Shaul Karl wrote:
> >
> > When can we meet ? Are you in Tel-Aviv area ?
> >
>
> I live in Tel-Aviv (pretty close to the junction of Dizingof and Ben-Gurion).
> We can meet on Tuesday or Wednesday at about 19:30, on Thursday (perhaps at
> the Jerusalem group meeting?) or sometime at Friday morning
> OK. Let's set the meeting in Tuesday at 19:30. I suggest we meet in
> LinuxQA offices ( The equipment is due to be here, too, so
> maybe we can
> also install it! ) . It is In the Bursa area in Ramat-Gan,
> foot access
> from Rakevet Merkaz, so it is easy for anyone not from Tel-Aviv to
> g
similar thing happened to my brother yesterday. he installed mandrake 7.0
from cdr and then supermount and regular mounting didn't work. said /dev/hdd
is not a valid block device. i played around with his computer a little and
noticed some reference to /dev/scd0 (even though he doesn't have an act
Ariel Biener wrote:
>
> About your Solaris vs. Tru64, I don't see how you wanna compare these.
> Solaris runs on x86 and Sparc platforms. Tru64 runs on Alphas. What do you
> want to compare exactly ?
If you want to buy a strong Workstation, it is obvious you will
want to compare several solution
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ury Segal wrote:
> If you want to buy a strong Workstation, it is obvious you will
> want to compare several solutions. Since both Sun and Compaq (Digital)
> offer ones, it makes perfect sense to compare their solutions as a whole,
> the CPU itself only a part of the comparis
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ariel Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ury Segal wrote:
>
> > If you want to buy a strong Workstation, it is obvious you will
> > want to compare several solutions. Since both Sun and Compaq (Digital)
> > offer ones, it makes perfect sense to compare their solutions as a
>--- Felix Shvaiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's off-topic, but may be somebody knows what is 'True
> 64 Unix'
> (Compaq/Digital - Alpha).
> What is good? What is bad?
> Linux vs. 'True 64 Unix' on Alpha (I know Linux is FREE,
> but...)
> Solaris vs 'True 64 Unix' ?
> Any references? Any comm
The only big advantage of Tru64 Unix on Linux/Solaris,
I know of is a great SMP support and a great,
built-in, support for clustering (if I am not
mistaken).
--- Felix Shvaiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's off-topic, but may be somebody knows what is
> 'True 64 Unix'
> (Compaq/Digital - Alph
Hi list,
Somtimes, if the design we used to create the wheel is
old and and with more and more feautres has been added
to it the wheel becomes unuseful, then we should
reinvent it from the base. But this is not the case, a
there is already editors in linux as AbiWord it is a
really better option
> there is already editors in linux as AbiWord it is a
> really better option to addd hebrew support to them,
> why isrealy users should other editors, what have they
> done bad?
A better question would be: Why do Israeli users have to use abiword, they
certainly don't deserve it!
Its pretty br
There is one other thing which i don't know if it was mentioned here.
The DigitalUNIX comes build in with the ADFS which has nice performance.
For Sun you will have to perches the DiskManager(or something) in order to
recive the extra options as raid ect'.
For linux i'm not sure.
Mike
- Ori
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ilya Khayutin wrote:
> A better option I think is to add hebrew
> support, build-in, into GTK+.
That idea clicked right home. It should be possible to handle the whole
right left problem entirely within a variant on the Gtk+ text-widget.
Are there any Gtk+ hackers here who w
Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ilya Khayutin wrote:
>
> > A better option I think is to add hebrew
> > support, build-in, into GTK+.
>
> That idea clicked right home. It should be possible to handle the whole
> right left problem entirely within a variant on the Gtk+ text-widget.
It i
>
> It is a good idea, but it will not give us a real hebrew editor.
> I want an editor.
editor as in emacs/vim?
is it going to have a hebrew gui or just hebrew font+bidi support?
Thanks,
Chen.
--
Chen ShapiraWeb Developer and Linux Activist
"Preliminary operational tests were inconclusi
Chen Shapira wrote:
> >
> > It is a good idea, but it will not give us a real hebrew editor.
> > I want an editor.
>
> editor as in emacs/vim?
No. Editor as in MS WordPad.
>
> is it going to have a hebrew gui or just hebrew font+bidi support?
All hebrew. Even hebrew puns.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Chen
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ury Segal wrote:
[About a hebrew enabled text-widget]
> It is a good idea, but it will not give us a real hebrew editor.
> I want an editor.
I disagree -- it has been proven (IDLE) writing an editor is easy if you
have a good text-widget. I dare say it will not be hard writi
The ADVFS as bundled with Tru64 UNIX has some basic features,
that do not need a license. But if you need to use the realy
usefull features, like adding a volume to an existing domain,
you need to install another subset (ADVFS Utilities) which
have to be licensed.
Avi
-Original Message-
Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ury Segal wrote:
>
> [About a hebrew enabled text-widget]
> > It is a good idea, but it will not give us a real hebrew editor.
> > I want an editor.
>
> I disagree -- it has been proven (IDLE) writing an editor is easy if you
> have a good text-widget.
N
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 01:54:01PM +0200, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ilya Khayutin wrote:
>
> > A better option I think is to add hebrew
> > support, build-in, into GTK+.
>
> That idea clicked right home. It should be possible to handle the whole
> right left problem entirely with
There has been discussion in the past with regard to 56K modem's that
will work under Linux. Could somebody please point me to a model that
can be purchased in Israel ? Dealer information would be most welcome
also...
Thankx in advance
Yaacov
--- Ilya Khayutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only big advantage of Tru64 Unix on Linux/Solaris,
> I know of is a great SMP support and a great,
> built-in, support for clustering (if I am not
> mistaken).
Check http://www.unix.digital.com/cluster/
Alex
=
Alex Landsberg
[EMAIL PROTECTE
I was working a little bit on the topic (the gtk+
coders & the gimp ones put where really interested to
make internalization and I was the only guy from
Israel at hand, so they volunteered me), if somebody
will provide more help in this, so we can really go to
the coding phase, this will be great.
I was talking about full hebrew support, built-in into
gtk+. Not only a bidi widget but also give the ability
to create a hebrew UI and so on... This is what we
really need for Linux hebrew support. There more
applications then a text editor, a common isrealy user
will also want more programs with
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000, Ilya Khayutin wrote about "Re: Reinventing the wheel (Re: Hebrew
Editor)":
> I was working a little bit on the topic (the gtk+
> coders & the gimp ones put where really interested to
> make internalization and I was the only guy from
> Israel at hand, so they volunteered me)
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Henry Ficher wrote:
> Hi List:
>
> After cloning my old disk with Ghost to a slightly bigger one, I'm
> getting the following messages every time I boot :
>
> Mar 12 22:49:49 Xitlali kernel: hda:hda: set_multmode: status=0x51 {
> DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> Mar 12 22
Hi,
I write an Internet Business Law column for Internet.com's Boardwatch
magazine . I'm writing a series of articles on open
source and I'd like to get community feedback for my next article dealing
with the question below. Can you post this or email your group members? If
they want to resp
it doesn't look at BSD licence in example..
GNU is not only open source but free information
look at the philosophy section of www.gnu.org
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Hi,
|
| I write an Internet Business Law
Why can't hebrew support be part of general-use products? MS Office2000
comes to mind as a proof that it can be done.
The main missing piece is to add support into the graphics tool-kit (i.e.
gtk, qt).
If you want to translate the user interface you don't need anything else.
Actually - if you wo
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Why can't hebrew support be part of general-use products? MS Office2000
> comes to mind as a proof that it can be done.
Do you know the difference between how much MS Office 2000
development costs was versus how much Israely people are willing
to invent in Hebrew support f
>
> OK. Let's set the meeting in Tuesday at 19:30. I suggest we meet in
> LinuxQA offices ( The equipment is due to be here, too, so maybe we can
> also install it! ) . It is In the Bursa area in Ramat-Gan, foot access
> from Rakevet Merkaz, so it is easy for anyone not from Tel-Aviv to
> get h
>
> > OK. Let's set the meeting in Tuesday at 19:30. I suggest we meet in
> > LinuxQA offices ( The equipment is due to be here, too, so
> > maybe we can
> > also install it! ) . It is In the Bursa area in Ramat-Gan,
> > foot access
> > from Rakevet Merkaz, so it is easy for anyone not from T
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:30:02PM +0200, Ury Segal wrote:
> So, we need a simple hebrew editor, that will enable someone to write
> a letter to his bank.
Would gnp do? As I've told, the GTK+ bidi hack already provides
pretty reasonable hebrew support for simple text editing (not rich).
--
Best
Hi!
What is the way to compile Solaris 2.6 binaries under
Solaris 7.
I hope there is no need to buy 2.6 just for that :{).
Thank you in advance for your help.
Alexander Indenbaum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
To unsubscribe, send mai
CS>> A better question would be: Why do Israeli users have to use
CS>> abiword, they certainly don't deserve it! Its pretty broken!
It's not broken, it's undeveloped.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-
US>> I dare you. Show me how you write a RTL-LTR text on a non
US>> RTL-LTR widget; or just show me good RTL-LTR widget.
Qtext did this on DOS, which is not an RTL-LTR widget.
US>> OR, show me a good Text widget. There isn't even ONE decent
US>> Text Widget, let alone LTR-RTL. Show me a Text wid
At 06:17 -0800 on 13/03/2000, Ilya Khayutin wrote:
>I was talking about full hebrew support, built-in into
>gtk+. Not only a bidi widget but also give the ability
>to create a hebrew UI and so on... This is what we
>really need for Linux hebrew support.
If I may add my 2c to the discussion.
If
> Moshe Zadka wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ilya Khayutin wrote:
> >
> > > A better option I think is to add hebrew
> > > support, build-in, into GTK+.
> >
> > That idea clicked right home. It should be possible to handle the whole
> > right left problem entirely within a variant on the Gtk+
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> QUESTION:
>
> I believe that Open Source is a very important freedom movement, because,
> like Harvard's Professor Lessig says, code is law, but with a non-human
> police force. With closed code, we'll all be prisoners in the very near
> future.
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --5B45A5CCDD83DCBE55B83FB0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
I am trying to coordinating IGLU preparations for IW2K instead of Ira. That is
why I was forward your message.
You are encoura
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Why can't hebrew support be part of general-use products? MS Office2000
> comes to mind as a proof that it can be done.
>
> The main missing piece is to add support into the graphics tool-kit (i.e.
> gtk, qt).
This won't help for a word processor.
Show will be on 28, 29, 30, 11am-8pm.
My list contain the following lines for people at the booth is as follows:
1) Guy Keren: 29th full day
2) Shaul Karl: 28th + 29th full day
3) Neer Friedman: 4pm-8pm ?
4) Alex Shnitman:
Any pointer and/or full explanation about the 8 in 10.0.0.0/8 and the way to
compute it for my network?
I guess that it has much to do with the subnet mask but isn't subnet masks of
the form 255.255.0.0?
--
Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An elephant is a mo
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 03:28:28AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> I am trying to coordinating IGLU preparations for IW2K instead of Ira. That is
> why I was forward your message.
> You are encourage to prepare a draft for an Hebrew flyer. I understand that
> you will be able to produce an EPS (Exten
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 04:44:06AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Any pointer and/or full explanation about the 8 in 10.0.0.0/8 and the way to
> compute it for my network?
> I guess that it has much to do with the subnet mask but isn't subnet masks of
> the form 255.255.0.0?
10.0.0.0 consists of 32
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Any pointer and/or full explanation about the 8 in 10.0.0.0/8 and the way to
> compute it for my network?
> I guess that it has much to do with the subnet mask but isn't subnet masks of
> the form 255.255.0.0?
I attached a shell script that I got from
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ariel Biener wrote:
I also include here a full translation table, for your convenience:
/0 == 0.0.0.0
/1 == 128.0.0.0
/2 == 192.0.0.0
/3 == 224.0.0.0
/4 == 240.0.0.0
/5 == 248.0.0.0
/6 == 252.0.0.0
/7 == 254.0.0.0
/8 == 255.0.0.0
/9 == 255.128.0.0
/10 == 255.192.0.0
/11 == 2
46 matches
Mail list logo
