Re: GCM counter inc

Can someone verify if it is a bug? Thanks On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Ronen Shitrit rshit...@gmail.com wrote: Hi According to the GCM NIST publication, the counter increment should be module 32 bit. Looking into the crypto code, I can see that when using gcm(aes) the gcm will use

GCM counter inc

Hi According to the GCM NIST publication, the counter increment should be module 32 bit. Looking into the crypto code, I can see that when using gcm(aes) the gcm will use the ctr over aes, ctr.c is using the crypto_inc with size of blocksize, which is 16 for AES. in case crypto_inc will overflow

RE: [WIP] crypto: add support for Orion5X crypto engine

. This does not alter my key at all. Point 1 on the next side is referring to the AesKeyRdMode bit which must be set prior reading the key. I can't find a definition of this bit so I guess the spec is out of date here. [Ronen Shitrit] you are right, this should be fix accordingly: To decrypt a data

RE: [PATCH 8/8] [CRYPTO] aead: Add authenc

run the encryption and authentication as one operation? BTW: will the kernel IPsec patch that uses this AEAD API will be submitted on this mailing list as well? Thanks Ronen Shitrit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-crypto- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: status of async crypto

Hi Herbert I found a mailing thread discussing combined mode algorithms, I think that this is the main missing link for good async support. Are you planning that this combined alg mode will support the async API? Is there any progress on this direction? Regards Ronen Shitrit -Original

RE: status of async crypto

Wow, I thought that there was more progress ... BTW: I know that the OCF support the OpenSWAN, does it also support the KLIPS by now? I also noticed that the Acrypto have a patch to support KLIPS, does it also support the OpenSWAN? Regards Ronen Shitrit -Original Message- From

status of async crypto

development of the async crypto support? Thanks for your advice Ronen Shitrit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

AH mode for OpenSwan with OCF.

should be applied after the OCF patch for OpenSwan, it includes: Add support for tasklet, Fix for using OpenSwan in AH mode Fix for using the OCF with OpenSwan in AH mode. Regards Ronen Shitrit - Hi I'm using the OpenSwan KLIPS

RE: OCF cryptosoft MD5 Vs HMAC MD5

Hi I tested it and it seems fine now. Before I got same digest for MD5 and HMAC MD5. Regards Ronen Shitrit -Original Message- From: David McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:31 PM To: Ronen Shitrit Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OCF

RE: OpenSSL with OCF

be fix in the OCF release. Now I still get hang when multi is bigger then 2, I can see that part of the threads didn't finish?! Any suggestions?? Ronen Shitrit Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

OpenSSL with OCF

of the buffers from user to kernel space each time. Any other suggestions?? Is it possible that we will skip the copy to kernel, and use direct mode?? Regards Ronen Shitrit Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body

RE: Dm-crypt patch for OCF

moved to the read callback. Regards Ronen Shitrit Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd -Original Message- From: Evgeniy Polyakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:36 AM To: Ronen Shitrit Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dm-crypt

RE: OCF or Acrypto for IPSec and dm-crypt

, then I will need to re-evaluate my decision for going with the OCF, since the big guys here likes to go with the mainline. Regards Ronen Shitrit Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd -Original Message- From: Herbert Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 5:39 AM

RE: [ACRYPTO] dm-crypt ported to acrypto.

seems better. But If I let the limit to get to more then 100 pending requests, then I get memory corruption probably cause of some overrun. I'm not sure if any pending requests is allowed at all, I will need to investigate it more. Regards Ronen Shitrit Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd

RE: [ACRYPTO] dm-crypt ported to acrypto.

reading through the dm_crypt. -I think that we might have a problem if a write operation will be processed in parallel to a read operation, the read might wait for the write to complete, and the dm_async_pending might also get wrong values??? Regards Ronen Shitrit Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd

RE: [ACRYPTO] dm-crypt ported to acrypto.

it is queued and we return to the user, before the encrypt is completed. Regards Ronen Shitrit Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd -Original Message- From: Evgeniy Polyakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 10:50 PM To: Ronen Shitrit Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux