I also agree perl would be an overkill. What we need is to create a
framework like we have for lrps for web based management. Every lrp must
have a web based config template that will be used by a master web script.
The template format and scripting needs to be developed and standardised.
What
On Thursday 29 August 2002 14:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I can commit to any updates/modifications to sh-httpd that may be
required. I think it's possible to dramatically increase the CGI
response of the existing sh-httpd when running CGI's, which would be
a big help for a CGI
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 21:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
using sh-httpd. or a
small server (boa, thttpd)
It looks as if almost noone knows about mini_httpd
(http://www.acme.com/). It's from the same authors as thttpd. It's a
little slower than thttpd, but smaller (40k vs. 71k) and it can
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 21:40, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I'm well aware of mini_httpd, but it's 40K...sh-httpd is about 9K
(including the conf file), and it's text so it compresses well in *.lrp
packages!
Agreed!
There's also micro_httpd, but it won't do CGI...
You can wrap most any
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 12:56, Eric Wolzak wrote:
(snip)
I agree with your summary Eric.
Advantage of webmin, there are all kinds of
modules. Adaption is much easier than building
from scratch.
Disadvantage memory and CPU.
I would be against using Perl personally.
Porting Webmin would
Alternatively, use the same fields and write the
engine in shell.script or php using sh-httpd. or a
small server (boa, thttpd)
It can be done with sh-httpd. Mosquito has used thttpd,
but thttpd is considerably larger (and more versitile).
My vote would be to use sh-httpd w/POST patch.
Hello Charles, Lynn , list
Alternatively, use the same fields and write the
engine in shell.script or php using sh-httpd. or a
small server (boa, thttpd)
It can be done with sh-httpd. Mosquito has used thttpd,
but thttpd is considerably larger (and more versitile).
My vote would
Hi Eric, Lynn, Charles
Asking for permission to come aboard.
regards
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16
---
This sf.net email is
I also agree perl would be an overkill. What we need is to create a
framework like we have for lrps for web based management. Every lrp must
have a web based config template that will be used by a master web script.
The template format and scripting needs to be developed and standardised.
I'm
combined reply to several posts and some ideas (at the bottom):
On Thursday 29 August 2002 14:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
to leaf-devel. Is anyone ready to work on and/or discuss any
sections of this???
I can commit to any updates/modifications to sh-httpd that may be
required. I
10 matches
Mail list logo
