Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo43460, Part II, getLength to isEmpty

2011-12-10 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Oliver, nice! I had introduced this method, but this move was still on todo. Thanks for doing this :) Thomas On 12/10/2011 01:29 AM, Olivier Hallot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460, Part II Module basctl - --

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Correct bracket closing.

2011-01-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
From 83c6e1d5ab69429fcae33bda26fcbdb6dbd97099 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:55:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Correct bracket closing. --- sc/source/ui/vba/vbahelper.cxx |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] ure/sal/inc/rtl/ustring.hxx - new method isEmpty()

2011-01-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
()) {...} if (!aStr.isEmpty()) {...} I think this would make the code more readable. -Thomas From fdf1e69730457763778f5735bb5709f5fc227327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:43:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] New method: isEmpty() - Checks if a string

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] impress - remove doubled copyright notice

2011-01-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 01/21/2011 03:08 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Thomas, On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:54 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: won't do this without your approval. Looks fine to me - no point in duplicating license headers. Michael K was writing a nice lint tool, that may be able to find

Re: [Libreoffice] MacOS build breakage

2011-01-23 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hopefully this is fixed now. I accidently removed a 'premac.h' and 'postmac.h' definition. -Thomas On 01/23/2011 07:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: components:6ea1497263e15e212d6c42c23e9e8b76d6dc1470 breaks the MacOS build: Compiling: extensions/source/plugin/base/service.cxx

[Libreoffice] sw/filter/ww1

2011-01-25 Thread Thomas Arnhold
2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:34:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Don't build ww1. --- sw/prj/build.lst |3 +-- sw/source/filter/makefile.mk |1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sw/prj/build.lst b/sw/prj

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DBG_TRACE_BASIC, DBG_SAVE_DISASSEMBLY and sbtrace.hxx

2011-01-31 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, does anyone need this macros? I removed them completely. -Thomas From dfe6fbe864926c8ef29c34681b0425f7aacdca75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:52:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove DBG_TRACE_BASIC, DBG_SAVE_DISASSEMBLY and sbtrace.hxx

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DBG_TRACE_BASIC, DBG_SAVE_DISASSEMBLY and sbtrace.hxx

2011-01-31 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks. On 01/31/2011 12:32 PM, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Hi Thomas, On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:58 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: does anyone need this macros? I removed them completely. I just pushed your patch here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove Mizi Research copyright note for hwpfilter

2011-01-31 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I'm not really sure about this. There are some files lying around with StarDivision or StarOffice copyright notes. They could be removed, could they? -Thomas From b93f098328afb2cf3ad420bfef45dacbdd7d5181 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove Mizi Research copyright note for hwpfilter

2011-01-31 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Ok, I wondered because this copyright notice is only inside two files of hwpfilter. But you're right, they have to the rights on it. -Thomas On 01/31/2011 07:30 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On 1/31/11, Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org wrote: Hi, I'm not really sure about

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove Mizi Research copyright note for hwpfilter

2011-01-31 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks. Filed a bug #33782. -Thomas On 01/31/2011 09:44 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:20 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: There are some files lying around with StarDivision or StarOffice copyright notes. They could be removed, could they? Heh, probably not. In this case

[Libreoffice] solenv/inc/settings.mk overwrites CDEFS

2011-02-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I just found out, that settings.mk resets all CDEFS which were defined in some makefiles. For example: sc/source/ui/vba/makefile.mk defines: CDEFS+=-DVBA_OOBUILD_HACK But some lines later settings.mk is included (which is solenv/inc/settings.mk) .INCLUDE : settings.mk In this file CDEFS

Re: [Libreoffice] solenv/inc/settings.mk overwrites CDEFS

2011-02-02 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks, didn't see that. I fixed it that way. -Thomas On 02/02/2011 12:48 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org wrote: Hi, I just found out, that settings.mk resets all CDEFS which were defined in some makefiles. For example: sc

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] avoid ambiguous else

2011-02-02 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I have no idea how the compiler parses that block of code as it is indeed ambiguous. But I'm more in favor of interpreting it based on the indent levels than how the compiler might be parsing it. Kohei From 088714d49235976ff04a0ac0f8f37e32120810b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] avoid ambiguous else

2011-02-02 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks ;) On 02/02/2011 11:44 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 23:27 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Oh, I think this was a mistake o mine. I removed the brackets, didn't really thought, that the else statement could be associated with the inner if. I attached the patch to bring

Re: [Libreoffice] HTML formatting in comments?

2011-02-03 Thread Thomas Arnhold
. Regards, On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 17:41 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: In addition to this: There's the possibility to define multiple return values with \retval. So we would get a nice formatted list like with param. From the doxyfile documentation: - \retval return value

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] ure/sal/inc/rtl/ustring.hxx - new method isEmpty()

2011-02-03 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, as I understand this, it would be nice to have this method in OString, too. I've attached the patch. Thomas On 01/21/2011 05:55 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Thomas, On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:52 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: New method: isEmpty() - Checks if a string is empty. I

Re: [Libreoffice] Problems with windows build

2011-02-04 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I think the problem is, that without resize the hash map could be overfilled. I did fix this like commit 6ecdae26517b89ee670. Think problem is like in PspKernInfo::Initialize() [in vcl/unx/source/gdi/salgdi3.cxx]: maUnicodeKernPairs.insert( aKernPair ); maUnicodeKernPairs is

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] rm double line spacing/dead code/empty comments, transl. comm. German-English

2011-02-04 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Christina, I started to remove double includes. These could be identified by a script (if you want to have that write me a mail). But there is one problem within this task - called forward includes. I think removing doubled includes and removing double line spacing within them will be more

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments + bash line

2011-02-08 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Guilaume, you can request a git account an push the patches by your own: http://freedesktop.org/wiki/AccountRequests Thomas On 02/08/2011 08:57 AM, Guillaume Poussel wrote: I have edited the wiki to show I'm currently working on it. Please find attached again new patches to remove this

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy hack patch!

2011-02-08 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Gna, sorry for this. Didn't update the wiki page, as these clean up was incidendental to some other cleaning. I'll update the wiki page. Thomas On 02/08/2011 09:56 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 11:59 -0500, spad...@sover.net wrote: Now with fewer blank lines! Thanks for

Re: [Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-10 Thread Thomas Arnhold
To have that log on the web would be nice (not all persons have a big mail account - some mail providers only give you a few megabytes at all). I did a fresh build with a git clone from the morning and there were no errors at all. Thomas On 02/10/2011 02:55 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Would it be

Re: [Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-10 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Oh, didn't see the link. Didn't know that it's already on the web! I'm not sure if everybody knows that there are logs on the web, maybe you could add this link to the tinderbox mails :) Thomas On 02/10/2011 04:38 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: To have that log on the web would be nice (not all

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused variables and indistinguishable branching

2011-02-10 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I removed these two variables this afternoon ;) I'll push the rest in some hours. Thanks, didn't see that at all! Thomas On 02/10/2011 06:11 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: Hi, This is an easy hack against calc. Cheers, -- Takeshi Abe ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] remove unused variables and indistinguishable branching

2011-02-10 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I pushed it. Thanks! On 02/10/2011 07:03 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi, I removed these two variables this afternoon ;) I'll push the rest in some hours. Thanks, didn't see that at all! Thomas On 02/10/2011 06:11 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: Hi, This is an easy hack against calc. Cheers

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy Task - remove non-compiled / dead code

2011-02-11 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, looks nice. But that doesn't replace manual overlooking what was deleted. For example in dmake/dmake.c was the following left: /* Uncomment the following line to pass commands to the DBUG engine * before the command line switches (-#..) are evaluated. */ This comment was related to

[Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-11 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, what the heck do we do with Tools - Media Player? Do we need this within an office suite? Is anyone using this?! Thomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack: remove obsolete gjc aot compilation

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I've removed gjc aot from the build system. I grep'd for occurances inside other repos, but it doesn't match anything. Looks like this is all. LibO builds an runs fine on Linux. Thomas From a67a2555a34b07babfc809e7d58e9ee6c8f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Dead Java code

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Luke, thanks for that. But could you please use git format-patch for the next patches? Would be easier. Thanks for the patch! Thomas On 02/12/2011 06:15 PM, L P wrote: Deleted some more commented-out code in xmerge. Code is contributed under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. Luke

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack: more commented out code

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Luke, I applied patchfile one only partially. These @param and @autor tags are important for javadoc. Thanks! Thomas On 02/12/2011 06:36 PM, Luke Petrolekas wrote: First patch deletes two commented lines out and removes four bogus comments. The second patch deletes some commented out

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Easy hack: more commented out code

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Pushed. On 02/12/2011 06:57 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi Luke, I applied patchfile one only partially. These @param and @autor tags are important for javadoc. Thanks! Thomas On 02/12/2011 06:36 PM, Luke Petrolekas wrote: First patch deletes two commented lines out and removes four

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] More dead code in xmerge

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
This one got obsolete by one of your other patches. Thomas On 02/12/2011 05:56 PM, L P wrote: Deleted some more commented-out code in xmerge. code is contributed under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. Luke ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Remove bogus comments

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, thanks, looks nice! Pushed it! Thomas On 02/12/2011 09:12 PM, Antoine Proulx wrote: Hi, Here's a patch who removes bogus comments. It's released under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. Antoine ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Remove Xine

2011-02-12 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, looks nice! I've build and run it without any problems. And I didn't find any references, too. Thomas On 02/12/2011 06:07 PM, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Here is a patch to remove xine. I didn't want to push it myself cause perhaps it needs to be reviewed. I just removed unxlng

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments in components and impress

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks for all of them! I pushed them all. I deleted one additional line in cui/source/tabpages/numfmt.cxx: //@ aEdFormat.SetText( aLbFormat.GetSelectEntry() ); as this also belong to a deleted comment. Thomas On 02/13/2011 02:08 PM, Guillaume Poussel wrote: Second part.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [Patch] Remove bogus comments and dead code from editeng

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, nice, thanks for this! I pushed it. As far as I know there is no need to reformat the code, because this should be done by a script some time later (and we want to be compatible to diffs from OOo). Thomas On 02/13/2011 03:29 PM, Arnaud Versini wrote: Hi, Remove some comments from

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Looks good. Thanks! I pushed it. Didn't know that there are bug numbers like this #b449874#. Thomas On 02/13/2011 01:57 AM, Antoine Proulx wrote: Hi, Here's a patch (another one) who removes bogus comments. It's released under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. Antoine

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [Patch] Easy hack: idl removed and translated comments

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! I pushed it all. Thomas On 02/13/2011 01:26 AM, Michael Münch wrote: Hi, first attempt so I will take any advise (split the patch into smaller files?). License is LGPLv3+/MPL. I would have edited the wiki that I am working on this directory but the registration is disabled.

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Christoph thanks for the discussion link and the specs! On 02/12/2011 10:01 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 23:08 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: what the heck do we do with Tools - Media Player? Do we need this within an office suite? Is anyone using this?! :-) My

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove Xine

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I did this already, as the registration for the wiki doesn't work at the moment. Thomas On 02/13/2011 10:19 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 18:07 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Here is a patch to remove xine. I think that was an Easy Hack, can you remove it from that

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Easy hack: remove obsolete gjc aot compilation

2011-02-13 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I pushed it now. Wanted that someone had a look at it ;) On 02/13/2011 10:38 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 17:02 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: And I removed configure.cmd as it's a personal file (local paths and so on). Yeah, remove that, and the aot removal looks good too

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! On 02/14/2011 02:01 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Thomas Arnhold wrote: Didn't know that there are bug numbers like this #b449874#. Those are from the old Sun-internal bugtracker (in contrast to the old StarDivision-internal bugtracker, which is w/o letter prefix) - and can be elided

Re: [Libreoffice] duplicate code (binfilter)

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I've updated the wiki. On 02/14/2011 10:40 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Christina, On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 21:07 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: binfilter/bf_svtools/source/config/svt_menuoptions.cxx and svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx So - as Tor says, binfilter is

Re: [Libreoffice] [Partially Pushed] Patch

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Balint, looks good. I've pushed the second one. I slightly changed your patch - removed the newlines for the empty methods and didn't remove the description in writerfilter/inc/doctok/WW8Document.hxx as this is some kind of doxygen code. For the first patch, which removes the method, I'm not

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi Balint, looks good. I've pushed the second one. I slightly changed your patch - removed the newlines for the empty methods and didn't remove the description in writerfilter/inc/doctok/WW8Document.hxx as this is some kind of doxygen code. For the first patch, which

[Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or less long list of files with copyright notice missing. I've attached it to the mail. I've only searched for cxx and hxx files. I filed a bug at OOo:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] cppcheck easyhack

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! Pushed it. Thomas On 02/14/2011 07:54 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: Hullo List, One, likely final, cppcheck-found post- to pre-iterator patch. Cheers, Kevin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/14/2011 09:32 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi, I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or less long list of files with copyright notice missing

[Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) SINIX RM400 ... And another thing, in combination with GCC: C272 (occurs with GCC) i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC defined C272 ) .

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, On 02/12/2011 10:01 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 23:08 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: what the heck do we do with Tools - Media Player? Do we need this within an office suite? Is anyone using this?! :-) My suspicion is that ~no-one is using it. I think the same.

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#32552 (alt key opens File-menu)

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Julien, I've compiled and tested it. Works fine. I read the bug description and there was said, that on Windows Alt works as F6 on Linux - to set focus on the menubar. Now we completely got rid of this with Alt on Linux. Is this intentionally, say that Alt alone has no effect at all? I

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Yeah, thanks for fixing them :) Thomas On 02/16/2011 09:36 AM, Noel Power wrote: Hi Thomas, On 14/02/11 21:02, Thomas Arnhold wrote: On 02/14/2011 09:32 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Yes, some of them. I've corrected the list. Many

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Caolán, I'm looking ahead this at the weekend. Maybe it's worth a task to write a little lint script which checks if new files have a copyright header. Thomas On 02/14/2011 10:10 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:02 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: You're right

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, And another thing, in combination with GCC: C272 (occurs with GCC) i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC defined C272 ) . Doesn't look that this is set anymore. Yeah, you got me there. No idea where C272 came from. I strongly suspect it was set to indicate

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/15/2011 10:28 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Of the ports listed on http://porting.openoffice.org/ , Tru64 is dead and I would be surprised if VMS and Linux/m68k were much alive. Yeah, only take the completed one, VMS and Tru64

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove dead code

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Great! Pushed it! Thanks. Thomas On 02/16/2011 07:16 PM, Bálint Dózsa wrote: Hi, I have removed some dead code form //xml2cmp, /xmlhelp/ and //xmloff/. My code is under the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license. Regards, Balint Dozsa ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove OSF/1 support

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Francois, in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Found out, that osarch.pm is pretty unused ;) I didn't touch libs-extern(-sys) and dmake, too. Your patchset looks good. Thomas On 02/16/2011 08:49 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patches remove OSF/1 support from the build

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove unused macro

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/16/2011 03:40 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:06:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TIME_RESOLUTION_100NS_TICKS defines in

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/16/2011 09:53 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test. It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, most

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/16/2011 09:53 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test. It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, most

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove TCPP support

2011-02-17 Thread Thomas Arnhold
ce9dd25c9b5383daa6259a1e328d3409a0b60778 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:21:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove TCPP Seems to be an old compiler --- rsc/source/prj/gui.cxx |2 +- rsc/source/prj/start.cxx |4 ++-- rsc/source/rscpp

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove TCPP support

2011-02-17 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Ah, forgot one. On 02/17/2011 10:31 AM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi, TCPP seems to be an old compiler. Google doesn't know anything about it, but there were some comments in the source which let me conclude that this a compiler. I've removed it from filter and writer. For libs-gui I need

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] 386BSD and MACH defines.

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Nice. I let those files untouched, thought they came from X. I'll remove hpux and this other stuff soon. Thomas On 02/21/2011 05:19 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patch a 386BSD #defined test (the only one ?) If nobody objects, I'll push it in a few hours. I have left the MACH

Re: [Libreoffice] Build speedup

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/17/2011 01:02 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:08:58AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: CSET is probably also complete foo IIRC. Though I don't know to what it referred. I don't know if these cleanups are the reason, but my builds are now faster by a few minutes.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove TCPP support

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/17/2011 10:39 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: TCPP seems to be an old compiler. Turbo C++ ? --tml Yes, thanks :) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove TCPP support

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/17/2011 11:08 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 10:34 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Ah, forgot one. All looks good, go for it. CSET is probably also complete foo IIRC. Though I don't know to what it referred. C. IBM CSet C- Compiler - I'll remove this one, too

[Libreoffice] Removed ASSERT_ID and errhdl.[ch]xx

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I've recently replaced all ASSERT_ID() macros with OSL_ASSERT(). Therefore errhdl.[hc]xx became obsolete. So I removed these files. There was a line in errhdl.hxx: SW_DLLPUBLIC void AssertFail( USHORT, const sal_Char* ); With this removed I changed the API, right? There is one file left

Re: [Libreoffice] Removed ASSERT_ID and errhdl.[ch]xx

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/21/2011 06:37 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 18:20 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: SW_DLLPUBLIC void AssertFail( USHORT, const sal_Char* ); With this removed I changed the API, right? Sure, but only an internal API, the external API, i.e. the bits that extensions link

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translate german comments of writer/sw/source/ui/cctrl

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Martin, I've pushed it. Please could you attach such a diff as patch next time? Would be easier to commit it :) Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 10:28 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: This translates the few german code comments in the cctrl directory to english. This is contributed under the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Comment fix

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I've pushed it. Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 10:03 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: This fixes a typo that occured during translation. thanks. This is contributed under the terms of the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license. --- sw/source/ui/app/docsh2.cxx |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translation of German comment in libs-core/svx/source/customshapes/

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Albert, thanks! I've pushed it. But could you please separate your dead code removal and translation? It makes it hard to review this and if some dead looking code should come back later it's harder to do this (with translations in one diff). :) Thanks for your patches! Thomas On 02/21/2011

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Translation of German comment in libs-core/svx/source/dialog/

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Yeah, thanks! Had some trouble with the diff - at the end of file there were some accidentally redos of some prior changes. I removed them (CSET and tools/list.h). And there were lots of trailing whitespaces. But now it's all fine. Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 09:14 PM, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:

Re: [Libreoffice] How to start with some code?

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Rogerio, you could grep for it in the command line with grep '\$MINLEN' * -R or you could search the source with http://opengrok.libreoffice.org. Then you'll get libs-core/sfx2/source/dialog/password.* as result :) You've already done some contribution with this email! Would be nice if you

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Translation of German comment in libs-core/svx/source/dialog/

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/22/2011 01:52 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 21:14 +0100, Albert Thuswaldner wrote: Hi, Translated German comments in libs-core/svx/source/dialog. Made a few other fixes (removed out commented code) along the way. Albert, @@ -515,9 +501,7 @@ void SvxRectCtl::Paint(

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translate german comments of writer/sw/source/ui/cctrl

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/22/2011 12:06 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: Am 21.02.2011 23:08, schrieb Thomas Arnhold: Hi Martin, I've pushed it. Please could you attach such a diff as patch next time? Would be easier to commit it :) Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 10:28 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: This translates

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translate german comments of writer/sw/source/ui/cctrl

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/22/2011 11:38 AM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: On 02/22/2011 12:06 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: Am 21.02.2011 23:08, schrieb Thomas Arnhold: Hi Martin, I've pushed it. Please could you attach such a diff as patch next time? Would be easier to commit it :) Thanks! Thomas On 02/21/2011 10

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I've finally removed the menu entry from calc, writer and draw. Thomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Yeah right, but on writer, calc and draw? It's still in impress. Or are you using it from the other apps? Thomas On 02/22/2011 09:47 PM, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: Sometimes Mediaplayer is useful. Inserting video, preview, etc. KAMI ___

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-23 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/23/2011 05:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Perhaps you should ask end-users. Some users are using Draw or Writer as a replacement of MS-Publisher. Or Writer to edit their website. Maybe it is useful in these cases ? Right, the website thing came to my mind later, too. But as I said: I

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove include of no more existent errhdl.hxx

2011-02-23 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Sébastien, On 02/23/2011 08:46 AM, Sébastien Le Ray wrote: This patch removes an include which prevent debug build of sw (the file has been deleted in commit 6aa93c291d18c7db6dbee73adc6c4aa1bdc88eda. I removed the whole except directory with dbgloop.cxx in it. Maybe your tree is out of

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-23 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Yifan, On 02/23/2011 10:47 AM, Yifan Jiang wrote: I guess end-users could still bring the menu item back using the menu customization UI (Tools-Customize...-Menus). Is that right? That's possible. But for writer and calc the background calls are gone. So it won't work. Maybe I re-enable

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove unused methods

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Balint, not all of them are unused. getDropDownEntries() and getDropDownResult() are used at FormControlHelper.cxx. But the rest is fine. I applied the rest. Thanks! Thomas On 02/22/2011 05:11 PM, Bálint Dózsa wrote: Hi, I have removed some unused methods. Regards, Balint Dozsa

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] removed commented code

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Christina, thanks, pushed this! Why don't you commit this by your self? Your patches look good! :) Thomas On 02/24/2011 01:37 PM, Christina Roßmanith wrote: Hi, continued to remove commented code lines. As usual under LGPLv3+ / MPL Christina

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Remove unused commented variable

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, pushed this. Thanks! Thomas On 02/23/2011 10:47 PM, Michael Lefevre wrote: --- writerfilter/source/dmapper/PropertyMap.cxx |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/writerfilter/source/dmapper/PropertyMap.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove commented variable

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks, pushed this, too :) Thomas On 02/23/2011 11:11 PM, Michael Lefevre wrote: Still code cleaning. --- sc/source/ui/view/gridwin.cxx |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/sc/source/ui/view/gridwin.cxx b/sc/source/ui/view/gridwin.cxx index

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove more commented unused variables

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Pushed this. Thanks! Thomas On 02/23/2011 11:03 PM, Michael Lefevre wrote: Keep cleaning the code, line by line. --- filter/source/flash/swfwriter.hxx |2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/filter/source/flash/swfwriter.hxx

[Libreoffice] Build fails without gdb installed

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, the latest build fails on sal cppunit tests, because I have no gdb installed. This dependency is new, maybe because some tests got enabled. I think configure should check for gdb and turn this test on/off. --- -- - start unit test #1 on

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fails without gdb installed

2011-02-25 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/24/2011 10:37 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: It only does this if the environmental variables DEBUGCPPUNIT or debugcppunit are set. Those aren't automatically set, they have to be set manually when trying to debug a unit test, at which point its reasonable to expect gdb to be installed. Did

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-25 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, On 02/25/2011 12:07 PM, Fernand Vanrie wrote: Please consider: We are living and working in a Multi Media world: Not only who is working with Impress needs a media player, all content can have mixed content and LO must be the one stop place to handle all multi media stuff. I partially

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove dead code

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Nice, thanks :) Pushed it. Thomas On 02/28/2011 11:21 PM, Michael Lefevre wrote: ACCESSIBLE_EVENT_NOTIFICATION_ENABLED was never define. So the #ifdef #endif brackets could go away. --- .../extended/accessibleiconchoicectrlentry.hxx | 16

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [Patch] remove dead code

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks, pushed the first one. The second didn't apply (0002-..). Thomas On 02/27/2011 10:26 PM, Xisco Faulí wrote: Remode all dead code from /libs-core/sfx2/source ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Antoine, pushed this, thanks! Probably your name isn't set in the gitconfig, only your mail address was given as author. You could set this with: git config --global user.name Your Name Thomas On 02/28/2011 12:06 AM, Antoine Proulx wrote: Hi, Here's a patch who removes bogus comments.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove Dead Code

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! I've pushed it. Deleted three additional comments as they belong to the deleted code. Nice work :) Thomas On 02/27/2011 04:17 PM, Xisco Faulí wrote: Greetings ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] No full justification in master?

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Khaled, On 03/01/2011 05:10 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: In locally built libreoffice master I can't get full justification; text is kept left aligned. I tested with the distro packaged 3.3.1 and justification is fine. Can anyone confirm this, or it is just me? Yes, I can confirm this! I've

Re: [Libreoffice] media export ...

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, On 03/01/2011 06:29 PM, Fernand Vanrie wrote: Video in PDF can been done but it must be Flash-video :-) So: or: we need a on the fly conversion, or you havbe accept Flash video in the LO documents. I can help to do some research but i am not a coder, just a bit off a avandced user. That

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Code cleanliness

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 03/01/2011 02:07 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: #n123456# bugids are Novell bugids, typically publically available, e.g. #n672421# - https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672421 So they're typically useful information. I've added this information to the Easy Hacks page, under Translate

Re: [Libreoffice] media export ...

2011-03-02 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Fernand, On 03/02/2011 11:48 AM, Fernand Vanrie wrote: 2 Corrections: - I was wrong, in PDF documents we can now embed most off the Video-formats - LO - (windows) still not accept flash video Use Insert - Media and Sound - Select 'All files' as filter, so you are able to add flv videos,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] get rid of duplicated .gitattributes files

2011-03-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 03/12/2011 11:46 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote: So far we have 4 .gitattributes files in the root of 4 repos with the same contents. To have them in the rest of the repos and avoid duplication, it's better to have a single one in the bootstrap repo and configure the rest of the repos to use that

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replace j_assert with OSL_ in writer/starmath

2011-03-17 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 03/17/2011 11:26 PM, Jacek Wolszczak wrote: Easy hacks align ASSERT ( friends) macro foo patch. Yeah, this looks nice. Did you build this once with --enable-debug and --enable-dbgutil? Thomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Replace j_assert with OSL_ in writer/starmath

2011-03-18 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Jacek, On 03/18/2011 09:14 AM, Jacek Wolszczak wrote: I did compile it with --enable-debug as it's OSL_ specific and it compiled correctly. Haven't used --enable-dbgutil as there are no #ifdef DBG_UTIL in the files I touched. But for the future I will recompile LibreO with both flags

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >