On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 09:07, Adam Thornton wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:51, Beinert, William wrote:
Unfortunately, that opinion is shared by many US citizens
-Original Message-
From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some of us don't give a hair from a rat's behind
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 15:50, Clifford Jackson wrote:
Hello All:
I am a main frame sys prog. and I just got an
assignment to build a web server that will support web
hosting. I have a machine running windows 2000 advance
server and I am planning to install APACHE web server,
tell me if I am
Someone should tell SCO that Neurosis and Paranoia are MY diseases (but
I'll sell them a binary runtime use license so they can stay legally
neurotic).
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 08:13, Lionel Dyck wrote:
http://www.internetweek.com/ITServices/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=13100927
SCO's Own Evidence
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 06:44, John Summerfield wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Ryan Ware wrote:
Microsoft has used Akamai for eons for downloads of all sorts. I find it
amusing that people think that Microsoft would have an issue with using a
linux server for something. I guess this
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 08:34, Dave O'Neill wrote:
Nope, chomp() will only delete a single trailing \n.
For those who like to count rivets, what it really does is removes a
trailing string exactly matching the current value of the input record
separator as defined by the $/ variable -- which
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 12:30, Alan Cox wrote:
For a lot of jobs people are an awful lot better than robots. I'm seeing
a shortage of programming robots for example. Software is bound to go
this way - its like farming - labour intensive, more skilled than people
think. Unlike farming its really
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 05:02, Alan Cox wrote:
There are also a lot more young people in countries like Brazil, and a
much more go do it attitude as opposes to go sue it.
But Alan, that's what confuses me the most. Corporate US is nuts about
inflicting pain on software (some) pirates and
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 16:37, John Summerfield wrote:
Why would any other country honour US patent laws? US patents are for the US, not
other countries.
This attitude so many Americans have that what's good for the US is good
for every else really cheeses others off. Each country has its own
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 17:16, John Summerfield wrote:
Not your laws so much as the expectation that _everything_ American -
laws, business interests, culture, Macdonalds ... is right for everyone.
Take Iraq for example. How relevant is US copyright law to Iraqis? Guess
who's writing Iraq
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 20:27, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 03:05:16PM -0400, Loren Charnley, Jr. wrote:
I think that I have received this message enough, 3 times, in less than an
hour. Please stop!
Additionally, even one message would have nothing to do with Linux/390,
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:29, John Summerfield wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, James Melin wrote:
snipping away
What I would look to do is to create a second runnable system, so I
could boot a different disk (or a tape) and mount the system to be
operated on either ro or rw, depending on what's
Linux's weakness, however, was the lack of a central body investing in
its development in areas such as engineering, manageability,
compatibility and security, Ballmer said.
Someone should explain to Mr. Balmer that this weakness is kicking his
butt. Especially considering that with all of the
This is most interesting. Here's a rather funny question that's been
kicking around in my pointy head for a couple of weeks: If SCO doesn't
own the rights to Unix, as Novell claims, than what was it that
Microsoft purchased from SCO?
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 13:15, Ken Dreger wrote:
Very
I understand that this was the intent but from the looks of it they
ended up with beach-front property in Idaho.
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 14:15, Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
wrote:
A proxy in the war against Linux.
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Adams [SMTP:[EMAIL
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 14:19, Rod Furey wrote:
Does that mean that folks in this group are just an illusion?
Of course it does - didn't you know that all the answers here are
generated automatically by a pipe written by Rob, fed over a network
link from Alan via an interface written by Neil?
It appears that there is still no evidence to back this claim up.
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 14:36, Lionel Dyck wrote:
New claims by SCO claim they *do* own Unix
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,81887,00.html?nas=PM-81887
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:43, John Summerfield wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 04:17, you wrote:
Someone should explain to Mr. Balmer that this weakness is kicking his
butt. Especially considering that with all of the money that Microsoft
has to invest they still can't seem to produce a
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 17:12, John Summerfield wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 07:02, you wrote:
John, It really wasn't intended to be quite so serious. But since you
mention it, I am not convinced that they do understand. I'm sure that we
have all seen the interviews with x-MS'ers that speak to
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 15:35, Richard Troth wrote:
I note that the zSeries clock is (800, 900, even 9672s)
is awfully accurate compared to even the newest PCs.
(Have not compared it to Sun or HP mid-range hardware.)
I'm talking about watching the drift file NTPD maintains.
It goes below 1.000
Thanks folks,
It looks like the sysplex timer offers more than just time and, in at
least a few valued opinions, the time that it keeps is probably more
accurate than I could get from an ntp solution.
Thanks again, we'll look into the used market and see if there is
something out there that might
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 16:34, Michael Morgan wrote:
All of our S/390 systems (Linux/390, VM z/OS) get the time from an
external time source..ie the IBM 9037 sysplex timer. We manually set the
time in the sysplex timer (about once a year :)) We don't care how
accurate the time is, so we've
This might be a little off topic so feel free to let me know if it is.
Our z/800 is about 90 seconds off of time with the rest of the network
and this is starting to cause some havoc with an application that we are
currently developing. I have been told that getting the mainframe to
sync up is
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 14:10, Alan Cox wrote:
On Gwe, 2003-05-30 at 22:40, Steven A. Adams wrote:
This might be a little off topic so feel free to let me know if it is.
Our z/800 is about 90 seconds off of time with the rest of the network
and this is starting to cause some havoc
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 15:31, Vic Cross wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Steven A. Adams wrote:
I am being told that there is not a way to use ntpd under one of my
Linux guests to set the clock and propagate these settings through VM to
the CTC.
We have a bunch of Linux guests doing time sync
of them (but recent versions may have changed that).
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Time Sync
-snip-
Thanks Alan,
I am very familiar with ntp. My question
not stating that your comments
about spamcop are wrong, only that I don't see that from spamcop (yet).
I am, however, watching my logs for this event because of the disclaimer
that spamcop posts.
--
Steven A. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
--
Steven A. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will create a .profile for root.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 850.219.5050
http://www.mainline.com
--
Steven A. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
products on UNIX as
well as Linux, and any script we write will only be running on Linux? I
frequently code my scripts that way because I want them to be treated as
bash scripts and not sh scripts.
Mark
--
Steven A. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 14:03, Mark D Pace wrote:
When I want to change environment variables for a user I put them in
.bashrc in there home directory.
I wanted to change root's environment variables but I did not find a
.bashrc in /root. So I created a .bashrc and put in my export commands.
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 19:30, Mark Post wrote:
Ok, it's not too often I get to gloat about anything, so I'm taking the
opportunity as it's presented itself... :)
From dmesg:
-snip-
CPU3: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz stepping 07
Total of 4 processors activated (22321.56 BogoMIPS).
-snip-
Has anyone done a successful source compile of LPRng on SLES7 with
gcc3.2? What was the secret? I was able to manually patch config.sub and
config.guess and the make went through happy, no errors or warnings.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Steve
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 14:46, Post, Mark K wrote:
Your questions are a little confusing. The title talks about segmentation
faults, but you ask about successful compiles.
Sorry Mark, to clarify:
1. The linux guest has been updated with gcc3.2 and glibc2.5.
2. Many products have been compiled
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 15:26, Post, Mark K wrote:
I've done it, but not on a SLES7 system. It was a SuSE 7.0 system. I
started downloading SRPM files from the SuSE 8.1 distribution and compiling
them. (talk about a _lot_ of compiles!) I just tested it, and I was able
to print a file using
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 15:56, Lucius, Leland wrote:
Hi Steven,
Just curious...did you recompile libc as well?
Leland
FYI: I've gotten it to work under SLES7...
tux:~ # cat /etc/SuSE-release
SuSE SLES-7 (s390x)
VERSION = 7.2
tux:~ # gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.2.1
Copyright (C) 2002
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 19:32, John Summerfield wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Steve Gentry wrote:
Further . . .
Once a fix is made to the code, the patched version of the OS can be
swapped into place . . . without taking down the system
I've been a sys.prog. for about 20 years, 15 of
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 20:06, John Summerfield wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Steven A. Adams wrote:
I think ComPaqard calls this Hymilaya (used to be Tandem).
Did Tandem use Linux? I'm sure I went to a Tandem Non-stop presentation
late 70s, early 80s.
No offense intended here but Tandem
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 20:02, Bishop, Peter G wrote:
Apologies for the wrapped picture. This one should be more legible.
+-+++ A +--+
| the world ++ switch+--+ z/VM 4.2 OSD channel |
| |
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 11:28, Scott Archer wrote:
If I understand it correctly, we can not run WEBCT binaries on S/390 Linux
without recompiling the source on the S/390 hardware.
If it's compiled for SPARC or IA than it will not run in an S/390 environment
Is this correct? Do we have any other
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 20:57, Rich Smrcina wrote:
This is one that is looking to be all over the map. If you have data entry or
transactional type workload on WAS, Linux for zSeries is a great fit. Fast,
small transactions that do some database activity on the back end and send
back a web
Hey All,
Here's the request: I'd really like to get some performance perspective
from those individuals that have used WAS under linux, AIX and or MVS.
We are getting ready to use WAS and would like to get a view on which
platform should yield the best performance from those that have used it.
The find command works well and if you don't care to see the permission
errors and such you might try appending 2/dev/null to the command.
Something like:
find / -name xxx* -print 2/dev/null
In a nutshell your telling STDERR to output to /dev/null.
Steve
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 13:30, MACK,
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 15:43, Steve Bui wrote:
Our users complain that connection to our linux lpar is slow,
and they want to know our ethernet speed. Our datacom says
that our connection speed to the switch is 100Mb, but I can't
find any command that display the ethernet connection speed in
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 00:08, John Summerfield wrote:
Convert your favorite CICS app to the Windows world, connect 25000
concurrent user sessions and watch the clock - then come back and tell
us how long the Intel box(ES) stayed alive under that realistic load. It
boils down to this, at the
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 16:33, Adam Thornton wrote:
I beg to differ. Unless you mean Crashes of computers running Windows
are rarely caused by hardware. My desktop machine *usually* crashes,
when it crashes, because of the hardware. Sometimes it's a cooling
problem (luckily my system senses
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 17:32, Mark Darvodelsky wrote:
But the question still does not appear to be answered - why does the
mainframe have to run at such a low clock speed?
Perhaps someone with some hardware knowledge could explain it? Why can't
the clock be cranked up to be the same speed as
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 19:17, Ronald Wells wrote:
Thank You Steven
35yrs here and have worked on too many platforms to dismiss any of them for
there suited needs--but management has been duped for so long and they have
been blinded by there training and have not--most--worked in any other
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:40, Peter J. Farley III wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what *was* the thread you were looking for and
found?
It was http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?LINUX-VM.33367. It did
provide some helpful information for is. It gave us enough insight to
connect c3270 as a
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 21:25, Peter J. Farley III wrote:
Steve, did you mean this thread on tn3270e problems?
Actually, I was able to find what I was looking for but I did miss that
one. This is right on the lines of what we wanted to do, we are getting
a 2074 soon and looking for an emulator
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 13:02, Stephen Frazier wrote:
The STK ICEBERG has something they call RAID5+1. I am not sure exactly
how it works but they say that you can loose 3 drives before the CE
arrives to fix it and still not lose any data.
This implies that they are mirroring a pair of RAID5
Can someone please lead me to the list archives? I have lost the recent
thread on open source 3270 emulators and would like to review it.
Thanks in advance,
Steve
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:04, Vic Cross wrote:
Steve, head for http://linuxvm.org. Among the links on the left of the page is
the pointer to the \'official\' archive at Marist. Other methods exist that are
much quicker than this, however, but I do not have details to hand.
As for 3270
52 matches
Mail list logo
