Re: Definitive tree

2000-06-19 Thread Alistair Riddoch
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 12:02:41AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: : I think I've figured how to : sort some of the stack handling stuff out and get some of our data space : back. You're not thinking of backtracing stack addresses, are you? The last release can be found here:

Re: Definitive tree

2000-06-19 Thread Alan Cox
and the source is now stored under CVS at sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/project/?group_id=3232 I'll grab the sourceforget copy and probably send you diffs. (I dont have the local bandwidth to fight cvs) Is this in some way related to your idea of moving the structure required from the

Re: Definitive tree

2000-06-19 Thread Alan Cox
I've gotten pretty familiar with the linker, let me know if you need a hack. Otherwise, my memory says that we've got enough info in the current header to put the stack below the data, providing the linker will change the beginning data offset to the max stack size. We can already build

Re: Definitive tree

2000-06-18 Thread Alan Cox
: I think I've figured how to : sort some of the stack handling stuff out and get some of our data space : back. You're not thinking of backtracing stack addresses, are you? No. Something much simpler. The idea being to get into a state where there is nothing on the kernel stack needed