rest collisions warning but no collision

2014-09-05 Thread bart deruyter
Hi all, running this code (also in attachment) results in a warning saying there are too many colliding rests. I don't see where the collision could be though, the warning shouldn't be there in my opinion. I know it renders fine, but still, I prefer results without warnings, it makes me worry that

Re: rest collisions warning but no collision

2014-09-05 Thread Phil Holmes
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 2:53 PM Subject: rest collisions warning but no collision Hi all, running this code (also in attachment) results in a warning saying there are too many colliding rests. I don't see where the collision could be though, the warning

Re: rest collisions warning but no collision

2014-09-05 Thread bart deruyter
and lower voices. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - *From:* bart deruyter bart.deruy...@gmail.com *To:* lilypond-user@gnu.org *Sent:* Friday, September 05, 2014 2:53 PM *Subject:* rest collisions warning but no collision Hi all, running this code (also in attachment) results

Re: rest collisions warning but no collision

2014-09-05 Thread Werner LEMBERG
They are effectively colliding, which you've avoided by moving them as pitched rests. Hmm. `Effectively colliding' isn't user friendly... Is there a way to avoid this warning if pitched rests really don't collide? Werner ___ lilypond-user