Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On 11/19/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 07:12:00PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Thu, > Nov 19, 2015 at 12:57:42AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >>> One last question before I upload: could you please send by email the >>> MD5 sums of the files that I should

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

Am 19.11.2015 um 01:12 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: The benefit of signing files is so that whoever downloads the file can be confident that it is the same file that you uploaded. Downloads and uploads are not often corrupted as they were before, but a file is made up of many 0's and 1's which are

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 07:12:00PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:57:42AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > One last question before I upload: could you please send by email the > > MD5 sums of the files that I should upload > > > > Ehm, just upload the installer, the 40MB

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On 11/19/2015 06:15 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 19.11.2015 um 01:12 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >> The benefit of signing files is so that whoever downloads the file can >> be confident that it is the same file that you uploaded. Downloads and >> uploads are not often corrupted as they were before,

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/19/2015 06:15 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 19.11.2015 um 01:12 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >> >>> The benefit of signing files is so that whoever downloads the file can >>> be confident that it is the same file that you

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

One last question before I upload: could you please send by email the MD5 sums of the files that I should upload Ehm, just upload the installer, the 40MB file.  > (so in this case it will be just the MD5 sum for the installer but for the final release I will also want the MD5 sum for the

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:57:42AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > One last question before I upload: could you please send by email the > MD5 sums of the files that I should upload > > Ehm, just upload the installer, the 40MB file. OK. If I get a +1 from another LyX developer I will just upload it. I

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

Am 17.11.2015 um 02:34 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0-alpha-1/ Thanks. What is LyXPackageComplete220-alpha1.zip and should it be uploaded to the FTP? It should not be uploaded. it is the source code of the installer. Unzip it and you can build the installer by your

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:06:07AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 17.11.2015 um 02:34 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >>http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0-alpha-1/ > > > >Thanks. What is LyXPackageComplete220-alpha1.zip and should it be > >uploaded to the FTP? > > It should not be uploaded. it is the

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > What about RC? Should we upload the bundle for RC? Yes. P

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 07:01:35PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > What about RC? Should we upload the bundle for RC? > > Yes. P OK I will do that. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > Le 16/11/2015 11:33, Liviu Andronic a écrit : > >> > >> The Ubuntu packages are built against Qt 4.8. Scott, is it a good or a > >> bad idea to build

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

Am 14.11.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I would like to make the announcement for the alpha release on Monday. Here is the installer for Windows: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0-alpha-1/ regards Uwe

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:07:26PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/11/2015 22:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: > >>On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >>>Le 16/11/2015 11:33, Liviu Andronic

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

Le 17/11/2015 00:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:07:26PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 16/11/2015 22:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Munch

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > The tar balls are here: > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0alpha1/ > I've uploaded Ubuntu packages to the development PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily Testers should install

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

Le 16/11/2015 11:33, Liviu Andronic a écrit : The Ubuntu packages are built against Qt 4.8. Scott, is it a good or a bad idea to build against Qt 5.4.1/5.4.2, where available? With Qt 5.4.1 in Ubuntu I am affected by and

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/11/2015 11:33, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> The Ubuntu packages are built against Qt 4.8. Scott, is it a good or a >> bad idea to build against Qt 5.4.1/5.4.2, where available? >> > > With Qt 5.4.1 in Ubuntu I am

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

Le 16/11/2015 22:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 16/11/2015 11:33, Liviu Andronic a écrit : The Ubuntu packages are built against Qt 4.8. Scott, is it a

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:44:37AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 14.11.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >I would like to make the announcement for the alpha release on Monday. > > Here is the installer for Windows: > > http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0-alpha-1/ Also, what version of Qt do

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:44:37AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 14.11.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >I would like to make the announcement for the alpha release on Monday. > > Here is the installer for Windows: > > http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0-alpha-1/ Thanks. What is

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Thanks for uploading to the PPA. I made a few changes to the > description: > > "upcoming 2.1 release" -> "upcoming 2.2 release" > and I added a new legend item: > lyx2.2pre -- a pre-release (e.g. alpha, beta) of an