On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 09.35.44 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> OK, let's a propose a few things:
> - always use a period as separator, like we do for export (be
> consistent). Or, if we think that the period was a bad idea, use
> something else (minus or underscore) consistently.
That
Le 21/02/2018 à 09:21, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
Id this patch is deemed appropriate there is still one small issue.
should it be as it is:
A) document.lyx -> document-lyx21.lyx
or
B) document.lyx -> document.21.lyx
as it is with the downgrade option format.
IIRC it used to be lyx21 but
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 10.43.17 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Something like what follows attached?
>
> I have tested it with several cases and it works.
Id this patch is deemed appropriate there is still one small issue.
should it be as it is:
A) document.lyx -> document-lyx21.lyx
or
On Monday, 19 February 2018 11.42.57 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 17/02/2018 à 14:02, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
> > How about the following patch?
>
> What happens if the format is not from a released version? In this case,
> we would like to keep the old naming IMO. I am not sure what
On 1/30/18, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.3.0rc2
>
>
Ubuntu packages are now available on the PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily
Regards,
Liviu
> We are proud to announce the second
On Monday, 19 February 2018 11.42.57 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 17/02/2018 à 14:02, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
> > How about the following patch?
>
> What happens if the format is not from a released version? In this case,
> we would like to keep the old naming IMO. I am not sure what
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 15.53.41 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 31/01/2018 à 16:29, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
> > My idea, in the last message, was for lyx2lyx to add the -lyxXX suffix
> > to the file name by default when called with the --backup option.
> >
> > E.g.
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:58:54PM +, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> I would include the link to the mirror listing. Otherwise, I can imagine
> frustration of having a slow/failed download causing me to then go hunt for
> a better alternative on the website (for a new user, who may not be totally
>
Am 01.02.2018 um 18:21 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:14:34PM +, emile lunardon wrote:
LyX for Windows offers incomplete support for non-TeX fonts. This is the
case, for example, of the Gyre Schola font, which although proposed by
Miktex 2.9 , is unknown to LyX 2.3 RC2
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:14:34PM +, emile lunardon wrote:
> LyX for Windows offers incomplete support for non-TeX fonts. This is the
> case, for example, of the Gyre Schola font, which although proposed by
> Miktex 2.9 , is unknown to LyX 2.3 RC2 (this is not the case of LyX 2.3
> compiled
On 02/01/2018 12:19 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 05:06:52AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:36 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>>> You can download LyX 2.3.0rc2 from ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/.
>>>
>>>
>> Colleagues,
>>
>>
LyX for Windows offers incomplete support for non-TeX fonts. This is the
case, for example, of the Gyre Schola font, which although proposed by
Miktex 2.9 , is unknown to LyX 2.3 RC2 (this is not the case of LyX 2.3
compiled under Linux Ubuntu 16.04).
2018-01-31 7:36 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > Given my recent faulty assumption on how the download site and associated
> > mirrors work, what are your thoughts on the wording change:
> >
> > You can download LyX 2.3.0rc2 from
Joel Kulesza wrote:
> Given my recent faulty assumption on how the download site and associated
> mirrors work, what are your thoughts on the wording change:
>
> You can download LyX 2.3.0rc2 from ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/ (based
> in Paris) or a closer mirror listed at:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 05:06:52AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:36 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> >
> > You can download LyX 2.3.0rc2 from ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/.
> >
> >
> Colleagues,
>
> Given my recent faulty assumption on how the
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:36 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> You can download LyX 2.3.0rc2 from ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/.
>
>
Colleagues,
Given my recent faulty assumption on how the download site and associated
mirrors work, what are your thoughts on the wording
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 21.43.11 WET Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes wrote:
> PS: and José will answer that he agrees 1000% and
intended to do that
> for the start %-]
Nah... last time I used gogol, now I will use gogolplex
(10^(10^100)) and my share of smiles is over for the day. :-)
--
José
On 2018-01-31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 31/01/2018 à 07:36, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> If a file from an earlier version of LyX is opened *and saved* with
>> any version of 2.3.x, then the original file will automatically be
>> backed up. The backup file will be found in the backup
Le 31/01/2018 à 16:29, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
My idea, in the last message, was for lyx2lyx to add the -lyxXX suffix
to the file name by default when called with the --backup option.
E.g.
lyx2lyx --backup myfile.lyx would result in the original file to be
called myfile-lyxXX.lyx (where
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 11.16.26 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, it is nice to have a --backup option, but if lyx itself can avoid
> to figure out the suffix from the cryptic lyxformat value, it is even
> better.
FWIW I agree with you. :-)
My idea, in the last message, was for
Le 31/01/2018 à 12:02, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
The following is an example from lyx to lyx13:
python -tt $$s/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -V 1.3 -o $$o $$i
OK, I missed the format definition for lyx22 in lib/configure.py.
Note that initially the command line option had the original format
passed
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 10.35.08 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 31/01/2018 à 11:11, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
> > I am suggesting that
> >
> > format 508 -> .22.lyx
> >
> > format 509 -> .23.lyx
>
> What is the current situation? Is it lyx2lyx that creates the .22.lyx
> names? I
Le 31/01/2018 à 11:11, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
I am suggesting that
format 508 -> .22.lyx
format 509 -> .23.lyx
What is the current situation? Is it lyx2lyx that creates the .22.lyx
names? I could not find it in the sources.
I have it also on my list to do this for other scripts, the
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 09.48.50 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It would be nice if we were able to translate lyxformat values that
> correspond to stable release to a nicer name. For example, -22x.lyx~
> instead of -lyxformat-508.lyx~, or even .22.lyx~, a bit like what export
> as 2.2.x
Le 31/01/2018 à 07:36, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
If a file from an earlier version of LyX is opened *and saved* with
any version of 2.3.x, then the original file will automatically be
backed up. The backup file will be found in the backup directory, if one
is set under Tools> Preferences> Paths,
Public release of LyX version 2.3.0rc2
We are proud to announce the second public release candidate of the new LyX 2.3
series. This pre-release is meant for testing and should not be used for
serious work. For curious users who would like to test in order
26 matches
Mail list logo