Liz,
You asked about the early intent of the Contributor Terms before they were
re-written by legal counsel. As promised:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes or directly
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1lVQlsnuEKPY2gjspScwHqgmo8RyoqmuaWWmWh58T4TY
0.1
At 10:46 AM 14/08/2010, Rob Myers wrote:
On 08/14/2010 07:33 AM, Liz wrote:
If you believe, like many data donors, that the attribution must be preserved,
then a licence which incorporates the viral provisions is necessary.
The ODbL does incorporate attribution. From a given work you can find
- Original Message -
From: Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org;
Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:38 PM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Is CC-BY is compatible with ODbL/CT?
(Was
At 05:50 PM 22/08/2010, David Groom wrote:
Intent:
(1) Section 4 always was intended to allow and encourage governmental
organisation imports that require attribution under the standard terms
without need for derogation.
(2) Maintain maximum flexibility for future choices. The license used in
- Original Message -
From: 80n 80n...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is CC-BY-SA is compatible with ODbL - a
philosophical point
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 5:44 PM,
Hi,
I'm sort of sick of allegations that what I say and do in the
community is somehow tainted by myself doing business in OSM. Here's a
quote from talk a while ago:
Chris Browet wrote:
The fact that many key players (SteveC, Frederik, Richard(?)) in the
project also have commercial
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:50 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.netwrote:
- Original Message - From: 80n 80n...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is CC-BY-SA is
I can't speak for Chris, but you don't make me nervous because you're quite
open and you don't drive any issues that may have business implications.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm sort of sick of allegations that what I say and do in the
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't speak for Chris, but you [Frederik] don't make me nervous because
you're quite
open and you don't drive any issues that may have business implications.
He doesn't make me nervous, but I wouldn't want him (or anyone
On 22/08/2010 15:27, Mike Collinson wrote:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes or directly
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1lVQlsnuEKPY2gjspScwHqgmo8RyoqmuaWWmWh58T4TY
0.1
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=18q0b_f_-rtuWWC04qaAcO3NY_Aob2QjY2gGRMmo0IrM
0.2
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:58 PM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 22/08/2010 15:27, Mike Collinson wrote:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes or directly
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1lVQlsnuEKPY2gjspScwHqgmo8RyoqmuaWWmWh58T4TY
0.1
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
That's an open question for the lawyer that wrote the CT. In casual
conversation with one lawyer (casual as in I wasn't paying the
lawyer) I was told that legal-English is not FORTRAN and the or is not
required for
12 matches
Mail list logo
