Re: addFingering

> \repeat { } > > generates a repeat expression. Whether that is "unfold" or not. > And relativity works "linearly" across the expression even when > alternatives are involved where having to write \relative each time > would be a royal pita. > -- > David Kastrup Yes that's clear. But

Re: Triplets

On 14.01.2017 23:34, Hans Aikema wrote: Can you try replacing UP in that line by 1 and DOWN in that line by -1 apparently the version of Lilypond in use does not yet have these constants defined (values taken from

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 22:34, Hans Aikema wrote: > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote: >> >> >>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but

Re: addFingering

Gianmaria Lari writes: >> \repeat { } >> >> generates a repeat expression. Whether that is "unfold" or not. >> And relativity works "linearly" across the expression even when >> alternatives are involved where having to write \relative each time >> would be a

beams in treble and bass staff

Novice question. Attached it's a small music fragment from an harpe score. How can I write it using lilypond? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

UTF-8 chars in included filenames on Windows 10 revisited

Hi list, it appears UTF-8 character in filenames on Windows seems to be a recurring theme. The attached files placed into the same directory won't properly run on Windows 10 or Windows 7 while there is no problem at all on Linux (I suspect no problem on OSX either but haven't checked): test.ly

Re: addFingering

> \repeat unfold is not evaluated at all. It stays a repeat expression > until it gets interpreted. One reason it is implemented that way is in > order to keep the repeats in > > \relative c' { \repeat unfold 4 { c e g } } > > in the same octave rather than get > > \relative c' { c e g c e g c e

Re: addFingering

Gianmaria Lari writes: >> \repeat unfold is not evaluated at all. It stays a repeat expression >> until it gets interpreted. One reason it is implemented that way is in >> order to keep the repeats in >> >> \relative c' { \repeat unfold 4 { c e g } } >> >> in the same

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

OK, thanks for working on this. However, it would be still valuable to know why module loading fails with a static version of guile. This might be either a bug or missing information in the documentation. It's a known problem ... there already is a related thread in guile-user that should

Re: addFingering

Thank you David Kastrup and Nalesnik and Gilles for you answer your help and your explication! I don't like the idea to use a custom repeat instead of the standard. But I will make some test and see. Thank you again! ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: beams in treble and bass staff

Am 14.01.2017 um 11:07 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > Novice question. Attached it's a small music fragment from an harpe > score. How can I write it using lilypond? You have to name your staffs and then use the \change command. \version "2.19.53" \new PianoStaff << \new Staff = "upper"

Re: beams in treble and bass staff

Hi Gianmaria, Am 14.01.2017 um 11:07 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > Novice question. Attached it's a small music fragment from an harpe > score. How can I write it using lilypond? The term to search for is "change staff": This should help you:

Re: Incomplete measure numbering in repeat

On 14.01.2017 08:05, Menu Jacques wrote: Hello folks, In this example (from Gabrieli, faked time signature), is the second alternative's first measure to be numbered 3, or 2? I can basically think of three options: 2 – if you don’t count repeated bars twice 2a – to stress that it’s an

Re: beams in treble and bass staff

Hi Joram, 'Change staff' is perfectly fine in English. 'Switch' would also be acceptable, but there seems to be no reason to change this. Personally, I would say 'change'. Switch can have a subtle meaning of 'interchange' sometimes, which is not what is meant. Andrew On 14 January 2017 at

Re: beams in treble and bass staff

Hi Andrew, Am 14.01.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > 'Change staff' is perfectly fine in English. Thanks, Andrew. Reading the German translation for the two words (the closest words, like it is translated in the docs), "verändern" (change) sounds like changing the color or the size of a

Re: beams in treble and bass staff

Thanks to all for the very quick and fantastic help. g. On 14 January 2017 at 11:36, Noeck wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Am 14.01.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > > 'Change staff' is perfectly fine in English. > > Thanks, Andrew. Reading the German translation for the two

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

Knut Petersen writes: >> OK, thanks for working on this. However, it would be still valuable >> to know why module loading fails with a static version of guile. This >> might be either a bug or missing information in the documentation. > > It's a known problem ...

Re: Incomplete measure numbering in repeat

On Sat 14 Jan 2017 at 10:58:58 (+0100), Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 14.01.2017 08:05, Menu Jacques wrote: > >Hello folks, > > > >In this example (from Gabrieli, faked time signature), is the > >second alternative's first measure to be numbered 3, or 2? > > I can basically think of three options: >

Re: Experience with several import filters

Hello Urs, Here is the fragment from line 1471 on of the attached file, derived from one of Recordare’s examples: E -1

Re: Triplets

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to > the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than > the square one Lily uses by default. I've come up with a mechanism: > >

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

>> OK, thanks for working on this. However, it would be still >> valuable to know why module loading fails with a static version of >> guile. This might be either a bug or missing information in the >> documentation. > > It's a known problem ... there already is a related thread in >

Re: Incomplete measure numbering in repeat

On 14.01.2017 16:49, Simon Albrecht wrote: I think I’ll also raise this as an enhancement request on the issue tracker. Done: Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Removing Barlines

On 14.01.2017 18:22, David Kastrup wrote: Amir Teymuri writes: Hello, i am a new lilypond user. How can i hide / remove barlines completely? When i set \override Score.BarLine in each upper and lower staffes of a piano staff only the line on the systems will be overriden

Re: Incomplete measure numbering in repeat

On 14.01.2017 16:13, David Wright wrote: On Sat 14 Jan 2017 at 10:58:58 (+0100), Simon Albrecht wrote: On 14.01.2017 08:05, Menu Jacques wrote: Hello folks, In this example (from Gabrieli, faked time signature), is the second alternative's first measure to be numbered 3, or 2? I can

Re: Removing Barlines

Amir Teymuri writes: > Hello, > > i am a new lilypond user. How can i hide / remove barlines completely? > When i set \override Score.BarLine in each upper and lower staffes of a > piano staff only the line on the systems will be overriden but not the > line between upper and

Re: Triplets

Hi Martin, please note that you have to replace the double backslashes by a single one and mind the line breaks in the e-mail. Here is a version that works for me (2.19.50). Best, Joram tupletBracketToSlur = { % Use slur-stencil \override TupletBracket.stencil = #ly:slur::print %% Use

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 19:57, Richard Shann wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to >> the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than >> the square one Lily uses by

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 20:46, Noeck wrote: > tupletBracketToSlur = { > % Use slur-stencil > \override TupletBracket.stencil = #ly:slur::print > %% Use 'thickness from Slur > \override TupletBracket.thickness = #1.2 > %% 'control-points need to be set > \override TupletBracket.control-points = >

Re: Triplets

Hi Martin, Am 14.01.2017 um 21:51 schrieb J Martin Rushton: > I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the > same input file? Of course. You can put one after the other without problems and you can nest them using #{ …ly… #} and #( …scheme… ). > I don't have access to

Re: Triplets

> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton > het volgende geschreven: > > > > I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the > same input file? I don't have access to the code, this is embedded > within a larger application.

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:14, Noeck wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Am 14.01.2017 um 21:51 schrieb J Martin Rushton: >> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the >> same input file? > > Of course. You can put one after the other without problems and you can > nest them using #{ …ly…

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote: > > >> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton >> het volgende geschreven: >> >> >> >> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the >> same input file? I don't have access to the code,

Re: Triplets

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 20:51 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 14/01/17 19:57, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to > >> the original. Triplets are indicated

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:33, J Martin Rushton > wrote: > > > > On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote: >> >> >>> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton >>> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm guessing

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: > > Here's a complete working example: > 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8>< > > %% LilyPond file generated by Denemo version 2.0.17 > > %%http://www.gnu.org/software/denemo/ > > \version "2.18.0" > > >

Lyrics question

Hi Lilyponders, I have a question about Lyrics. I have a composition where the instrumentalists need to sing in various places. No matter what I try, the lyrics are all ending up stacked below the bottom staff, rather than under each individual staff. Please see the MWE below. Any ideas greatly

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:41, Hans Aikema wrote: > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:33, J Martin Rushton >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> >>> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton het volgende

Re: Triplets

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: > > I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to > waste a lot of time, so I've gone back to using square type brackets, > the slur type were not clear. yes, the first

Triplets

Hi, I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than the square one Lily uses by default. I've come up with a mechanism: \relative c'' { \tupletUp \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##f

Re: Problem with Null Voice changing length of stems on beamed notes

I downloaded and tried to compile it with Lilypond 2.19.54 and everything is perfect just as you pointed out. It seems that it was a bug and they fixed it in development version. Scores looks great now. I just hope that development version does not bring any surprises. Thanks! -- View this

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:49, Richard Shann wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> >> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: >> > >> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to >> waste a lot of time, so I've gone back to using square type

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:49, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> >> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: >> > >> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to >> waste a lot of time, so I've

Re: Lyrics question

Hi Craig, Craig Dabelstein wrote > No matter what I try, the lyrics are all ending up stacked below the > bottom staff, rather than under > each individual staff. Try alignBelowContext: % --- \version "2.19.36" \language "english"

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton > wrote: > > >> > Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but there's > an issue with one variable: > ---%<-- > Processing `.../file.ly' > Parsing... >

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote: > > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but there's >> an issue with one variable: >>

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:42, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > On 14.01.2017 23:34, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> Can you try replacing >>> UP in that line by 1 >>> and DOWN in that line by -1 >>> apparently the version of Lilypond in use does not yet have these constants >>> defined

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 22:07, Hans Aikema wrote: > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:49, Richard Shann wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >>> >>> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: >>> >> >>> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version

Re: Triplets

2017-01-14 23:41 GMT+01:00 J Martin Rushton : > > > On 14/01/17 22:34, Hans Aikema wrote: >> >>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> >>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton