024, at 15:03, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>> Many thanks for the clarification that this approach will not work and
>> alternative suggestions.
>>
>> I presume that /image will only include PNGs in a SVG output and not EPS (the
>> documentation reads a little unclearl
Am 10.04.24 um 15:50 schrieb Alex Harker:
Many thanks for the clarification that this approach will not work and
alternative suggestions.
I presume that /image will only include PNGs in a SVG output and not EPS
(the documentation reads a little unclearly on this as the section on
backends
> Many thanks for the clarification that this approach will not work and
> alternative suggestions.
>
> I presume that /image will only include PNGs in a SVG output and not EPS (the
> documentation reads a little unclearly on this as the section on backends is
> elided with co
Many thanks for the clarification that this approach will not work and
alternative suggestions.
I presume that /image will only include PNGs in a SVG output and not EPS (the
documentation reads a little unclearly on this as the section on backends is
elided with comments on coloured
Am 10.04.24 um 14:31 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
It would be possible to convert EPS to SVG with pstoedit or via PDF and
Inkscape. Both would avoid rastering vectors into a pixel image.
True, but LilyPond so far doesn't support including SVG images either.
(It does support \markup \path in SVG
> It would be possible to convert EPS to SVG with pstoedit or via PDF and
> Inkscape. Both would avoid rastering vectors into a pixel image.
True, but LilyPond so far doesn't support including SVG images either.
(It does support \markup \path in SVG though.)
signature.asc
Description: This
Am 10.04.24 um 13:29 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
I am trying to include an epsfile as a top-level markup (it is not in
a score) and then output as SVG.
You can't (this should indeed be mentioned in the documentation). EPS files
are included by basically inlining them into the PS code that
> An alternative, if you can use raster graphics, would be a PNG file added
> with the \image command.
P.S. \image is new in 2.25
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/graphical-markup
(and I remember now that I wrote down what does and doesn't
support EPS in the 2.25
> I am trying to include an epsfile as a top-level markup (it is not in
> a score) and then output as SVG.
You can't (this should indeed be mentioned in the documentation). EPS files
are included by basically inlining them into the PS code that LilyPond
generates,
which is then converted to
I am trying to include an epsfile as a top-level markup (it is not in a score)
and then output as SVG.
If I render to pdf I see the eps file part, but if I render to SVG I don’t see
it - everything else is included. If I examine the SVG as text I don’t appear
to see anything relating to the
A way to output to stdout directly (on Linux):
$ ln -s /dev/stdout foo.svg
$ lilypond -dbackend=svg -o foo music.ly
Regards,
Curt
On 5/5/2020 2:42 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 03 May 2020 at 12:22:31 (+0200), Valentin Villenave wrote:
On 4/30/20, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Apr
On Sun 03 May 2020 at 12:22:31 (+0200), Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On 4/30/20, David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 30 Apr 2020 at 21:58:28 (+0200), Marcel Aartsen wrote:
> > I don't think you can use stdout itself, as LP already uses it.
>
> Well, there *used* to be some work towards something like
On 4/30/20, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 30 Apr 2020 at 21:58:28 (+0200), Marcel Aartsen wrote:
> I don't think you can use stdout itself, as LP already uses it.
Well, there *used* to be some work towards something like that; see
the framework-socket.scm file in LilyPond’s source code…
> I
. This means that the user on
> the front end triggers a request that is processed by some server-side
> Python code that, in my case, in turn calls Lilypond. Lilypond's output
> is ultimately on the front end to be displayed in html, so I figured
> that svg output wou
that is processed by some server-side
Python code that, in my case, in turn calls Lilypond. Lilypond's output
is ultimately on the front end to be displayed in html, so I figured
that svg output would be best. And I reckon that it will be
unnecessarily cumbersome and slow to let Lilypond write to file
Hello
There's been discussion about this over the last few years; however, i'm not
sure if this particular feature has been requested before
How easy would it be to modify the generated SVG document, such that every note
and rest be encapsulated in its own markup group:
and
ky spacing commands even if they make the PDF look
terrible, as long as they give the desired SVG output. So if anyone can
suggest some specific commands to try, including where to put them, I'm
content to experiment with nudge values and other options until the SVG
positioning comes out ok.
From: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
Sent: 10 January 2018 15:21
To: James Opstad
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: SVG output - Group multiple grobs together
Hi James,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:51 AM, James Opstad <jamesops...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
Hi James, I'm cc'ing the user list, as per the usual custom.
On 01/11/2018 08:13 AM, James Opstad wrote:
Thanks. I will work through David's example. It seems it isn't
possible to embed more than one item within a group and one group per
grob is the only approach for the time being. If
On 01/10/2018 06:51 AM, James Opstad wrote:
How would I include multiple grobs within the same group e.g. all the
grobs associated with a single note (NoteHead, Stem, Accidental etc.)?
Hi, I don't think there is currently a way to do that. You could give
each grob you want to group together
Hi James,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:51 AM, James Opstad <jamesops...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have been experimenting with the new output-attributes grob property for
> SVG output. For example, the following code creates a group with id="noteC"
> aro
Hello,
I have been experimenting with the new output-attributes grob property for SVG
output. For example, the following code creates a group with id="noteC" around
the C notehead.
\version "2.19.80"
\pointAndClickOff
\relative c' {
\once \override NoteHead.output
Paul Morris paulwmorris.com> writes:
>
> > On Feb 1, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Paul Booker homebass.net> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, that wasn't clear, got it now, thanks
> > Works for one-line parts but also converts two line pieces to one line,
> > ignoring the \break. Can I reinstate that somehow, without
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Paul Booker wrote:
>
> Interesting!
> I had a go, guessing with
>
>paper-height=#(one-line-auto-height-breaking)
Try this:
%
\version "2.19.36"
\paper {
page-breaking = #ly:one-line-auto-height-breaking
}
{ c1 }
I had a go, guessing with
paper-height=#(one-line-auto-height-breaking)
which worked on the svg output but with log as below
# -*-compilation-*-
Processing `ly/scaleC.ly'
Parsing...
include/defs.ily:9:19: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression
beginning here
paper-height=#
While trying to achieve svg output comparable to png output, I have reached
a workaround which comes close enough for my purposes. Now I have a question
at the other end of this!
I have this in my "defs.ily" file:
#(set-default-paper-size "a6" 'landscape)
\paper{
i
Paul Morris paulwmorris.com> writes:
>
> %
>
> \version "2.19.36"
>
> \paper {
> page-breaking = #ly:one-line-auto-height-breaking
> }
>
> { c1 }
>
> %
>
> The syntax is documented on that page in the Notation Reference that I
linked to in my previous message.
>
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Paul Booker wrote:
>
> Ok, that wasn't clear, got it now, thanks
> Works for one-line parts but also converts two line pieces to one line,
> ignoring the \break. Can I reinstate that somehow, without the white-space?
Not with this function. It
Hi Paul,
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 7:36 AM, paul booker wrote:
>
> Can anyone see this becoming a scheme function which could sit in my
> defs.ily file and save this ugly step?
> I guess I mean an internal to Lilypond rather than external solution.
> I'm not at all familiar with
Is anybody using SVG with 2.19.31?
I am seeing this error:
Layout output to `sonata-page-1.svg'...
warning: cannot find SVG font #f
warning: cannot find SVG font #f
/home/andro/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/output-svg.scm:428:30: In
procedure string-join in expression (string-join
Answering my own issue on further investigation, I refer to Noto Sans Bold
Italic in an override for dynamics. My system lacks the SVG fonts for this
typeface. Enabling –V and going through the backtrace led to some insight.
But the error message presented that just refers to font #f is not
Il giorno gio 19 nov 2015 alle 11:11, Andrew Bernard
ha scritto:
Answering my own issue on further investigation, I refer to Noto Sans
Bold Italic in an override for dynamics. My system lacks the SVG
fonts for this typeface. Enabling –V and going through the
Hi Federico,
Yes indeed, exactly that. And thanks.
Andrew
On 19/11/2015, 22:05, "Federico Bruni" wrote:
>This should be issue 3809?
>https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3809/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Il giorno gio 19 nov 2015 alle 12:05, Federico Bruni
ha scritto:
Il giorno gio 19 nov 2015 alle 11:11, Andrew Bernard
ha scritto:
> Answering my own issue on further investigation, I refer to Noto
Sans
> Bold Italic in an override for dynamics.
Hello all,
I need a way to inject an event's moment (like what event-listener.ly
produces) into its corresponding grob id property (so it'll appear in
the SVG output).
I tried all kind of things but nothing works. I'd share all my attempts
if needed but if someone thinks of something which
Hello all,
I'm looking for a way to inject an event's moment (like what
event-listener.ly produces) into its corresponding grob id property (so
it'll appear in the SVG output).
I tried all kind of things but nothing works. I'd share all my attempts
if needed but if someone thinks
Hello,
I have a ly file with eps image like
...
\markup { \epsfile #X #10 #sample.eps }
Pdf output is fine, but using the svg backend, I get this warning:
missing stencil expression `embedded-ps'
and the image is not printed.
Thank you
Thomas
--
Mac OS X 10.10, LilyPond 2.19.15 and 2.18.0
Op Thu, 8 May 2014 11:22:42 +0100
Gerard McConnell gerine...@gmail.com schreef:
How do you get Lilypond to output SVG from Frescobaldi?
Thanks,
Gerard
LilyPond → Engrave (custom), select SVG.
--
Wilbert Berendsen
(http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl)
How do you get Lilypond to output SVG from Frescobaldi?
Thanks,
Gerard
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 08.05.2014 12:22, schrieb Gerard McConnell:
How do you get Lilypond to output SVG from Frescobaldi?
Thanks,
Gerard
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Use Engrave (Custom)
Federico Bruni fedelogy at gmail.com writes:
thanks, added to the tracker:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3778
Is it possible to raise the seviry of the bug in the tracker? It is listed
now as ugly, but in effect it is worse: under certain conditions, it makes
music
It looks like this needs to be done by a project manager. For an issue to
be critical it needs to be a regression error, that is, it works before but
doesn't now. Did it work in 2.16? if so, post that here:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3778#c4
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
[mailto:ksnor...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 29 april 2014 16:13
To: Jan Rosseel
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: svg output differs from pdf output
It looks like this needs to be done by a project manager. For an issue to be
critical it needs to be a regression error, that is, it works before
*Cc:* lilypond-user@gnu.org
*Subject:* Re: svg output differs from pdf output
It looks like this needs to be done by a project manager. For an issue to
be critical it needs to be a regression error, that is, it works before but
doesn't now. Did it work in 2.16? if so, post that here
, the backend just translates already made layout/rendering
decisions to graphical primitives.
Regards,
JanR
*From:* Knute Snortum [mailto:ksnor...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* dinsdag 29 april 2014 16:13
*To:* Jan Rosseel
*Cc:* lilypond-user@gnu.org
*Subject:* Re: svg output differs from pdf output
Am 29.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Knute Snortum:
For an issue to
be critical it needs to be a regression error, that is, it works before but
doesn't now. Did it work in 2.16?
To be more specific: To be a regression it had to be working before _on
purpose_. That is someone has to have deliberately
the pdf and svg output.
To illustrate it, I've made a screenshot. Lilypond 2.18.0 was used,
frescobaldi 2.0.12 on Ubuntustudio 13.10 and on KDE. Look at the metronome
mark, there is a collision of the fingering notation and the metronome mark,
which is much lower then in the pdf output.
(above
2014/1/5 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
This shorter example shows the problem. When viewed on Mint 16 amd64, the
tempo marking in the SVG output is both lower, so that it collides with the
stem of the A, and also has insufficient space between the equals sign and
the preceding
- Original Message -
From: Alex Loomis
To: bart deruyter
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: svg output differs from pdf output
There also seems to be something wring with the ledger lines in the pdf.
That's almost certainly just the way
On 05/01/14 09:50, bart deruyter wrote:
Hi all,
I ran a little test, because I often use svg as output to manipulate
afterwards.
I noticed there seems to be a difference between the pdf and svg output.
To illustrate it, I've made a screenshot. Lilypond 2.18.0 was used,
frescobaldi 2.0.12
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 01:25:42AM -0400, Bric wrote:
How hard would it be to enhance the svg export with robust svg element id's
that
retain (at least SOME of) the original lilypond's note characteristics ??
instead of assigning anonymous generic inkscape object names (e.g.,
id=rect7306
and group elements much more easily,
it seams, actually adding the svg grouping, post factum, if need be.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/svg-output-tp137775p142987.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On December 16, 2012 at 4:52 PM Gerard McConnell gerine...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently Microsoft has created the problem:
«Known issues with this security update
We are aware of issues related to OpenType Font (OTF) rendering in
applications such as PowerPoint on affected versions
Hi,
have you tried the backend svg:
lilypond -dbackend=svg infile.ly
svg uses for some reason not the format but the backend option.
Cheers,
Joram
lilypond -o outfile.svg -fsvg infile.ly
What am I doing wrong?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
2013/3/18 Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de
have you tried the backend svg:
lilypond -dbackend=svg infile.ly
svg uses for some reason not the format but the backend option.
keep a look to this issue:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=967
Bric wrote
lilypond -o outfile.svg -fsvg infile.ly
please note that lilypond adds the extension automatically so probably you
want to write
lilypond -o outfile -dbackend=svg infile.ly
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/svg-output-tp137775p142987
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/svg-output-tp137775p137783.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
Apparently Microsoft has created the problem:
«Known issues with this security update
We are aware of issues related to OpenType Font (OTF) rendering in
applications such as PowerPoint on affected versions of Windows that occur
after this security update is applied. We are currently
Gerard McConnell gerine...@gmail.com writes:
By the way, I presume I'm top-posting. I read somewhere that there's
something wrong with doing that, but doesn't it allow whoever is
following the thread to get the new material without having to go
through the old material?
Why would you be
Hello,
I'm using v 2.13.50. Is there any known problem with the SVG output? I'm
losing numbers and text when I try to open it with Inkscape 0.48.
Thanks for any help,
Gerard
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
, December 15, 2012 9:53 PM
Subject: svg output
Hello,
I'm using v 2.13.50. Is there any known problem with the SVG output? I'm
losing numbers and text when I try to open it with Inkscape 0.48.
Thanks for any help,
Gerard
:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/41vfg7hcz9s6cho/pdfOutput.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/nukjkjfem7ys0v2/svgDisplay.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u0w9hmn5lxazjzp/guitarTwinkle.svg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0pkreb1vaglknct/guitarTwinkle.ly
I have found the combination of Lilypond's .svg output with further
Am 15.12.2012 23:46, schrieb Gerard McConnell:
Phil,
Thanks very much for the reply. Okay, I've done the upgrade to 2.16.1
but the problem isn't solved. I've placed the .ly and .svg files, and
pictures (screen dumps?) of the .pdf output from Lilypond (which is
fine) and the display of the
Thanks Joram,
I checked with Firefox on my machine and it displays the svg fine too.
Does it seem that there must be some settings in Inkscape that I need to
fix?
Gerard
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 15.12.2012 23:46, schrieb Gerard McConnell:
Phil,
this thread:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/234562
Does that help at all?
Should be an easy fix,
Ben
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/svg-output-tp137775p137783.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive
Sorry for the noise. I was using the wrong version of lilypond.
Many thanks,
Peter
On 09/19/2011 10:44 PM, Gerard McConnell wrote:
I don't know if this is any help, but with JEdit
%lilypond -dbackend=svg %buffer
works fine. That is, whatever is in the buffer gets output as an SVG file.
Gerard
Hi,
When I run this on terminal
lilypond -dbackend=svg finalscore.ly
instead of each page of the score as seperate svg files I get one,
empty, file named finalscore.svg.
Any idea where it might be going wrong? (There is no error message.)
Thanks,
Peter
Hi,
I'm using lilypond's SVG output to produce playable notation using
JavaScript and HTML5 audio:
http://percussion360.com/
Tim.
On 24/08/11 08:46, Marek Klein wrote:
Hello,
2011/8/18 Sandor Spruit a.g.l.spr...@uu.nl mailto:a.g.l.spr...@uu.nl
Hello,
I recently had an informal
Hello,
2011/8/18 Sandor Spruit a.g.l.spr...@uu.nl
Hello,
I recently had an informal discussion with some collegues on the use of
SVG, in general.
They are in music research, I am a developer working on a completely
unrelated topic -
so please forgive me my ignorance w.r.t. music-related
Hello,
I recently had an informal discussion with some collegues on the use of
SVG, in general.
They are in music research, I am a developer working on a completely
unrelated topic -
so please forgive me my ignorance w.r.t. music-related terminology.
We discussed the possibilities to use
Ok! Thanks!
Now I know how to do it!
2011/7/21 m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com
On Jul 18, 2011, at 8:20 PM, Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear mike,
I think I didn't understand You.
What do You mean by
you can rewrite this using LilyPond stencil commands?
Could You give a short
Dear community,
when I compile the following file with
lilypond -dbackend=svg
the svg-output looks different to the pdf, I've compiled with lilypond.
The symbol for muchair is not displayed correctly.
Here the example:
\version 2.14.1
%% note with air
#(define (airohalf radius height thick
On Jul 18, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear community,
when I compile the following file with
lilypond -dbackend=svg
the svg-output looks different to the pdf, I've compiled with lilypond.
The symbol for muchair is not displayed correctly.
Here the example:
\version 2.14.1
Am 11.06.2011 03:15, schrieb Patrick McCarty:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 10.06.2011 17:55, schrieb Patrick McCarty:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.dewrote:
Hello list,
I needed some lilypond svg graphics, and while
Hello list,
I needed some lilypond svg graphics, and while
lilypond -dbackend=svg myfile.ly
worked with 2.13.x, it now doesn't with 2.15.0 and complains with
GNU LilyPond 2.15.0
ERROR: Wrong number of arguments to #primitive-procedure cons
Has the syntax changed? I searched in the archives,
Hi Marc,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello list,
I needed some lilypond svg graphics, and while
lilypond -dbackend=svg myfile.ly
worked with 2.13.x, it now doesn't with 2.15.0 and complains with
GNU LilyPond 2.15.0
ERROR: Wrong number of arguments
Am 10.06.2011 17:55, schrieb Patrick McCarty:
Hi Marc,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello list,
I needed some lilypond svg graphics, and while
lilypond -dbackend=svg myfile.ly
worked with 2.13.x, it now doesn't with 2.15.0 and complains with
GNU
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 10.06.2011 17:55, schrieb Patrick McCarty:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello list,
I needed some lilypond svg graphics, and while
lilypond -dbackend=svg myfile.ly
worked with
seems to corrupt the
SVG output file generated by :-
( lilypond -dbackend=svg lilypondfile.ly )
Opening the svg in Inkscape fails...
Opening the svg file in gedit (a text editor) shows the
ampersand highlighted in red.
Deleting it, and saving the file gives an svg file which
opens correctly
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:05 AM, wjm mooney...@aim.com wrote:
Greetings,
I have been having a problem with certain SVG files failing to open in
Inkscape.
The attached file compiles correctly and produces the expected PDF result
but when generating an SVG file the result seems to be corrupt
On 2010-04-21, keith Luke wrote:
I've been using various SVG programs slurs around lyrics per the attached
snippet. Inkscape, Scribus, and GIMP all do a good job, but each program
has issues with creating multi-page PDF output. I am hoping there is a
neat or sneaky way of doing this in
multiple conversions and edits.
Thanks,
Keieth
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Keith,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:25 AM, keith Luke kkll...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using LilyPond 2.12.3 to create SVG output with the command:
lilypond -dbackend
I'm using LilyPond 2.12.3 to create SVG output with the command:
lilypond -dbackend=svg xyz.ly
for various LilyPond files. I'm getting inconsistent results as most files
SVG output are readable by Inkscape, but a file is giving me a problem.
LilyPond produces the svg file but nothing shows
Hi Keith,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:25 AM, keith Luke kkll...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using LilyPond 2.12.3 to create SVG output with the command:
lilypond -dbackend=svg xyz.ly
for various LilyPond files. I'm getting inconsistent results as most files
SVG output are readable by Inkscape
Yes, that's the main goal of SVG output.
Gerard McConnell wrote:
Am I wrong in thinking that when the SVG output is usable
for Windows machines, then that output can be imported
into Inkscape, where it can be worked on further to
produce pages like those in children's piano tutors
Am I wrong in thinking that when the SVG output is usable
for Windows machines, then that output can be imported
into Inkscape, where it can be worked on further to
produce pages like those in children's piano tutors, with
pictures, circles around clefs or key signatures, pretty much
any sort
SVG is not specific to Windows--- it is a web standard. If Inkscape
can manipulate SVG then you can do as described...
--hsm
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Gerard McConnell gerry...@indigo.ie wrote:
Am I wrong in thinking that when the SVG output is usable
for Windows machines
У сб, 2010-01-16 у 15:33 +, Graham Percival пише:
It would be nice if somebody could check the regtest comparison...
it's too late to recall 2.13.11 if it broke anything, but if it *did*
break something, the sooner we find out about it, the faster we can
fix it.
More info in the
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk
brownian@gmail.com wrote:
У сб, 2010-01-16 у 15:33 +, Graham Percival пише:
It would be nice if somebody could check the regtest comparison...
it's too late to recall 2.13.11 if it broke anything, but if it *did*
break something, the
У пн, 2010-01-18 у 10:20 +, Graham Percival пише:
1. Comparisons: go here, and select the version you want to check:
http://lilypond.org/test/
for example, v2.13.11-1
You'll see the difference in regtests between v2.13.10 and v2.13.11.
For any change, ask yourself if it's a change for
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 04:27:26PM +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
For instance: In the ancient-accidental.ly regtest, the accidentals for
hufnagel and **MENSURAL** look exactly the same. Shouldn't they be
different? I don't know actually.
Well, ignore any regtests that you have no clue
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:09:36 +
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
new feature (*cough* bugfix)
What does that mean?
Why wasn't svg output fixed when it broke? Is there is a
problem with priorities? Doesn't lilypond's on line output,
including the docs, look a million times
changes that it's silly to call it a bugfix.
Why wasn't svg output fixed when it broke?
Because nobody, INCLUDING YOURSELF, sent a well-formed patch to fix it
when it broke.
Is there is a problem with priorities?
Yes -- yours. You're not willing to put the effort into helping the
lilypond
that it's silly to call it a bugfix.
Why wasn't svg output fixed when it broke?
Because nobody, INCLUDING YOURSELF, sent a well-formed patch to fix it
when it broke.
Is there is a problem with priorities?
Yes -- yours. You're not willing to put the effort into helping the
lilypond
In
/v2.6/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS.html:
The SVG backend is now a fully functional backend.
Please, can this be fixed this in 2.12? It is hardly a new feature.
Hasn't it been out of commission long enough? TAI. Regards, daveA
___
lilypond-user
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:44 AM, David Raleigh Arnold
d...@openguitar.com wrote:
In
/v2.6/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS.html:
The SVG backend is now a fully functional backend.
Please, can this be fixed this in 2.12? It is hardly a new feature.
Hasn't it been out of commission long enough?
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:44 AM, David Raleigh Arnold
d...@openguitar.com wrote:
In
/v2.6/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS.html:
The SVG backend is now a fully functional backend.
Please, can this be fixed this in 2.12?
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:32:25 -0800
Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:44 AM, David Raleigh Arnold
d...@openguitar.com wrote:
In
/v2.6/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS.html:
The SVG
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:51:19PM -0500, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
Thanks. So the answer is no. I thought bugfixes were applied
to stable releases.
That is correct. I will not backport this new feature (*cough*
bugfix) because I am a mean and lazy person and I hate all users.
Hopefully
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:51:19PM -0500, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
Thanks. So the answer is no. I thought bugfixes were applied
to stable releases.
That is correct. I will not backport this new feature
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo