Thanks! That's worth a shot. I'll have to do some experimenting.
SLES 11 never had any issues with it and LVM certainly shouldn't lose its wits
until the next reboot, but if we can work around that, at least we can avoid
getting it into that state and save a reboot.
Marcy
-Original
Thanks Stefan.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stefan
Haberland
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 7:14 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] DASD driver errors - sles 12 sp2 current maintenance
> I would open a ticket
On 02.05.2017 12:34, Stefan Haberland wrote:
Hi Marcy,
May 01 18:12:35 cdzea02a9919 kernel: dasd-eckd.b3193d: 0.0.8006: An
error occurred in the DASD device driver, reason=09
May 01 18:12:35 cdzea02a9919 kernel: dasd(eckd): I/O status report
for device 0.0.8006:
Hi Marcy,
May 01 18:12:35 cdzea02a9919 kernel: dasd-eckd.b3193d: 0.0.8006: An error
occurred in the DASD device driver, reason=09
May 01 18:12:35 cdzea02a9919 kernel: dasd(eckd): I/O status report for device
0.0.8006:
dasd(eckd): in req: 7d437ed8
On Tuesday, 05/02/2017 at 10:48 GMT, Stefan Haberland
wrote:
> kernel: dasd(eckd): I/O status report for device 0.0.8006:
> dasd(eckd): in req: 7d437ed8 CC:00 FC:04 AC:00 SC:17
DS:0E CS:00 RC:0
> dasd(eckd): device 0.0.8006: Failing CCW:
On 05/01/2017 10:20 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
Is my dump volume made with zipl -d on SLES 11 SP4 still good for SLES 12 SP2?
Would be nice not to have 2 of them.
There might be some differences regarding SMT (and maybe also SIMD)
support but I'm not sure that's really all to take into account:
I would open a ticket so that that Linux doesn't issue it when using a
non-fp minidisk (which it can easily find out). Error messages should
never be treated as "oh, just ignore it." If you do that, then you ignore
the real error messages.
You are right and all I was saying was that the
>>> On 5/2/2017 at 06:44 AM, Stefan Haberland wrote:
> Most likely someone from z/VM has to look at this.
Doing a cat on the host_access_count file gets the same/similar error when
running in an LPAR. So, I don't think this is necessarily z/VM related.
>>> On 5/1/2017 at 07:28 PM, Marcy Cortes
>>> wrote:
> So maybe LVM2 needs to hold off in SLES 12 SP2? How?
>
> And yes, its entirely possible the minidisk had stuff on it before which is
> why we always dasdfmt first.
I suppose you could try doing a