Re: [leaf-devel] Next branch: improvements

On 11 Apr 2012, at 14:16, Yves Blusseau wrote: Le 23/04/2012 11:31, Andrew a écrit : 11.04.2012 11:20, Erich Titl написал: Hi Andrew at 23.04.2012 10:07, Andrew wrote: 11.04.2012 09:36, Erich Titl написал: Hi Andrew at 22.04.2012 23:20, Andrew wrote: Hi all. I'm thinking about some

Re: [leaf-devel] Next branch: improvements

On 23 Apr 2012, at 20:20, Andrew wrote: 11.04.2012 21:36, david M brooke написал: On 11 Apr 2012, at 14:16, Yves Blusseau wrote: Le 23/04/2012 11:31, Andrew a écrit : 11.04.2012 11:20, Erich Titl написал: Hi Andrew at 23.04.2012 10:07, Andrew wrote: 11.04.2012 09:36, Erich Titl

[leaf-devel] Server www.mpfr.org is not responding

Hi all, I've just upgraded my build host to Fedora 17 and I'm attempting a full rebuild of BuC 4.x. This failed because the attempt to download mpfr-2.3.2.tar.bz2 from www.mpfr.org doesn't work because that server is not currently responding. I have located a copy of mpfr-2.3.2.tar.bz2 from

Re: [leaf-devel] Server www.mpfr.org is not responding

Looks like it's back online now so no need for any immediate action. We also have an obligation to provide source code for everything we ship as part of each LEAF distribution, in order to comply with the terms of most of the open source licenses, and it's *much* easier to do that if we have a

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next: errors during build

On 11 Jun 2012, at 17:49, Andrew wrote: Hi all. I noticed that there are some packages that are built with errors. Some of them I fixed (for ex., shorewall6 - it installs init file as shorewall, not shorewall6, and so on), and some of them have unresolved dependencies (includes), among

[leaf-devel] BuC 5.x - Raspberry Pi Proof of Concept is Working

Hi all, My Raspberry Pi Model B, on order since April, arrived yesterday. After a few hours of work I have it running BuC 5.x very nicely. Only a Proof of Concept at this stage, but it shows that it can be done. Screen, keyboard and network are all working OK and LRP package loading and saving

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 5.x - Raspberry Pi Proof of Concept is Working

On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 21:27 +0300, Andrew wrote: 02.07.2012 21:01, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am 01.07.2012 23:43, schrieb david M brooke: Hi all, My Raspberry Pi Model B, on order since April, arrived yesterday. After a few hours of work I have it running BuC 5.x very nicely. Only a Proof

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC v5

On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 18:54 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Current git sources build fine for x86 and I had only one error (oprofile) for arm-versatile. I also get that one build error on any non-x86 platform. The OpenWrt team have the same problem, and they have a patch to fix :-) See

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC v5

On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 11:50 +0100, david M brooke wrote: On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 23:50 +0300, Andrew wrote: What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h). I am currently seeing a clean build for all

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC v5

On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 12:00 +0300, Andrew wrote: I finished merge; it seems that there is no troubles - but I haven't time to re-check this. So anybody pls update to new master and try to compile all. Completely new clone of master builds OK for me :-) - 201 packages, all green And 4.3 is

Re: [leaf-devel] Git workflow questions

Hi kp, Thanks for the responses. On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 00:13 +0100, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Hi David; Am Freitag, 7. Februar 2014, 21:09:32 schrieb David M Brooke: Hi leaf-devel, I've been busy with other things for a while and I haven't had much time for LEAF development. However

Re: [leaf-devel] qemu and raspberry pi

Hi Jim, It’s been a long while since I tried using qemu to emulate a RaspberryPi but I did get it to work. Probably kp has more recent experience. There are some notes at http://bering-uclibc.zetam.org/wiki/Bering-uClibc_5.x_-_User_Guide_-_Appendices_-_Working_with_Disk_Image_Files (the very

Re: [leaf-devel] findfs in linuxrc

Hi Erich, I added that code in 2012 in response to a user request. The need for findfs was flagged up at the time. See http://sourceforge.net/p/leaf/mailman/message/29449905/ David > On 23 Dec 2015, at 10:16, Erich Titl wrote: > > Hi Folks > > Looking at linuxrc I see