tance-on-ibm-z
>
> In either case, a running multipathd ensures the new LUN paths are
> automatically assembled into a new multipath device representing your new
> volume.
>
> https://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/dw/linux390/lvc/zFCP_Best_Practices-BB-Webcast_201805.pdf#page=15
>
your new
volume.
https://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/dw/linux390/lvc/zFCP_Best_Practices-BB-Webcast_201805.pdf#page=15
https://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/dw/linux390/lvc/zFCP_Best_Practices-BB-Webcast_201805.pdf#page=16
You can then prepare the new volume as you did for your already existing LVM
Hello
I must confess that I have little knowledge about Multipathing but still
based on my research below is what I understood
My storage team has given a LUN ID of 500g
So as per df -TH
I see
/dev/mapper/bradvg2-u03_lv is mounted on /u03
So similarly I have to create another mount point with
That was going to my next question. We have run into similar with LVM with
ECKD stuff after new disks have been added. We opened tickets and all have
been fixed with updates to various pieces (lvm2 being one I remembered).
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf
s390x s390x GNU/Linux
multipath-tools-0.7.3+153+suse.80d9ed4-2.16.1.s390x
lvm2-2.02.180-9.34.8.s390x
Thanks everyone for helping out with this. I got a lot of good information and
learned a lot about the internals of LVM. Still far from an expert, but at
least a I
When it's up, try running
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
grub2-install
dracut -f
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Duane Beyer
Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2020 8:14 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] LVM does
Thanks Mike,
That is the temporary plan as a work around, but I really need to fix the root
cause.
I did receive a message external to the list about checking the global_filter
in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf. That’s what I am going to look at today. I'll post my
results.
Duane
-Original
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Marcio da Silva
Nunes
Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2020 2:58 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LVM does not come online after reboot. PVMOVE used to migrate data.
Duane,
A possibility that can be verified.
When use the text-based
-Centro de Dados
Diretoria de Operações
+55 (61)2021-9099
+55 (61) 99981-0376
- Mensagem original -
De: "Duane Beyer"
Para: "Linux on 390 Port"
Enviadas: Sábado, 5 de dezembro de 2020 12:28:39
Assunto: Re: LVM does not come online after reboot. PVMOVE used to migrate
Subject: Re: LVM does not come online after reboot. PVMOVE used to migrate data.
Duane,
Let's see if it helps.
Were the new FCP that are not associated with root included in the zfcp.conf
file?
If they are part of the root system disk then they must be in zipl.conf.
Maybe it works.
Marcio da
Diretoria de Operações
+55 (61)2021-9099
+55 (61) 99981-0376
- Mensagem original -
De: "Duane Beyer"
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2020 18:01:08
Assunto: Re: LVM does not come online after reboot. PVMOVE used to migrate data.
I s
I should have included this. Status, NOT available
This is what LVDISPLAY displays for the LVM disks:
--- Logical volume ---
LV Path/dev/u01/u01
LV Nameu01
VG Nameu01
LV UUID6qzW2g-xJr4-osII-ULfn-d9nb-VscF-saGdBL
LV
until we rebooted one of the systems using the new
LUNS.
The system went into emergency mode.
The following action was taken to recover:
The LVM disks were commented out of fstab and the system was rebooted. The
system came up clean without the SCSI disks.
At this point, I issued a lvchange
message," just a status display.
-snip-
> 2) The upgrade was very slow and struggle. (The Linux system was useable
> after 3 reboot, and there was many device(dasd)/lvm/FS error.)
> In the SLES12 I saw many simlar errror messages:
> WARNING: Device for PV x5zvM9-l42o-ifVM-zMWC-NgT5-dZ8
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Jan Stodola
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 3:36 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Adding disk to root LVM with RHEL 7
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:29 PM Martha McConaghy <
martha.mccona...@marist.edu> wrote:
> I feel like Alic
/etc/dasd.conf, I ran mkinitrd
> and zipl. Then, I rebooted. I did NOT touch the LVM, or anything, at that
> point. This resulted in a bunch of dracut timeout errors and am now in
> dracut emergency mode. I'm about to give up and just give this darned
> thing a TB LUN and be done wi
.conf, I ran mkinitrd and zipl. Then, I rebooted. I did
> NOT touch the LVM, or anything, at that point. This resulted in a
> bunch of dracut timeout errors and am now in dracut emergency mode.
> I'm about to give up and just give this darned thing a TB LUN and be
> done with it. But, t
: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Martha McConaghy
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 1:26 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Adding disk to root LVM with RHEL 7
I feel like Alice through the looking glass at this point. I was hopeful that
mkinitrd would do the trick, but now I
I feel like Alice through the looking glass at this point. I was hopeful that
mkinitrd would do the trick, but now I have a whole new problem. After
bringing the disk online, adding it to /etc/dasd.conf, I ran mkinitrd and zipl.
Then, I rebooted. I did NOT touch the LVM, or anything
Also make sure that you add the address "0.0.0200" to the /etc/dasd.conf file
Larry Davis (z/VM Team)
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Cohen, Sam
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 12:06 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Adding disk to root LVM w
On 4/15/20 12:02 PM, Martha McConaghy wrote:
> Ah, DOH! I did not run mkinitrd and am now kicking myself. (Its OK, I need
> the exercise.) I'll give that a try and see if it makes a difference.
Do yourself a favor and remove the cio_ignore parameter from
/etc/zipl.conf entirely. It's a z/VM
Sorry
Thanks,
Sam
(217) 862-9227 (office)
(602) 327-2134 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 8:57 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Adding disk to root LVM with RHEL 7
Martha not Marcy
Martha not Marcy :)
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Cohen, Sam
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 8:55 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Adding disk to root LVM with RHEL 7
Marcy,
Did you check zipl.conf to see if you need to list the disk
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 11:42 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Adding disk to root LVM with RHEL 7
I'm kind of assuming RH7 works like sles11 and doesn't use grub2, but did you
"mkinird;
t On Behalf Of Rick Troth
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 8:26 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Adding disk to root LVM with RHEL 7
Looks like you did everything right: online, dasdfmt, fdasd, lvextend,
vgextend, and using "1" instead of the whole disk (because i
: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 8:43 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Adding disk to root LVM with RHEL 7
I'm kind of assuming RH7 works like sles11 and doesn't use grub2, but did you
"mkinird; zipl" after getting that disk online?
You can also "cat / run/initramfs/
or several) in any filesystem,
any backing store (CKD, FBA, SCSI/SAN), anymode (LVM, partitioned, whole).
Never know when the system or some program will walk to the end "just
because".
-- R; <><
On 4/15/20 10:58 AM, Martha McConaghy wrote:
> I have servers that I'm setting u
I have servers that I'm setting up with RHEL 7.8 on ECKD disk. I installed it
with root in an LVM, all of that worked fine. Now, I'm testing adding a 2nd
ECKD disk to the LVM as I know that will be required in the future, but I'm
running into a confusing problem. Everything works as I expect
Hello Csaba,
My experience leads me to believe that a step or steps in the upgrade
process are the root cause of the issues that you are seeing.
You mention making a backup of the OS DASD but it is unclear to me if
you tried to perform a test upgrade on this backup DASD. The LVM
entries
from the used
disks (PVs, LVs also). This was the staus till the new attempt of Linux
upgrade.
1 ) After it (on the last week), I started the OS upgrade again. I created
a full backup about the Linux OS (SLES 11) to a new disk before the
upgrade.
(The Linux itself is only on a pure 1 disk
On 9/12/19 5:19 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
Just went through all this a while ago!
Here's my instructions for my 101 -> 201 move
2. Enlarge the 101 disk if not already 1000 cyl (non LVM)
# Allocate a 1000 cyl disk at address 201
vmcp link \* 201 201
chccwdev -e 201
# Lsdasd - get
Csaba,
Did you also run zipl?
Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 17:14 schreef Csaba Polgar
> Hello,
>
> We have many system with SLES 11 SP4, and would like to upgrade these to
> SLES 12 SP4.
> The the root filesystem (/, on dasd 201, with ext3, and without LVM, simple
> dasd)
Just went through all this a while ago!
Here's my instructions for my 101 -> 201 move
2. Enlarge the 101 disk if not already 1000 cyl (non LVM)
# Allocate a 1000 cyl disk at address 201
vmcp link \* 201 201
chccwdev -e 201
# Lsdasd - get new disk letter
dasdfmt -f /dev/dasd? -b 4
Hello,
We have many system with SLES 11 SP4, and would like to upgrade these to
SLES 12 SP4.
The the root filesystem (/, on dasd 201, with ext3, and without LVM, simple
dasd) has the OS (itself the Linux, without the applications).
But this root filesystem is too small for the upgrade. So, I did
Hi Rich,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:01:18 -0700
Rich Smrcina wrote:
> For those of you at SHARE in Phoenix. If wish to join us for the LVM program
> dinner, please let me know either via email or here at SHARE face-to-face.
>
> We will be going to Steve’s Greenhouse Grill on Adams S
Wednesday.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 12, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Rick Troth wrote:
>
>> On 3/12/19 3:01 PM, Rich Smrcina wrote:
>> For those of you at SHARE in Phoenix. If wish to join us for the LVM program
>> dinner, please let me know either via email or here at SHARE
On 3/12/19 3:01 PM, Rich Smrcina wrote:
> For those of you at SHARE in Phoenix. If wish to join us for the LVM program
> dinner, please let me know either via email or here at SHARE face-to-face.
>
> We will be going to Steve’s Greenhouse Grill on Adams Street a half a block
>
For those of you at SHARE in Phoenix. If wish to join us for the LVM program
dinner, please let me know either via email or here at SHARE face-to-face.
We will be going to Steve’s Greenhouse Grill on Adams Street a half a block
from of the 2nd Street entrance to the convention center.
Feel
.
Regards,Anderson Augusto
Em segunda-feira, 24 de dezembro de 2018 11:26:04 BRST, Rinaldo
escreveu:
Hello!
I have added a disk to '/' in lvm Ubuntu 18.
I did the 'chzdev -e 152' , but I didn't run the command
'update-initramfs -u' before the ipl, so the machine is not recognizing
the lvm
to '/' in lvm Ubuntu 18.
I did the 'chzdev -e 152' , but I didn't run the command
'update-initramfs -u' before the ipl, so the machine is not recognizing
the lvm disk 152.
Is it possible to do this command now?
I tried, but it seems that the kernel loaded does not have this command.
Best Regards
Hello!
I have added a disk to '/' in lvm Ubuntu 18.
I did the 'chzdev -e 152' , but I didn't run the command
'update-initramfs -u' before the ipl, so the machine is not recognizing
the lvm disk 152.
Is it possible to do this command now?
I tried, but it seems that the kernel loaded does
On 23.04.2018 19:41, Mariusz Walczak wrote:
> The below email is classified: Internal
>
> Hello group,
>
> Recently we had a DASD failure and I had to delete and recreate logical
> volume in LVM. We had two model-9 DASDs defined as two logical volumes
> (different v
I take that back something went wrong and the partition wasn’t resized
after all. No worries.
Cheers
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 13:32 Donald Russell wrote:
> Thanks Stefan,
> That all worked like a charm except I can’t seem to get the file system
> expanded.
>
> I got
Thanks Stefan,
That all worked like a charm except I can’t seem to get the file system
expanded.
I got everything copied, deleted and created a new larger partition with
the same starting track.
The file system is ccs so I booted up the new disk and thought xfs_growfs
would do the trick. I’m
On 25.04.2018 05:48, Donald Russell wrote:
I have a RHEL 7 zLinux on a single Mod-9 ECKD DASD. there are three
partitions:
1 - /boot
2 - swap
3 - /
From one Linux system I tried attaching a not-in-use zLinux Mod-9 and a
Mod-27 and using fdasd and dd to copy the partitions. That didn’t work,
I think you need to use fdisk to extend the partition:
https://access.redhat.com/articles/1190213 and then resize2fs or the
appropriate filesystem resize command as stated in the article...
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Donald Russell
wrote:
> I
I have a RHEL 7 zLinux on a single Mod-9 ECKD DASD. there are three
partitions:
1 - /boot
2 - swap
3 - /
>From one Linux system I tried attaching a not-in-use zLinux Mod-9 and a
Mod-27 and using fdasd and dd to copy the partitions. That didn’t work,
then I tried a VM DDR of the Mod-9 to
The below email is classified: Internal
Hello group,
Recently we had a DASD failure and I had to delete and recreate logical volume
in LVM. We had two model-9 DASDs defined as two logical volumes (different
volume groups). I used lvcreate -l 1760 to make sure the number of extents
e M
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Dave Myers <dave.my...@siriuscom.com>
wrote:
> This is a SLES12 question.
> I extended an LVM and DID NOT run the dasd_configure command.
> Extend is fine, but now I'm wondering if my changes will survive a boot ??
>
> What does dasd_configur
>>> On 3/2/2018 at 12:53 PM, Dave Myers <dave.my...@siriuscom.com> wrote:
> This is a SLES12 question.
> I extended an LVM and DID NOT run the dasd_configure command.
> Extend is fine, but now I'm wondering if my changes will survive a boot ??
>
> What does dasd_co
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 9:54 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] Extended LVM - want to make sure changes are ready for
next boot
This is a SLES12 question.
I extended an LVM and DID NOT run the dasd_configure command.
Extend is fine, but now I'm wondering if my changes
This is a SLES12 question.
I extended an LVM and DID NOT run the dasd_configure command.
Extend is fine, but now I'm wondering if my changes will survive a boot ??
What does dasd_configure do, and is it too late now to run that command to
harden changes??
If so, how do I make sure my LVM extend
)
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Jagos,
Brian
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 10:54 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SHARE LVM Dinner Wednesday August 9th
[External Content] Please use caution.
Hi All,
If you
Hi All,
If you are attending SHARE in Providence Rhode Island and would
like to attend the LVM Dinner please contact myself or any member of the LVM
committee. Please RSVP before Tuesday 12 noon if you are going to attend. We
are going to Bravo Brasserie. Below is the link
re planning to attend SHARE in San Jose, please note the update to
> the traditional LVM Program Dinner event.
>
> Greetings from the SHARE LVM Program volunteer team!
>
> It is a tradition at SHARE conferences to plan a trip to a local dining
> establishment for the LVM Program Dinner
Last Chance... You must *respond today.*
This is being posted to both IBMVM and LINUX-VM.
If you are planning to attend SHARE in San Jose, please note the update to
the traditional LVM Program Dinner event.
Greetings from the SHARE LVM Program volunteer team!
It is a tradition at SHARE
Thanks for the feedback all!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 25, 2016, at 10:34, Grzegorz Powiedziuk <gpowiedz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We have lvroots on all our systems, in the past we had root without lvm and
> honestly in both scenarios there always was a way to get to
We have lvroots on all our systems, in the past we had root without lvm and
honestly in both scenarios there always was a way to get to the data in
case of problems of course if all devices were available.
But it is always good to have unique vgnames (we do hostname_vgroot for
example).
LVM
no matter what
you prefer, your cloud tools won't handle your chosen file system layout
unless you like one big vanilla / partition with ext3 and no lvm at all.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 13:26 Donald Russell <russell@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have rhel5 with rootvg and rootlv. That caused us some g
(upgrading to rehl7) we put the "basic Linux system" on a
simple-to-use Mod-9 and use LVM for application file systems and a few
others. Now it's very simple to mount that / file system on another server
if necessary.
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016, Michael Weiner <mwei...@infinite-b
I don't know if that changed but it used to be that zipl could safely boot from
LVM that was on only one physical volume. See this older discussion for details:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-390%40vm.marist.edu/msg62491.html
Tomas
Tomas Pavelka
CA Technologies
Sr Software Engineer
CA CZ
years. When you get thrown into a rescue situation, the only
tools you have available are in the root file system. If you can't get to them
because LVM is bent then you have to resort to other means, with the attendant
problems others have already discussed.
> Or is it recommended to
The experts also still debate this .. I myself see nothing wrong with
root in an LVM - others shudder in horror. There are pros and cons to both
approaches. For recovery - having a bootable LVM free Linux is a good
thing so you can mount other guests VG disks without worry of duplicate
Keep in mind that LVM's are unique to a Linux guest. If a volume is to be
mounted in another system then it can't when an LVM with the same name already
exists.
Our cloning procedures want to mount a new system in our maintenance Linux
guest. This means that the base system (at least /, /etc
, the only time we use LVMs is for application data or log files in
> directories such as /opt/was/, /oradata/logs/ or something like that. We
> used to use an LVM for /var/ but found we didn't need it.
>
> We use about a 12 GB file system for Linux (/). If the users fill up
> regu
Michael,
When you say 'root directory' I assume you mean / and not /root/.
FWIW, the only time we use LVMs is for application data or log files in
directories such as /opt/was/, /oradata/logs/ or something like that. We
used to use an LVM for /var/ but found we didn't need it.
We use about a 12
Hi Michael,
In our shop we use a normal directory to root, and create a VG for the
expandable directories. We usually have VG for /usr and /opt.
Our cloning scripts are happy with this setup, and we don't have much
headache when we have to link the root mdisk to another machine to
diagnostics.
Good morning all,
I was having a little debate yesterday and I want to get the experts on this
list opinions.
What's the best practice when it comes to the root directory?
Is it acceptable and recommend to create an vgroot and lvroot so it is
expandable?
Or is it recommended to have the
not
taken advantage of this opportunity, please point your browser to
http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/2853089/facaa86f1b27 and complete a survey
there.
Thank you,
Rick Barlow
SHARE LVM Program Manager
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff
The SHARE Linux and VM Program Technical Steering Committee needs your
input!
Please point your browser to
http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/2853089/facaa86f1b27
and complete a short survey there.
Romney
Romney White
Senior Technical Staff Member
z Systems Architecture and
into the new version anyway.
Thanks for explaining the patch comment. Good to know it still works for LDL
disks.
Actually I had to get the lvm2 package from another SP3 source disk and
installed it with rpm. We are now back on the SP3 base version and the LVM is
mounted once again.
Met vriendelijke
lled.
>
>
> Mark Post
>
>
And if your system is already down and you can't recover from backup, then
link volumes under a different sles machine, mount them and chroot into it
and downgrade lvm as Mark said. That's how I've fixed
lumes will be supported, whether a partition was
used (/dev/dasd?1) or not (/dev/dasd?). CDL formatted volumes will only be
supported if a partition was used.
> Today I have updated an SLES11 SP3 and I can't access the LVM anymore. This
> is an LVM based on unpartitioned LDL formatted
46217)". Is the only for CDL disks and not for LDL disks?
Today I have updated an SLES11 SP3 and I can't access the LVM anymore. This is
an LVM based on unpartitioned LDL formatted disks.
Met vriendelijke groet/With kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Berry van Sleeuwen
-Original Message
On 04/25/2016 11:05 PM, Dave Myers wrote:
> By "point and shoot"...do you mean I just need to copy the fstab entries over
> to the new server and "mount -a" ??
Yes.
If the same PVs are attached to the guest and are online, then the
system will see them and by default activate the VG(s). You
m.com<mailto:dave.my...@siriuscom.com>
Sirius Computer Solutions | www.siriuscom.com<http://www.siriuscom.com/>
10100 Reunion Place, Suite 500, San Antonio, TX 78216
From: Dave Myers
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 6:47 PM
To: 'linux-390@VM.MARIST.EDU' <linux-390@VM.MARIST.EDU>
Subjec
And if you want zVM to take care of the disk label, you can dedicate the
current dasds, add a new set of dasds to the vg, and use the pvmove (man
pvmove) command to migrate data seamlessly from the old dasds to the new
ones.
We did this, in production, on the db2 servers, without taking anything
If it's the same DASD, then you should not need vgexport/vgimport. Just
point and shoot. The system will see the signatures on the disks and
recognize the volume group.
-- R; <><
On Apr 25, 2016 8:48 PM, "Dave Myers" wrote:
I am migrating a server from LPAR SLES10
I am migrating a server from LPAR SLES10 (bare metal) to zVM Guest and a new
SLES11 server.
I need to migrate some existing LVMs.
I know I need to DEDICATE the 3390s in the zVM USER DIRECT for the SLES11 guest
and I think I need to maybe VGEXPORT and VGIMPORT ??
Can someone please give me some
run into this
> issue.
>
I think we really should do stable release uploads in Debian of the
fixes to have LVM working on jessie for the next point release.
Because clearly there are users after it like yourself =)
Regards,
Dimitri.
> Martha
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:25:05 -0600 Mar
McConaghy <u...@vm.marist.edu> wrote:
>> I've been fighting with a Debian install all day and wonder if anyone else
>> has run into the same problem. I wanted to use LVM for the root filesystem,
>> so created a /boot partition and an LVM for the rest. Everything works fine
>>
Thanks, Ray. I thought I was going crazy too!
Martha
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:01:26 -0400 Ray Mansell said:
>Martha...
>
>I've been fighting the same thing all afternoon. Thought I was going
>bonkers, since it all worked so well last week. For the moment I've
>installed without L
, Martha McConaghy <u...@vm.marist.edu> wrote:
>>> I've been fighting with a Debian install all day and wonder if anyone else
>>> has run into the same problem. I wanted to use LVM for the root filesystem,
>>> so created a /boot partition and an LVM for the rest. Ever
On 12.04.2016 01:11, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12 April 2016 at 00:00, Martha McConaghy <u...@vm.marist.edu> wrote:
>> I've been fighting with a Debian install all day and wonder if anyone else
>> has run into the same problem. I wanted to use LVM for
Martha...
I've been fighting the same thing all afternoon. Thought I was going
bonkers, since it all worked so well last week. For the moment I've
installed without LVM, but there's certainly a problem.
Ray
On 4/11/2016 19:00, Martha McConaghy wrote:
I've been fighting with a Debian install
>>> On 4/11/2016 at 07:00 PM, Martha McConaghy <u...@vm.marist.edu> wrote:
> I've been fighting with a Debian install all day and wonder if anyone else
> has run into the same problem. I wanted to use LVM for the root filesystem,
> so created a /boot partition and an LVM f
Hello,
On 12 April 2016 at 00:00, Martha McConaghy <u...@vm.marist.edu> wrote:
> I've been fighting with a Debian install all day and wonder if anyone else
> has run into the same problem. I wanted to use LVM for the root filesystem,
> so created a /boot partition and an L
I've been fighting with a Debian install all day and wonder if anyone else
has run into the same problem. I wanted to use LVM for the root filesystem,
so created a /boot partition and an LVM for the rest. Everything works fine
until it comes to the step where it tries to write out ZIPL
Actually, those were just examples. The Samba and TSM guests have the biggest
LVM filesystems. We have a quite a few linux guests, most of them use LVM.
Ranging from a small webserver to a couple of oracle database machines with
LVM's up to 40G.
I don’t think it matters if we are talking zVM
It was very valuable for me, thanks to all of you!
WBR, Sergey
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
I would like also to mention that when it comes to LVM, it makes much more
easier to manage such systems especially with FCP involved.
Imagine that you break your multipath config for example and you lose your
“mpath” names. If you have LVM, you can still boot. LVM will just scan all your
paths
Hi All,
Could you, please, explain me a real usage of the LVM in the server
environments with z/VM or whatever.
Do you really need to "online" expand your "opt" or "home" directory which
is worth to have additional layer in disk access?
Moreover, databases a
please, explain me a real usage of the LVM in the server
>environments with z/VM or whatever.
>Do you really need to "online" expand your "opt" or "home" directory which
>is worth to have additional layer in disk access?
>Moreover, databases already have
Two great responses from Bob and Berry. Here's my LVM story too.
On 10/05/2015 08:56 AM, Sergey Korzhevsky wrote:
> Could you, please, explain me a real usage of the LVM
> in the server environments with z/VM or whatever.
I was introduced to LVM by colleagues.
Since then, I hav
Hi Sergey,
Our Samba server has a 180G filesystem on Model 9 DASD. It's obviously an LVM
just to get to that size. Our TSM server has a 3.2TB staging filesystem, this
guest has 72 model 54 disks to build the LVM filesystem.
Striping within LVM can spread IO onto multiple disks.
Databases
es you are actually using LVM? Is this Websphere, databases,
> Samba, log storage, custom application with a lot of data, anything else?
Oh my personal systems, I use LVM for all filesystems except the boot
volume.
Once the system is up, the boot volume is out of the picture.
(I maintain t
We use LVM on EVERY server we build, for all of the disk, with the
exception of /boot, and ASM disks for Oracle. Everything else is beneath
LVM. Why? Because the users never estimate their space needs sufficiently,
so there is always a need to add. Because disk subsystems seldom last the
life
Hi Rick,
Could you tell me some details, because it is not obvious for what type
of services you are actually using LVM? Is this Websphere, databases,
Samba, log storage, custom application with a lot of data, anything else?
Stories about TSM and Samba are great, but this is one installation
My experience is that LVM is almost always used -- non-LVM is rarer on
zLinux.DASD sizes have grown which help limit some needs for using LVM
-- but the ability to be expanded dynamically is a pretty big sell point
when the goal is 'no outage required' for most shops..
One exception
Greetings from the SHARE LVM Program group!
We would like to invite anyone who may be interested in meeting with us and
learning more about the Linux and VM Program at SHARE to join us for dinner
during the next SHARE conference, which is being held in Orlando, Florida.
The dinner is scheduled
1 - 100 of 1108 matches
Mail list logo