Is IGLU's Debian mirror working properly? In particular, isn't there a
problem with the Packages and the Sources files?
follows the results of apt-get update when using IGLU and another
mirror.
* IGLU:
Hit http://ftp.iglu.org.il testing/main Packages
Get:1 http://ftp.iglu.org.il
Hi,
I'm trying to compile Caitoo and I am running in to a
problem I cant figure out.
My ./configure script exit with an error saying that
my system can not compile a small KDE application and
that I should check my includes insolation.
in side the ./configuree script is trying to compile
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Christoph Bugel wrote:
But which spreadsheet format should we ask them to use?
I think, if at the moment we can't find suitable opensrc spreadsheet
format, it would be nice to have *at least* PDF or HTML version
of their schedules. But again, they don't reply to emails.
the error means u dont have teh -dev package
all u need is to know what kind of package are you trying to build (network
mutimedia etc..) adn get the package-dev rpm.
should solve the problem. kapplication.h is probably a part of kdebase-dev or
kdelibs-dev.
file calld kapplication.h now, I
- Original Message -
From: Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Eliran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: Giving/Selling RedHat 7.3
On Thu, May 30, 2002, Eliran wrote about Giving/Selling RedHat 7.3:
Can any one burn me a copy of
A silly question: dos anybody want to build open office with bidi support for
win32,mac and other os'es? Poeple do need those since not all will install
linux for getting a free office... (is it our job anyway?)
- diego
--
Getting the job done is no excuse for not following the rules.
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Mati: any idea if the bidi patch compiles under windows? If it runs?
In principle, the code is common. At some point in time, our team built a
working Bidi-enabled version of OO for Windows. There were some
differences with the Linux versions (some modules did not need
Hi,
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 07:03:44PM +0200, Eliran wrote:
\\ I don't know if it is much related but I couldn't find any other appropriate
place..
Can any one burn me a copy of RH7.3 (not all 6 cd's neccessarily, the 3 installation
disks are just fine) for a low price (less than 10 NIS
- Original Message -
From: Yedidyah Bar-David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Eliran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Giving/Selling RedHat 7.3
Hi,
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 07:03:44PM +0200, Eliran wrote:
\\ I don't know if it is much
Hi,
I have the following distros: RH 6.0, 7.1, 7.2. I don't know what to do with
them (don't want to throw them to the garbage). So if anyone wants them,
please send me postal stamps and I'll send them to you. (I live and work in
Jerusalem, a personal meeting is also an option)
Boris
Well, here is another response of Richard M.
Stallman the FSF founder.
Now he condemns the UnitedLinux
(Suse, Turbo Linux, Mandrake and others joined forces).
What next ?
Regards,
Eliran
job job, someone has to speak for those who cannt ('cause they are coding too
much) He _is_ right. The day this will happen a big part of freedom will be
ported to win32 platform.
- diego
On Friday 31 May 2002 22:29, Eliran wrote:
Well, here is another response of Richard M. Stallman the
On 2002-05-31, Eliran wrote:
Well, here is another response of Richard M. Stallman the FSF founder.
Now he condemns the UnitedLinux (Suse, Turbo Linux, Mandrake and others joined
forces).
What next ?
Maybe you should explain *why* you disagree with RMS.
I think RMS is right.
BTW,
On 2002-05-31, Corwin wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Christoph Bugel wrote:
But which spreadsheet format should we ask them to use?
I think, if at the moment we can't find suitable opensrc spreadsheet
format, it would be nice to have *at least* PDF or HTML version
of their schedules.
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
job job, someone has to speak for those who cannt ('cause they are coding too
much) He _is_ right. The day this will happen a big part of freedom will be
ported to win32 platform.
It is legally possible to port GPLed software to Win32. In fact,
On Saturday 01 June 2002 02:41, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
job job, someone has to speak for those who cannt ('cause they are coding
too much) He _is_ right. The day this will happen a big part of freedom
will be ported to win32 platform.
It is legally
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Eliran wrote:
Well, here is another response of Richard M. Stallman the FSF founder.
Now he condemns the UnitedLinux (Suse, Turbo Linux, Mandrake and others
joined forces).
Let's get some facts straight first:
SuSE, TurboLinux, Caldera and Conectiva (not Mandrake)
17 matches
Mail list logo
