On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 05:53:57PM -0400, David Vossel wrote:
The plan to set 'volume_list=[@*]' in lvm.conf and override the tags
during
the activation using vgchange -ay --config 'tags{ mytag{} }' vg0 does not
work.
As a similar alternative, I am forcing the volume_list in lvm.conf
- Original Message -
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 4:30:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 05:53:57PM -0400, David Vossel wrote:
The plan
- Original Message -
From: David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com
To: General Linux-HA mailing list linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 4:41:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
- Original Message -
From: David Vossel dvos
- Original Message -
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 5:58:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:52:39PM -0400, David Vossel wrote
- Original Message -
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Cc: Jonathan Brassow jbras...@redhat.com, Fabio M. Di Nitto
fdini...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 3:35:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:00:48PM -0500, Brassow Jonathan wrote:
On May 17, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:42:30AM -0400, David Vossel wrote:
The use
Nitto fdini...@redhat.com
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 3:50:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:00:48PM -0500, Brassow Jonathan wrote:
On May 17, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10
- Original Message -
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 5:58:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:52:39PM -0400, David Vossel wrote:
- Original
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:00:48PM -0500, Brassow Jonathan wrote:
On May 17, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:42:30AM -0400, David Vossel wrote:
The use of 'auto_activation_volume_list' depends on updates to the LVM
initscripts - ensuring that they
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:42:30AM -0400, David Vossel wrote:
The use of 'auto_activation_volume_list' depends on updates to the LVM
initscripts - ensuring that they use '-aay' in order to activate
logical
volumes. That has been checked in upstream. I'm sure it will go into
On May 17, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:42:30AM -0400, David Vossel wrote:
The use of 'auto_activation_volume_list' depends on updates to the LVM
initscripts - ensuring that they use '-aay' in order to activate logical
volumes. That has been checked
...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 5:01:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On May 14, 2013, at 10:36 AM, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com
Cc: Fabio
...@redhat.com, Jonathan Brassow jbras...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 8:37:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On May 15, 2013, at 7:04 PM, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brassow Jonathan jbras...@redhat.com
To: David
: Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:32:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On May 16, 2013, at 9:08 AM, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brassow Jonathan jbras...@redhat.com
To: David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com
Cc: General Linux-HA mailing
Brassow jbras...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 9:50:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 04:06:09PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-05-14T09:54:55, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's what
AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:36:54AM -0400, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com
Cc: Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com
...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 9:50:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 04:06:09PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-05-14T09:54:55, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's what it comes down to. You aren't
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On May 14, 2013, at 10:36 AM, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com
Cc: Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com, General Linux-HA
On 05/14/2013 04:20 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-05-14T15:59:05, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Appart from a larger restructuring of the code,
For which I'd still like to hear a good explanation. Mind, this
is not to say that this or that version is better, but that
- Original Message -
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Cc: David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com, Fabio M. Di Nitto
fdini...@redhat.com, Andrew Beekhof
and...@beekhof.net, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com, Lon Hohberger
l...@redhat.com,
Hi all,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:22:08PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
This is about pull request
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/222
Merge redhat lvm.sh feature set into heartbeat LVM agent
Apologies to the CC for list duplicates. Cc list was made by looking at
the
On 2013-05-14T09:54:55, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's what it comes down to. You aren't guaranteed exclusive
activation just because pacemaker is in control. There are scenarios
with SAN disks where the node starts up and can potentially attempt to
activate a volume before
On 2013-05-14T15:59:05, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Appart from a larger restructuring of the code,
For which I'd still like to hear a good explanation. Mind, this
is not to say that this or that version is better, but that such
a huge change calls for a serious effort on
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 04:06:09PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-05-14T09:54:55, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's what it comes down to. You aren't guaranteed exclusive
activation just because pacemaker is in control. There are scenarios
with SAN disks where the
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 04:06:09PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-05-14T09:54:55, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's what it comes down to. You aren't guaranteed exclusive
activation just because
25 matches
Mail list logo
