I think you are misunderstanding my concern. Naturally we are not
negating that there may be cases in which we are liable for damages
because a court comes to the conclusion that we negligent in one way or
the other, but that would be in court where we have a chance to defend
ourselves against
I will be happy to proceed according to Rex's instructions, but not
until Simon says it is OK.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Hi,
Since the open data on data.gov.tw from Taiwan government
covers only Taiwan, I assumed that any legal case will be following
Taiwan law and Taiwan Civil Code.
On your concern, "does useful things with the data" does not mean
a mapper can just import the data negligently. I believe any
Good to see that 6.3 at least raised half an eye brow with the OKFN,
they seem to however chosen the most harmless interpretation possible,
my reading would be that it could be equivalent to a hold
harmless/indemnification clause. Now for probably 99.9% of OKFNs
audience the concerns are probably
Hi,
"Open Government Data License Taiwan 1.0" just has been approved as
Open Definition Conformant License[1] last month.
There were some discussion[2] about clause 6.3, it does not impose any
additional agreement nor does it impose any restrictions, but a
reminding and a corresponding clause
OK thanks Simon for the clarification!
I'll ask the participants of
https://www.facebook.com/groups/odtwn/permalink/1927450013936074/?comment_id=1927539973927078
and
https://discuss.okfn.org/t/license-approval-request-open-government-data-license-taiwan-1-0/4593/12
to chime in here to get this
As has already been pointed out 3.2 could be problematic. The
translation is a bit wobbly and unclear, but if I understand it
correctly the intent is to reference a data set specific attribution
requirement that would naturally have to be looked at for any specific
data use.
The really killer is
Yes I wrote the legal questions people week ago but nobody replied.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Yes I asked legal-questions a week ago and no one answered. Perhaps
someone could ask them for me. Thanks.
> "KL" == Kathleen Lu writes:
KL> Hi Dan,
KL> The English version, at least, appears less restrictive than CC BY 4.0, and
KL> closer to the Canada Open Government License. The license
Hi Dan,
The English version, at least, appears less restrictive than CC BY 4.0, and
closer to the Canada Open Government License. The license is not specific
as to the type of attribution required.
The conservative route, is, as Frederik said, to ask the agency if
attribution on the
Hi,
On 04/25/2017 01:38 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> What do you folks think about
> http://data.gov.tw/license#eng ?
> Can we use that data?
Not without further clarification. The way in which we would use the
data could be seen as violating their 3.2: "[The user] must make an
explicit notice
11 matches
Mail list logo
