Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-22 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 17:15 +1200, chris wrote:
 On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 20:06 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
  On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
   On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 19:29 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
   On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Sawtell 
   csawt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2010 19:17, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
 snip
most of the X ugliness is revealed in /var/log/Xorg.0.log
   
   
http://amlc.berlios.de/
   
It just works.
  
   IME not always. In fact there must be a change in X if it is not
   working now and did in a previous edition.
  
   Look for the wrong/non existent edid in the log file.
 snip
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_display_identification_data
 
 After following the suggestions offered, I downloaded -compiled the
 script, which worked and gave me new modes etc.
 
 However, there is no edid information in the xorg.log files.
 Also in the preferencesmonitor gui, it only offers Default monitor,
 and all other options greyed out.
 
 I have after some work obtained the edid information for this monitor, a
 Viewsonic wms wide 22.  I used the viewsonic edid.exe program on the XP
 partition of this box to obtain the edid information. (As an aside, this
 programme will not run under Vista);but I am stuck at this point as to
 how to get it into the system.
 
 Also, just to check there is not a hardware issue, I installed Linux
 mint 10, into am Asus p4, that I have hanging around.  Same result, and
 the same limited resolutions.
 
 Further suggestions more than gratefully appreciated, as my 70 year old
 brain is nearly at its limit.
 
 (Moans, Oh why could I not have stayed with CPM?)
 regards Chris T
 
 
 
 
I haven't got anything at all in my xorg config ( 10.04 ). I used to,
when 1400x1050 was a weird size, but that was years ago. Do you have a
VX2233wm? If so, that's a native 1920x1080 resolution. As long as you're
talking to it digitally it should just work. 

Are you using the proprietary drivers? I must admit to doing so, but I
stick with nVidia these days... 

http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Lucid_Installation_Guide
provides a fair overview of all the available options. It contains the
line

By default there is no configuration file (xorg.conf) for X anymore, so
X will try to do the right thing.

so it must be offering a simpler solution!

I'd go the propietary fglrx driver route, hopefully just selecting the
ATI accelerated graphics driver via the Restricted Driver Manager. 

Good luck (:

Steve

-- 
Steve Holdoway st...@greengecko.co.nz
http://www.greengecko.co.nz
MSN: st...@greengecko.co.nz
Skype: sholdowa


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-22 Thread chris
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 17:38 +1200, Steve Holdoway wrote:
 On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 17:15 +1200, chris wrote:
  On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 20:06 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
   On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 19:29 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Sawtell 
csawt...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 18 June 2010 19:17, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
  snip
 most of the X ugliness is revealed in /var/log/Xorg.0.log


 http://amlc.berlios.de/

 It just works.
   
IME not always. In fact there must be a change in X if it is not
working now and did in a previous edition.
   
Look for the wrong/non existent edid in the log file.
  snip
   
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_display_identification_data
  
  After following the suggestions offered, I downloaded -compiled the
  script, which worked and gave me new modes etc.
  
  However, there is no edid information in the xorg.log files.
  Also in the preferencesmonitor gui, it only offers Default monitor,
  and all other options greyed out.
  
  I have after some work obtained the edid information for this monitor, a
  Viewsonic wms wide 22.  I used the viewsonic edid.exe program on the XP
  partition of this box to obtain the edid information. (As an aside, this
  programme will not run under Vista);but I am stuck at this point as to
  how to get it into the system.
  
  Also, just to check there is not a hardware issue, I installed Linux
  mint 10, into am Asus p4, that I have hanging around.  Same result, and
  the same limited resolutions.
  
  Further suggestions more than gratefully appreciated, as my 70 year old
  brain is nearly at its limit.
  
  (Moans, Oh why could I not have stayed with CPM?)
  regards Chris T
  
  
  
  
 I haven't got anything at all in my xorg config ( 10.04 ). I used to,
 when 1400x1050 was a weird size, but that was years ago. Do you have a
 VX2233wm? If so, that's a native 1920x1080 resolution. As long as you're
 talking to it digitally it should just work. 
 
 Are you using the proprietary drivers? I must admit to doing so, but I
 stick with nVidia these days... 
 
 http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Lucid_Installation_Guide
 provides a fair overview of all the available options. It contains the
 line
 
 By default there is no configuration file (xorg.conf) for X anymore, so
 X will try to do the right thing.
 
 so it must be offering a simpler solution!
 
 I'd go the propietary fglrx driver route, hopefully just selecting the
 ATI accelerated graphics driver via the Restricted Driver Manager. 
 
 Good luck (:
 
 Steve
 

Hi Steve,
Further update.
The monitor is a 2235wm, and for some reason I am under the impression
that the native mode is 1680x 1050.
However,because of a couple of other matters that weren't right I pulled
the hard drive, which was suspect and getting very hot:-(, and did a
complete reinstall  of 10.04 using a new 160gb drive.

  As I needed to keep SWMBO happy I uncoupled the box from my KVM switch
and set it up with the Viewsonic as a standalone system.

(Boy am I learning things the hard way)!

Bingo, it picked up the monitor and the edid information and immediately
settled onto the 1680x1050 resolution.
Also in the gui, it shows the full range of resolutions, and the monitor
name etc.

So the problem apparently is the KVM switch.
(which has not been an issue up until this release).

Question now is How can I set this as the default resolution so it will
choose it when I boot up using the KVM?

The only thing I can think of is to set up and xorg.conf
Any ideas?

I will however download the fglrx driver and install that. An overnight
job by modem.

Also the hardware drivers gui, does not show any drivers when you
activate it.  It just says   no propriety drivers on this system.
Idea's?

cheers chris t



Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-22 Thread aaron

 
 I will however download the fglrx driver and install that. An
 overnight job by modem.

im fairly shure you card is only supported by the legacy version of
fglrx

also i generally recommend avoiding it like the plague...

i think something like this:

Section Monitor
Identifier DVI-0 # or whatever yours is
Option PreferredMode 1680x1050
EndSection

in xorg.conf should do the trick


Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-22 Thread chris
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 00:48 +1200, aaron wrote:
 i think something like this:
 
 Section Monitor
 Identifier DVI-0 # or whatever yours is
 Option PreferredMode 1680x1050
 EndSection 

Many thanks, I shall try that today.
get back to you
regards Chris T



Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-22 Thread dave lilley

As a footnote to this I've been told right or wrong that the
xorg.conf should be put in /usr/lib/X11/xorg.conf.d
directory.

At least that's where I put my xorg.conf for a touch screen
monitor I've got.
but suppose it wouldn't matter too much if it's put in
/etc/X11 directory either.

Take what you want from this posting.

Dave.

- Original Message Follows -
 On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 00:48 +1200, aaron wrote:
  i think something like this:
  
  Section Monitor
  Identifier DVI-0 # or whatever yours is
  Option PreferredMode 1680x1050
  EndSection 
 
 Many thanks, I shall try that today.
 get back to you
 regards Chris T
 


Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-22 Thread Craig Falconer

chris wrote, On 06/23/2010 07:52 PM:

   As I needed to keep SWMBO happy I uncoupled the box from my KVM switch
and set it up with the Viewsonic as a standalone system.

...

Bingo, it picked up the monitor and the edid information and immediately
settled onto the 1680x1050 resolution.
Also in the gui, it shows the full range of resolutions, and the monitor
name etc.

So the problem apparently is the KVM switch.
(which has not been an issue up until this release).


So the KVM switch is filtering out the EDID info.   Get a better KVM 
switch.   Novaview and Rextron ones work well.


A four port PS2 switch with OSD is about $200+
A four port USB switch with OSD is about $220+
2 port ones are available, but they don't do OSD or chaining.

Cables are normally extras too, in case they're a part of your existing KVM.

You can get 8 and 16 port ones too, but they're getting really pricy.

Interestingly - some KVM switches support dual monitors now.


Another option is to buy a new separate monitor and lose the KVM switch 
completely - probably quite similar costs.



--
Craig Falconer


Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-22 Thread chris
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 11:45 +1200, Craig Falconer wrote:
 chris wrote, On 06/23/2010 07:52 PM:
 As I needed to keep SWMBO happy I uncoupled the box from my KVM switch
  and set it up with the Viewsonic as a standalone system.
 ...
  Bingo, it picked up the monitor and the edid information and immediately
snip
 switch.   Novaview and Rextron ones work well.
 
 A four port PS2 switch with OSD is about $200+
 A four port USB switch with OSD is about $220+
 2 port ones are available, but they don't do OSD or chaining.
snip
 completely - probably quite similar costs.
 
 
Hi Craig,
what I actually did, was follow an x-org template sent by Aaron (I
think)
and add the preferred mode into that, so it is now working fine through
the switch.
Just for your info, there were two issues.  One was a flaky hard drive
which I have consigned null
The other the Kvm switch.
Also on the ubuntu forum =technical support, a number of heads have
popped up with the same kvm issue, or looking for solutions.

I need to read man xorg and work out how to include a driver section to
finish the whole thing off.
However for now working and nearly completely resolved.
And SWMBO is happy.
On a personal note, how is the land rover?
We are still wandering around the landscape
Cheers Chris Thomas




Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-22 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:57 +1200, chris wrote:
 On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 11:45 +1200, Craig Falconer wrote:
  chris wrote, On 06/23/2010 07:52 PM:
  As I needed to keep SWMBO happy I uncoupled the box from my KVM switch
   and set it up with the Viewsonic as a standalone system.
  ...
   Bingo, it picked up the monitor and the edid information and immediately
 snip
  switch.   Novaview and Rextron ones work well.
  
  A four port PS2 switch with OSD is about $200+
  A four port USB switch with OSD is about $220+
  2 port ones are available, but they don't do OSD or chaining.
 snip
  completely - probably quite similar costs.
  
  
 Hi Craig,
 what I actually did, was follow an x-org template sent by Aaron (I
 think)
 and add the preferred mode into that, so it is now working fine through
 the switch.
 Just for your info, there were two issues.  One was a flaky hard drive
 which I have consigned null
 The other the Kvm switch.
 Also on the ubuntu forum =technical support, a number of heads have
 popped up with the same kvm issue, or looking for solutions.
 
 I need to read man xorg and work out how to include a driver section to
 finish the whole thing off.
 However for now working and nearly completely resolved.
 And SWMBO is happy.
 On a personal note, how is the land rover?
 We are still wandering around the landscape
 Cheers Chris Thomas
 
 
A final solution is to just use remote X and a headless box. I know that
10.04 seems to have destroyed that option for some reason...

X :1 -query remote ip

then Ctrl-Alt-F8 and ..F7 to swap displays was so simple in a pure *nix
environment.

vnc is also another alternative. I do have a KVM switch lying around,
but it's analog... 

Cheers,


Steve


-- 
Steve Holdoway st...@greengecko.co.nz
http://www.greengecko.co.nz
MSN: st...@greengecko.co.nz
Skype: sholdowa


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-22 Thread chris
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 12:21 +1200, Steve Holdoway wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:57 +1200, chris wrote:
  On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 11:45 +1200, Craig Falconer wrote:
   chris wrote, On 06/23/2010 07:52 PM:
snip
  
 A final solution is to just use remote X and a headless box. I know that
 10.04 seems to have destroyed that option for some reason...
 
I had no problems with this set up until 10.4, which is why it bit me.

 X :1 -query remote ip
 
 then Ctrl-Alt-F8 and ..F7 to swap displays was so simple in a pure *nix
 environment.
 
Uhm that would be nice, but I do need to dual boot one of the machines
into another operating system.  (Being discreet here)

 vnc is also another alternative. I do have a KVM switch lying around,
 but it's analog... 
 
is that an advantage or a disadvantage, would be willing to try it
Cheers Chris

 Cheers,
 
 
 Steve
 
 





Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-21 Thread chris
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 20:06 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 19:29 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
  On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Sawtell csawt...@gmail.com 
  wrote:
   On 18 June 2010 19:17, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
   On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
   most of the X ugliness is revealed in /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  
  
   http://amlc.berlios.de/
  
   It just works.
 
  IME not always. In fact there must be a change in X if it is not
  working now and did in a previous edition.
 
  Look for the wrong/non existent edid in the log file.
snip
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_display_identification_data

After following the suggestions offered, I downloaded -compiled the
script, which worked and gave me new modes etc.

However, there is no edid information in the xorg.log files.
Also in the preferencesmonitor gui, it only offers Default monitor,
and all other options greyed out.

I have after some work obtained the edid information for this monitor, a
Viewsonic wms wide 22.  I used the viewsonic edid.exe program on the XP
partition of this box to obtain the edid information. (As an aside, this
programme will not run under Vista);but I am stuck at this point as to
how to get it into the system.

Also, just to check there is not a hardware issue, I installed Linux
mint 10, into am Asus p4, that I have hanging around.  Same result, and
the same limited resolutions.

Further suggestions more than gratefully appreciated, as my 70 year old
brain is nearly at its limit.

(Moans, Oh why could I not have stayed with CPM?)
regards Chris T






Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-18 Thread Nick Rout
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
 Greetings Clugers,
 I am hopeful someone on the list can assist me with this issue.

 Hardware  HP Workstation P4
 Video Card Sapphire Radeon x300se
 Viewsonic led Monitor native resolution 1600x1200

 Under Ubuntu 8.04 I had no graphics issues at all, running the ati
 radeon opensource driver resolution 1600x1200.

 Since I Upgraded to 10.4 I can only get 1200x1048 on the Viewsonic
 monitor.

 However If I plug in my old Sony I can choose 1600x1200.

 I spent hours reconfiguring xorg reading the man pages for xorg, and
 xrandr, all to no avail.
 Also googled extensively with out any workable answers
 Any help greatly appreciated

most of the X ugliness is revealed in /var/log/Xorg.0.log


Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-18 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On 18 June 2010 19:17, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
 Greetings Clugers,
 I am hopeful someone on the list can assist me with this issue.

 Hardware  HP Workstation P4
 Video Card Sapphire Radeon x300se
 Viewsonic led Monitor native resolution 1600x1200

 Under Ubuntu 8.04 I had no graphics issues at all, running the ati
 radeon opensource driver resolution 1600x1200.

 Since I Upgraded to 10.4 I can only get 1200x1048 on the Viewsonic
 monitor.

 However If I plug in my old Sony I can choose 1600x1200.

 I spent hours reconfiguring xorg reading the man pages for xorg, and
 xrandr, all to no avail.
 Also googled extensively with out any workable answers
 Any help greatly appreciated

 most of the X ugliness is revealed in /var/log/Xorg.0.log


http://amlc.berlios.de/

It just works.

-- 
Sincerely etc.
Christopher Sawtell


Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-18 Thread Nick Rout
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Sawtell csawt...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 18 June 2010 19:17, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
 Greetings Clugers,
 I am hopeful someone on the list can assist me with this issue.

 Hardware  HP Workstation P4
 Video Card Sapphire Radeon x300se
 Viewsonic led Monitor native resolution 1600x1200

 Under Ubuntu 8.04 I had no graphics issues at all, running the ati
 radeon opensource driver resolution 1600x1200.

 Since I Upgraded to 10.4 I can only get 1200x1048 on the Viewsonic
 monitor.

 However If I plug in my old Sony I can choose 1600x1200.

 I spent hours reconfiguring xorg reading the man pages for xorg, and
 xrandr, all to no avail.
 Also googled extensively with out any workable answers
 Any help greatly appreciated

 most of the X ugliness is revealed in /var/log/Xorg.0.log


 http://amlc.berlios.de/

 It just works.

IME not always. In fact there must be a change in X if it is not
working now and did in a previous edition.

Look for the wrong/non existent edid in the log file.


Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-18 Thread chris
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 19:29 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Sawtell csawt...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
  On 18 June 2010 19:17, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
  Greetings Clugers,
snip
 
  most of the X ugliness is revealed in /var/log/Xorg.0.log
 
 
  http://amlc.berlios.de/
 
  It just works.
 
 IME not always. In fact there must be a change in X if it is not
 working now and did in a previous edition.
 
 Look for the wrong/non existent edid in the log file.

edid?  excuse my ignorance
can you elaborate please



Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-18 Thread chris
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 19:23 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
 On 18 June 2010 19:17, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
  Greetings Clugers,
,snip
 
 http://amlc.berlios.de/
 
 It just works.
 

Thanks will let you know how I get on
regards Chris T



Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-18 Thread Nick Rout
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 19:29 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Sawtell csawt...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
  On 18 June 2010 19:17, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
  Greetings Clugers,
 snip
 
  most of the X ugliness is revealed in /var/log/Xorg.0.log
 
 
  http://amlc.berlios.de/
 
  It just works.

 IME not always. In fact there must be a change in X if it is not
 working now and did in a previous edition.

 Look for the wrong/non existent edid in the log file.

 edid?  excuse my ignorance
 can you elaborate please



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_display_identification_data


Re: resolution Problem Ubuntu 10.4

2010-06-18 Thread chris
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 20:06 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 19:29 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
  On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Sawtell csawt...@gmail.com 
  wrote:
   On 18 June 2010 19:17, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
   On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chris che...@gmail.com wrote:
   Greetings Clugers,
  snip
  
   most of the X ugliness is revealed in /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  
  
   http://amlc.berlios.de/
  
   It just works.
 
  IME not always. In fact there must be a change in X if it is not
  working now and did in a previous edition.
 
  Look for the wrong/non existent edid in the log file.
 
  edid?  excuse my ignorance
  can you elaborate please
 
 
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_display_identification_data

Thank you Nick  I will look it up immediately
regards Chris T