On Sat, 05 Aug 2000, Marc Mutz wrote about, Re: resuming FTP uploads:
Richard Adams wrote:
snip
'reget filename'.
snip
He said 'upload' ducking
O well, cant always get it right can we.
At least he will know howto do it in reverse.
Marc
--
Marc Mutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been having problems changing my resolution from 640x480 to
800x600. I tried running xf86config and when I do it sets my resolution
to 640x480. Someone told me there's a gui deal to do it called
xconfigurator. When I try running that from a command line as root I get
"command not found".
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000, Steven Ackerman wrote:
I've been having problems changing my resolution from 640x480 to
800x600. I tried running xf86config and when I do it sets my resolution
to 640x480. Someone told me there's a gui deal to do it called
xconfigurator. When I try running that from a
Sorry about that. I'm using Red Hat 6.1.
Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000, Steven Ackerman wrote:
I've been having problems changing my resolution from 640x480 to
800x600. I tried running xf86config and when I do it sets my resolution
to 640x480. Someone told me there's a
Do you have xconfigurator installed? Try
rpm -qa | grep Xconfigurator
If you cant find it. You have to install it first. I think it is included in
the RedHat 6.1 CD. Anyway the command to run the program is
Xconfigurator
with capital X.
-bk-
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 04:54:22 -0700
Steven Ackerman
I'm no guru at this module thing. I usually compile everything into the
kernel, but I am trying to install
a Linksys fastether 10/100 which is suppose to use the tulip driver
(RedHat 6.2). My previous network card (linksys eth16) wasn't a problem
to get working.
I've tried building it into the
About 2/3 of the way through the xf86config interaction, there is a spot
where it asks you if you want to change the order of the resolutions. If you
do so for the 8-bit ones, you should be able to get the system to default to
800*600. I think you do it by specifcying an order like 324, but
Please post again with a more exact description of what you are doing. I use
the Linksys LNE100TX NIC here all the time and have no trouble with the
tulip driver provided with either Debian Potato or LRP distributions. I
doubt RH is shipping an outdated tulip.o.
So please clarify the following
My ppp script now goes further, but still runs into the authentication
problem
Here are the pppd and chat log files, with debug added
The message, 'can't locate module char-major-45' in the pppd log file has
been appearing for some time. I don't believe I previously reported it
David
I can not get my new linksys 10/100LNETX card to be recognized by
Linux. It works fine under windows. Let me also
state that my prior Linksys ether16 ISA card was working perfectly prior
to my 'upgrade.'
I am getting one of two problems depending on how I am building the
tulip driver. Into
At 12:03 PM 8/6/00 -0400, Dances with Turtles wrote:
I can not get my new linksys 10/100LNETX card to be recognized by
Linux. It works fine under windows. Let me also
state that my prior Linksys ether16 ISA card was working perfectly prior
to my 'upgrade.'
[details deleted]
Well ... your
After I run xvidtune to get the sync settings, how in the world do I know
which lines to change in XF86Config?
(i.e., which 640x480 line do I change? There are a bunch of them.)
-jdr-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
I located the gcc-2.95.1-3 rpm and tried to install it, but
apparently I don't have two packages I need:
error: failed dependencies:
binutils = 2.9.5.0.12 is needed by gcc-2.95.1-3
cpp = 2.95.1 is needed by gcc-2.95.1-3
I got and installed the cpp-2.95.1-3 rpm, but got the
Ray Olszewski wrote:
At 12:03 PM 8/6/00 -0400, Dances with Turtles wrote:
I can not get my new linksys 10/100LNETX card to be recognized by
Linux. It works fine under windows. Let me also
state that my prior Linksys ether16 ISA card was working perfectly prior
to my 'upgrade.'
Howdy, Y'all:
I've been trying to get networking running on my
Slackware v7.0.0 install on my k6-2-266, 96 Megabyte RAM;
dual booting with windows98.
I have edited /etc/rc.inet1 with my IP address and bc-address:
192.168.1.2 192.168.1.255.
I have edited /etc/modules.conf:
alais net-pf-4
Charles --
Some of what you post here is too vague to troubleshoot. I'll answer what I can.
You write:
If I:
insmod ne
/lib/modules/2.2.13/net/ne.o: unresolved symbol ei_open
" ethdev_init
" and about 4 more lines
ne.o requires that 8390.o be installed first. So either do that with insmod
or
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000, Charles E. Gelm wrote about, ethernet not working:
Howdy, Y'all:
alais net-pf-4 off #original: OBTW, what does this mean?
alias net-pf-5 off #original: OBTW, what does this mean?
alias ne io=0x2a0 irq=10 #-- added line. ? that's a decimal ten right?
Lawson pointed
I remember working on a machine with 4 k memory; but this was a main-frame
(IBM 1620) using vacum tubes; input and output by punched cards, and
running Fortran II;
Must have been in '68 or '69.
This was the "obsolete" machine us students were allowed to play with; for
serious computing, there
I was using a 1620 in 1970, and it was transistorized, not tubes. Had a
5-meg disk drive (14 inch variety, stacked platters) and punched cards.
"High speed" output was to punched cards, and if you wanted something you
could read, you had to run the cards through an accounting machine. The
O.K. I installed the rpm for binutils-2.10.0.18-1 and now,
when I try to install gcc-2.95.1-3, I get these error messages:
[root@localhost rks]# man rpm
[root@localhost rks]# rpm -i --test gcc-2.95.1-3.i386.rpm
file /usr/bin/egcs from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file from package
Yes, I changed to pop3 address and got past that point. Now the server has
something else it doesn't like. Here's the relevant syslog:
Aug 6 21:39:55 debian fetchmail[914]: POP3 +OK CPIMSPOPA09.email.msn.com
POP3 Server
Aug 6 21:39:55 debian fetchmail[914]: POP3 USER MSN/davidturetsky^M
Aug
Gee, what memories you bring back!
I learned FORTRAN II on an IBM 1620 Model 1 (no disk drive) at NYU in the
mid-60s, subsequently upgraded to a Model II with a 5meg drive. I then went
on to do a lot of programming on an 1130
In 1971 I went to work for a company which made a microprogrammable
/proc/interrupts does NOT list all supported interrupts. It just lists the
ones that have actually been used. If the lack of a listing here is the ONLY
reason why you think your Linux kernel is not supporting the second serial
port, then you are probably mistaken.
If you have some other reason
I am getting both 0.12 and 0.18 -- I don't know why!
thanks!
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000806 16:44]:
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Richard Spencer wrote:
I located the gcc-2.95.1-3 rpm and tried to install it, but
apparently I don't have two packages I need:
error: failed
I can't find any variant of account name that produced any
successful/different result, so I am posting the question to msn, which
provided the account name styling in the first place. Their policy is to
reply within 24 hours
Lawson, yes, I had failed to chmod 755 /etc/ppp/ppp-off. However when
At 01:25 PM 8/6/00 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Aug 6 11:25:29 debian pppd[274]: rcvd [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 auth pap]
Looks like the remote pppd is satisfied with the shell login and doesn't
want to be bothered with PAP. Maybe you can try
noauth
in /etc/ppp/options.
Good catch, Lawson.
Good. You've found the answer. Your chatscript reported using
"davidturetsky" as userid, but the ISP expects "MSN/davidturetsky". Change
the chstscript and see if pppd (however you invoke it - I don't have the
backfile of your messages handy) now works correctly.
At 12:18 AM 8/6/00 -0700,
27 matches
Mail list logo
