Re: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Perry
R P Herrold wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ lsb_release -a LSB Version: \ :core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch Distributor ID: CentOS Description:CentOS release 5.2 (Final) Release:5.2 Codename: Final [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ihlscoh2:~

Adrienne McGrory/UK/IBM is on vacation until Monday 8th September

2008-08-21 Thread Adrienne McGrory
I will be out of the office starting 21/08/2008 and will not return until 08/09/2008. I am out of the office on vacation returning on Monday 8th September, I will respond to your mail upon my return. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe

Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread van Sleeuwen, Berry
Hello list, For various tests we have created a group of new SLES10 guests. They all are just one 3390-3 volume so they can be cloned vary fast. But for some reason these machines sometimes switch the rootdisk, and therefore the entire filesystem, to readonly. I have tried a remount but that

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Perry
van Sleeuwen, Berry wrote: Hello list, For various tests we have created a group of new SLES10 guests. They all are just one 3390-3 volume so they can be cloned vary fast. If you use FLASHCOPY its fast regardless of DASD size. But for some reason these machines sometimes switch the

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Evans, Kevin R
Kinda makes one realize how long z/OS (or its ancestors) has been around, doesn't it? K -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Cox Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 2:46 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Distribution ages, was:

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread van Sleeuwen, Berry
Hello Mark, I meant fast in a way that the / is copied and then changes the hostname and IP address. No other fancy things, just a default environment for our support staff to play around with. The cloning process is loosly based on the cloning scripts from redp4322. The dasd is copied using

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Perry
van Sleeuwen, Berry wrote: Hello Mark, I meant fast in a way that the / is copied and then changes the hostname and IP address. No other fancy things, just a default environment for our support staff to play around with. The cloning process is loosly based on the cloning scripts from

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Perry
Evans, Kevin R wrote: Kinda makes one realize how long z/OS (or its ancestors) has been around, doesn't it? K And those of us who have worked on it too ;-) mark -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread van Sleeuwen, Berry
Hello Mark, I'll have to look into the flashcopy process but have not taken the time for it just yet. I guess one thing that would be wrong then is that I copy from the live system. So the source nlzlx920 is being copied from within the nlzlx920. But would that introduce IO errors on the

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Perry
van Sleeuwen, Berry wrote: Hello Mark, I'll have to look into the flashcopy process but have not taken the time for it just yet. I guess one thing that would be wrong then is that I copy from the live system. So the source nlzlx920 is being copied from within the nlzlx920. But would

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread James Tison
I guess one thing that would be wrong then is that I copy from the live system. I think that's your problem. You're copying from a likely unstable source (the live system might be writing to your volume as you attempt to copy it). Try shutting down the master (live) system with shutdown -h now

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread van Sleeuwen, Berry
Mark, Hm, I even didn't think about cache and what it could do to not only files but also to the filesystem itself. And even if I did I'd have guessed it would only mess up a logfile that isn't in use on the target anyway. We would start in a new machine with an empty /var/log/messages and

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Evans, Kevin R
Very true. I was feeling fine until you made me feel old this morning g. K -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Perry Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 6:25 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Stahr, Lea
When I installed VM BSEPP, I did not know if the idea of virtualization would last. Now I have a penguin ranch. Lea Stahr zVM, Linux and zLinux Administrator Navistar, Inc. 630-753-5445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread David Boyes
Just for a test, try switching the disk references in /etc/fstab to by-path syntax. I'm speculating here, but is it possible that there are some issues with correctly identifying which disk to use for /dev/dasda? -- For LINUX-390

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread Fargusson.Alan
Doing a dd on a device goes through the cache, so in this case the cache can't be the problem. Doing a dd on a live system however will not work. With or without a cache the filesystem can change while you are doing the copy, which would result in a bad root on the new system. I suspect that

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread John Summerfield
van Sleeuwen, Berry wrote: Mark, Hm, I even didn't think about cache and what it could do to not only files but also to the filesystem itself. And even if I did I'd have guessed it would only mess up a logfile that isn't in use on the target anyway. We would start in a new machine with an empty

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread John Summerfield
Evans, Kevin R wrote: Kinda makes one realize how long z/OS (or its ancestors) has been around, doesn't it? MFT? -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Evans, Kevin R
Yeppers. K -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Summerfield Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 11:59 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version Evans, Kevin R wrote: Kinda makes one realize how long

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Stahr, Lea
OS/VS1? Lea Stahr zVM, Linux and zLinux Administrator Navistar, Inc. 630-753-5445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Summerfield Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 10:59 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re:

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Evans, Kevin R
Nah, MFT and I don't even remember what release CICS was in (it was macro based, ya know DFHKC, DFHFC etc). Suffice it to say, there was no Restart/Recovery. This was when I was at Allied Breweries in England, we wrote our own (with a lot of IBM cooperation - we had several SEs on site back then)

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Stahr, Lea
MFT, MVT, then VS1.I was DOS/VS. Installed CICS 1.0 macro level to replace BTAM stuff like 40407F7F2DOLDER THAN THE HILLS. My new 360/30 had a DISK drive (no more TOS). DFHPCT, DFHPPT, DFHFCT, DFHTCT etc in CICS. Lea Stahr zVM, Linux and zLinux Administrator Navistar, Inc. 630-753-5445 [EMAIL

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Evans, Kevin R
Mine was 360/50 and a 360/30. When the 30 was replaced with a 2nd 50, we ran the 30 for about a month outside of the computer room (with no air conditioning other than opening the windows) with IBMs blessing. 2311 and 2314 disk drives with a paper tape reader that had a flippable table so that the

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Stahr, Lea
We had a check 13 pocket sorter that was connected to a printer that printed tapes. When the pocket filled, you pulled the tape and banded it to the checks. (1968) Our primary system was a card only 1401G. Lea Stahr zVM, Linux and zLinux Administrator Navistar, Inc. 630-753-5445 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Evans, Kevin R Mine was 360/50 and a 360/30. When the 30 was replaced with a 2nd 50, we ran the 30 for about a month outside of the computer room (with no air conditioning other than opening the windows) with IBMs blessing.

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Evans, Kevin R
This is getting like Monty Python g. One guy says When we were young, we used to eat the leather from our shoes. The other guy says You had shoes?. LOL Kevin -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stahr, Lea Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Evans, Kevin R
I'd like to sit in a tower and tell some people where to go g today. K -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 1:40 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

z/VM CP commands (LOGON)?

2008-08-21 Thread Tom Burkholder
z/VM'ers, After a few searches and actually scanning the CP commands and utilities manual, hopefully I can get some help with this z/VM related question. If I have a z/linux guest called ztrash01, I can logon to z/VM as ztrash01, IPL xxx, logon to Linux and shutdown -h now, and if I'm still

Re: z/VM CP commands (LOGON)?

2008-08-21 Thread Kris Van Hees
Check out the AUTOLOG and XAUTOLOG commands. Kris On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:10:56PM -0400, Tom Burkholder wrote: z/VM'ers, After a few searches and actually scanning the CP commands and utilities manual, hopefully I can get some help with this z/VM related question. If I have a

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Post
On 8/20/2008 at 12:26 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -snip- I'd question that on all sorts of grounds. For one I'm very sure Debian is much much newer than Slackware. Slackware is *old* - really old. You're right, although depending on how you measure age

Re: z/VM CP commands (LOGON)?

2008-08-21 Thread Pieter Harder
To cause the IPL of guest ztrash01 at LOGON, I believe I can put that in the PROFILE EXEC (e.g. IPL xxx) at the end, but how (if at all) can I cause the guest to be logged on (opposite of FORCE) while being logged on to z/VM as operator? XAUTOLOG guestname Pieter Harder Brabant Water

Re: z/VM CP commands (LOGON)?

2008-08-21 Thread Gary Detro
To solve your problem you need to review the CP XAUTOLOG command and place the IPL xxx in the profile exec for your linux guest. Thanks, Detro Senior IT Specialist 1177 S. Beltline Rd, Coppell, TX 75019 Internal Mail Stop: 71-01-3001O Phone: 469-549-8174 (t/l603) Fax: 469-549-8149 (t/l 603)

Re: z/VM CP commands (LOGON)?

2008-08-21 Thread Huegel, Thomas
Also, just a little tip.. You might want to either SET OBSERVER .. in the ztrash01 profile exec or in the directory entry for ztrash01. That way you can see the LINUX IPL console messages even though it is comming up disconnected. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port

Re: z/VM CP commands (LOGON)?

2008-08-21 Thread Tom Burkholder
Thanks to all! XAUTOLOG it is and an IPL xxx added to the profile. It's already been tested and works. I'll also look at the SET OBSERVER too from the latest email tip. Thanks again, Tom B. From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Detro Sent: Thursday, August 21,

Re: 3270 console confusion

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Post
On 8/20/2008 at 3:36 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robin Atwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -snip- 2.6.16.46-0.12-default. I am currently trying to workout how to do an upgrade but I am using the SP1 starter system and documentation seems sparse. You're entitled to 180 days of maintenance.

Re: 3270 console confusion

2008-08-21 Thread Robin Atwood
On Friday 22 Aug 2008, Mark Post wrote: On 8/20/2008 at 3:36 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robin Atwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -snip- 2.6.16.46-0.12-default. I am currently trying to workout how to do an upgrade but I am using the SP1 starter system and documentation seems

Re: 3270 console confusion

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Post
On 8/21/2008 at 4:11 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robin Atwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -snip- Thanks, I will check this out. But I am having trouble locating good doco as to how to set up the online maintenance. The first part of my article at

Re: Two Different YaST2 Control Center displays

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Post
On 8/6/2008 at 3:04 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mrohs, Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have 2 SLES10 SP1 servers. When I start yast2 on the first linux, the xterm screen shows a long scrolling list of selections, and its slow. On the second linux, the Control Center display is compact

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread Rob van der Heij
I expect the problem is using 'dd' for the copying may not get the magic signatures that makes the disk a CDL format, so the driver ends up seeing it as LDL and gets things misaligned. But you should be able to notice that when the new system is booting. Have you considered using DDR or such to

Re: z/VM CP commands (LOGON)?

2008-08-21 Thread Clovis Pereira
Tom, suggestions: 1- To automate the IPL, I start my Linuxes together with VM, coding CP XAUTOLOG guest into AUTOLOG1's profile.exec 2- To automate Shutdown, there are changes on VM (SYSTEM CONFIG) and in Linux (zipl.conf) Resuming: On SYSTEM CONFIG (can be activated by commands, too):

Re: z/VM CP commands (LOGON)?

2008-08-21 Thread Brad Hinson
One other thing you may find useful: If you boot with the kernel parameter vmhalt=LOGOFF (added to /etc/zipl.conf), the guest will logoff after halt. -Brad Tom Burkholder wrote: Thanks to all! XAUTOLOG it is and an IPL xxx added to the profile. It's already been tested and works. I'll also

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Post
On 8/21/2008 at 5:22 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I expect the problem is using 'dd' for the copying may not get the magic signatures that makes the disk a CDL format, so the driver ends up seeing it as LDL and gets things misaligned. No, that

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread John Summerfield
Evans, Kevin R wrote: BE to re-institute our own recovery stuff). We even had pre-production 3270 screens g. We had a few 2260s on one system; 3270s hadn't been invented yet. I know, this dates me a lot g. Kevin -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread John Summerfield
Evans, Kevin R wrote: Mine was 360/50 and a 360/30. When the 30 was replaced with a 2nd 50, we ran the 30 for about a month outside of the computer room (with no air conditioning other than opening the windows) with IBMs blessing. 2311 and 2314 disk drives with a paper tape reader that had a

Re: Root filesystem error switches to ReadOnly

2008-08-21 Thread John Summerfield
Mark Post wrote: On 8/21/2008 at 5:22 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I expect the problem is using 'dd' for the copying may not get the magic signatures that makes the disk a CDL format, so the driver ends up seeing it as LDL and gets things

Re: Distribution ages, was: Linux version

2008-08-21 Thread Mark Perry
Evans, Kevin R wrote: This is getting like Monty Python g. One guy says When we were young, we used to eat the leather from our shoes. The other guy says You had shoes?. OS/360 - some of you guys make me feel young, thanks ;-) You must be around 60, either that or your systems were old at