Re: Key signatures repeated on every staff

On Sat 15 Apr 2017 at 23:12:36 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote: > On 15/04/17 21:55, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > Hi Wol, > > > >> > most of the music I see from the turn of last century does NOT. > > > Does not repeat the key signature? Fascinating! What field/genre are you > > working in? > >

Re: Key signatures repeated on every staff

On 15/04/17 21:55, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Wol, > >> > most of the music I see from the turn of last century does NOT. > Does not repeat the key signature? Fascinating! What field/genre are you > working in? Mostly published by either Boosey, or Hawkes. They merged about 1920 ... :-) I

Re: Key signatures repeated on every staff

Hi Wol, > most of the music I see from the turn of last century does NOT. Does not repeat the key signature? Fascinating! What field/genre are you working in? I studied, and now work in the classical (both “old” and “new”), jazz (instrumental and vocal/choral), and musical theatre worlds, and

Re: Key signatures repeated on every staff

On 15/04/17 15:55, Malte Meyn wrote: May I ask how much sheet music you have seen so far? All (!) classical sheet music repeats key signature at every line. And many editions of pop/jazz/… do that also. And most of the music I see from the turn of last century does NOT. However, imho, it

Re: flip clef at end of line only

Am 15.04.2017 um 18:02 schrieb Malte Meyn: Am 15.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Marc Hohl: Hi list, I am working on a little piece that's played as written; after that, the musician has to turn the page upside down and play the resulting notes. I managed to get the clef displayed at the beginning

Re: flip clef at end of line only

Am 15.04.2017 um 18:11 schrieb Son_V: Hi list, I am working on a little piece that's played as written; after that, the musician has to turn the page upside down and play the resulting notes. I'm sorry, I'm just adding noise, but the thing you're working on seems interesting for me. I

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

Am 15.04.2017 um 16:14 schrieb Son_V: to have every beat numbered could help when in a choir the Maestro calls to sing from a given beat. The vast majority of scores available have bar numbers at the start of each system. So if you don’t want the trouble of writing bar numbers in each and

Custom parenthesize ignoring Staves?

Hey, I'm working on re-typing some educational notes and I'm wondering if maybe someone had this problem and also came up with some Scheme to deal with this. http://i.imgur.com/T7z8Ty7.png - this is the source; http://i.imgur.com/IGocUKW.png - this is what I came up with (nevermind wrong notes)

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 07:14 -0700, Son_V wrote: > I understand (maybe), but to have every beat numbered could help when > in a > choir the Maestro calls to sing from a given beat. > That's the reason why I want them to be visible. > > Sorry to be such an humble learner. This reminds me of an old

Re: flip clef at end of line only

> Hi list, > I am working on a little piece that's played as written; > after that, the musician has to turn the page upside down and play the > resulting notes. I'm sorry, I'm just adding noise, but the thing you're working on seems interesting for me. I remember that JS Bach made some work of

Re: flip clef at end of line only

Am 15.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Marc Hohl: > Hi list, > > I am working on a little piece that's played as written; > after that, the musician has to turn the page upside down and play the > resulting notes. > > I managed to get the clef displayed at the beginning and the end of each > line, and

flip clef at end of line only

Hi list, I am working on a little piece that's played as written; after that, the musician has to turn the page upside down and play the resulting notes. I managed to get the clef displayed at the beginning and the end of each line, and I can flip the clef ;-) Unfortunately, overriding the

Happy Easter to everyone

Wouldn't try to write a minimum example now! :-) As in object! :-) And thanks for the patience. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Happy-Easter-to-everyone-tp202311.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Key signatures repeated on every staff

[...] >But yes, it’s self-explaining this time. Thank's God! :-) >> On my scores, the key signature appears on every beginning of a staff. >Not only on yours. >> I wonder if it's right or if it SHOULD be avoided. In the latter case, >> what >> should I do? > May I ask how much sheet music

Re: Key signatures repeated on every staff

Am 15.04.2017 um 16:41 schrieb Son_V: > I dare to try a minimal example! :-) > But I hope it's self-explaining. \version "2.18.2" { \key d \major R1*20 } That’s not too hard ;) But yes, it’s self-explaining this time. > On my scores, the key signature appears on every

Key signatures repeated on every staff

I dare to try a minimal example! :-) But I hope it's self-explaining. On my scores, the key signature appears on every beginning of a staff. I wonder if it's right or if it SHOULD be avoided. In the latter case, what should I do? Thanks. -- View this message in context:

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

I understand (maybe), but to have every beat numbered could help when in a choir the Maestro calls to sing from a given beat. That's the reason why I want them to be visible. Sorry to be such an humble learner. -- View this message in context:

Re: Minimal examples (was: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...)

Thanks for your kind lesson. I hope I will make a good use of this (bu I'm unsure of). Thnx again -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Last-number-on-a-score-but-this-is-the-first-in-the-next-one-tp202294p202306.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at

Re: What are the units for \hspace?

On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 13:04 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2017-04-15 10:35 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann : > > Is it documented anywhere what the units used in the markup command > > \hspace are? > > The general doc is at NR 5.4.3 Distances and measurements ah, I see - the

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

Am 15.04.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Son_V: >> \override Score.BarNumber.break-visibility = #end-of-line-invisible > > Thanks! That was successful. > > But I'm still in doubt of what should be the correct way. There is no single correct way. In classical music traditionally you have bar numbers

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

> \override Score.BarNumber.break-visibility = #end-of-line-invisible Thanks! That was successful. But I'm still in doubt of what should be the correct way. Is it right to show the last number in the staff, or is it not? IMHO I prefer not to leave the last number visible (and I am going to

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

Am 15.04.2017 um 15:40 schrieb Son_V: >> And a solution > > Sorry but I wasn't able to find it, surely, my fault. I tried some of your > code without success. I'm using version "2.18.2" on Linux. Maybe try all code, not some code ;) ___

Minimal examples (was: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...)

Am 15.04.2017 um 14:30 schrieb Son_V: > I'm not able to make a truly "minimum example", that's what I could do: I’ll show you how this can be simplified. > \version "2.18.2" > \header { > } You don’t need an empty \header, \paper, \layout, … block. > PartPOneVoiceOne = \relative a' { >

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

> And a solution Sorry but I wasn't able to find it, surely, my fault. I tried some of your code without success. I'm using version "2.18.2" on Linux. -- View this message in context:

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

Am 15.04.2017 um 13:54 schrieb Son_V: > Hi all, Lilypond (using \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t > #t #t) ) writes at the end of a score, the number of the next beam, that is > written at the beginning of the subsequent score; and it writes at the end > of the last score the

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

Hi, > I'm not able to make a truly "minimum example", that's what I could do: I showed you a much smaller example. And a solution. Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

I'm not able to make a truly "minimum example", that's what I could do: \version "2.18.2" \header { } PartPOneVoiceOne = \relative a' { \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t #t #t) \clef "treble" \key c \major \numericTimeSignature\time 4/4 a1 | % 2 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1

Re: Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

Hi, Please include tiny compilable examples with your questions. > Lilypond (using \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t > #t #t) ) writes at the end of a score, the number of the next beam, that is > written at the beginning of the subsequent score; and it writes at the end > of

Re: [Spam] Re: Multiple instruments in score and parts

On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 12:34 +0200, Rutger Hofman wrote: > On 04/13/2017 03:37 PM, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:19 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At the moment I cannot really see how to deal with this sort of > > > >

Last number on a score; but this is the first in the next one...

Hi all, Lilypond (using \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t #t #t) ) writes at the end of a score, the number of the next beam, that is written at the beginning of the subsequent score; and it writes at the end of the last score the number that should be at the beginning of an

Re: Multiple instruments in score and parts

On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 17:40 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi David, > > > > > That thread is now 8 months old, and I wondered what has happened > > since. > Unfortunately, not as much as one would hope… > > > > > Is some of it yet incorporated into the development version of > > LilyPond? >

Re: What are the units for \hspace?

Hi Andrew, 2017-04-15 13:14 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard : > Hi All, > > It would be great if the documentation could actually state that. We have LM 4.3.3 Length and thickness of objects and NR 5.4.3 Distances and measurements Also, I did a quick glance over the available

Re: What are the units for \hspace?

Hi All, It would be great if the documentation could actually state that. The average user is not going to be able to cook up that code to probe the size. I am great believer in reference manuals being terse (e.g. UNIX man pages), but they lilypond ones tend to err on the side of being too terse

Re: What are the units for \hspace?

2017-04-15 10:35 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann : > Is it documented anywhere what the units used in the markup command > \hspace are? The general doc is at NR 5.4.3 Distances and measurements > > the documentation is: > > \hspace amount (number) > > Create an invisible

Re: [Spam] Re: Multiple instruments in score and parts

On 04/13/2017 03:37 PM, David Sumbler wrote: On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:19 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi David, At the moment I cannot really see how to deal with this sort of problem, other than having completely separate input for the score and the part at these points, controlled by

What are the units for \hspace?

Is it documented anywhere what the units used in the markup command \hspace are? the documentation is: \hspace amount (number) Create an invisible object taking up horizontal space amount. The "amount" appears to be smaller than the width of the "m", but larger

Re: lilypond errors on a guitar minor sixth chord

2017-04-15 2:36 GMT+02:00 Stan Mulder : > Thomas, > > Got it. I used your first solution with the addendum. If at some point in > the future I need more chords, I will construct a more extensive file for > guitar chords. I did construct a fingering file for plectrum banjo

Re: "natural width" of a measure

Am 14. April 2017 16:04:31 MESZ schrieb David Nalesnik : >On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Urs Liska wrote: >> >> >> Am 13.04.2017 um 16:48 schrieb David Nalesnik: >>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Urs Liska >wrote:

Re: lilypond errors on a guitar minor sixth chord

Am 15.04.2017 um 02:36 schrieb Stan Mulder: > Thanks for the clarification on the reply-all. I wasn't sure what to do. > Is there some place on the web were I can see other discussions? There are several archives, f. e. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/ (this is the mailing