On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:16 AM, jtd j...@mtnl.net.in wrote:
No. But you really suck. Noticed the distinct lack of a smiley. No?
heck never mind.
Bah...and you think I care for your remarks? :)
Explain how exactly is SAMBA/CIFS better than a M$ share.
Stability
ooh...my
On Sunday 28 December 2008 04:55, Dinesh Joshi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:16 AM, jtd j...@mtnl.net.in wrote:
No. But you really suck. Noticed the distinct lack of a smiley.
No? heck never mind.
Bah...and you think I care for your remarks? :)
Explain how exactly is SAMBA/CIFS better
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Dinesh Joshi dinesh.a.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah yeah Linux beats crap out of Windows. Whose saying otherwise?
Though compatibility is an issue infact heres a bit, you can use NFS
on Windows boxes with some Unix utilities for windows software. I
forget its
Raj Mathur wrote:
On Wednesday 24 Dec 2008, Rony wrote:
[snip]
Why not setup virtual machine so that anyone from the network can
access it?
Networking between host and guest machines is a big pain. It is not
good for production.
Having played around a bit with Xen
Dinesh Joshi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
Networking between host and guest machines is a big pain. It is not good
for production.
It wasn't ever a big pain for me. All it took was setting up a bridge
and N tun/tap interfaces. Its not
Dinesh Joshi wrote:
Let me just cut to the chase and before reading my reply I'm putting
in a disclaimer for everybody. I'm not a Microsoft supporter nor a
hater. I'm a Linux enthusiast and a supporter of the Open Source
movement / philosophy but I do not like when people go overboard
On 12/24/08, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
Networking between host and guest machines is a big pain. It is not good
for production.
What part is a big pain? I have setup a couple of guests inside
VirtualBox and allow them to be accessed from my LAN. I have been
running a few things like
Networking between host and guest machines is a big pain. It is not good
for production.
--
Regards,
Rony.
if you use bridge networking in vmware , there is no problem in any networking
whatsoever. It is being used in many data centers for live servers for
production use.
regards
--
Issues has been mostly due to the cumbersome process. Suppose i have 2 linux
machines and 1 WINXP; virtual machine A,B and C respectively.
I want to process a document from A in C, i will have to copy from A to B
and
then from B to C before i actually begin work. Then i have to save and go
M$ scores in Office due to its proprietary document formats. Does OO
have access to the entire document format as M$ has? Once it enters the
ODF arena, it could be evaluated better against OO. Same with all other
graphics softwares that use closed restrictive formats.
Format for new version
On Thursday 25 December 2008 22:27, Shamit Verma wrote:
M$ scores in Office due to its proprietary document formats. Does
OO have access to the entire document format as M$ has? Once it
enters the ODF arena, it could be evaluated better against OO.
Same with all other graphics softwares
On Thursday 25 December 2008 10:31, Dinesh Joshi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:53 AM, jtd j...@mtnl.net.in wrote:
???. Samba /CIFS works better than M$ network share. However you
Ooh my boat is t3h bigger than you're boat. I rock. You suck.
Right? :)
No. But you really suck. Noticed the
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Sachin Gopalakrishnan
mai...@sachingopal.com wrote:
Well it was cumbersome to transfer files from
one computer to another and then transfer it to the virtual machine.
no problems with network sharing. Besides the virtual machine hung too much
due to a
display
Mehul Ved wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Sachin Gopalakrishnan
mai...@sachingopal.com wrote:
Well it was cumbersome to transfer files from
one computer to another and then transfer it to the virtual machine.
no problems with network sharing. Besides the virtual machine hung too
On Wednesday 24 Dec 2008, Rony wrote:
[snip]
Why not setup virtual machine so that anyone from the network can
access it?
Networking between host and guest machines is a big pain. It is not
good for production.
Having played around a bit with Xen in the past few days, I'm interested
in
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Sachin Gopalakrishnan
mai...@sachingopal.com wrote:
There can never be a replacement for the crap that is M$office. Even a
brainless moron cant write such crap.
There are at least two SUPERIOR alternatives Openoffice and Koffice.
I'm not sure who said that
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:53 AM, jtd j...@mtnl.net.in wrote:
???. Samba /CIFS works better than M$ network share. However you
Ooh my boat is t3h bigger than you're boat. I rock. You suck. Right? :)
Explain how exactly is SAMBA/CIFS better than a M$ share. And how
EXACTLY is a SAMBA / CIFS share
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Mehul Ved mehul.n@gmail.com wrote:
Why not setup virtual machine so that anyone from the network can access it?
gee whizz why didn't I think of it? :) So what virtualization package
are you talking about? What network are you talking about? Oohh how do
you
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
Networking between host and guest machines is a big pain. It is not good
for production.
It wasn't ever a big pain for me. All it took was setting up a bridge
and N tun/tap interfaces. Its not very difficult to follow
Having played around a bit with Xen in the past few days, I'm interested
in knowing what sort of host/guest network issues you've faced. I
found the networking to work fine both ways, but then I haven't done
any rigorous applications yet.
Issues has been mostly due to the cumbersome
You are confusing your familiarity of M$ with features of OO. The two
have absolutely nothing to do with each other. The OO ui DOES NOT
MIMIC M$. so you really need to read the OO manuals and tuts.
Put in a pivot and watch the application slow down like hell.
Even if we put in a few vlookups
There can never be a replacement for the crap that is M$office. Even a
brainless moron cant write such crap.
There are at least two SUPERIOR alternatives Openoffice and Koffice.
I use ubuntu 8.04 as my desktop at home but i need excel at my workplace on
my laptop.
I have tried using OO (not
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 11:33, Sachin Gopalakrishnan wrote:
There can never be a replacement for the crap that is M$office.
Even a brainless moron cant write such crap.
There are at least two SUPERIOR alternatives Openoffice and
Koffice.
I use ubuntu 8.04 as my desktop at home
23 matches
Mail list logo
