I will also like a copy Mark!
-Original Message-
From: Mark Post [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 2002 12 18 01:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Yet Another IBM Conspiracy Theory
Are you sure about that? If I try to access the first URL, it just bounces
me to the
At 12:44 17-12-02 +0100, Seifert, Harald wrote.
Harald,
Here are definitions that we used to activate an OSA-Gbit, OSA-Feth as
well as a Hypersockets connection:
1) Update /etc/chandev.conf
Noauto;qeth0,0x0400,0x0401,0x0402;addparms,0x10,0x0400,0x402,portname:GBPORT1
Mark,
I'll be happy to host this one, too.
Please send a copy to me offline and I'll upload it immediatly.
Mark Post wrote:
The book itself is not in the cache at Google, but I and a number of other
people have copies (I know it was one of the more popular downloads).
But, I did come
My first post on this subject didn't make it through moderation...
You can get a copy from IBM, on their Taiwanese website (the Redbook IS in
English!) - go to:
http://www2.tw.ibm.com/cgi-bin/db2www/techdoc/index.d2w/report
You'll see it listed about four items up from the bottom. Click on it,
It's slow. Go to the second URL, looks for the redbook title (left side near
bottom), click on it, eventually a little 'download' window (in Chinese)
pops up, and the download starts automatically. Eventually.
Let me know how it goes.
Mike
http://www.corestore.org
Are you sure about that? If
Fortunately it's still available from IBM Taiwan, who it seems aren't
singing from quite the same hymnsheet as the folks in the USA :)
http://www2.tw.ibm.com/cgi-bin/db2www/techdoc/check.d2w/report?No=194
See also http://www2.tw.ibm.com/cgi-bin/db2www/techdoc/index.d2w/report
Grab it before the
I would like a copy also
Thank.
LOGO BIYCSA V1.jpg
The availablilty, then disappearance, then pending availability of the UNIX
Tools Toys web page brings to mind a few thoughts I keep having about
open source and USS.
1) I really appreaciated the website and redbook because it helped
me greatly to get a handle on porting tools to USS.
Use yast2. It's a perfect tool for tasks like this.
Maciek
--
Maciej Ksiezycki
Systems Programmer
Unizeto Sp. z o.o.
http://www.unizeto.pl
Mark Post [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Harald,
It was kind of hard to tell because of all the MIME quoting, but it
looks as
though your first line
I would like a copy also.
Thanks.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nestor Acosta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2002 14:15
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Yet Another IBM Conspiracy Theory
I would like a copy also
Thank.
BEGIN:VCARD
Mark, put this book to http://www.linuxvm.org/. So, they'll stop bother
you :)
WBR, Sergey
Hi Folks,
Anyone have a table of comparison between Filesystems (Ext2, JFS,
ReiserFs, etc) and loss of space
in formated filesystems ?
TIA
Evandro Vargas - IBM Brasil
(Crossposted on VMESA-L and Linux-VM)
Hi Folks,
I'm in the process of implementing gigabit ethernet for a client and am
very curious about something. I have a TCPIP stack on VM (VM/ESA 2.4.0)
with a dedicated gigabit card at IP address 152.225.118.46. I have a
Linux/390 guest virtual machine
Please try to send email to group mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NJ
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: Re: sna-linux
Author: markkp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at Internet
Date:12/18/02 1:51 AM
Which also seems to come up
Hi,
I use SuSE Linux/390 7 (2.2.16, quite old I know). I had two 3390 disks put
together in a volume group and several logical volumes running.
I added a third 3390 disk to the linux (VM minidisk and added to parmfile, ran
silo etc). During reboot vgscan reports that no volume groups
can be found
Montgomery,
Are you sure on the January 30th date? LinuxWorld runs January 21-24 in
NYC.
You are right - the date should be January 23rd. Thanks for the catch.
-Mike MacIsaac, IBM [EMAIL PROTECTED] (845) 433-7061
Hey Michael,
Am I missing something here... What is 152.225.118.49
Rob
Robert C Schwartz
Technical Services
Boscovs Department Stores LLC
610-929-7387
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Michael Coffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18,
Arrggh - I have guests at both .49 and .50, I evidently included the trace
to .49 (same results). Strike .50 in my note and replace it with .49 (sorry
for the confusion).
Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer
Internal Revenue Service - Room 6527
Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Hi list,
I speak for myself and not for IBM.
I should be working on CUPS and Samba printing, but this thread has created
an itch I just have to scratch. I'll shed some light on the conspiracy
theory, though you won't find a smoking gun :))
I proposed the redbook Open Source Software for OS/390
Hi,
I am experiencing a problem when installing RedHat Linux 7.2 in VM. I am
trying to initialize a GigEthernet OSA card. I followed all procedures as far
as linking the IBM OCO modules with the RedHat distribution. Also, all
microcode and VM maintenance should be up to date.
A few months ago
Can you ping from VM to .49?
What's the status of the VCTC device?
Can you ping from the .49 Linux machine to .46?
Robert C Schwartz
Technical Services
Boscovs Department Stores LLC
610-929-7387
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Coffin Michael C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Weird. Resolves from here...I wonder if it's a routing issue.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark Post
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Hi Rob,
Yes, pinging works fine to/from the guests. In fact all IP traffic to/from
the guests works fine - but traceroute shows this timeout at .46 (the VM
TCPIP server). I'd just like to understand why it times out and clear it up
if possible.
I'm not sure what you mean by the status of the
Michael:
Run the test with TRACE IPUP IPDOWN ICMP enabled. It looks as though the
packet is being dropped by VM TCP/IP. The trace will show what is going
on.
Romney
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:45:19 -0500 Coffin Michael C said:
Hi Rob,
Yes, pinging works fine to/from the guests. In fact all IP
Thanks for the good news Mike!
I speak for myself and not for IBM.
I should be working on CUPS and Samba printing, but this thread has created
an itch I just have to scratch. I'll shed some light on the conspiracy
theory, though you won't find a smoking gun :))
Snip a bunch of good news
In
Hi Romney,
I ran a trace which is too big to include here, but I'm seeing Passed Route
F and DontRoute F in the trace, here's a snip:
DTCPDO065I DispatchDatagram: Dest 152.225.118.49, protocol 17 dispatch mode
0, P
assed Route F, DontRoute F
DTCPDO066I DispatchDatagram releases LastRouteEntry
I've just started installing 2.4.7 of Redhat, and I've answered the network
typ (escon etc,) with ETH0.
It then is asking me for a device and port pair thing like
escon0,0x600,0x601 etc.
I know it should be eth0,0x???,0x??? but the install instructions I found
on the CD are quite thin
How
Michael:
This looks fine. What we're interested in finding in the trace output
is the reception and handling of the packet that TRACERTE sends to the
VM system (the one that times out).
Romney
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:19:34 -0500 Coffin Michael C said:
Hi Romney,
I ran a trace which is too big
Hi Romney,
That's just it, I don't see anything in the VM TCPIP trace that suggests a
timeout (at least no verbage that clearly says timed out or anything like
that). Is there a keyword I can use to scan for that would indicate a
timeout? Maybe it's there and I'm just not seeing it (the trace
Michael:
Well, it's likely that VM dropped the packet. You should look for ICMP
packets with a destination address of 152.225.118.46.
If you'd like me to look at it, you can send the trace via anonymous FTP
to our drop-off site (testcase.boulder.ibm.com/s390/toibm/vm). Transfer
the file in
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Coffin Michael C wrote:
Hi Rob,
Yes, pinging works fine to/from the guests. In fact all IP traffic to/from
the guests works fine - but traceroute shows this timeout at .46 (the VM
TCPIP server). I'd just like to understand why it times out and clear it up
if possible.
If you have an anonymous FTP server be sure that your the lost+found
directory in /pub has attributes set to 700. There is an exploit that
allows evil hackers to create their own directories as an anonymous user.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake
Sergey,
I really can't do that without asking permission of the site's host/sponsor,
Velocity Software. And, while Barton and his team have been really great to
me and the mailing list over the years, I don't see that this is
particularly related to Linux/390, so I wasn't going to ask. In the
I have installed Debian woody with the IBM OCO QETH and QDIO modules for
2.4.17. Installation went fine and able to telnet in and to do install.
Upon booting from dasd the first time, I get the following error:
Setting up IP spoofing protection: rp_filter.
Configuring network interfaces:
Ken,
There might be more information in the kernel ring buffer. Do a dmesg
command (if there's one on the initrd) and post the output from that (the
relevant parts should be at the end).
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken
Should be portname: , not portname= ... From recent traffic on this
list, that and add_parms seem to be commonly mistyped.
~ Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Crowley, Glen L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian
What is in /etc/modules.conf?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Crowley, Glen L
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian cant find OSA adapter files
I have installed Debian woody with the
cat /etc/modules.conf
### This file is automatically generated by update-modules
#
# Please do not edit this file directly. If you want to change or add
# anything please take a look at the files in /etc/modutils and read
# the manpage for update-modules.
#
### update-modules: start processing
I missed typed it in the email, during the install I used portname:OSA1
Glen
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Jarboe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Debian cant find OSA adapter files
Should be portname: , not
Well, there are two entries in there for eth0. I'm not sure which one
wins, the first or last.
I would verify which module name you have, either qeth.o or
qeth-2.4.17-s390-3.o in /lib/modules, and delete the other one. Run
depmod -a just for no good reason, and try it again.
Also, just as I
I've been making a little progress on getting updates made. I'm still about
3 months behind, though. I'm up to September 18th, and will be trying to
make more updates over the next few weeks.
Mark Post
James,
Is this a qeth/qdio card, or an LCS card? For qeth/qdio, the port numbers
are the device numbers, and have to start on an even boundary. For LCS, you
have to specify both the device number and the actual port.
For more help, try the Device Drivers and Installation Commands manual at
Lucky for you Christmas is coming up... :)
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 02:01 pm, you wrote:
I've been making a little progress on getting updates made. I'm still
about 3 months behind, though. I'm up to September 18th, and will be
trying to make more updates over the next few weeks.
Um, I don't know how to answer that question except that the OTHER port
on it worked with suse 7.0 and auto :) The car itself is an OSA ENTR card
running with both ethernet ports as ethernet
I have my Suse 7.0 in port 0, and this one plugged into port 1. The chipid
is 34, devices 830-83F.
Thomas,
What does your parmfile look like when it works, and what does your parmfile
look like when it fails?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Thomas Emde
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What kind of software do people run on Linux/390 for high-availability clustering?
We're considering setting up two Linux servers on two different 390/IFL processors as
printservers and want to be able to failover to the other processor when one fails or
is taken down for service. And of
Gordon,
look into using VM's CSE (Cross System Extensions) technology. It allows for
implementing just such a failover technique and it's already included in
your VM system. You can easily test your implementation by using two 2nd
level VM guests coupled via a (v)CTC adapter.
Contact me offline
Is it possible to setup a GUESTLAN between zVM and the
SuSE SLES7 RAM SYSTEM (i.e. initial starter system)?
Or do I have to use CTC first, then install the SuSE 2.4.7 system
and then implement the guestlan between Linux and VM ???
Tia
Dave
Yes, this can be done. Just define the NIC and couple it to the lan
before you IPL.
James Johnson Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programmer Voice: 660-543-8065
Central Missouri State University Fax: 660-543-8123
- Original
In a message dated 12/18/2002 3:51:15 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, this can be done. Just define the NIC and couple it to the lan
before you IPL.
James Johnson Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programmer Voice: 660-543-8065
Central
I have done it. I use option 8, HIPERSOCKETS, on the network setup menu.
James Johnson Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programmer Voice: 660-543-8065
Central Missouri State University Fax: 660-543-8123
- Original Message
Dave,
Thanks for the reply. We've actually already looked into using CSE if it happens to
go on two VM systems. Other possibilities are vm/linux and rs-6000/linux or
intel-linux, or even a Unix system. In other words, one on a VM guest linux and one
somewhere else as the failover site.
So,
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, James Johnson wrote:
I have done it. I use option 8, HIPERSOCKETS, on the network setup menu.
Dave, if your z/VM is 4.3 and you are using the so-called QDIO Guest LAN
(DEFINE LAN xxx QDIO), you will define your connection to the LAN as if it
was an OSA-Express. If your
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Mark Post wrote:
Well, there are two entries in there for eth0. I'm not sure which one
wins, the first or last.
The first, IIRC.
I would verify which module name you have, either qeth.o or
qeth-2.4.17-s390-3.o in /lib/modules, and delete the other one. Run
depmod -a
Take a look at http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/
That is the open source product of choice since Beowulf, and others, decided
to start selling the product. Unfortunately, I don't see an S/390 port for
this product so I apologize of being off-topic with this reply.
On Wednesday 18 December
Thanks for the reply. We've actually already looked into using CSE if it
happens to go on two VM systems. Other
possibilities are vm/linux and rs-6000/linux or intel-linux, or even a Unix
system. In other words, one on a VM guest linux and
one somewhere else as the failover site.
So, the
Gordon,
Dave and David have given you a lot of information already, but I wanted to
at least mention the High Availability using clusters chapter in the
Distributions Redbook that Carlos Ordonez wrote. It covers the topic at a
readable level and may help you assimilate some of what's been
I don't know about anybody else, but my reaction to this was that it's a
great blueprint for a really interesting SHARE session. :)
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David Boyes
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:00 PM
To:
Hi,
it looks as follows when it's working:
dasd=400,410,440 root=/dev/dasda1 noinitrd ctc=noauto vmhalt=M OPERATOR
LINUX DOWN vmpoff=M OPERATOR LINUX DOWN
and like this when not:
dasd=400,410,440,450 root=/dev/dasda1 noinitrd ctc=noauto vmhalt=M
OPERATOR LINUX DOWN vmpoff=M
At 17:56 18-12-02 -0500, Dave Myers wrote:
I was wondering if the RAM system has the proper qdio qeth drivers for
guestlan??
Yes, it does not ;-)
The anonymous beta trial (or whatever SuSE defined it) is from Oct 31, 2001
as far as I know. That one does support Hipersockets and has the 'Option
60 matches
Mail list logo
