Re: One official build system?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I'm still not sure what the implications of moving to CMake as our > official build system are (I should have made this more clear in my To start with: If you make tarball with autotools and cmake is there difference between those two, do we get the same files/and their

Re: One official build system?

> The following email thread (3 years ago) suggests that we would like to > move to one official build system in the long-run across all platforms, > but that there were barriers to using CMake: > http://marc.info/?i=kmrd28$e1k$1%20()%20ger%20!%20gmane%20!%20org > > Have those issues been

Re: One official build system?

On 06/03/2016 04:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:38:09PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016 um 12:42:33, schrieb Richard Heck >>> I guess maybe there is a question worth discussing here about how many >>> of us understand cmake well

Re: Horizontal crolling impossible in table in float in LyX 2.2.0

Le 03/06/2016 18:40, Richard Heck a écrit : On 06/01/2016 04:46 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 01/06/16 à 18:34, Richard Heck a écrit : I hope to do the 2.1.5 release in a week or so. Once that's been done, and if nothing really bad has appeared in the meanwhile, then we let's merge

Re: Changing trac defaults

Le 03/06/16 à 22:30, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I have set it to "unspecified". Is it better? Yes, in my opinion this is better. I also tried to make the ticket keyword plugin work again, but the only thing I managed to obtain is a link to our wiki page about keywords. I do not know how to

Re: Changing trac defaults

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:07:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 02/06/2016 à 06:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > Now the default milestone is blank, which is great. Can we also have the > > version be blank by default? I think this would help, as discussed > > before, so that we know

Re: One official build system?

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:38:09PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016 um 12:42:33, schrieb Richard Heck > > On 06/03/2016 11:37 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > On Friday, June 3, 2016 1:16:04 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >> From what I understand, most

Re: One official build system?

Le 03/06/16 à 18:42, Richard Heck a écrit : Same here. I am used to autotools, so I use it. I have reservations about cmake, but I would have some against autotools if I was not used to it already. All I ask from cmake is that it does the right think (i.e. what we advise people to do) by

Re: One official build system?

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:34:15AM -0600, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > > > What are the > > advantages? What are the basic commands? How do you set up > > out-of-directory builds? > > > > > I am far from an expert; however, a

Re: One official build system?

Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016 um 12:42:33, schrieb Richard Heck > On 06/03/2016 11:37 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Friday, June 3, 2016 1:16:04 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> From what I understand, most developers on Linux use autotools. I can't > >> tell if this is

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 24/05/2016 23:37, Pavel Sanda a écrit : I only tried 2.2, so I did not really compare. I do not have 2.0 here. I can try to have a look at 2.1 vs 2.2 later. >>> >>> Please try, we should see whether the problem is reproducible at all... >> >> Since you

Re: [LyX/master] Introduce basic support for microtype.sty.

Kornel Benko wrote: > > --- a/src/frontends/qt4/ui/FontUi.ui > > +++ b/src/frontends/qt4/ui/FontUi.ui > ... > > > > + > > + > > + > > + Activate extensions such as character protusion and font > > expansion via the microtype package > > + > > Do you mean protrusion

Re: One official build system?

On 06/03/2016 11:37 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Friday, June 3, 2016 1:16:04 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> From what I understand, most developers on Linux use autotools. I can't >> tell if this is because that is what most developers have experience >> with or if it is because autotools

Re: Horizontal crolling impossible in table in float in LyX 2.2.0

On 06/01/2016 04:46 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 01/06/16 à 18:34, Richard Heck a écrit : >> I hope to do the 2.1.5 release in a week or so. Once that's been done, >> and if nothing really bad has appeared in the meanwhile, then we let's >> merge 2.2.2-staging and move towards a 2.2.1

Wishlist for future LyX

Now that we have 2.2.0, here are some wishes for the future: Enumeration style document setting == GUI for setting the numbering style, similiar to what we already have for bullet lists. I.e. the default for the 4 levels are "1.", "(a)", "i.", "A." The gui would change

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Friday, June 3, 2016 2:02:15 PM WEST Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I prefer the fixed schedule. We never know exactly when starting a > release cycle what features will happen or not. But we can enforce when > the release will happen. +1 -- José Abílio

Re: One official build system?

On Friday, June 3, 2016 1:16:04 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > From what I understand, most developers on Linux use autotools. I can't > tell if this is because that is what most developers have experience > with or if it is because autotools has other advantages. > > Scott In my case I use

Re: One official build system?

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > What are the > advantages? What are the basic commands? How do you set up > out-of-directory builds? > > I am far from an expert; however, a self-contained and somewhat compact application of CMake is available here:

Re: One official build system?

Le 03/06/2016 06:16, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Dear all, The following email thread (3 years ago) suggests that we would like to move to one official build system in the long-run across all platforms, but that there were barriers to using CMake:

Re: [LyX/master] Do not duplicate jpg format

Le 02/06/2016 21:33, Georg Baum a écrit : commit 8d255ced2a003b2b8262bf51d1b245ff0dee9dc3 Author: Georg Baum Date: Thu Jun 2 22:31:27 2016 +0200 Do not duplicate jpg format Some qt versions report both "jpeg" and "jpg" as loadable file extensions. In this case

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 03/06/2016 à 15:03, Liviu Andronic a écrit : We already have nightly builds for Ubuntu Linux: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily It's been running for couple of years (probably all through the 2.2 development cycle), though I'm not sure it's made much of an impact in

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 22:26, Georg Baum a écrit : >> >> We need to decide: Either have a fixed schedule, and an unknown feature >> set >> of the next release, or a fixed feature set, and an unknown schedule. We >> do >>

Re: Changing trac defaults

Le 02/06/2016 à 06:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Now the default milestone is blank, which is great. Can we also have the version be blank by default? I think this would help, as discussed before, so that we know if there is a version specified the user likely has that version. Currently the

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 31/05/2016 à 22:26, Georg Baum a écrit : We need to decide: Either have a fixed schedule, and an unknown feature set of the next release, or a fixed feature set, and an unknown schedule. We do not have enough man power for defining both a fixed feature set and a fixed release schedule. I

Re: Require C++11 for 2.3?

Le 03/06/2016 à 07:24, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Dear all, Are we going to require C++11 starting with LyX 2.3.0? From what I understand, this will make several things easier. Hello Scott, Yes, that's the plan. JMarc

Re: [LyX/master] Introduce basic support for microtype.sty.

Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016 um 07:49:08, schrieb Pavel Sanda > commit ba2b86fa5d718c434521a7b9722e6ccd677864ad > Author: Pavel Sanda > Date: Thu Jun 2 22:40:21 2016 -0700 > > Introduce basic support for microtype.sty. > >