dE . wrote (24-04-12 07:25)
What I suggest is a metabug for interoperability issues. These issues
[..]
Ah, that is what I meant indeed!
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Hi Astron,
Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote (27-04-12 15:27)
Oh, pain... yes, Ctrl-+/- would be really cool. Unfortunately, Excel
also seems to use Ctrl-+/- for Insert/Delete Cells.
On the other hand, having zoom on Ctrl-[/] would mean, at least for
me, that you need to press three keys for
Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote (28-04-12 17:38)
Le 28/04/2012 15:27, Regina Henschel a écrit :
The position of [ and ] depends on local. A German keyboard has it on
AltGr+8 and AltGr+9.
Yes. FR kbd has them on AltGr+5 / AltGr+)
Thanks Regina and Jean-Francois for this info.
Apart from
Hi Pedro,
thanks for noticing ... I added Michael and Fridrich to cc.
Pedro wrote (22-04-12 01:43)
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
Sure :-) luckily it is a really trivial bug to fix - it looks (to me)
like the same bug as bug#45584 - Thorsten: dudie - you fixed only 1/2 a
blocker bug symptom (ie.
Hi,
Can someone(s) pls have a look at:
Bug 48333 - Path changed to home (as defined in the users options)
with File Save As, FileTemplateEdit, ... (edit)
Bug 48869 - Crash when dragging selected column to the left (edit)
and see if they can add answers to the questions there ?
thanks a
Hi,
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (19-04-12 13:47)
this is the reminder that we have the next QA call on Friday:
2012-04-20 1400UTC
Prolly can join.
- MAB wars/severity wars:
Ah well, at least people notice that more hands are needed. Obviously
gives some discussion too.
I find the word
Hi,
I see Bug 45376 - [FORMATTING] Incorrect text wrapping around drawing
shape, one of the 3.5 MAB issues, that seems to be fixed with two
commits in master, according to comment 4 (
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45376#c4 )
Could pls be considered to push these patches to
Hi Tim,
Tim Hardeck wrote (12-04-12 21:35)
this patch integrates mouse centered zooming which means that the
position of the mouse is used as a target during zooming. So the screen
position is shifted in the direction of the pointer.
[...]
It was suggested that there shouldn't be an option for
Michael Meeks wrote (12-04-12 18:00)
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 16:16 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Ah, very good that you ask. I use the switch regularly, but am not so
used to the LookFeel on Win 7 in my virtualbox. Thus indeed: I had
picked the wrong one. and taking the other makes the (changed) OOo
Hi Pedro,
Pedro wrote (12-04-12 19:37)
I'm glad you revived this topic: Although there are substantial differences
between the Open dialogs (if you use the document Version feature you *need*
to use the LO dialog http://help.libreoffice.org/Common/Version_Management),
Ah, smart :-)
I
Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote (13-04-12 12:30)
See the mockup attached for what I would propose.
Looks useful and good to me !
On the same subject: my favourite is adding Ctrl-key commands to use
zoom-in/out, as in other software.
Some notes on that :
- UNO:ZOOMIN en UNO:ZOOMOUT already
Hi *,
Will post a blog tomorrow on TDF blog. The idea (from our QA meetings):
is having indeed a list of areas that can be clearly pointed at, and
to mention them in a sort of standard post on our official TDF blog.
E.g. every two weeks 4 to 8 items and guiding users interested to test
in
Hi *,
Forwarding compliments that people on the Dutch users list are making
for the improvements in 3.5.2 :-)
Kind regards
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi *,
Forwarding compliments that people on the Dutch users list are making
for the improvements in 3.5.2 :-)
Kind regards
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Hi Rainer, Florian, *,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (07-04-12 19:05)
very often we hear this question, and again and again we have to state
that that question only can be answered by the questioner.
[...]
So after the question from someone who uses 3.4.5 and plans to update to
3.5.2 I created a
Hi Sophie,
Sophie Gautier wrote (10-04-12 23:05)
If it's easy, it will attract people too. QA is frightening for a lot of
users because it looks like technical when it's not.
Ah well, of course it is technical compared to what many people are used
to, but I agree with you that easier tools
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (30-03-12 12:12)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:43:21AM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
My take on this:
- What does make sense, is having indeed a list of areas that can be
clearly pointed at, and to mention them in a sort of standard post
on our official TDF blog. E.g. every two
Hi Michael,
Michael Stahl wrote (02-04-12 16:55)
it would be great if somebody could test if both native folder and file
picker still work as they did before (e.g. compare with 3.5 branch) on
the various supported Windows releases.
On Win 7, in LOdev 3.6.0alpha0+ Build ID:
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (30-03-12 12:12)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:43:21AM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
My take on this:
- What does make sense, is having indeed a list of areas that can be
clearly pointed at, and to mention them in a sort of standard post
on our official TDF blog. E.g. every two
Hi Michael,
Michael Stahl wrote (02-04-12 16:55)
it would be great if somebody could test if both native folder and file
picker still work as they did before (e.g. compare with 3.5 branch) on
the various supported Windows releases.
On Win 7, in LOdev 3.6.0alpha0+ Build ID:
Hi Markus,
Markus Mohrhard wrote (04-04-12 03:11)
I just pushed a fix for fdo#33634 to master.
:-)
Please have a special look at visual appearance, export to pdf,
printing, print preview and all areas that you know which use borders.
Have found fdo#48377 - possiprolly related ?
Cheers,
Thanks for this great patch, Jesús,
Useful to prevent drowning my Writer documents when I'm laughing too
tears one again.
Jesús Corrius wrote (01-04-12 19:08)
Please, also apply this patch to the LibreOffice-3-5 branch. We don't
want to leave the users of the stable version unprotected. Do
Pedro wrote (29-03-12 01:13)
If Hardware Acceleration is not important then it's okay to do that. But it
must be, otherwise it wouldn't be activated by default, right?
I've really no idea what positive thing it should bring :-)
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Hi Markus,
Writing to the Dutch Discuss list for people that do some things with
charts...
From the text below,is it correct that I can tell them to just make
some simple example files, which preferably clearly shows one issue, and
add them to the issue ?
Markus Mohrhard wrote (28-03-12
Stephan Bergmann wrote (28-03-12 09:17)
On #libreoffice-dev:
Mar 19 16:55:09 CorNouws hi - initializing extensions for the first
start takes longg (in daily Linux_x86 etc) Known, or should I file an
issue ?
[...]
Mar 19 18:13:14 sberg mmeeks, issue number: no idea, Cor asked here
about an hour
Hi Markus,
Writing to the Dutch Discuss list for people that do some things with
charts...
From the text below,is it correct that I can tell them to just make
some simple example files, which preferably clearly shows one issue, and
add them to the issue ?
Markus Mohrhard wrote (28-03-12
Pedro wrote (29-03-12 00:30)
Doesn't anybody care about the bad image this projects?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46901
A simple patch to turn hardware acceleration off by default wouldn't
have be to hard ?
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Hi,
Experienced with some daily build the last week(s) that initializing
extensions on the first start is verry slow.
Known ? Issue ?
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Michael Stahl wrote (23-03-12 17:44)
because up until a week ago my knowledge of Writer's drawing code was
precisely zero, it would be a good idea to test this a bit.
Thanks for your attention for this one too!
Hmm, testing.
Will it be in a daily tomorrow?
(I usually only look at the master,
Cor Nouws wrote (23-03-12 18:13)
Will it be in a daily tomorrow?
(I usually only look at the master, not at release branches).
Last commit message here
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?h=libreoffice-3-5-2
is from three days back.
But I guess I can compare the commit ID
Matteo Casalin wrote (23-03-12 21:30)
On 03/21/2012 01:23 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
One could say, that because in other locations using modifiers do make a
difference, it is good to have that here too, thus that unintended use
of the modifiers, while no specific function is linked to that use
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (21-02-12 13:03)
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Just to be sure: people eligible to do reviews, are those delivering
code, or solely those with commit access?
I would say a competent developer, and/or someone willing to take
Hi Tim,
Tim Hardeck wrote (22-03-12 16:49)
I just wanted to specify some issues I would like to get feedback on:
Ah yes, I remember your previous mail, that I was net able to reply on.
Since I can read some code, and know the discussion, I could understand
your question.
But indeed, in
Hi Matteo, Stefan,
Great that you care for this, Matteo!
And of course that you helped with discussing, Stefan.
I'm a bit late: trouble to keep in track with the various topics in the
community, but found this important enough to read and try to add some
thoughts. Sorry if it is a bit too
Hi Matteo, Stefan,
Great that you care for this, Matteo!
And of course that you helped with discussing, Stefan.
I'm a bit late: trouble to keep in track with the various topics in the
community, but found this important enough to read and try to add some
thoughts. Sorry if it is a bit too
Goedemorgen Joop.
Joop KIEFTE wrote (19-03-12 22:02)
Can anyone identify what's the problem in this document or in LibreOffice?
As the man with the same first name as you have, used to say: two things:
- http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport for an issue
- pls don't overload the
Hi Cameron, Kendy, *,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (06-03-12 11:20)
This is some good research, I hope you don't mind if I CC: the devel
mailing list, and the UX advise list too? :-)
Really appreciate work on this subject!
I think this is actually a good question for the UX advise list :-) My
Volker Merschmann wrote (07-03-12 13:59)
In the meantime I have found the names of the maintainers: Gerard
Jensen, Don Crowley, Nikola Yanev
I do not know any of them and they are not linked from the FB-page.
Can anybody help?
Don't know them either. But am willing to post a polite message,
Hi Nick,
libreoffice...@gmail.com wrote (12-03-12 10:45)
Dear Admin Developers,
(I'm neither of them - just handling some mail with some delay )
Questions:
1. Any chance to do it using LO frame instead of Java ? If yes than
will it work faster with LO frames (based on your
Hi Maxime,
Maxime de Roucy wrote (14-03-12 18:38)
Two new patchs that modify the default behaviour of the format
paintbrush.
0001-Format-paintbrush-default-behaviour.patch
To apply to the core repository.
0001-Change-format-paintbrush.patch
To apply to the help repository.
By default the
Hi David,
David Tardon wrote (15-03-12 14:14)
I am too, apparently. I am hereby cancelling this request pending
further investigation.
I know there are some bugs around paper settings and printing.
If you didn't yet see them, I might try to see (next week) if there is
some pattern in them.
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (14-03-12 10:59)
Thanks to Fridrich, we have one from yesterday.
\\o// for Fridrich
We are sorry, we were busy with the 3.4 and 3.5 bugfix releases and
sometimes forgot to switch the tinderbox back to master.
It's not a huge problem - I don't download it so
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote (06-03-12 14:40)
What specifically doesn't work for you? For me it's about okay ~today.
(I remember August promised you a better solution for later, though.)
It is about navigating through the various sections (left) with the
arrow keys. If that does
Cor Nouws wrote (13-03-12 20:25)
It looks logic to suggest that people that are too unhappy with current
macro-recording functionality, stand up to improve it, rather then to
hide it, and with the same strike, expose people that do use the
recording to undocumented risks.
So an easy and sort
Pedro Lino wrote (14-03-12 08:40)
Do you mean you are going to add an option to enable Macro separately
from the rest of the experimental features? That is great!
I expect I can achieve that yes.
How to activate macros is a quite common question from users so I
think that would be a welcome
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (07-03-12 17:04)
Rating for LibreOffice is benevolent, but not enthusiastic, may be
you should know on CeBit.
Good thing is that LibreOffice is used as an indicating name for
LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org (in at least one section)
Concerning mentioned bugs and
Hi,
IMO, we need a tag for bugs related to experimental turned on/off
See comment https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43869#c24
What is useful? whiteboard, keyword, tag in summary line ?
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
Hi,
Until recent (.. ?) I could paste the buidl ID from Hlep About in my
browser and it then showed the corresponding latest commit
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id= ...
Does not work with the Build ID from a daily build from today
Build ID:
Hello Korrawit,
Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote (13-03-12 16:02)
Does not work with the Build ID from a daily build from today
Build ID: 39b3448-4a2109f-e67b1bf-fb5e6f3-638d9c
I still can open this:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=39b3448
Ah, I was used pasting
Hi Bjoern, *,
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (13-03-12 20:14)
A feature is either stable enough to be included even with experimental
enabled or it is not. If you care about macros, help out getting it stable
enough to be moved out of experimental an into the general feature set.
Hmm, macro
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Linux-x86_10-Release_Configuration/
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Bjoern, *,
Thanks for the invitation and the initiative!
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (07-03-12 02:45)
I would like to set up a LibreOffice QA call to streamline our QA efforts. I
propose to make our first call on:
Friday, 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC
As life shows now, I'll be able to join. And
Hi Kendy,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (07-03-12 12:41)
Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5.1 Online Update is
working? How to test:
- install 3.5.1 _RC1_ (for Windows, or other)
- trigger Online Update from the Help menu
- expected result: LibreOffice reports that there is an
Hi,
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (07-03-12 13:04)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:55:10AM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
I have some explicit ideas on some of the items.
Should we attempt to exchange those before the meeting, or at least
mention them (briefly)?
In general, just mention a new topic
Petr Mladek wrote (05-03-12 10:41)
I agree that reviewing strings is important. I just try to explain that
we could do much more tests when we separate functional and translations
tests.
I hope it also makes Litmus testing more attractive, when people
(realise they) can choose the tests in
Hi devs,
I have the idea that it might be useful to consider encouraging devs on
Linux to use Windows in a VM.
I know that some of the devs are actively using Windows build
environments, but also that others haven't even a running Win OS to
check certain issues.
Setting up a VM is not a big
Hi Norbert,
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (04-03-12 13:56)
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Cor Nouwsoo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
I have the idea that it might be useful to consider encouraging devs on
Linux to use Windows in a VM.
I've tried a couple of time, without success, to get a build running
Cor Nouws wrote (04-03-12 19:56)
( Of coursethat could become easier when a full VM is made
available - IIRC, there were thoughts about that.)
Having read some other mails here, I know I correctly remembered that ;-)
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Hi,
For the issues that I am in CC, it happens in an estimated 10-20% that
at some time any one touches, changes the version field (1) to a later
version. Which should not been done, once it is set properly with
submitting the bug.
Is there a possibility to set that field to locked, or only
Hi all,
Regarding this change, I remember I had some discussion (or a bug) about
the fact that navigation of the option page was broken by the patch.
And I see this commit in git: 064065985a24e2454234e929969cc2b1649b3d01
However, when I work in a build from last week (1), I see that
Cor Nouws wrote (03-03-12 22:29)
However, when I work in a build from last week (1), I see that
navigating the option pages (sections, left panel of the window) with
arrow keys does not work.
1) LibreOffice master 120116 3.6.0alpha0+
a9ebfbc-9eed775-f061262-libreoffice-3-5 branch-point
I
Hi Luc,
Luc Castermans wrote (02-03-12 19:53)
Libo 3.5 and also 3.5rc1 do not start anymore. Attached message I get.
LibreOffice 3.5 does not work anymore
Looks pretty dramatic.
How can I find out what's wrong?
Best mail to QA-list with some more details. Or look in BugZilla
Cedric Bosdonnat wrote (20-02-12 15:47)
Don't hesitate to grab a daily build to test it.
daily/Linux-x86_10-Release_Configuration/ still missing :-\
Luckily I did a local build yesterday, and while doing my work with
that, was catched by the new funcionality. Great solution.
Thanks!
If
was still demanding use of Env.Host.sh
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
From 1bba0619844d00417d88dcd2908a7f66ed53792e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:29:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] removed check on need to run Env.Host.sh first
2012 10:25, Cor Nouwsoo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
was still demanding use of Env.Host.sh
[...]
Petr Mladek wrote (22-02-12 11:14)
Cor Nouws píše v St 22. 02. 2012 v 10:25 +0100:
was still demanding use of Env.Host.sh
[...]
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Arnhold wrote (21-02-12 13:20)
What do you think, is it save to remove it?! Or would you think this
would be a gain in usability?
Is it possible for you to polish my crystal bowl a bit, e.g. where do we
have those beeps.
Just from what pops up in my mind, I think those
Hi Andrew, *,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (20-02-12 12:59)
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Have been poking around the LO code today trying to decide where I
might put break points to help in tracking this. Looks like this
occurs (for my sample) when auto-save kicks in, so I may place a
break point
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (20-02-12 17:05)
Having a well formed, and reproducible bug report would be rather
useful :-)
Yes, I think we realise that :-)
Therefore I added some comments on how I can reliably reproduce (more
opening the doc and doing some random work for some
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (20-02-12 17:13)
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at least
Hi Kendy,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (20-02-12 18:04)
Nope, still 3 I am afraid :-( - after the feature freeze, before we even
needed 1 review for pushing to the libreoffice-3-5 branch, it was 3
reviews for a feature or two that got in few days after the feature
freeze (I remember the SmartArt
just a heads up: they still miss.
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi all,
NoOp wrote (17-02-12 05:31)
On 02/15/2012 02:44 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
The current (3.5) design looked as the best option, was in the daily
builds [http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/] for several
months, and nobody complained - so we were happy with it; what a pity
that you
Stephan Bergmann wrote (13-02-12 10:06)
Introduced with
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9276f7d5740a28b342db2a9bcd8644ff2f4f5742
fdo#32263; should affect all Linux desktops.
Thanks for the info, Stephan,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Kohei Yoshida wrote (15-02-12 17:29)
1. Put a value in cell A1.
2. Move the cursor to A2.
3. Ctrl-D to copy the value of A1 into A2.
For me this never worked in Calc ..
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Michael Meeks wrote (14-02-12 17:31)
Incidentally, I really like the patch - and as someone who exits their
app often via either a SEGV, or an explicit kill, I'd really like the
recently used documents list to work ;-)
Big thanks from me too.
It's one of those little annoyances that
Cor Nouws wrote (12-02-12 17:05)
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote (11-02-12 09:04)
On Linux (or Linux Gnome only ???) the profile directory for LO 3.5.0
has been move to ~/.config/libreoffice. This information should be
clearly stated in the release notes for 3.5.
Could somebody who knows exactly
Luc Castermans wrote (14-02-12 20:06)
I'm this poor little bug left alone in the corner. When will I be solved ?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36681
Luckily it's not alone :-)
It's one of the currently 43 open issues in our
Bug 37361 - LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs
And
Hi Németh,
Németh László wrote (13-02-12 16:20)
Lightproof (from “lightweight proofreader”) is a Python grammar
checker framework for LibreOffice. Default English, Hungarian and
[...]
Thanks for the info and the checker!
We had some people before in Netherlands community active with spell
Hi Ivan, Muhammad,
Ivan Timofeev wrote (12-02-12 09:21)
On 08.02.2012 17:06, Muhammad Haggag wrote:
This patch changes LO behavior so that we update recent documents on
file open, save, save as, save all, and close. The previous behavior
was to only update the list on document close.
Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote (12-02-12 13:30)
IMHO the case which 'file open' would be useful is already described
in the bug comment 0 and 4: saving with a new name doesn't get old
name into the list.
Yes, if that is the technical reason, and can't be (easily) solved
different (as suggested
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote (11-02-12 09:04)
On Linux (or Linux Gnome only ???) the profile directory for LO 3.5.0
has been move to ~/.config/libreoffice. This information should be
clearly stated in the release notes for 3.5.
Could somebody who knows exactly what has been modified, update the
Michael Meeks wrote (09-02-12 15:56)
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 13:53 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9babbf346c4d6f76e8b3a243a00e73a173c16ba6
...
Did this make 3.5.0rc3?
Yes - it's in the branch before rc3.
Hmmm :-\
Bug 45748 - Page
Jan Holesovsky wrote (09-02-12 21:29)
A patch or 2 of mine was reverted, as it/they caused another trouble, so
maybe it went with that; not really sure - either way, sorry for that.
Worth a bugreport, probably to the Most Annoying Bugs, we should really
polish our new features :-)
OK,
Hi Ivan, Muhammad,
Ivan Timofeev wrote (12-02-12 09:21)
On 08.02.2012 17:06, Muhammad Haggag wrote:
This patch changes LO behavior so that we update recent documents on
file open, save, save as, save all, and close. The previous behavior
was to only update the list on document close.
Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote (12-02-12 13:30)
IMHO the case which 'file open' would be useful is already described
in the bug comment 0 and 4: saving with a new name doesn't get old
name into the list.
Yes, if that is the technical reason, and can't be (easily) solved
different (as suggested
pierre-yves samyn wrote (08-02-12 15:09)
In the same token, there are good ideas in the conditional
formatting dialog of the extension report builder (see
screenshot). - Up and Down keys to change the order of conditions -
Indeed handy !
The plus and minus keys to add - delete conditions
Michael Meeks wrote (31-01-12 16:56)
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:48 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
I just fixed some remaining leaking page breaks. Could someone review
and cherry-pick it for 3.5 (and hopefully it's not too late for 3.5.0)?
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (07-02-12 11:01)
So, though the overall impression is OK (as is with builds from the
master) as long that checking issues from the last weeks is not clear, I
would not bet on it.
I have the same feeling.
(I read your text below as the opposite ;-) )
Well, we
Hi,
Since some weeks, there is Bug 45074 - Failed symbol dependency from
builtin libstc++ DSO
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
FYI, filed two issues today:
Bug 45693 - Lines from text in description / comments often broken
Bug 45717 - notifications from bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org send
from both PST and from my local time zone
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Hi,
As promised to Thorsten on Sunday, I've been looking at 3.5.0 and issues.
I looked at issues that I've seen, that are at 37361 and at the 44
issues filed during our second BugHuntSession (little delay :-\ )
Added some comments, added some to bug 37361 etc.
Quite some have already been
Cor Nouws wrote (07-02-12 01:08)
However, I have no idea if the issues from the last weeks have been
spotted / judged consequently and with enough detail (looking at what
happened with the issues from January 21 and 22, I have to doubt
seriously alas.)
So, though the overall impression is OK
FYI, filed two issues today:
Bug 45693 - Lines from text in description / comments often broken
Bug 45717 - notifications from bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org send
from both PST and from my local time zone
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Hi,
As promised to Thorsten on Sunday, I've been looking at 3.5.0 and issues.
I looked at issues that I've seen, that are at 37361 and at the 44
issues filed during our second BugHuntSession (little delay :-\ )
Added some comments, added some to bug 37361 etc.
Quite some have already been
Hi Ivan,
Ivan Timofeev wrote (04-02-12 17:48)
Hmm, where do you see a contradiction? :) I pushed the patch, because I
did not find any usage of ImplSalLogFontToFontA, Caolan said that
callcatcher could not help in this case, anyway.
Do you still see a contradiction?
No. Thanks for
Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote (03-02-12 09:14)
I want to remove the build information and place only the major version info
(like 3.5) but i wasn't sure. Maybe, it is a neccessary information.
Yes, we might want to keep that for now, even though auto-generating
an ODT in the spirit of Mozilla's
Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote (03-02-12 11:23)
Anyway, I'd say, no objections from my side. Please go ahead.
No from me either. I like the improvement.
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi,
Sorry to disturb ;-)
Do I see a contradiction below?
Ivan Timofeev wrote (31-01-12 12:16)
I've just pushed it.
Caolán McNamara wrote (31-01-12 14:21)
Its windows only code, and callcatcher can only see what gets compiled
as its just a compiler wrapper and I run it under Linux.
--
-
Hi Christophe,
Christophe Strobbe wrote (03-02-12 23:31)
I have a presentation and a lightning talk scheduled at tomorrow's
LibreOffice devroom. Unfortunately, it looks very unlikely that I will
be able to make it to the conference.
Sorry to read that :-\
But in case you càn make it, we'll
Hi Terry,
Terrence Enger wrote (30-01-12 17:52)
If this is a good idea, I would welcome suggestions about
wording and a good place to put it.
There is a lot of information already, and people tend to write first
and sometimes read after that (look at myself now ;-)
But I think, if you can
401 - 500 of 888 matches
Mail list logo
