On Friday 08 February 2008 00:22:36 Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday February 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 03:02:00 Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday February 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems the other topic wasn't quite clear...
not necessarily. sometimes it
Hi Steve,
Steve Fairbairn wrote:
snip
Is anyone using an array with disks on PCI interface cards?
Almost, I have a Sil3132 PCI-E card (2 port SATA-300) mixed with 6 on
board ports (on Asus M2N-E mobo). No problems there, I quite pleased
with it.
Is there an issue with mixing motherboard
Hi All,
I currently have a couple of IT8212 PCI ATA RAID (1, 0 ot 1+0) cards
which Linux RAID doesn't seem to like too well. Initially I tried
creating an array out of 4 disks on the 4 primaries over the 2 cards.
Although this seemed to work, the access performance was impossibly low
and I
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:51:39PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday February 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:25:31AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday February 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I hereby give the idea for inspiration to kernel hackers.
Thursday 07 February 2008 22:35:45 Bill Davidsen napisał(a):
As you may remember, I have configured udev to associate /dev/d_* devices
with
serial numbers (to keep them from changing depending on boot module loading
sequence).
Why do you care?
Because /dev/sd* devices get swapped
Steve Fairbairn wrote:
Can anyone see any issues with what I'm trying to do?
No.
Are there any known issues with IT8212 cards (They worked as straight
disks on linux fine)?
No idea, don't have that card.
Is anyone using an array with disks on PCI interface cards?
Works. I've
Friday 08 February 2008 13:44:18 Bill Davidsen napisał(a):
This is exactly what is not clear for me: what is it that identifies
drive/partition as part of
the array? /dev/sd name? UUID as part of superblock? /dev/d_n?
If it's UUID I should be safe regardless of /dev/sd* designation?
Marcin Krol wrote:
Thursday 07 February 2008 22:35:45 Bill Davidsen napisał(a):
As you may remember, I have configured udev to associate /dev/d_* devices with
serial numbers (to keep them from changing depending on boot module loading
sequence).
Why do you care?
Because
Hi All,
My RAID 5 array is running slow.
I've made a lot of test to find out where this issue is laying.
I've come to the conclusion that once the array is created with mdadm
2.6.x (up to 2.6.4), whatever the kernel you run, whatever the mdadm you
use to re-assemble the array, the array's
Quoting Hubert Verstraete [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All,
My RAID 5 array is running slow.
I've made a lot of test to find out where this issue is laying.
I've come to the conclusion that once the array is created with mdadm
2.6.x (up to 2.6.4), whatever the kernel you run, whatever the mdadm
you
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:54:55AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
The promise tx4 pci works great and supports sata/300+ncq/etc $60-$70.
Wait, I have used tx4 pci up until ~2.6.22 and it didn't support AFAIK
ncq. Are you sure that current driver supports NCQ? I might then revive
that card :)
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:54:55AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
The promise tx4 pci works great and supports sata/300+ncq/etc $60-$70.
Wait, I have used tx4 pci up until ~2.6.22 and it didn't support AFAIK
ncq. Are you sure that current driver supports
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 02:24:15PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:54:55AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
The promise tx4 pci works great and supports sata/300+ncq/etc $60-$70.
Wait, I have used tx4 pci up until ~2.6.22 and it
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 02:24:15PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:54:55AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
The promise tx4 pci works great and supports sata/300+ncq/etc $60-$70.
Wait, I have
Hi, I'm thinking about building a few storage servers that use PMP's via the
new ICH10R southbridges that are supposed to support FIS based switching (with
PMPs). These boards should ship in a couple months (with the P45 Northbridges)
according to my distributors. My question is when should
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Steve Fairbairn wrote:
Can anyone see any issues with what I'm trying to do?
No.
Are there any known issues with IT8212 cards (They worked as straight
disks on linux fine)?
No idea, don't have that card.
Is anyone using an array with disks
Does anyone recommend any inexpensive (probably SATA-II) PCI interface
cards?
See this message and surrounding thread from November 2007 on
the linux-ide list.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg12726.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the
Hello, Neil.
YOU WROTE : 5 февраля 2008 г., 13:10:00:
On Tuesday February 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feb 5 11:56:12 raid01 kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
at virtual address 001cd901
This looks like some sort of memory corruption.
Possible you have bad memory,
Hi linux-raid.
RAID5 how chage chunck size from 64 to 128, 256 ?
is it possible ?
Somebody did this ?
--
Best regards,
Andreas-Sokov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
19 matches
Mail list logo
