To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf
I am confused about the advantages (or disadvantages) of attaching
documents instead of image files.
For example, I have some naturalization records saved as jpgs, and
others as pdfs. I like that the documents
@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf
...
I guess it's up to the user as to what their preference will be later on
down the road when you have thousands of images/PDFs. One big advantage of
using the PDF files is that you can add notes
...@legacyfamilytree.com]on
Behalf Of Ward Walker
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:35 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf
Bill,
Adobe Reader is able to add annotations to a PDF if the appropriate user
rights have been applied to the PDF. I suspect
: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf
I think you're speaking of the permissions for sharing with people who are
only using the Reader.
I forgot to mention that I'm using the latest Adobe Acrobat software. I
don't remember what the capabilities were
I am confused about the advantages (or disadvantages) of attaching documents
instead of image files.
For example, I have some naturalization records saved as jpgs, and others as
pdfs. I like that the documents come up in the picture gallery because I think
it is almost as exciting to see a
Personally, I use images for photos only and pdf's for all documents. Having
images of documented records come up in reports would only bloat reports,
whereas citing sources streamlines reports. Just my 2ยข worth
If the document is important to your report, then print it out as an
attachment.
6 matches
Mail list logo
