On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 10:26 -0400, Ben Winslow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I think you're not really gaining anything by doing this, but
you are losing something in breaking backwards compatibility. Consider
that, if you currently want to send /exec to the person you're talking to
in
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 10:22 -0500, Jeremy Nelson wrote:
So many of you know this, so bear with me:
/SEND sends a message to the window's current target
/SAYsends a message to the window's current channel.
If you have a /query going in a window with a channel, the /query
I'm in agreement with Jeremy's original proposal. If you have an
open /query, /exec -o should most definitely be going there; not
doing so is unintuitive, despite years of common IRC practise.
And before someone proposes it: I also strongly object to a /set
variable to define the behaviour of
So many of you know this, so bear with me:
/SEND sends a message to the window's current target
/SAYsends a message to the window's current channel.
If you have a /query going in a window with a channel, the /query overrides
the channel as the current target. This is the
