Hi,
I noticed an oversight in \rest-by-number
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2966
resulting in a bad/wrong example in the NR.
What's the way to fix it:
a) revert the patch
or
b) create a followup
?
-Harm
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
I noticed an oversight in \rest-by-number
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2966
resulting in a bad/wrong example in the NR.
What's the way to fix it:
a) revert the patch
or
b) create a followup
?
If the oversight only
2012/12/12 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
I noticed an oversight in \rest-by-number
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2966
resulting in a bad/wrong example in the NR.
What's the way to fix it:
a) revert the patch
or
b)
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review
Description:
Changes lilypond-example for rest-by-number
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/6924053/
Affected files:
M scm/define-markup-commands.scm
Index: scm/define-markup-commands.scm
diff --git a/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
Can't review parser-code, but from description:
LGTM
For the sake of easier understanding I'd have given these
examples,though, to show that printing yes/no is more a matter of
accident:
% fingering is printed
%\displayMusic
{ \tweak #'color #red -3 c }
% fingering is not printed
