Hi,
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
One of these days I would like to convert it to a v4l2 driver using
gspca as basis, this however will
Hi,
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
One of these days I would like to convert it to a v4l2 driver using
gspca as basis, this however
On 06/17/2009 09:43 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
One of these days I would like to convert it to a v4l2
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
One of these days
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:56:21 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org escreveu:
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
One of these
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 09:43 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
I personally think that loosing support for the parallel port
version is ok given that the parallel port itslef is rapidly
disappearing, what do you think ?
I agree wholeheartedly. If we remove pp support, then we can also remove
On 06/17/2009 11:56 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
Hans Verkuilhverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
works with the v4l1
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 09:43 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
I personally think that loosing support for the parallel port
version is ok given that the parallel port itslef is rapidly
disappearing, what do you think ?
I agree wholeheartedly. If we remove pp support, then we can also remove
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:26:58 +0200 (CEST)
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 09:43 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
I personally think that loosing support for the parallel port
version is ok given that the parallel port itslef is rapidly
disappearing, what
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:41:23 +0200
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com escreveu:
Hi all,
On 06/17/2009 04:28 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:59:59 +0200
Hans de Goedehdego...@redhat.com escreveu:
snip
As for usbvideo that supports (amongst others) the
Hi,
On 06/17/2009 05:23 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:41:23 +0200
Hans de Goedehdego...@redhat.com escreveu:
Hi all,
On 06/17/2009 04:28 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:59:59 +0200
Hans de Goedehdego...@redhat.com escreveu:
snip
As
Hans de Goede wrote:
sn9c102
Supports a large number of cams also supported by gspca's sonixb / sonixj
driver, we're using
#ifdef macros to detect if both are being build at the same time to
include usb-id's only
in one of the 2.
Btw, it would be interesting to work with the
On 06/17/2009 08:11 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
sn9c102
Supports a large number of cams also supported by gspca's sonixb / sonixj
driver, we're using
#ifdef macros to detect if both are being build at the same time to
include usb-id's only
in one of the 2.
Btw, it
14 matches
Mail list logo
