Riccardo Perni schrieb:
Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On 10/23/07, Riccardo Perni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On 10/22/07, Riccardo Perni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible
to handle this situation?
You may try
In the wiki I found the keyword resource fencing and also disk
reservation
in clusters like the symantec (veritas) hasf they have implemented disk
rervations.
Disk reservations can be implemneted by a specia SCSI-3 command sequence.
Is there any disk reservation strategy implemented in heartbeat
Junko IKEDA schrieb:
Is there any disk reservation strategy implemented in heartbeat and its
agents (did
not found any).
i think someone from NTT posted a resource agent that did this
Hi Fabian,
NTT's RA is not a scsi reservation to be exact,
but try the attached if you
Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 12:19 + schrieb Yan Fitterer:
First question: Are you interested in my patch (just 2-3 lines)?
Most likely ;) Although I'm not completely sure how case is handled
elsewhere. We might be case-sensitive on purpose! (although I can't see
a good reason to do this
Hi,
I have searched for some times, why my defined evms-failover resource
does not work on any of my heartbeat 2.0.8 nodes (SLES10SP1, x86_64).
I want to use a private evms container to avoid the (noc cluster) file
system to be mounted twice by administrative error.
But the resource was not
Hi,
please try either lower-cased host/node names or use the patch I sent
yesterday. The problem is that heartbeat uses the lower-cased hostnames
as nodenames and membership list in the CCM. EVMS compares
case-sensitive. This means evms says your cluster node acquiring the
private container is
Hi all,
my question is: are there any know problems/limitations
with quorum server and heartbeat 2.1.13 (or 2.0.8)?
I would need the quorum server for a split-site (streched)
4 node cluster (2 nodes on each side).
Best regards
Fabian
___
Linux-HA
-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Fabian Herschel
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:03 AM
To: Linux-HA
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] RE: Help with STONITH Plugin
Thanks for the input. What could cause the STONITH request to not be
sent from tengine?
Do you have
action has
to be fullfilled before other actions could be processed.
@List: Would that be a valid work-arround?
Regards
Fabian Herschel
linux-ha-requ...@lists.linux-ha.org schrieb:
Betreff:
[Linux-HA] Configurating STONITH device (how to avoid reset each other)
Von:
Alessandra Giovanardi
cause dual mounted file systems - ugly!
Best regards
Fabian Herschel
Andreas Reschke schrieb:
Hi,
i need to set up a HA-Cluster for a SAP-application.
Requirements:
- 2 IBM x3650
- SLES 10 SP2 x86_64
- SAN (EMC)
Steps:
1. installing SLES on the server
2. configure heartbeat (v1)
- /etc
Of course you checked, that firewall is off?
Am 06.07.2010 13:01, schrieb Trujillo Carmona, Antonio:
I'm try to setup a 2 nodes cluster for HA, after configure it I began to test
it but fail.
I configured a ping node and it got offline always.
I try to configure a ping resource and neither
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are there other nodes with the same multicast address?
On 08/02/2011 12:38 AM, Hai Tao wrote:
I reinstalled the OS for node1 (in a two nodes HA, and the node1 had a disk
error), and reconfigured HA. however, after restarting the heartbeat, I see
On 11/14/2012 03:33 PM, Digimer wrote:
Linux in general is all about choice, possibly to a fault. I see
no reason why clustering shouldn't be the same.
I really like linux and cluster frameworks to spent choice (I was
even so near to miss-spell that as joice :) but on the other hand
it does not
On 11/15/2012 12:03 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I can think of 3 tooling changes:
- ptest/crm_simulate - hb_report/crm_report - standalone crmsh
Thats not /too/ bad in 4 years.
But completely un-needed. Where is the benefit on changing from crm to
pcs?
On 11/14/2012 11:20 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I sincerely hope SUSE does continue with crmsh but I _like_ that
there are people trying something new.
Yes I also like things which are going better. But what is the benefit
on dropping CRM and introducing PCS to that procject? What is the
benefit
On 11/14/2012 05:10 PM, alain.mou...@bull.net wrote:
Hi Just for information, I'm using cleanup and crm_mon very very
very often with lots of ressources configured in Pacemaker and
never had any problem like the problems you describe ... (on RHEL)
Alain
crm shell and tools like crm_mon are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rafal,
placing a new master on the right (not restarted) side is typically
done by the crm_master calls. You might check the scoring if the
resources after you have killed one side and check it with
ptest -Ls (or an matching other call without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/29/2012 10:14 PM, Robinson, Eric wrote:
Bump... does anyone have some insight on this? Google is not
turning up anything useful.
Our newest cluster will not failover master/slave drbd resources.
It works fine manually using drbdadm from a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/2012 08:34 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2012-12-04T20:38:54, Fabian Herschel fabian.hersc...@arcor.de
wrote:
Specifying target-role=Master is completely different from
specifying a role=Master/Slave on an operation.
The former
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/10/2012 10:59 PM, codey koble wrote:
To anyone who could help possibly:
My current setup: 2 Ubuntu 10.04 LTS servers running heartbeat,
pacemaker, apache, and mysql Heartbeat and pacemaker are running
great for my needs with one exception,
be that your switch was
either reconfigured for a time period or there was a fireware update?
Just my thoughts abou things happened at customer side.
Fabian Herschel
On 12/14/2012 06:31 AM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
node1(ailprd1) IP:192.168.7.11 node2(ailprd2) IP:192.168.7.12
Its a two node
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Muhammad,
also find my ansawer inline...
On 12/14/2012 12:55 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 16:47 +0500, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
please find me replies in-line
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 12:13 +0100, Fabian Herschel wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/21/2012 08:14 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu schrieb am 20.12.2012 um 17:50 in
Nachricht 50d341c3.1040...@bmrb.wisc.edu:
Hi!
So (pseudo-code following)
if (host(NFS_server) == host(NFS_client))
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Muhammad,
please find my answer below...
On 29.04.2013 17:19, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
On 04/29/2013 08:04 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-04-26T23:56:04, Muhammad Sharfuddin
m.sharfud...@nds.com.pk
wrote:
I just upgraded from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.04.2013 08:27, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Muhammad Sharfuddin m.sharfud...@nds.com.pk schrieb am
29.04.2013 um 14:16 in
Nachricht 517e6482.2040...@nds.com.pk:
I think that you should just follow that advice, i.e. read that
SAP
note and install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.04.2013 13:22, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
Hello Fabian,
On 04/30/2013 02:19 PM, Fabian Herschel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Hi Muhammad,
please find my answer below...
The new setup preferred by _SAP_
Hi,
Did you run the ha update like a rolling update, so one node with current
version online, the other down. Than updating the offline node, reentering the
cluster again? In this case I would think the cluster is ok but still only
supports the old options. Its different from the
Hi,
my first idea would be to fix binnetaddr. It should be the
networkaddress not the machines network address.
Regards
Fabian
On 02/27/2014 03:42 PM, TRIBOLET Thomas wrote:
Hello,
Before starting, my first language is French so I'll try to do my best to
explain my problem in English.
I would create the group with the meta attributr for unordered resources.
Meta odered=false
Von Samsung-Tablet gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Vladimir Romanov vroma...@gmail.com
Datum:03.05.2014 10:29 (GMT+01:00)
An: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Betreff:
On 05/05/2014 02:36 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4 May 2014, at 4:22 pm, Fabian Herschel fabian.hersc...@arcor.de wrote:
I would create the group with the meta attributr for unordered resources.
Meta odered=false
N. Use a colocation set.
Could you explain your No? Whats wrong
On 05/06/2014 01:08 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 5 May 2014, at 10:06 pm, Fabian Herschel fabian.hersc...@arcor.de wrote:
On 05/05/2014 02:36 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4 May 2014, at 4:22 pm, Fabian Herschel fabian.hersc...@arcor.de wrote:
I would create the group with the meta
Hi,
do you reboot always both nodes the same time, or do you reboot only one node.
Stopping only the resources during reboot is pretty bad. I would add the
cluster startscript like /etc/init.d/openais to you start/stop sequence. This
would also tell the left node about the leaving and joining
Create 2 constraints:
1. Colocation between ip adress (the one for the master) and master status of
your mastr/slave resource: You need to add the status master (instead of
start, which is the default) to the constraint.
2. Colocation between ip adress (the one for the slave) and slave status
Hi Muhammad,
could you try:
primitive SAPInst-DVEBMGS00 ocf:heartbeat:SAPInstance \
op monitor interval=120 timeout=60 \
op start interval=0 timeout=300 \
op stop interval=0 timeout=300 \
params InstanceName=TLP_DVEBMGS00_thltlp
DIR_EXECUTABLE=/usr/sap/TLP/DVEBMGS00/exe
for
START_PROFILE
On 01/15/2015 01:07 AM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
On 01/15/2015 12:46 AM, Fabian Herschel wrote:
Hi Muhammad,
could you try:
primitive SAPInst-DVEBMGS00 ocf:heartbeat:SAPInstance \
op monitor interval=120 timeout=60 \
op start interval=0 timeout=300 \
op stop interval=0
On 01/15/2015 03:57 PM, Fabian Herschel wrote:
Hi Muhammad,
please retry the command as user sidadm. Or inspect the resource
agent for ALL environment variables to be set, not only LD_LIBRARY_PATH
If sapcontrol would be disfunctional using sidadm you have a SAP
problem and that could
No only in very old versions there where two different profiles. One START
profile and one instance profile. Today they are combined in the instance
profile. The parameter name however could not be changed without hurding all
installations outside.
So its ok with a current NetWeaver, if the
-ha.org
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] SAPInstance does not start and asking for
START_PROFILE
On 01/15/2015 02:35 AM, Fabian Herschel wrote:
Hi Muhammed,
sorry please do NOT use startsap. Please use sapctrl.
sapctrl -nr 00 -function Start
Check the started processes using
sapctrl -nr 00
On 01/14/2015 10:53 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
On 01/15/2015 02:35 AM, Fabian Herschel wrote:
Hi Muhammed,
sorry please do NOT use startsap. Please use sapctrl.
sapctrl -nr 00 -function Start
Check the started processes using
sapctrl -nr 00 -function GetProcessList
I dont find
On 01/15/2015 11:35 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Fabian Herschel fabian.hersc...@arcor.de schrieb am 15.01.2015 um 09:05
Hi!
I'm working for over 20 year with SAP R/3.
Me to :) I started with SAP R/3 1.1b and also have seen 1.0 which was
SAP R/3 try and buy (which I changed in a non marketing
40 matches
Mail list logo
