On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Zhenqiang Chen
zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org wrote:
zlib is used to build binutils, which is built before GCC.
If you install a 32-bit binary toolchain on 64-bit system, you might
have link error. By default, there is no 32-bit zlib on 64-bit system.
You have to
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Zhenqiang Chen
zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org wrote:
mkedwards has these scripted up at:
https://github.com/mkedwards/crosstool-ng/tree/master/scripts/build/companion_libs
We should add these in upstream. I'd rather focus on GCC first, get
that out as a
Hi there. Connect is just around the corner. Have a look at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/Q4.11Plans
for a summary of the toolchain sessions and hacking topics.
It would be great to have kernel and OCTO input in the ARM STM driver,
Kernel debugging, and KVM sessions.
--
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Bruno Niklaus niklaus.br...@gmail.com wrote:
hi@all
i try to build the linaro-gcc on a ubuntu host 11.10 32 bit for a cortex a9.
but it doenst build to the end.
this is the first time ever i try to build a toolchain on my own, so excuse
me if its just a
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Zhenqiang Chen
zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org wrote:
Summary:
* Exercise crosstool-ng and summarize the gaps.
Details:
* Exercise crosstool-ng
(1) Sync with lp:~linaro-toolchain-dev/crosstool-ng/linaro.
(2) Try to config linux-host-baremental-target an
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
(short week: 4 days)
RAG:
Red:
Amber:
Green: blog started :-) http://translatedcode.wordpress.com/
Nice. Could you add it to planet.linaro.org?
https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/PlanetLinaro
-- Michael
Following on from last night's performance call, I had a look at how
64 bit integer operations are mapped to NEON instructions. The
summary is:
* add - fine
* subtract - fine
* bitwise and - fine
* bitwise or - fine
* bitwise xor - fine
* multiply - can't as the instruction tops out at 32
...and here's the missing test case.
-- Michael
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
Following on from last night's performance call, I had a look at how
64 bit integer operations are mapped to NEON instructions. The
summary is:
* add - fine
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:12 AM, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote:
I've just tried rerunning some benchmarks on my panda, which I
reinstalled recently and am getting
some odd behaviour:
The kernel is 3.0.0-1404-linaro-lt-omap
For example:
simple_strlen: ,102400, loops of ,62,
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2011.10
release of both Linaro GCC 4.6 and Linaro GCC 4.5.
Linaro GCC 4.6 2011.10 is the eighth release in the 4.6 series. Based
off the latest GCC 4.6.1+svn179483, it contains a range of vectoriser
performance improvements and
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org writes:
limits-fndefn.c takes an impressively long time to run. On an idle
machine, -O3 -g -c takes 17:31 and -O2 -g -c takes The test already
has a dg-timeout-factor
Here's my summary from Monday's meeting on the harder parts of binary
toolchains.
Using a 4.6 compiler against a 4.5 based sysroot such as Natty:
* libgcc and libstdc++ are part of the compiler
* The compiler expects features that are in the corresponding runtime
* You can't reliably run or
Saw this on the linaro-multimedia list:
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-multimedia/2011-September/74.html
libpng spends a significant amount of time in memcpy(). This might
tie in with Ramana's investigation or the unaligned access work by
allowing more memcpy()s to be inlined.
--
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote:
W dniu 16.09.2011 04:56, Michael Hope pisze:
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2011.09
release of both Linaro GCC 4.6 and Linaro GCC 4.5.
Linaro GCC 4.6 2011.09-1
Måns pointed me at the IDCT throughput test that's included with
libav. I've written up a page on how to build and run it at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/LibAvDCT
Included are results with and without the vectoriser. In all cases
the vectoriser improves things, including
(bouncing to linaro-dev as it's generally interesting)
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at some of the perf regressions we've been seeing
these days in an attempt to understand what's going on in these cases.
Hi there. The 2011.09 release has been spun and is testing up well.
The 4.5 and 4.6 branches are now open so feel free to commit any
approved patches.
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Mounir Bsaibes
mounir.bsai...@linaro.org wrote:
Release Management needs the list of the the blueprints that will be
delivered this month.
For each bp, they want a Headline and Acceptance criteria. The Headline is a
statement to include in the Monthly release
For reference, trunk r178719 fails to build in an A9 or ARMv5 configuration:
http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/gcc-4.7~svn178719/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild181-ursa4-cortexa9r1/
The error is:
/scratch/cbuild/slave/slaves/ursa4/gcc-4.7~svn178719/gcc/default/build/./prev-gcc/g++
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Michael K. Edwards
m.k.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I should be able to equip you soon with a web browsing benchmark based
on Firefox's Talos suite (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos).
The most representative test (tp5) unfortunately depends on a data set
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
* Looked at why the backport of lp823708-4.5 retriggered the same
bootstrap failure that Chung-Lin's patch did. Haven't been able
to reproduce yet.
Feel free to use leo1 and leo2. A make -j2 speeds
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:32 PM, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote:
On 5 September 2011 04:21, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/strings-performance/sizes
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org writes:
While out benchmarking today, I ran across code similar to this:
int *a;
int *b;
int *c;
const int ad[320];
const int bd[320];
const int cd[320];
void fill
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:51 AM, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Michael,
I've just committed a pair of memcpy's into src/linaro-a9 - memcpy.S
that is armv7
and memcpy-hybrid.S that is a Neon hybrid which uses neon for non-aligned
cases
and for large (128K or larger)
While out benchmarking today, I ran across code similar to this:
int *a;
int *b;
int *c;
const int ad[320];
const int bd[320];
const int cd[320];
void fill()
{
for (int i = 0; i 320; i++)
{
a[i] = ad[i];
b[i] = bd[i];
c[i] = cd[i];
}
}
I was surprised and happy to
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Amit Kucheria
amit.kuche...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
On 22 August 2011 13:35, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Ramana
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi
Some time ago we agreed that not everyone here uses Ubuntu distribution
and decided to provide so called 'generic linux' cross toolchain.
Recently I managed to get it done and now need brave testers to
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
bernhard.rosenkran...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
is the Linaro toolchain (esp. gcc) useful on x86/x86_64, or is an
attempt to use the Linaro toolchain with such a target just asking for
trouble?
(No, I'm not secretly an Intel spy ;) Just
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org writes:
I put a build harness around libav and gathered some profiling data. See:
bzr branch lp:~linaro-toolchain-dev/+junk/libav-suite
It includes a Makefile
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org writes:
I put a build harness around libav and gathered some profiling data. See:
bzr
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Richard Earnshaw
richard.earns...@arm.com wrote:
I was just browsing libgmp this afternoon and noticed that it really
could do with an overhaul to support recent ARM chips.
The ARM code seems to have been written for StrongARM; which is now
almost obsolete
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2011.08
release of both Linaro GCC 4.6 and Linaro GCC 4.5.
Linaro GCC 4.6 2011.08 is the sixth release in the 4.6 series. Based
off the latest GCC 4.6.1+svn177703, it focuses on fixing bugs found
during the Android integration and in
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having real trouble here :(
I just can't seem to get bzr to work! I've tried to branch gcc-linaro/4.6
again and again
Hi there. I've written up the standard configurations that we use to
build and test Linaro GCC:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Configurations/GCC
It includes such things as flags, libraries, and sysroots. You might
find it useful to see what we're testing or, if new to
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 August 2011 05:25, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi there. This is a heads-up that the name of the Toolchain group
releases will change slightly with next weeks release. We're dropping
Hi there. This is a heads-up that the name of the Toolchain group
releases will change slightly with next weeks release. We're dropping
the respin suffix (the -0) to line up with the new whole of Linaro
naming convention.
What was:
gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.xx-0.tar.bz2
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
bernhard.rosenkran...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
ld in the current (4.6-2011.07-0-8-2011-07-25_12-42-06) Android
toolchain fails to link uboot:
arm-eabi-ld:
Hi there. We had a brainstorm this afternoon about areas QEMU could
go into in the future. My pigeon-scratchings are at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Q3.11/QEMUFutures
See also:
https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/RoadmapIdeas#QEMU_everywhere
-- Michael
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release of
both Linaro GCC 4.6 and Linaro GCC 4.5.
Linaro GCC 4.6 is the fifth release in the 4.6 series. Based off the latest
GCC 4.6.1+svn175677, it adds new optimisations and vectoriser improvements.
Interesting changes include:
*
Hi there. The 2011.07 release has been spun and is testing up well.
The 4.5 and 4.6 branches are now open so feel free to commit any
approved patches.
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mar...@juszkiewicz.com.pl wrote:
Hi
Linaro backport PPA [1] got updated to latest versions of armel cross
toolchains -- oneiric packages were used as a base.
What got changed:
- gcc 4.4 was updated to 4.4.6-3ubuntu1
- gcc 4.5 was updated
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote:
On czw, 2011-06-16 at 19:48 +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
Ubuntu armel and armhf cross compilers, CSL 2011.03-42 have same
problem.
Compiled fine with gcc 4.3 from Poky toolchain. Same with Emdebian
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Paolo Pisati p.pis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/08/2011 12:29 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
Hi Paolo. Could you please treat this as an application problem and
try to track it down further? It would be great if you could track it
down to an individual function
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
== This week ==
* Experimented more with A8 and A9 tuning for auto inc/dec addresses.
* More work on the auto inc/dec pass itself.
* Compared the assembly output in the GCC testsuite for a range
of
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Paolo Pisati
paolo.pis...@canonical.com wrote:
It all started with this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791552
basically, switching toolchain from 4.5 to 4.6, somehow broke usb on omap3.
This morning i tested with linux-linaro-natty:
I've done a quick write-up on the (almost) continious builds done in
the toolchain group:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Builds
It's high level and includes things like what branches we watch, how
often they get built, where the results go, and how things like
testsuite results are
The toolchain build system now records the change in testsuite results
between builds. For example:
Current trunk and the one built a week ago on x86_64:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-4.7~svn174684/logs/x86_64-maverick-cbuild123-crucis-x86_64r1/testsuite-diff.txt
GDB trunk and the one
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/29 Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org:
Hi,
The Linaro Team is pleased to announce the release of Linaro 11.05.
11.05 is the second public release that brings together the huge amount of
engineering effort that has
Hi Richard, Ramana. FYI, trunk currently fails to bootstrap on ARM:
../../../gcc-4.7~/libcpp/expr.c: In function 'cpp_num_sign_extend':
../../../gcc-4.7~/libcpp/expr.c:1321:1: error: could not split insn
(insn:TI 53 49 92 6 (set (reg:DI 10 sl [orig:151 num$high ] [151])
(ior:DI (not:DI
Linked below are the draft slides for next week's toolchain public
plan review. A copy is at:
http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/linaro-toolchain--public-plan-review.pdf
The copy with all slides and the notes pages is at:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Ira Rosen i...@il.ibm.com wrote:
At the moment good 'ol
CoreMark is worse with -O3 -omfpu=neon...
It maybe worth to try -fvect-cost-model.
Worse again I'm afraid. -O3 -mfpu=neon scores 99 % of -O3. -O3
-mfpu=neon -fvect-cost-model scores 96 %.
-- Michael
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org writes:
How about also 'Ensure vectorised code doesn't regress over
non-vectorised code'? The goal would be for 90 % of benchmarks to not
regress and 99 % to regress
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Ulrich Weigand
ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi there. The next two weeks is where we take the technical topics
from the TSC and the discussions had during the summit and turn them
into the concrete engineering
Hi everyone. Welcome to Budapest. The schedule is at:
http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-o/track/linaro-toolchain/
and should be pretty solid now. The NEON and strings ones may change
to a room with a conference line, but we'll see. Thursday and Friday
are mostly clear.
Be at the hotel by 8:45.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Yuping Luo yplu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying add usb gadget mass storage to uboot , and got run-time
abortion on usbmsd.c with the default u-boot Os option. I use linaro
2011.03 4.5.3 version, and my trials as following:
1) During debugging , I
Hi there. The toolchain session blueprints for the summit are now up
on Launchpad:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain?searchtext=toolchain-o
You can check out the schedule here:
http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-o/track/linaro-toolchain/
although it's really only for show at the
Hi Andrew. I uploaded the wrong preprocessed source to the GCC
bugzilla entry. It included the __attribute__((noinline)) workaround
which hides the problem.
I've fixed that and re-attached the correct version. The assembly
version contains the following:
.size wm8974_pcm_hw_params,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Andrew Stubbs
andrew.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 26/04/11 03:39, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
But I digress. This is just to say that gcc shouldn't pull
__aeabi_uldivmod in this case because:
There isn't a library call (or instruction) for a straight 'mod'
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/26 Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com:
Hi Michael,
2011/4/26 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org:
Hi Barry. I think the toolchain is operating correctly here. The
current version recognises a divide followed by a modulo
another kernel
construct to prevent the optimisation from happening.
Googling around brought up this thread:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/965262
-- Michael
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
2011/4/26 Michael Hope michael.h
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of both Linaro GCC 4.5 and Linaro GCC 4.6.
Linaro GCC 4.5 2011.04 is the ninth release in the 4.5 series. Based
off the latest
GCC 4.5.2+svn171921, it adds new optimisations, support for Android,
and fixes for many of the
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of Linaro GDB 7.2.
Linaro GDB 7.2 2011.04 is the fifth release in the 7.2 series. Based
off the latest GDB 7.2, it includes a number of ARM-focused bug fixes.
This release fixes:
* LP: #684218 Failure to backtrace out of
I've fixed up the testcompare pages on ex.seabright.co.nz. It was
getting confused by parallel testsuite runs and couldn't handle the
results jumping about. I've also added a filter to buildlog that does
a prefix match. Going to:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog/gcc-linaro
shows
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:39 AM, AJ ONeal coola...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm compiling an application built with TI's DVSDK 3 *[0].
/home/user/ti/dvsdk/dvsdk_3_01_00_10/linuxutils_2_25_02_08/packages/ti/sdo/linuxutils/cmem/lib/cmem.a470MV(cmem.o470MV):(.ARM.exidx+0x0):
undefined reference to
at 3:06 PM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:39 AM, AJ ONeal coola...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm compiling an application built with TI's DVSDK 3 *[0].
/home/user/ti/dvsdk/dvsdk_3_01_00_10/linuxutils_2_25_02_08/packages/ti/sdo/linuxutils/cmem/lib
That's good work. Thanks Chung-Lin. Test cases and all!
-- Michael
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi, I've just pushed a merge of the current upstream patches for
resolving the CoreMark regressions.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi there. I ran a build of gcc-linaro-4.5+bzr99491 on ursa1 through 4
to see if there was any difference in build machines. The following
tests had different results:
* gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-structnest.c
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org writes:
Hi there. Mounir and I have been looking at the work for next cycle.
A summary spreadsheet with notes is available here:
https://spreadsheets0.google.com/ccc
Hi everyone. The conference code for today's call is 5238686884. The
dial in numbers are the same as the weekly meeting. See:
http://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
Hi there. Mounir and I have been looking at the work for next cycle.
A summary spreadsheet with notes is available here:
https://spreadsheets0.google.com/ccc?key=ty1c-H56f0GxnL1Hk9LCmRg
I'm very interested in feedback, especially on the time estimates and
extra topics we should suggest to the
Dave, I see strlen in the backtrace. Could you have a look at this?
-- Michael
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jani Monoses j...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Public bug reported:
FTBFS on armel
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Retried the Android build with a view to integrating Android support in
Linaro GCC 4.5 (4.6 should already support it). Eventually, after
downloading many different git repositories and branches, and maxing out the
Hi there. The new porter boxes are now available for use. See:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Hardware
for details.
These are PandaBoards with 768 MB of memory, a USB HDD, and a good
internet connection. They can be used for day to day jobs like
building programs, triaging
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:31:45PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
Linaro GCC 4.5 releases vs our first:
http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/releases-o3-vs-gcc-linaro-4.5-2010.08-1.png
Linaro GCC 4.5 builds
toolchain and
seeing if they work in this 4.5.2 linaro one...)
Thanks,
Diane
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Diane Holt holt.di...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news is, my build completed successfully, once I put those
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/30 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org:
I couldn't reproduce this, sorry. I built nbench using
gcc-linaro-4.5-2011.03-0 using both -O3 -mtune=cortex-a9
-mfpu=vfpv3-d16 and -O3 -mtune=cortex-a9 -mfpu=neon and in both
The Bazaar team have been working on improving the performance of bzr
on the gcc-linaro tree. Here's how long the steps take on my machine
with the current 2.4 development version:
Update tip before branching:
bzr pull 20.4 s (no revisions)
Make the branch:
bzr branch --hardlink 4.5
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Diane Holt holt.di...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news is, my build completed successfully, once I put those extra
libs in /usr/lib and updated my PATH to include the bin in the work area.
The bad news is, there are a number of utililties that this build doesn't
For reference. We know that the NEON intrinsics in GCC have issues.
I came across this page:
http://hilbert-space.de/?p=22
which has a colour to greyscale conversion done using intrinsics.
gcc-linaro-4.5-2011.03-0 does poorly through saving intermediate
values on the stack. The core of the
PM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
wrote:
The build got pretty far, but eventually failed with:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/ubuntu/work/build/gcc/libiberty/testsuite'
make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install'.
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/ubuntu/work/build/gcc
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Diane Holt holt.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Michael, that's the sort of thing I was hoping for. And it almost
worked :)
A great thing about Debian/Ubuntu is 'apt-get build-dep'. On recent
systems at least you can run 'apt-get build-dep gcc-snapshot' and have
Hi there. A reminder that today's call has shifted due to the
European daylight savings change. It's now at 0800 UTC which is 9 am
in the UK, 10 am in central Europe, and 10 am in Israel.
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Diane Holt holt.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I should have been more specific. Yes, a cross-compiler for ARM
(we're building for cortex-a8, which is why we're interested in the neon
optimizations). As I mentioned, I can't use the one that's available as a
Hi Barry. GCC can be switched at runtime by supplying -march=* and/or
-mcpu=* flags to the compiler, just as you have done below. The
'--with-arch=*' lines you see below set what GCC compiles to by
default.
Does your chip have a FPU? If not, it's probably the
--with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 line that's
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:07 AM, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:54:36 -0600, Mounir Bsaibes
mounir.bsai...@linaro.org wrote:
James, are you going to check on that and make a decision, whether it is ok
to change the mapping?
I will get back to you.
For
Dave did an investigation earlier in the year into Cortex-A9 and
RealView PBX support in QEMU. The write-up is available here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Outputs/QEMURealViewPBX
Dave and Peter: could you please review it?
I've now closed out the blueprint. I'd like to do
Here's a end-of-cycle write up for Versatile Express support in QEMU:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Outputs/QEMUVersatileExpress
Most of it is taken from Peter's page:
https://wiki.linaro.org/PeterMaydell/QemuVersatileExpress
which is the place to go if you want the current
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 11/03/11 22:54, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:31 PM, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org
mailto:james.wes...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:31:57 -0600, Mounir Bsaibes
LP: #731665 is a silent bad code generation bug at least on functions
which are empty except for inline assembly:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/731665
It was introduced in the shrink-wrap patch and is due to using an
uninitialised variable. Andrew, can you please
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Bahadir Balban bbal...@b-labs.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 15:02 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of Linaro QEMU 2011.03-1.
Linaro QEMU 2011.03-1 is the second release of qemu-linaro. Based
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Christian ANDERSSON2
christian.c.anders...@stericsson.com wrote:
Hello Linaro toolchain guys,
I have a few questions regarding GCC fully supporting the ARM Cortex M4,
I’m especially thinking of the additional DSP instructions and if these are
supported and
Services at ex.seabright.co.nz are back up.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi there. We've had an earthquake. Family and friends are fine but i'll be
unavailable for a few days. Services on ex.seabright.co.nz are down. I'll
cancel Wednesdays
Hi there. We've had an earthquake. Family and friends are fine but i'll be
unavailable for a few days. Services on ex.seabright.co.nz are down. I'll
cancel Wednesdays standup call.
See you soon,
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of both Linaro GCC 4.4 and Linaro GCC 4.5.
Linaro GCC 4.5 is the seventh release in the 4.5 series. Based off the
latest GCC 4.5.2, it includes many ARM-focused performance
improvements and bug fixes.
Interesting changes
Hi there. As discussed on Monday, I've shifted today's standup call
an hour earlier to 1700 UTC. See you then!
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
I just stumbled across this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.debugging.openocd.devel/15584
And the mentioned clock issue seems to be fixed here:
I've had a go with running the QEMU release candidate. Short story is
that it boots to a prompt against the 11.05 alpha2 release so I'm
happy.
It was a messy road so I've written up my train of though here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/QEMU
Note that if you follow the
Just a reminder that the dial-in numbers for today's and all future
calls has changed. See:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings
for the new list. I'll hang out on IRC just before the meeting to
help the lost...
-- Michael
___
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:03 AM, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote:
On 26 January 2011 12:12, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Vijay,
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Vijay Kilari vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Dave,
Thanks for this info.
I have few more
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
I assume we're moving the toolchain calls over to the
new confcall numbers -- but just to check, are we doing
so for this Wednesday's status call? The calendar
entry still has the old numbers...
Let's keep this
201 - 300 of 352 matches
Mail list logo
