Please refer to:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/whatsnew.html
... for the 2008-07-04 change summary:
New experimental (unsupported) package kuli 1.0.0:
userspace sample demonstrating KVM usage for Linux on System z
* end
Hi All
Our current disk layout has specific mount points with MOD 9's behind ,
we now need more space on one specific mount point,
Is it possible to turn this mount point into a LVM configuration without
moving the data off ?.
Looking at the doco , the current plan would be to move all the data
Ceruti, Gerard G wrote:
Hi All
Our current disk layout has specific mount points with MOD 9's behind ,
we now need more space on one specific mount point,
Is it possible to turn this mount point into a LVM configuration without
moving the data off ?.
Looking at the doco , the current plan
We're in the process of reorganizing our downloads. The location for
downloading SWAPGEN has moved to:
http://download.sinenomine.net/swapgen/
The explanatory material on the old page will be revised and expanded to
address some of the comments from the last few weeks.
If you have
In preparing some z/VM course material, I found myself having to define
z/VM system management. It turns out that you have:
- Provisioning (real and virtual)
We are utilizing Shared-Root, therefore we picked up various
scripts and modified as needed ( if any ).
- Human operations (IPL,
Hi mark
I was looking to just move/grow the one mount point only, short term I will
create specific mount points with a new Mod 9 behind it, the next install I
will go LVM from the start.
Thanks
Regards
Gerard Ceruti
may the 'z' be with you
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 11:30 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Security (authentication, authorization, audit)
Directory only.
(sigh) This means you cannot audit the activites of a virtual machine and
your passwords are stored in cleartext. Your backups contain the same
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:54 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik N Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
I would therefor encourage people to choose file systems based on
their relative merits, rather than concerns over continued
development.
By and large, I agree with what you said.
Can someone point me to documentation on creating a local patch server ?
Thanks.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
At 12:10 PM 7/8/2008, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 11:30 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Security (authentication, authorization, audit)
Directory only.
(sigh) This means you cannot audit the activites of a virtual machine and
your passwords are stored in
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:44 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Levy, Alan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone point me to documentation on creating a local patch server ?
For which distribution? If SLES, then look at
http://www.zjournal.com/index.cfm?section=articleaid=992 although you
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:38 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ceruti, Gerard G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Is it possible to turn this mount point into a LVM configuration without
moving the data off ?.
Looking at the doco , the current plan would be to move all the data off
the mount
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 12:47 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THANX! I know but you do with what you have. Backups go thru a
hipersocket from MFL/z/VM to z/OS.
You do with what you have as long as you have a Get Out Of Jail Free card
in your pocket. That is, a management-approved
Thanks for the info.
In the yup config file, how do you specify multiple architectures (sles9
and 10), subversions (sp1, sp2, etc), directories (sles9, sles10), etc.
In your example, you only specify sles10 sp1
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:06 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Levy, Alan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the info.
In the yup config file, how do you specify multiple architectures (sles9
and 10), subversions (sp1, sp2, etc), directories (sles9, sles10), etc.
In your example, you
On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Mark Post wrote:
Adam Thornton had at least once instance where reiserfs ate his data
on a system under heavy load. All in all, enough to make someone
running a business to worry.
Much worse: it ate a customer's data.
Suffice it to say, I no longer use or
For a while, there was a recommendation for reiser, perhaps back in SLES 8 or
so.
But then, I started seeing recommendations for EXT3, which now has been my FS
of choice in SLES 9 and SLES 10.
When I reviewed the decision making process, I concluded that EXT3 was just
fine for what I want at
At 01:00 PM 7/8/2008, you wrote:
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 12:47 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THANX! I know but you do with what you have. Backups go thru a
hipersocket from MFL/z/VM to z/OS.
You do with what you have as long as you have a Get Out Of Jail Free card
in your
The reason to recommend reiser is performance, and in fact, ext2 gives
much better performance. It just isn't journaled. As I said, you
should certainly pick your filesystem based on your needs. In big
business, data integrity is the name of the game, since clients hate
it when you lose their
In that case, the next time I need a file system that will corrupt my
data at blazing speed, I'll pick reiserfs.
Jon
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 03:05 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanx Alan. Looks like I need to do some reading on NPIV. By the
way, I'm pretty sure, thos you have me second guessing, that if you
have several chpds on a frame, they all have the same WWPN which
comes from the
Michael MacIsaac wrote:
I tried to categorize what's available today into 4 main areas (I
apologize if I your software is not on the list, or if it listed as Dead
or dying but is not. I do not also plan to address performance
management). Here is the survey:
I use RHN Satellite for my
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 09:10 EDT, Shawn Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What is your greatest need in z/VM and Linux systems management? :
Bare metal provisioning. I'd like to provision Linux guests entirely
through the web -- allocate all resources (hipersockets, DASD,
everything), have
23 matches
Mail list logo
