On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:59:48PM +0100, Giuseppe Calamita wrote:
Hello, I wonder if application such as Spotflux: http://www.spotflux.com/ in
security general terms and agency proof strength.
At first glance it appears to be a closed-source app which allegedly solves
certain security/privacy
Hi All,
NDItech is looking to collect a set of the best-of-the-best resources on
threat modeling and risk assessment, particularly on information security
pertaining to creating, storing, and sharing information. I'd love to hear
from the list on what tools/resources you use, and will re-share an
The latest news at https://aopriv.jottit.com/ is that allout.org have
deleted the problematic survey.
The interesting thing is that Andre Banks from AllOut says:
I just heard about the potential security issue you wrote about below through
an advisor who is on the LibTech list
So thanks to
As a social engineer, one wonders about the agenda of an organization that
calls itself all out doing this kind of BS so...coyly.
What an unfortunate mistake on their part! Imagine if someone had set such
a thing up as a honeypot. Indeed. Some people believe we should be all
out...it would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013.03.10 04.28, Bruce Potter wrote:
Apologies if this is too far afield, but a friend in a small island
needs assistance with an unexploded ordinance problem.
Is there a list or other resource I can refer him to?
While this is at best
best, Joe
--
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Senior Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy Technology
https://www.cdt.org/
On Mar 19, 2013, at 16:18, Eleanor Saitta e...@dymaxion.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013.03.19 15.02, Lindsay Beck wrote:
Hi All,
NDItech
Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not reply-all by default been
broached? Maybe I'm the only one that trips over it so often. best, Joe
On Mar 19, 2013, at 19:06, Joseph Lorenzo Hall j...@cdt.org wrote:
best, Joe
--
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Senior Staff Technologist
Center
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:08:48PM -0400, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not reply-all by default been
broached? Maybe I'm the only one that trips over it so often. best, Joe
This is something that has been debated numerous, and I do mean *numerous*,
We used to use individual replies rather than reply all, but the list
members took a vote to change the default to reply all. If there's
enough interest, we could always bring it up for another vote, as the
decision was made a year or so ago, and the list has grown a lot since
then.
Best,
Yosem
Hey Yosem
How have you been ?
I sent an email to the libtech list about the NSL story but it didn;t'
seem to go through.. could it be stuck in a moderation queue somewhere ?
best,
Nick
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
moderator at
..on Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:24:39PM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:08:48PM -0400, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not reply-all by default
been broached? Maybe I'm the only one that trips over it so often. best, Joe
This
On Mar 19, 2013, at 19:32, Yosem Companys compa...@stanford.edu wrote:
We used to use individual replies rather than reply all, but the list
members took a vote to change the default to reply all. If there's
enough interest, we could always bring it up for another vote, as the
decision was
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 19:08 -0400, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not reply-all by
default been broached?
Reply-to-list poses a significant usability risk that can escalate into
a security issue, so it's unfortunate that it's being used here of all
Matt said:
Reply-to-list poses a significant usability risk that can escalate
into a security issue, so it's unfortunate that it's being used here
of all places.
I agree. Some more information on Reply-To header munging:
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html
It's
Am I right to assume Mike and Matt are asking that the issue be put up for
a vote again so that the default is changed back from reply-to-all to
reply-to-poster?
If so, I will get that survey going.
Thanks,
Yosem
One of the moderators
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Michael Allan
Here is a very personal example, in which I learned a valuable general lesson
about talking shit:
http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/2008-March/001175.html
which had a side effect of cementing one of my professional mantras: What would
David Wagner do? ::)
I can certainly take
16 matches
Mail list logo
