ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

This Engineering Notebook post contains second thoughts about Trilium Notes. *tl;dr:* Leo might add only *incremental *improvements inspired by Trilium Notes. All fundamental aspects of Leo will remain as they are. *Leo's body pane* Yesterday, I proposed that Leo's body might contain either

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

On Friday, April 26, 2024 at 1:31:41 PM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: The Easter Egg is the only way to expand the VR pane. An optional floating VR window would solve that problem. Here you go: ns = c.free_layout.get_top_splitter() ns.open_window('_leo_viewrendered3') -- You received this

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

On Friday, April 26, 2024 at 7:45:11 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: This Engineering Notebook post contains second thoughts about Trilium Notes. *Trilium's weaknesses* Trilium undervalues the power of text: I think that Edward does not appreciate how often users want to use Leo as an

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

I'm with you here. Between VR3 and Freewin, I've tried floating windows, new frames, and rendering into a tab in the log frame. Freewin has a switchable display (edit <-> render) and I find that convenient and easy to work with, even without a way to set the default to *render*. Having the

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

On Friday, April 26, 2024 at 1:13:38 PM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 8:02 AM Thomas Passin wrote: >> As an option, the VR pane could become a floating window. > This is already possible, at least with VR3. With VR3 enabled, right click on the boundary between two

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

Why would a floating window solve any problems here? How are you envisioning that a floating VR3 window, *which can already be done* *today without any additional coding*, would help the situation? As a counterpoint, I only have a single display available to me. I generally do my work (in Leo)

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 8:02 AM Thomas Passin wrote: >> As an option, the VR pane could become a floating window. > This is already possible, at least with VR3. With VR3 enabled, right click on the boundary between two frames to get the splitter menu. Select *Window* then *VR3*. VR3 opens in

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:49 AM Thomas Passin wrote: >> Trilium undervalues the power of text: > I think that Edward does not appreciate how often users want to use Leo as a Notebook... I agree. Leonistas *should *be able to use lots of graphics :-) That's why improving the VR plugins and

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

On Friday, April 26, 2024 at 7:45:11 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: This Engineering Notebook post contains second thoughts about Trilium Notes. *tl;dr:* Leo might add only *incremental *improvements inspired by Trilium Notes. All fundamental aspects of Leo will remain as they are.

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

*>Trilium's weaknesses:>There is no minibuffer and no way to execute commands by name. * True, but not fundamentally blocked. In the Awesome Trilium list is a js plugin for adding a command-palette. I imagine it's modelled after vs-code's Ctrl-Shift-P

Re: ENB: Seconds thoughts about Trilium Notes

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:38 PM Thomas Passin wrote: The Easter Egg is the only way to expand the VR pane. An optional floating > VR window would solve that problem. > > > Here you go: > > ns = c.free_layout.get_top_splitter() > ns.open_window('_leo_viewrendered3') > Wow. Thanks for this. And