Dominicus wrote
One can set an absolute fontsize for markup, but I don't know of a way to
set a fixed pointsize (or \mm dimension) for spacing between lines in a
markup column.
This causes the distance between stacked lines of text in a markup column
to scale relative to the staff size .
I
Eluze wrote
you can define the spanner in its own (dynamic) context and move it
wherever you want:
thanks for the answer. I am aware of the possibility to have the dynamics in
a separate voice - and it might be the solution here. I am however not fond
of having to enter dynamics in a voice
Am 15.01.2014 09:53, schrieb jensgc:
Are there any plans on making a SystemSpanner or similar that will combine
the flexibility from the TextSpanner with the only on top of system
property from \tempo and \mark ?
This sounds like a reasonable idea.
If it isn't possible to do something like
hi,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:53 AM, jensgc jen...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the answer. I am aware of the possibility to have the dynamics in
a separate voice - and it might be the solution here. I am however not fond
of having to enter dynamics in a voice without music - for the score in
jensgc wrote
Eluze wrote
you can define the spanner in its own (dynamic) context and move it
wherever you want:
thanks for the answer. I am aware of the possibility to have the dynamics
in a separate voice - and it might be the solution here. I am however not
fond of having to enter
jensgc jen...@gmail.com writes:
Eluze wrote
you can define the spanner in its own (dynamic) context and move it
wherever you want:
thanks for the answer. I am aware of the possibility to have the dynamics in
a separate voice - and it might be the solution here. I am however not fond
of
Henning Hraban Ramm lilypon...@fiee.net writes:
Hi,
if I update my scores with convert-ly to 2.18, it changes every
\vspace to \combine \null \vspace (within \markup{ \column {} }).
Why? Does that make sense?
It doesn't make sense but compatibility.
If you now write \vspace #2 in a
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Mike (et al.),
What would be involved in developing a feature to add notes or
tweaks at an arbitrary moment within a music expression?
music = \addAt (4 3/8) \global \once \override
RehearsalMark.extra-offset #’(-1 . 0)
we’re about
Simon Bailey-5 wrote
this is untested, but what might work would be to set up your score
with a Dynamics context at the top. Don't be mislead by it being
called Dynamics, you can put ANYTHING in there, doesn't have to be
Dynamics (I use one for putting pedal markings in piano staves for
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:28 AM, jensgc jen...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a quick thought - if I with the temporary polyphony construct shown in
your example can direct TextSpanner content to a special Dynamics context -
would it then be possible to skip the Dynamic context (and the spacer
Hello all,
this is asking for advices from you experienced LilyPond users.
Lets say you're engraving music for an instrument capable of playing
multiple voices, and the structure of the music is a mix between using
one voice and several. (In my case I'm thinking about piano music, but
lets
People,
David Kastrup kindly wrote a little Scheme script for me to generate
random notes within a range and I have started using that to practise
learning Classical Guitar and I think it is quite useful for learning to
jump around the fretboard well. It occurred to me that the next step
Am 15.01.2014 13:32, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
Is there any simple or otherwise stuff I could look at?
http://lilypondblog.org/category/using-lilypond/advanced/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Simon Bailey-5 wrote
If I add the music from the topmost staff to a separate dynamics context
(placed above that staff), will dynamics context then be printed twice?
yes, that's correct. the music is suppressed, but the dynamics will be
shown. this is why i suggested using a global structure
Urs,
On 2014-01-15 23:38, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 13:32, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
Is there any simple or otherwise stuff I could look at?
http://lilypondblog.org/category/using-lilypond/advanced/
The only thing there that I could see was:
Programmatically Generating LilyPond
Am 15.01.2014 13:58, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
Urs,
On 2014-01-15 23:38, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 13:32, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
Is there any simple or otherwise stuff I could look at?
http://lilypondblog.org/category/using-lilypond/advanced/
The only thing there that I could see
jensgc wrote
The reason I don't like the idea of a global structure definition is
that I have the individual parts (e.g. the quartet and the choir parts)
defined in seperate files to be able to test and work with them
independently. Having the \time and \key definitions in a part that is
jensgc wrote Wednesday, January 15, 2014 1:03 PM
In regards to tempo markings, it is a different matter, since any change in
tempo needs to apply to each and every voice in the system. It makes perfect
sense that the \tempo marking always goes to the System - I just don't
understand why it
Hi,
In regards to tempo markings, it is a different matter, since any change in
tempo needs to apply to each and every voice in the system. It makes perfect
sense that the \tempo marking always goes to the System - I just don't
understand why it is much more difficult to give a ritardando or
Trevor Daniels wrote
?
\tempo ritardando
Not a bad idea - but I would then have to abandon the idea of the normal
rit. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ al construct where the text spans the entire
duration of the ritardando.
Think I'll try a feature request for a SystemSpanner
- and perhaps a
hi kieren,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
In regards to tempo markings, it is a different matter, since any change in
tempo needs to apply to each and every voice in the system. It makes perfect
sense that the \tempo marking always goes
Hi,
Not a bad idea - but I would then have to abandon the idea of the normal
rit. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ al construct where the text spans the entire
duration of the ritardando.
Why not just put everything “global” in a global variable?
Then all of this is handled for you easily.
Thanks,
Kieren.
Hi,
he doesn't want to use a global structure variable:
Sorry… I missed this. =\
The reason I don't like the idea of a global structure definition is that
I have the individual parts (e.g. the quartet and the choir parts) defined
in seperate files to be able to test and work with them
Kieren MacMillan wrote
In regards to tempo markings, it is a different matter, since any change
in
tempo needs to apply to each and every voice in the system. It makes
perfect
sense that the \tempo marking always goes to the System - I just don't
understand why it is much more difficult to
Urs,
On 2014-01-16 00:01, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 13:58, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
Urs,
On 2014-01-15 23:38, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 13:32, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
Is there any simple or otherwise stuff I could look at?
Philip Rhoades wrote
It occurred to me that the next step would be to generate something that
is a little more melodic or musical
One simple thing you can do is to only work with the notes from one key at a
time. And I think this makes sense in terms of learning as well as sounding
more
Hi,
Hi. Not sure if you have seen my earlier posts
Sorry… yeah, I missed those.
I don't have my \tempo and \mark items in a global variable.
I do recommend using a global variable in the future.
I wrote the quartet part (starting at
approx. bar 70) in a separate file, making proofreading
Hi all,
So a half-day's work is more like the estimate for
every single further fix making the timing simulation work closer to
what iteration would do anyway.
Well, then… tell me the real cost, and I’ll see what I can do to [help] sponsor
it.
There is *NOTHING* I can think of which would be
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:48 PM, jensgc jen...@gmail.com wrote:
Kieren MacMillan wrote
It’s not… I do exactly this all the time.
Simply put your ritardando or stringendo in the same global variable as
your \tempo and \mark items.
Hi. Not sure if you have seen my earlier posts - but I don't
Kieren MacMillan wrote
Having just engraved 25 minutes of large forces music for voices and
instruments (57 staves, for ~330 performers!), I **HIGHLY** recommend you
avoid doing things like that in future scores.
Thanks for the advice. I'm only on my 4th real score in Lilypond so I'll
take all
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi all,
So a half-day's work is more like the estimate for
every single further fix making the timing simulation work closer to
what iteration would do anyway.
Well, then… tell me the real cost, and I’ll see what I can do to
[help]
Simon Bailey-5 wrote
have you seen:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/skipping-corrected-music
?
Excellent! Highly useful - although it is a bit annoying to see a large
bunch of warnings when the showLastLength is set.
--
View this message in context:
Paul,
On 2014-01-16 01:58, Paul Morris wrote:
Philip Rhoades wrote
It occurred to me that the next step would be to generate something
that
is a little more melodic or musical
One simple thing you can do is to only work with the notes from one key
at a
time. And I think this makes sense
For better or worse, I am currently focusing on speeding up git
blame which is braking down lots of people.
Excellent! If you want a test case from the dark side, try
http://repo.or.cz/w/wortliste.git
For historical reasons, the `wortliste' is a single, large file
instead of smaller ones.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:04:35AM -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi,
In regards to tempo markings, it is a different matter, since any change in
tempo needs to apply to each and every voice in the system. It makes perfect
sense that the \tempo marking always goes to the System - I just
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
For better or worse, I am currently focusing on speeding up git
blame which is braking down lots of people.
Excellent! If you want a test case from the dark side, try
http://repo.or.cz/w/wortliste.git
For historical reasons, the `wortliste' is a
On 01/15/2014 04:33 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
+1
I've also been doing this for many years.
I've started using global variables more recently but can highly
recommend it!
On 01/15/2014 03:48 PM, jensgc wrote:
In effect - if there is someway to have \voiceA changed to \voiceAA in the
example
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
On 01/15/2014 04:33 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
+1
I've also been doing this for many years.
I've started using global variables more recently but can highly
recommend it!
Just don't let any programmers hear that.
--
David Kastrup
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
On 01/15/2014 04:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
I've started using global variables more recently but can highly
recommend it!
Just don't let any programmers hear that.
David, I'm sorry; I must again ask you
On 01/15/2014 04:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
I've started using global variables more recently but can highly
recommend it!
Just don't let any programmers hear that.
David, I'm sorry; I must again ask you what you mean? Is this a joke I'm
missing
On 01/15/2014 05:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
On 01/15/2014 04:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhrpeterbj...@gmail.com writes:
I've started using global variables more recently but can highly
recommend it!
Just don't let any programmers hear that.
David, I'm sorry; I must again ask
Le 15 janv. 2014 à 17:15:53, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org a écrit :
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
On 01/15/2014 04:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
I've started using global variables more recently but can highly
recommend it!
Just don't
I'm at a loss in finding a way to do some articulation marks.
I'm looking for an accented staccato so should be a combination of -. and
- on top of each other. Is this possible?
Thanks
Martin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
This problem is solved: version 2.18 is working now!
I did two things:
1. Uninstall
Because of some exercise with point and click I reserved a copy of output-ps.scm
It looks like at uninstall the map that contains this file
... /usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/output-ps.scm
was not removed.
2.
I'm looking for an accented staccato so should be a combination of -.
and - on top of each other. Is this possible?
-.-
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Jacques Menu jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch writes:
Le 15 janv. 2014 à 17:15:53, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org a écrit :
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
On 01/15/2014 04:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
I've started using global variables more
Martin Duclos martinrduc...@gmail.com writes:
I'm at a loss in finding a way to do some articulation marks.
I'm looking for an accented staccato so should be a combination of -. and
- on top of each other. Is this possible?
{ c-.- }
--
David Kastrup
On 01/15/2014 05:40 PM, Martin Duclos wrote:
I'm at a loss in finding a way to do some articulation marks.
I'm looking for an accented staccato so should be a combination of -.
and - on top of each other. Is this possible?
I think the way to do this is to write the two articulations in
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 04:54:17PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
On 01/15/2014 04:33 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
+1
I've also been doing this for many years.
I've started using global variables more recently but can highly
recommend it!
Just
Hi Kieren, James and all,
I extracted my edition-engraver from lalily. The example compiles here
with 2.18.
You can try this and comment ... I will add more comments to the code,
if this is of interest ;)
The compilation creates a file example.edition.log containing all
edition-engraver paths.
Tried that before and it didn't work. Just tried again and it's fine. Must
have been some other unrelated syntax error. Thanks for the quick replies!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:51 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Martin Duclos martinrduc...@gmail.com writes:
I'm at a loss in finding a
Paul Morris wrote
Philip Rhoades wrote
It occurred to me that the next step would be to generate something that
is a little more melodic or musical
One simple thing you can do is to only work with the notes from one key at
a time. And I think this makes sense in terms of learning as well
Please forgive me if this has been discussed and/or documented; I
haven't found specifics yet.
Are there lilypond controls for things like staccato, accents, and other
articulations/dynamics, with respect to midi output?
I noticed that the midi output is sensitive to the \staccato
On 01/15/2014 08:28 PM, Bric wrote:
Please forgive me if this has been discussed and/or documented; I
haven't found specifics yet.
Are there lilypond controls for things like staccato, accents, and
other articulations/dynamics, with respect to midi output?
I noticed that the midi output is
SoundsFromSound wrote
Paul, that is a great little bit of code! Thank you for sharing that...I'm
going to play around with it later today. :)
Glad you like it, but David Kastrup gets the credit for it:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg00638.html
I just changed it
Hi Kieren,
I have extracted the latex-markup commands. At the end of the file is a
little example.
There are three ways to produce the latex source:
1. use a markup-list, which is converted with markup-tex: \xelatex { ... }
2. include a file with tex-content: \xelatexInclude #filename
3. use a
Hello all,
in the documentation about percussion notation it is said that you need to
include the Parenthesis_engraver in order to use \parenthesize –
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-percussion.html#ghost-notes
This
is not true, you do not have to include
I got no output and a page full of fontconfig warnings when I ran it. I
left out all but the first since there were about 100 and they're all
nearly identical.
Starting lilypond 2.19.0 [xelatex-command-list.ly]...
Processing `/tmp/xelatex-command-list.ly'
Parsing...
This is XeTeX, Version
there may be some temptation for offering a
LilyPond-native syntax for that.
Pretty please? It's the feature I've been missing the most in lilypond.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:48 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Jacques Menu jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch writes:
Le 15 janv. 2014 à 17:15:53,
How much sense would it make for there to be a separate \mark-style command
that functioned identically but didn't mess with the counter?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Werner,
I suggest that such a command allows for a third,
In addition to the problem Mogens described, the first B is marked Solo
when \partcombine should be marking it a2.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Mogens Lemvig Hansen mog...@kayju.comwrote:
Hi,
With the first version of voiceB below I get “ warning: ignoring too many
clashing note
And also, with the first version the rest disappears.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Alex Loomis thebluemusic...@gmail.comwrote:
In addition to the problem Mogens described, the first B is marked Solo
when \partcombine should be marking it a2.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Mogens
Hi all,
Let’s just admit that \partcombine needs a fair bit of work…
Much like Janek’s Google Summer of Code Lyric Project, there are probably a
dozen features/fixes that would fit under GUPPY — that’s Grand Unified
Partcombine Project, Yo!” — including:
1. arbitrary voice count;
2.
Hi Alex,
How much sense would it make for there to be a separate \mark-style command
that functioned identically but didn't mess with the counter?
Meh… I don’t really like the original suggestion (of a RehearsalMark-relative
\addAt parameter), so it makes little sense to me.
Cheers,
Kieren.
Hi Jan-Peter,
I extracted my edition-engraver from lalily.
This seems so magical as to be almost unbelievable. =)
1. What — if any — drawbacks are there?
2. Why is this not exactly (or even a superset of) the \addAt feature I
requested?
Thanks!
Kieren.
Paul,
On 2014-01-16 07:22, Paul Morris wrote:
SoundsFromSound wrote
Paul, that is a great little bit of code! Thank you for sharing
that...I'm
going to play around with it later today. :)
Glad you like it, but David Kastrup gets the credit for it:
How much sense would it make for there to be a separate \mark-style
command that functioned identically but didn't mess with the
counter?
I'm all for it!
Meh… I don’t really like the original suggestion (of a
RehearsalMark-relative \addAt parameter), so it makes little sense
to me.
So
Alex Loomis thebluemusic...@gmail.com writes:
there may be some temptation for offering a
LilyPond-native syntax for that.
Pretty please? It's the feature I've been missing the most in lilypond.
Well, it's not a missing feature as such, it's just syntactic sugar. At
any rate, it does not make
Alex Loomis thebluemusic...@gmail.com writes:
How much sense would it make for there to be a separate \mark-style command
that functioned identically but didn't mess with the counter?
What do you mean? Neither \mark #4 nor \mark G mess with the counter.
--
David Kastrup
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
SoundsFromSound wrote
Paul, that is a great little bit of code! Thank you for sharing that...I'm
going to play around with it later today. :)
Glad you like it, but David Kastrup gets the credit for it:
People,
On 2014-01-15 23:32, Philip Rhoades wrote:
People,
David Kastrup kindly wrote a little Scheme script for me to generate
random notes within a range and I have started using that to practise
learning Classical Guitar and I think it is quite useful for learning
to jump around the
People,
On 2014-01-16 17:39, Philip Rhoades wrote:
People,
On 2014-01-15 23:32, Philip Rhoades wrote:
People,
David Kastrup kindly wrote a little Scheme script for me to generate
random notes within a range and I have started using that to practise
learning Classical Guitar and I think it
David,
On 2014-01-16 07:43, David Kastrup wrote:
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
SoundsFromSound wrote
Paul, that is a great little bit of code! Thank you for sharing
that...I'm
going to play around with it later today. :)
Glad you like it, but David Kastrup gets the credit for
Am 16.01.2014 06:35, schrieb David Kastrup:
Alex Loomis thebluemusic...@gmail.com writes:
How much sense would it make for there to be a separate \mark-style command
that functioned identically but didn't mess with the counter?
What do you mean? Neither \mark #4 nor \mark G mess with the
Am 2014-01-14 um 14:28 schrieb David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Henning Hraban Ramm lilypon...@fiee.net writes:
Hi,
if I update my scores with convert-ly to 2.18, it changes every
\vspace to \combine \null \vspace (within \markup{ \column {} }).
Why? Does that make sense?
It doesn't make
Hi Alex,
OK ... first note, I use this on my machine with Ubuntu 12.04 having
texlive(2012)-full installed and it does compile - but frescobaldi
doesn't recognize the produced PDF (it is not displayed).
I do also get a lot of Warnings from xelatex and from lilypond. The
TeX-warnings are a matter
76 matches
Mail list logo
