For the record, the Hercules list is uncensored. Phil Payne's access was set
to moderated (he can still post, if approved by a list moderator) because he
was disrupting the list despite repeated requests from a large number of
list members to lay off on his continual FUD. He was asked to take
My script is...
return=$rc_done
case $1 in
start)
. /etc/profile.d/javaprof.sh
#JAVA_HOME=.
nohup /usr/local/jakarta/tomcat/bin/startup.sh
;;
...working fine.
nohup is right command :)
WBR, Sergey
now becoming quite serious in the EMC/Hitachi case. The fatc that Hercules'
implementation of these features is in software and not in hardware brings
a fascinating aspect to bear.
Patents on software algorithms apply only in a tiny number of nations. At
worst Hercules would join the vast
The chapter was not accidentally left out. It is rare for a redbook
to change this way. The powers that be whom effected this change
come from a different part of IBM society. They have a different
viewpoint. They perhaps don't understand the significance of
the open source revolution.
Alan Altmark wrote:
snip
(And the problem will be magnified if z/VM adds support for IEEE VLANs.)
/snip
I've always thought that this would be a logical extension of the multiple
LPAR/multiple port support in OSA. If different device address pairs (OAT
entries) could be associated with
Mark,
The parmfile data that I orginally supplied was incorrect.
It actually had dasd=33a0,33A1 in it.
I used your procedures and they worked like a charm. I only wish
I knew what I did wrong the first time.
Thanks to all for your assistance.
SG
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K
I have a problem getting the RH 7.2 install system up
and running under a VIF image. I created a new DASD,
formatted it and put a filesystem on it. Mounted the
new dasd at /mnt, cd /boot, did a tar cf - . | tar xf
- -C /mnt (as described in the ISP/ASP RedBook alt
boot section). Ftp'ed
hello,
i had a problem with the 'boot-from-cd' procedure installing suse server
7, 2.4 kernel with a osa express card. the install script had a bug and i
had to use a work-around procedure. suse has a fix .
The fixed intrd, kernel image etc can be found here:
there's a lot of folk who say it doesn't work well that's the reason
the kernel's shipped without the support being built.
Writing is said to be especially hazardous to the data.
Reading seems pretty solid now days although I doubt it works at all on XP.
Generally its best to exchange data
Linux for S/390 zSeries:
Please check out the DeveloperWorks page at:
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/whatsnew.shtml
On the Recommended level 2.4.7 page at:
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/current2_4.shtml
you will find:
-
On Tuesday, 04/16/2002 at 10:27ZE10, Vic Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alan Altmark wrote:
snip
(And the problem will be magnified if z/VM adds support for IEEE
VLANs.)
/snip
I've always thought that this would be a logical extension of the
multiple
LPAR/multiple port support in OSA.
Hi,
Is there any configuration differences when it comes to setting up a DHCP
Server on s390 running SLES 7 compared to an Intel PC?
I have setup a DHCP Server on both, with no luck on s390. A windows client
connects to the Intel PC but not thes390. Only one of DHCP server is
running at the
Hi list,
I got the reply from the ITSO; the book is not going to be renumbered to
-01
as the changes do not meet the criteria:
For all - normal practice that is documented is that if 10%+
changes it is a
new version #. Otherwise not so. Remember that our site shows a last
revised
DHCP depends on broadcasting to be working. If you're using a network
interface that doesn't support broadcast, it won't work. What is your
network interface?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: darren zamrykut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:18 PM
To:
Can I ask you to state publically and explicitly: what were the reasons
given for the removal, by those who supported this action? We can surmise
what they might be, but it would be interesting to hear...
No. I don't recall details, and I've stuck my neck out as far as I care.
Let's move on
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 11:27:33AM -0400, Alan Altmark wrote:
FYIHere at the WAVV conference, one or more requirements are planned
to be submitted to IBM to address the issue of hobbyist licensing of S/390
and zSeries software.
That's great! I'll be happy to discuss my thoughts on the
...
but make gets error in system.h with error messages:
/usr/include/asm/system.h: In function '__xchg':
/usr/include/asm/system.h:67: '__u32 undeclared
/usr/include/asm/system.h:67: parse error before 'ptr'
/usr/include/asm/system.h:90: parse error before 'ptr'
make[2]: ***
I'll say. The first version clearly acknowledged the contribution made by
Roger and the Hercules team - not directly to the writing, but recognising
how helpful Hercules had been. Perhaps that contribution shouldn't have been
acknowledged; who am I to say? If it had never been there we
Florian,
Thanks for your respond. add this as a patch to the kernel src.rpm and
then rebuild the -- Do you mean rebuilding the kernel with 2.4.9-31
source tree and compile my file again? Anyway I did the following ways and
got the same error:
1 - applied kernel-2.4.9-31.s390.rpm,
trying to comile apr for mod_webapp under redhat linux s/390 2.4.9-31.1.
ran ./buildconf and ./configure as directed,
but make gets error in system.h with error messages:
/usr/include/asm/system.h: In function '__xchg':
/usr/include/asm/system.h:67: '__u32 undeclared
You'll be glad to know IBM is not infallible - they missed one. The URL
http://www.snipix.freeserve.co.uk/hercinst.html survives near the top of page 509.
The URL is dead. Nothing sinister, though - as I surmised, the owners have simply
dumped
Freeserve (very sensible of them) and gone to
Who in the world ever thought they _were_?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OK who messed with the redbook?
You'll be glad to know IBM is not infallible - they missed one.
Does anyone know if anyone has done the port of access control lists (acl's)
to Linux/390 yet? Specifically SuSE SLES7?
You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to
skydive twice. -Motto of the Darwin Society
Gordon W. Wolfe, Ph.D. (425) 865-5940
VM Technical
Running RH 7.2 in an LPAR. I wanted to verify something.
Hardware is getting the time from a sysplex timer. Linux is getting the
time from the hardware (how?).
So, the local clock on my linux server is a reflection of the sysplex
timer?
Running an NTP server using the local clock as a server
Different specifically How?
|-+
| | daniel.jarboe@cus|
| | tserv.com|
| | Sent by: Linux on|
| | 390 Port |
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |
If you know of a helpful tutorial on the application of patches to the Linux
for S/390 kernel, would you kindly post the URL (or similar) here? In
particular we're getting ready to apply the so-called Timer patches for
the 2.4 kernel. Thanks much!
did not spot -ansi flag anywhere in compiler flags.
but did put in CPPFLAGS in rules.mk to see what would happen and go same
error messages. so that wasn't it.
i tried to use the precompiled mod_webapp.so at
http://www.tuxosaur.org/downloads/mod_webapp.zip
but that just give Segmentation fault
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:38:54PM -0400, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:38:54 -0400
From: Michael MacIsaac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OK who messed with the redbook?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I ask you to state publically and explicitly: what were the
Daniel,
No, and no. Linux/390 is not getting the time from sysplex timer (at least
not directly). When Linux/390 boots up, it gets the time from VM (not the
hardware). (In your case, VM does get the time from the timer.) After
that, Linux/390 tries to keep the system time on its own. Which
did not spot -ansi flag anywhere in compiler flags.
You might be tripping over something different.
What I specifically thought it might be is in linux/types.h
there is a section that reads something like
#if defined(__GNUC__) !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
typedef __u64
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 10:56:26PM +0200, Richard Higson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:38:54PM -0400, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
No. I don't recall details, and I've stuck my neck out as far as I care.
Thank you Mike, for having the integrity to 'stick your neck out' as far
as you have. It
Don't use mod-webapp. Use mod_jk, it will give you better results.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Vincent Gazzillo
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: apr for mod_webapp make problem
did not spot
That mod_webapp.zip was built on a 2.2 kernel and probably that may have
caused the segfault. It works on our system with Suse 7.0, 2.2 kernel.
Samy Rengasamy.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Gazzillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL
What I specifically thought it might be is in linux/types.h
there is a section that reads something like
#if defined(__GNUC__) !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
typedef __u64 uint64_t;
typedef __u64 u_int64_t;
typedef
Hi Samy !
How to pre-allocate a 4GB File in a system with several 2.3 GB dasds?
We're looking for a way to be able to create a single file slightly
larger than 4Gbytes (to test some logic in the code which has been
known to break on ports where seek offsets go over 32-bits).
Or is the
We're looking for a way to be able to create a single file slightly
larger than 4Gbytes (to test some logic in the code which has been
known to break on ports where seek offsets go over 32-bits).
Or is the largest file we can ever make around 2.3Gbytes ?
The Linux LVM allows you to
Is there any configuration differences when it comes to setting up a DHCP
Server on s390 running SLES 7 compared to an Intel PC?
On the Linux side, no, but it *does* matter how the Linux system is
connected to the network. DHCP is broadcast-based, and thus if you have a
correctly configured
Internally I'm not sure if Guest LANs support what's needed
(yet?).
As of z/VM 4.2, guest LANs do not support broadcast, and thus DHCP does not
work on guest LANs.
-- db
This is going on far too long, considering this is the Linux group.
There's an unlinked copy
on my site at http://www.isham-research.com/insult.txt
Be warned - it does contain obscenities. This is not great prose.
Amusing. Pretty light-weight by Usenet standards, though -- not a single
Hi list,
I got the reply from the ITSO; the book is not going to be renumbered to
-01
as the changes do not meet the criteria:
For all - normal practice that is documented is that if 10%+
changes it is a
new version #. Otherwise not so. Remember that our site shows a last
What software does Linux replace? By and large Unix on other hardware
I'd think. From what I gather, if I buy a zSeries machine to run Linux
on, I'm also likely to buy z/VM and probably some other software too.
Laudable in principle, but what are the results? How many zSeries machines have
on, I'm also likely to buy z/VM and probably some other software too.
Laudable in principle, but what are the results? How many zSeries machines have
been sold
solely to run Linux? Is it three yet - out of 1,500 or so zSeries shipped?
How many shipped because Linux existed for S/390 -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
How many shipped because Linux existed for S/390 - thats the important
question. Including the hard to quantify cool factor it gave the 390
instead of making everyone think of balding old farts who speak only
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Second the motion. It turns out that the whole internals of the systems,
that evolved into System/390, were being designed into place, right
around the year I was born. So, yes, they are my age. And no laughs, and
finger pointing either.
---
Gregg C
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:07:38PM -0400, Post, Mark K wrote:
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:07:38 -0400
From: Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OK who messed with the redbook?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard,
I've got a running Red Hat 7.2 (very minimal) system up. What
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:55:02PM -0400, Mark Earnest wrote:
Hey, not fair! I happen to know one MVS systems programmer who is a
balding 23 year old fart :)
Yes, they do exist, but they're extremely rare...
I gave a talk at SHARE (the IBM large system users group) last July. I noted
that my
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
... making everyone think of balding old farts who speak only JCL 8)
Hey, not fair! I happen to know one MVS systems programmer who is a
balding 23 year old fart :)
You telling us that MVS causes premature hair
Let me just emphasis one distinction that appears not to have been
appreciated. Patents are not issued for algorithms but only the
implementation of them, in an invention or process. The effect of this is
quite limiting and specific. You could still implement the same algorithm
for a different
Excuse Me,
To the 1600 or so people subscribed to this list I wish a good evening.
As a partial clarification and addition to an earlier post made by Jay Maynard.
Phil Roberts does not speak or act for the Hercules team.
Phil's posting privileges were set to require moderator approval before
i'm running SuSe 7.0 Linux 2.2.16 and getting the same error as Vincent
stated. Not sure where the -ansi flag is invoked.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Rick Troth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: apr for mod_webapp
50 matches
Mail list logo
