On 2017-05-17 17:07:34 [+0200], To Chad Dupuis wrote:
> > > Sebastian, can you add this change to your patch set?
> >
> > Are sure that you can reliably reproduce the issue and fix it with the
> > patch above? Because this patch:
>
> oh. Okay. Now it clicked. It can fix the issue but it is still
On 2017-05-17 17:01:53 [+0200], To Chad Dupuis wrote:
> On 2017-05-12 11:55:52 [-0400], Chad Dupuis wrote:
> > Ok, I believe I've found the issue here. The machine that the test has
> > performed on had many more possible CPUs than active CPUs. We calculate
> > which CPU to the work time on in
On Wed, 17 May 2017, 11:01am, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-05-12 11:55:52 [-0400], Chad Dupuis wrote:
> > Ok, I believe I've found the issue here. The machine that the test has
> > performed on had many more possible CPUs than active CPUs. We calculate
> > which CPU to the work
On 2017-05-12 11:55:52 [-0400], Chad Dupuis wrote:
> Ok, I believe I've found the issue here. The machine that the test has
> performed on had many more possible CPUs than active CPUs. We calculate
> which CPU to the work time on in bnx2fc_process_new_cqes() like this:
>
> unsigned int cpu =
On Tue, 9 May 2017, 11:18am, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 10:17 -0400, Chad Dupuis wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 May 2017, 10:04pm, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Sebastian,
> > >
> > > > Martin, do you see any chance to get this merged? Chad replied to
> > the
> > > >
Chad,
> To be honest, I'm reluctant to merge these patches on bnx2fc as the
> I/O path on this driver has been stable for quite some time and given
> that it's an older driver I'm not looking to make changes there.
I understand that the driver is in maintenance mode. However, the Linux
kernel
On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 10:17 -0400, Chad Dupuis wrote:
> On Mon, 8 May 2017, 10:04pm, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> >
> > Sebastian,
> >
> > > Martin, do you see any chance to get this merged? Chad replied to
> the
> > > list that he is going to test it on 2017-04-10, didn't respond to
> the
> >
On Mon, 8 May 2017, 10:04pm, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Sebastian,
>
> > Martin, do you see any chance to get this merged? Chad replied to the
> > list that he is going to test it on 2017-04-10, didn't respond to the
> > ping 10 days later. The series stalled last time in the same way.
>
>
Sebastian,
> Martin, do you see any chance to get this merged? Chad replied to the
> list that he is going to test it on 2017-04-10, didn't respond to the
> ping 10 days later. The series stalled last time in the same way.
I am very reluctant to merge something when a driver has an active
On 2017-04-10 19:12:49 [+0200], To Martin K . Petersen wrote:
> This is a repost to get the patches applied against v4.11-rc6. mkp's scsi
> for-next tree can be merged with no conflicts.
…
Martin, do you see any chance to get this merged? Chad replied to the
list that he is going to test it on
On 2017-04-10 14:20:41 [-0400], Chad Dupuis wrote:
> Sebastian, will take a look.
This [0] commit in tip's smp/hotplug branch is staged for the next merge
window. It will trigger a lockdep warning on the recursive
get_online_cpus() invocation in the two drivers. It is fixed/avoided by
the
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, 5:12pm -, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This is a repost to get the patches applied against v4.11-rc6. mkp's scsi
> for-next tree can be merged with no conflicts.
>
> The last repost [0] was not merged and stalled after Martin pinged Chad
> [1]. He didn't even
This is a repost to get the patches applied against v4.11-rc6. mkp's scsi
for-next tree can be merged with no conflicts.
The last repost [0] was not merged and stalled after Martin pinged Chad
[1]. He didn't even reply after tglx pinged him approx two weeks later.
Johannes Thumshirn was so kind
[ +Lee and Chris ]
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 12:33:11PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> > > "Sebastian" == Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> > > writes:
> >
> > Sebastian> This is the a repost + fixups to get the patches
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Sebastian" == Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
>
> Sebastian> This is the a repost + fixups to get the patches applied
> Sebastian> against v4.9-rc4. mkp's scsi for-next tree can be merged
> Sebastian> with no
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
Sebastian> This is the a repost + fixups to get the patches applied
Sebastian> against v4.9-rc4. mkp's scsi for-next tree can be merged
Sebastian> with no conflicts.
Chad?
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux
This is the a repost + fixups to get the patches applied against v4.9-rc4.
mkp's scsi for-next tree can be merged with no conflicts.
The last repost was not merged and stalled after Chad Dupuis said to hold on
because he is testing but never came back with the results [0]. Johannes
confirmed that
This is the second repost + fixups to get the patches applied against v4.9-rc4.
mkp's scsi for-next tree can be merged with no conflicts.
The last repost was not merged and stalled after Chad Dupuis said to hold on
because he is testing but never came back with the results [0]. Johannes
confirmed
18 matches
Mail list logo