[LUTE] Re: UNICODE Test ÜÄÖ üäö à é

2017-07-29 Thread Rainer
Looks OK Rainer On 29.07.2017 14:29, David Van Edwards wrote: Dear Rainer, Just to check, this is using the normal Mac keystrokes for diacriticals, I wonder if it will be mangled by the Lute Net software? Ü Ä Ö ä ö ü é â è Best wishes, David At 14:20 +0200 29/7/17, Rainer wrote: I have

[LUTE] Anfänger können ünftig schöner Posten?

2017-07-29 Thread Ralf Mattes
Only a test To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[LUTE] Re: UNICODE Test ÜÄÖ üäö à é

2017-07-29 Thread Rainer
I have sent this mail with utf-8 encoding and everything looks OK. Rainer On 29.07.2017 13:40, Rainer wrote: German: ÄÖÜ äöü ß French:éâàè To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[LUTE] HTML mails

2017-07-29 Thread Rainer
By the way, a few months ago I created a few programs (on the IBM iSeries) for a customer that sends HTML mails to their customers. The public relations department insisted on sending HTML mails since they look much better than plain text. I used very basic html features (unordered lists,

[LUTE] Re: Better UNICODE Test �� �� ���� �� ����

2017-07-29 Thread Ralf Mattes
Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 14:41 CEST, Wayne schrieb: > >�� Thanks a lot! Word encoding seems to work now. And even so my humble emacs can't display emojis I appreciate your reference to the original context :-) Cheers, RalfD > > Wayne > > > > > >

[LUTE] UNICODE Test ÜÄÖ üäö à é

2017-07-29 Thread Rainer
German: ÄÖÜ äöü ß French: éâàè To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[LUTE] Re: UNICODE Test ÜÄÖ üäö à é

2017-07-29 Thread David Van Edwards
Dear Rainer, Just to check, this is using the normal Mac keystrokes for diacriticals, I wonder if it will be mangled by the Lute Net software? Ü Ä Ö ä ö ü é â è Best wishes, David At 14:20 +0200 29/7/17, Rainer wrote: I have sent this mail with utf-8 encoding and everything looks OK.

[LUTE] Re: Better UNICODE Test �� �� ���� �� ����

2017-07-29 Thread Ralf Mattes
Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 16:48 CEST, Wayne schrieb: > So one of the issues, with Subject or Body, is that when an encoded message > is unpacked for reading, > and then recoded for a reply or forwarding, the several different mail > reader/editors involved in the >

[LUTE] Better UNICODE Test     

2017-07-29 Thread Wayne
 Wayne > > Dear Rainer, > > Just to check, this is using the normal Mac > keystrokes for diacriticals, I wonder if it will > be mangled by the Lute Net software? > > Ü Ä Ö ä ö ü é â è > > Best wishes, > > David > > At 14:20 +0200 29/7/17, Rainer wrote: >> I have sent this

[LUTE] Re: UNICODE Test ÜÄÖ üäö à é

2017-07-29 Thread Ralf Mattes
Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 14:20 CEST, Rainer schrieb: > I have sent this mail with utf-8 encoding and everything looks OK. Hello Rainer, IIRC the original problem was garbled subject line and that gets transmitted in the mail header and that can't transport

[LUTE] Better UNICODE Test �� �� ���� �� ����

2017-07-29 Thread Wayne
So one of the issues, with Subject or Body, is that when an encoded message is unpacked for reading, and then recoded for a reply or forwarding, the several different mail reader/editors involved in the process tend to mess things up. I was not able to read the emojis in your reply to the