Re: (de)cresendi syntax

, MusiXTeX. So it is a bad sign in my opinion when changes in the input are hard to consistently make it to MIDI. Even when one does not want to see MIDI as an output device (and I _do_ use it for accompaniment), it is nice for proofhearing. -- David Kastrup

Re: [Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break

was foiled by kinks in the current implementation, and the long-term solution should prefer getting rid of kinks rather than adding new ones. Note that I don't have any actual knowledge of the code: it is just that this conversation sets off my alarm bells. -- David Kastrup

Equivalent of \downbow/\upbow on bar lines?

for a single note or chord. Any idea how to go about this? It would probably be ok to just place the sign a bit to the left of the starting note, like a \breathe tends to be placed behind it. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond

Re: Equivalent of \downbow/\upbow on bar lines?

this has over marks is that breathing signs are per-voice. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Pasting together markup expressions

#}))) #{ ^\markup { $piccolo $left $middle $right $bass discant } #})) \layout { ragged-right = ##t } \score { \relative c' { c\Discant #131 d \Discant #11 }} -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: Pasting together markup expressions

David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: Ok, the following somewhat naive approach which treats music and markup expressions sort of like cutpasteable strings falls apart horribly. How do I do this sort of thing properly? The goal is to be able to write something like \Discant #130 and get

Re: indent-ly

it does not have a default indentation. Incorrect. Try { \displayLilyMusic { a b \\ c d | d e | } } which will produce { a b \\ c d | d e | } That _is_ an idea of indentation and line breaking written by Lilypond itself. -- David Kastrup

Re: indent-ly

in which this can happen. It is actually just #{ IIRC. So a standard formatting engine can only be written inside LilyPond, or at least using LilyPond to generate metadata describing the structure of the input. I think that view is overly pessimistic. -- David Kastrup

Re: Codas / Trios

/Repeats#Repeats Scroll down to positioning segno and coda. Personally, I find it appalling that you have to plaster together markup like that without any predefined makros. In particular since this will not be reflected in the MIDI output. -- David Kastrup

Re: website so close, and yet so far

by other means which can be a problem if hand-writing Lilypond code is part of the project workflow (because of individual problem solutions or external contributors). It also works quite worse with version control systems than hand-written input. -- David Kastrup

Re: Codas / Trios

repeats, and in particular with accordions, it is common to have different registers (=midi instruments?) and octavations on different repeats. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Instrument name on second page

in the shuffle. This is what I've got so far for a 7 piece dixieland band: \book{ \header {instrumentName = Trombone } I use just instrument here. instrumentName is used in staffs. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user

Re: do you care about bug reports?

are you going to do if somebody complains about wrong Chinese ligatures? There may be somebody able to understand and fix the bug. And there might be somebody able to do this in a year when he joins the developers and sees the report in the bug database. -- David Kastrup

Re: Lyrics and repeats

think that repeat alternatives are doing far too little context matching work currently. Most should really be automatic. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Inline score inside markup - bugs in music alignment

in length. I would always prefer avoiding music line breaks in text. To make this work not just by accident, ragged-right is better to use than justified text. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

Re: Inline score inside markup - bugs in music alignment

satisfactory output. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Inline score inside markup - bugs in music alignment

Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: I happen to be the author of a LaTeX style file that typesets footnotes, [...] BTW, it is called `bigfoot', and is one of the most ingenious LaTeX packages IMHO. Its documentation is lousy. -- David Kastrup

Re: Inline score inside markup - bugs in music alignment

Jiri Zurek (Prague) zu...@ics.cas.cz writes: David Kastrup wrote: I happen to be the author of a LaTeX style file that typesets footnotes, This is EXCELLENT. Do you know that http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-lilyp...@gnu.org/msg13795.html I offered sponsorship for someone who would built

Re: Coloring note heads by pitch

stuff left by somebody on an abandoned student account. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: lilypond 2.13.7 is released

their doctorate. Ok, so chicken and cover. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Feathered beams with tuplet fractions

( bf cs bs as bs as g fs g } } fs4) -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: slurs and ties

instead. Feature request for tracker? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: lilypond 2.13.7 is released

, minus the original posting) made any sense, 0.2 cents was a lot of money. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Tie doesn't tie

to start guessing the right \voiceOne and similar settings in order to have the invisible notes sit on the same place as the visible ones. An artificial voice with invisible notes is pretty solidly pointing to missing functionality. -- David Kastrup

Re: tie engraver in staff? (Re: Tie doesn't tie)

that would help is a concept of graceful degradation. With that I mean that the Tie_engraver in a voice may declare I give up, and _if_ (and only if) one happens to have a Tie_engraver in the Staff, it will then get control in order to also place the tie. -- David Kastrup

Re: Orphaned and widowed lines in \markuplines

as possible. Quite contrary: it was about stacking less than possible if it avoids ugly results. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: modern accidentals rule

directions should match and the tie/slur should extend to the bar line rather than trigger an error). -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

on others' manual help. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: A barline half length long

something with ly:make-simple-closure, but it escapes me at the moment. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

, this situation is awkward, impeding and dissatisfactory. For others, it is reason to go away. I don't see that anything is gained for chastising me for my impression. That is merely shooting the messenger. Actually, more than the messenger. -- David Kastrup

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

the messenger. Actually, more than the messenger. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

see that anything is gained for chastising me for my impression. That is merely shooting the messenger. Actually, more than the messenger. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

, and the reaction please change it yourself is not addressing the topic at all. It also delivers the impression that the current state is basically my fault and responsibility, and nothing needs to be done about it that I don't do myself. -- David Kastrup

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:11:26PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: But if there is roadmap, design and vision, I have not yet been able to find it in the obvious places I have been looking for. The information for developers is the CG

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

can't make their own code as simple and self-contained (or see existing real code much uglier), that is an incentive for improving the state of their and preexisting real code. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http

Re: Quit

. It is next to impossible to get people to do what you want by merely stating that it is important. I can't that task before having a clue. I can coax code to do what I want it to do eventually. But I can't coax code into doing things like they were _intended_ to be done. -- David Kastrup

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

that kind of risk, never mind how much of a spoilsport that may make them. I plead guilty to having noticed the contributor's guide rather late into my rants. But it does not particularly help that the mailing list conversations avoid pronouncing its full name like it were Youknowwho. -- David Kastrup

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Lilypond is supposed to be a music typesetter. Music in, glyph placement out. If I have to do the typesetting myself, placing glyphs rather than specifying musical content, Lilypond is not doing its job. This is absolutely true. The objective *is* to make

Re: documentation formats

-by-example. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: documentation formats

code without changing my editing window. Yes, it is a life-saver for working with Lilypond with me. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

on the developer list. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

to be compiled in. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl writes: Op donderdag 12-11-2009 om 08:41 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef David Kastrup: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes: _Addressing_ the actual problems is definitely more suitably done on the developer list. So what are the actual problems

Re: developers developers developers

about it, they will do a better job than you can. Lilypond is a batch processing system. You can use whatever editor you like with it. If there are people who like Emacs, that does not change Lilypond to the better or worse. -- David Kastrup

Re: developers developers developers

with. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: developers developers developers

to participate even in LilyPondTool. All others participate with LilyPondTool? That's actually an absolutely amazing quota. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

to scare more Windows users than Linux/Unix/etc. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

, the principal programmers are casual users at best, since they are mostly, well programmers. That often leads to situations like your application slows down unbearably on million-line files -- million lines? for real? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

the stampede. They don't get along with each other and spend all their time working on Emacs, anyway. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: developers developers developers

has this wonderful feature. As does M-x grep RET in Emacs. And it's variants like M-x grep-find RET and similar. But Emacs can also navigate using tags tables, which is more direct and makes it easier to find definitions. -- David Kastrup

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

Jesús Guillermo Andrade gandr...@usermail.com writes: El 12/11/2009, a las 04:11 a.m., David Kastrup escribió: Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl writes: As a new contributor/developer, by using a different, and a particular unfriendly platform for free software

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes: On Nov 12, 2009, at 2:11 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Op donderdag 12-11-2009 om 08:41 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef David Kastrup: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes: _Addressing_ the actual problems is definitely more suitably done

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

Jesús Guillermo Andrade gandr...@usermail.com writes: El 12/11/2009, a las 02:17 p.m., David Kastrup escribió: And that's the main point: does the job. The one thing Emacs Lisp has going over Common Lisp that it is a reasonably limited language to learn in comparison. Which is a nuisance

Re: No string for pitch #Pitch

. Any ideas? Sounds like Lilypond is running out of strings for the given chords. Just a wild guess. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Beginner's questions

a is expected here. Additional precision: I've a relative c'' at the beginning Which would not work if you _did_ use italiano.ly. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: ottava: remove dashed line

this work automatically, so that one can use the same source for different styles of ottavation. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: ottava: remove dashed line

Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes: Am Freitag, 20. November 2009 18:47:11 schrieb David Kastrup: It is customary to write loco then when the ottavation ends. Probably easy to do this manually, though, but might be nice to have this work automatically, so that one can use

\set vs \override

of \override is also to change the value, and \once\override very obviously changes behavior over time while interpreting music. Maybe I am dense. Can somebody clarify? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http

Re: \set vs \override

Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 17:22 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: There is a chapter set vs override in the manual. I am afraid that I fail to grasp the difference from the chapter. [...] If the element description is a _special_ type of context property

Re: \set vs \override

are conceptually the same, it is easier to have commands that are conceptually the same. Even if they are just named \setgrob and \setcontext or so. But calling them \set and \override does not give the impression that they are used for different kinds of data, but for different kinds of action. -- David

Re: \set vs \override

Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:31 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: And I am arrogant enough to believe that if I don't understand a design decision after a few days of trying, it is likely that ultimately a lot of people other than myself

Re: \set vs \override

Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se writes: Joe Neeman wrote: On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 22:45 +, Graham Percival wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:31:40PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: I don't see a good rationale why \set, \override, \revert, \tweak should not work on the same

Re: \set vs \override

Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se writes: David Kastrup wrote: We used to have the same command for setting both context and object properties, see http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/topdocs/out-www/NEWS.html I read The syntax for setting properties has been

Re: \set vs \override

Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:56 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Right now I don't have the necessary clue level.  Merely a gut hunch. Why dont you invest some time to find out how it really works, What do you think I am doing? Reading

Re: \set vs \override

Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk writes: David Kastrup wrote: I will not doctor the documentation before I consider myself having a clue. And I am nowhere near that yet. From the bread-crumb trail of your posts on the various lists, it looks like you're exploring a similar set of avenues I

Re: \set vs \override

Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:55 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:56 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Right now I don't have the necessary clue level.  Merely a gut hunch

Re: \set vs \override

Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: * \override and \revert manipulate the defaults stored in said context property, pushing and popping values off the alist. This concise hint is wagonloads clearer than what

Re: another problem with partcombine

e c } lower = \relative c' {   c4 r2 } all ={  \new Staff { \partcombine \upper \lower  } } \score { \all  } That does not sound like you want the parts combined after all. Maybe something like { \upper } \\ { \lower } is what you want rather than \partcombine \upper \lower ? -- David

Re: \set vs \override

to stack closures in that manner might be convenient in other cases as well. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: \set vs \override

Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:50 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Sigh.  I guess I give up.  Yes, I understood that.  Pretty much from the get-go, and also from the manual.  The unanswered question is _why_ you want only _one_ of the two different

Re: number of systems on a3 page

to show the effect. If ragged-bottem is set to ##f the systems are stretched out as expected, but I need to fit more than 8 systems on one page. Any ideas? With the current developer version (2.13.9 or so), there are 12 systems per page with your input file. -- David Kastrup

Re: Compiling times on this file

. Browser is also good for eating memory. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: staffname not shown

/lilypond-user -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Messed up display of images in Emacs info reader

))) (put-text-property start (point) 'invisible t) (set-buffer-modified-p nil))) -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: tom tom staff

is 0 and which is 2? Or will the other line be -2? I must know this to ensure correct placement of percussion clef and notes. Wouldn't trying it out help? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

Re: tom tom staff

Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 07:50:32AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng hhpmu...@163.com writes: Then here's a visual problem: When I set the line-count to 3, will the clef position 0 be the middle line? Wouldn't trying it out

Re: parallelMusic and repeat

that gets moved into core needs to get this template expanded into the test suite, and every test failure is automatically a bug. Maybe GLISS could also be about processes for channeling the let's just hack something approximately working into Lilypond urge. -- David Kastrup

Re: parallelMusic and repeat

treat a number of structures and fold them into voices. I'll try to figure out something tomorrow. That does not make the use of \parallelMusic a better idea. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

Re: parallelMusic and repeat

Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: -Eluze elu...@gmail.com writes: i think \parallelMusic is just thought for a quick and easy input - without sophisticated structuring of a piece! In my personal opinion, tools of quick and easy nature that do not fit well

Re: parallelMusic and repeat

Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de writes: -Eluze elu...@gmail.com writes: i think \parallelMusic is just thought for a quick and easy input - without sophisticated structuring of a piece! Although it's an example of a functionality

Re: parallelMusic and repeat

Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de writes: Standardization does not mean let's call the current inconsistent ad-hoc behavior standard. A standard needs to make sense of its own, not just be a side-effect of a particular

Re: triple stop warnings

have utterly no idea why you would want to specify 2., but remove the resulting dot. Thanks -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: triple stop warnings

it explicitly notated and all in the same voice. There are dots on the half notes. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: triple stop warnings

Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes: Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 08:35:24 schrieb David Kastrup: Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com writes: Also for the other responses, sorry if I didn't explain it very well. This is the only way I've seen triple (and quadruple) stops notated

Re: triple stop warnings

= ##t c4*3 e g2. } } This appears to do the right thing. Now if one finds some tweaks that will also reassure Lilypond that this is the right thing, that might be perfect. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user

Re: Decrescendo on a single note

Tom Dickson bomb...@bombcar.com writes: I have a piece that has a decrescendo over the last note - what's the best way to set this? I tried c\ \! but it doesn't work. Is the only option to use a s1? c\ s*0\! might work. Did not test it, though. -- David Kastrup

Re: GUI

will be the fastest leading to the average unsuspecting user writing and processing their first Michael row the boat ashore kind of file. I have no good answer for that. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

Re: GUI

. :) But it is mostly wrong since the graphical programs usually don't allow editing existing input at all, but rather _generate_ or export Lilypond input. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: GUI

typesetting. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: GUI

or didn't want to use it. Looks like the proper starting point would be an instructional video then. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Tacet

smalltalk. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: which encoding for umlaute

readily have told you that. The result works for me after replacing all non-breakable spaces (probably inserted by your newsreader) with normal ones. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: NoteColumn shift in one voice affects dot position in another voice

to the last column is large), displacing a dot from its note costs corresponding to the displacement, least total cost is taken. Something like that. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: Good luck, Valentin

not get sidetracked to a degree where the task for which the tool was built got left on the wayside. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Good luck, Valentin

responsible for the PDFTeX bug reports concerning output files of more than 2GB size. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Good luck, Valentin

of the PDF file — as you note, there are many larger PDFs out there — but the size of the *LILYPOND-GENERATED* PDF. I would not mind having smaller output created. With probably a thousand elements per page, I am not sure that there is that much leeway, however. -- David Kastrup

Re: Good luck, Valentin

). -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

How can I let the ambitus engraver ignore the key signature?

, cis, \key h \major h,, dis, fis, h,, d, fis, h,, dis, a, h,, d, gis, \key fis \major fis, ais, cis, fis, a, cis, fis, ais, e, fis, a, dis, } -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: How can I let the ambitus engraver ignore the key signature?

M Watts zwy648...@gmail.com writes: David Kastrup wrote: Hi, the following is an excerpt from a systematic listing of accordion chords with different ambitus. The ambitus engraver should not heed the first (arbitrary) key signature but rather engrave as though we were in c major. How do I

Re: How can I let the ambitus engraver ignore the key signature?

David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: M Watts zwy648...@gmail.com writes: David Kastrup wrote: Hi, the following is an excerpt from a systematic listing of accordion chords with different ambitus. The ambitus engraver should not heed the first (arbitrary) key signature but rather engrave

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >