-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Whonix is an anonymous general purpose operating system based on
Virtual Box, Debian GNU/Linux and Tor. It has its focus on anonymity,
privacy, security and usability.
The Whonix project is looking for a volunteer.
Your task:
- - Join us with
Sometimes it needs someone to state the obvious. I totally agree with
his general message You can't beat politics with technology.
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
I am not sure we can fix the problem (global surveillance system) with
technology at all. Sure, personally I am a big fan of more usable and
safer tools to communicate. They make us technology/privacy enthusiasts
happy.
Do ordinary citizen care about e-mail anymore anyway?
I would assume, that
phree...@yandex.ru:
[...Tor...]
Both client and service can opt to drop their half of the circuit, which
turns
it into a more or less direct tcp connection, with nat traversal capabilities.
Is dropping half of the circuit really already implemented for client
and for server?
There is
phree...@yandex.ru:
On Monday, November 04, 2013 01:17:49 PM Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
On 11/04/2013 05:28 AM, phree...@yandex.ru wrote:
On Sunday, November 03, 2013 04:06:11 PM Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Nov 3, 2013, at 3:30, phree...@yandex.ru phree...@yandex.ru
wrote:
I don't see how pasting
Are they duplicating efforts? See https://leap.se/email.
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
change to digest, or change password by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Whonix is an operating system focused on anonymity, privacy and
security. It's based on the Tor anonymity network, Debian GNU/Linux
and the principle of security by isolation. DNS leaks are impossible,
and not even malware with root privileges can
Thank you for doing this work!
The world needs someone facing the truth, explaining why gpg isn't the
solution, advocating positive change. It's a communicative task, a very
difficult one. As long there is gpg, most geeks don't see need to create
better alternatives.
I'd say, gpg's development
for the Whonix Developer Mailing
List [3] and say hello.
Cheers,
adrelanos
[1] https://www.whonix.org
[2] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_Language_Extension_Bundle
[3] https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists#whonix-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
?
Cheers,
adrelanos
(Full disclosure: I am a maintainer of Whonix.)
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
change to digest, or change password
Nick:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:22PM +0200, Moon Jones wrote:
I stumbled upon UPR these last days. It does not work on my
machines. But the idea sounds good. Yet I could not find anything
like it. Tails comes close, but the network is enabled.
I don't know of any other distributions
coderman:
**why not instead focus on building low latency protocols
that are resistant to traffic analysis and confirmation?**
make them datagram based; utilize user space stacks and latest
research. solving the low latency datagram anonymity problem enables
existing usable private
Moritz Bartl:
Nice idea. I would use a trusted timestamp instead of a headline, but
anyway. What do you think, should I do this for torservers.net/onion.to?
http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/canary.txt
rsync.net will also make available, weekly, a warrant canary in the
form of a
Moritz Bartl:
Nice idea. I would use a trusted timestamp instead of a headline, but
anyway. What do you think, should I do this for torservers.net/onion.to?
http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/canary.txt
rsync.net will also make available, weekly, a warrant canary in the
form of a
Moritz Bartl:
On 09.08.2013 13:15, Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
Yup, Cryptocat has had build assurance for quite some time.
Sorry, not possible to backdoor without people noticing
is still a valid line of defence and has been one for a while.
You should think about splitting Cryptocat software
Nadim Kobeissi:
Jacob has a problem. For years, I have been abused in private and in
public by Jacob regarding my work on Cryptocat, in ways that are so
underhanded that if I described them on this list, you would not even
believe me. He does this to *many projects*. You obviously have no
Kyle Maxwell:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:41 PM, liberationt...@lewman.us wrote:
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:46:10 +0200
Moritz Bartl mor...@torservers.net wrote:
Repeat after me: Iceland is *not* a data haven.
[citation needed]
Shouldn't it be the other way around? If somebody claims that a
Why not post messages to usenet alt.anonymous.messages? It can provide
great properties for privacy and anonymity. You don't need any servers
or to invent any server software. Just use the existing infrastructure.
alt.anonymous.messages can be used as a big shared mailbox. And the
client
Werner Koch:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:30, adrela...@riseup.net said:
verification is the least secure method, to the download page?
(You can see the design here: [3])
A: 1 in ~11 users.
Actually [3] is the same URL as [1].
Sorry about that.
[1]: www.webcitation.org/6IWk5h4E9
[3]:
can get some more information and more detailed statistics here: [5] [6]
This is also a follow up to: [liberationtech] secure download tool -
doesn't exist?!? [4]
Cheers,
adrelanos
Footnotes:
[1] http://www.webcitation.org/6IWk5h4E9
[2] Please ignore the Moved to https://www.whonix.org; part
The Doctor:
On 07/18/2013 11:51 AM, Charles Allhands wrote:
Thanks for the link! Is there a reason why mix networks aren't
commonly used? I see mixminion hasn't been worked on in years.
One possible factor may be that many people are less interested in
anonymity of communications (i.e.,
Charles Allhands:
Thanks for the link! Is there a reason why mix networks aren't commonly
used?
Thanks for asking this interesting question. See this. Not written by
me. Source [1]
Roger Dingledine Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:10:48 -0700
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:15:04AM +0100, StealthMonger
Speaking as maintainer of Whonix here.
Jacob Appelbaum:
When upgrading a tails machine today, I noticed that the default
download link is HTTP.
This is actually a problem for many (security related) application
downloads, not only for Tails. For example, also the gpg4win homepage
has no https
Nathan of Guardian:
On 07/01/2013 02:03 PM, adrelanos wrote:
I think, this kind of tool doesn't exist yet.
Could torrents and magnet links address this issue?
As far I know they include hash verification.
Issues:
- you still have to tell the user you must download tool X before you
can
Eleanor Saitta:
On 2013.07.01 15.15, Julian Oliver wrote:
..on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:03:01PM +, adrelanos wrote:
In response to the tool doesn't exist...
apt-get install tor torify wget http://path.to/file
And how did you verify the trust path for your initial debian install
Eleanor Saitta:
On 2013.07.01 17.28, adrelanos wrote:
Eleanor Saitta:
On 2013.07.01 15.15, Julian Oliver wrote:
..on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:03:01PM +, adrelanos wrote:
In response to the tool doesn't exist...
apt-get install tor torify wget http://path.to/file
And how did you verify
the Debian community (or any other disto)
are aware of that threat model yet.
I failed explaining the threat model. So I am looking forward to your
blog post. More publicity about this little known, yet very serious
topic, is important.
Best,
adrelanos
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change
and technical design can be
found on it's homepage.
Homepage:
http://whonix.sf.net/
If you want to read a longer introduction/release message, you can
refer the the old one:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/2013-January/006707.html
Cheers,
adrelanos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
of screenshots, videos?
Or are there any usability studies what people actually do read and
understand?
Cheers,
adrelanos
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
danimoth:
On 11/02/13 at 10:20am, adrelanos wrote:
Hi,
since I want to write good documentation for my own project, I thought
it may be worth checking how other projects did.
Which project/documentation do you personally enjoy? Bonus points for
anonymity/privacy/security related projects
scarp:
If you look at the last 15 or so years you'll notice people consider
privacy a magic button on Facebook
Yes, I speculate that more then ~70% of people believe if they pressed
that button, that no one else, including Facebook can gain access to
their data.
In my experience, if you talk
problems. The principal design is less
vulnerable for any kind of leaks. At time of writing (January 2012) I
have been working on the theoretical concept and practical
implementation for 13 months, the basics have been developed by (at
least) three people, adrelanos, smarm and anonymous. [3] [4
32 matches
Mail list logo
