Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #35 Fri, 15 Jun 01 20:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux inheriting DLL Hell (GreyCloud)
Re: The Microsoft PATH. (The Ghost In The Machine)
Re: Linux inheriting DLL Hell (GreyCloud)
Re: More micro$oft customer service (Rick)
Re: Linux inheriting
Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #34Mon, 7 May 01 02:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Is StarOffice 5.2 compatible w/MS Office 97/2000? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Justice
Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #33Mon, 2 Apr 01 11:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: My take on GPLed code as free software (was: Richard Stallman what a tosser, and
lies about free software) (Jay Maynard)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. ("
Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #32 Sun, 18 Feb 01 03:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Joke of the day - from Microsoft (Craig Kelley)
Re: Why Open Source better be careful - The Microsoft Un-American (Brent R)
Re: Joke of the day - from Microsoft (Craig Kelley)
Re: Microsoft seeks
Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 20:13:03 EST
Contents:
Linux is crude and inconsistant. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Question with Security on Linux/Unix versus Windows NT/2000 ("kiwiunixman")
Re: Question with Security on Linux/Unix versus Windo
Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #30 Fri, 17 Nov 00 07:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: OT: Could someone explain C++ phobia in Linux? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Of course, there is a down side... ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: OT: Could someone explain C++ phobia in Linux
Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #29 Sat, 23 Sep 00 20:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: The internet was built on WIndow 95? (was Re: How low can they go...?) (The
Ghost In The Machine)
Re: Space Shuttle uses Windows software almost exclusively (lyttlec)
Re: Malloy digest, volume
Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #27 Fri, 23 Jun 00 14:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux, easy to use? (Pete Goodwin)
Re: Charlie Ebert the LinoShill (Pete Goodwin)
Re: Charlie Ebert the LinoShill (Pete Goodwin)
Re: Linux MUST be in TROUBLE
Re: mind hours in development Linux
Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #26 Thu, 27 Apr 00 00:13:04 EDT
Contents:
IBM and Linux (was: IBM dumping more shares of RedHat (Mark S. Bilk)
Re: "Technical" vs. "Non-technical"... (was Re: Grasping perspective...) (Terry
Porter)
Re: What else
