Re: Minimum compiler version

Am 29.10.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Georg Baum: BTW, I wanted to try the cross-compiling myself for several montsh now, because I am curious, but did not find the time up to now. The build-bot already cross-compiles for Windows, it is NOT a Windows machine. Recently travis updated their bots to to

Re: Minimum compiler version

Peter Kümmel wrote: > In another project I saw speed improvements just > by enabling C++11 (I assume mainly because of the > move semantic). Yes, I guess we all agree that C++11 brings many improvements. > I would even support MSVC only for developers and do the > release with MinGW, would

Re: Minimum compiler version

Am 25.10.2015 um 20:31 schrieb Georg Baum: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I thought we always wanted to support as many compilers as reasonably possible in order to allow newcomers to easily compile LyX and to let them contribute. Does it make sense to still support Qt 4.5, but to require the

Re: Minimum compiler version

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I thought we always wanted to support as many compilers as reasonably possible in order to allow newcomers to easily compile LyX and to let them contribute. Please, take also into account other factors determining the attractiveness to newcomers, such as

Re: Minimum compiler version

Op 24-10-2015 om 7:13 schreef Peter Kümmel: Am 23.10.2015 um 21:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: support of MSVC2010. I think I don't need to tell Peter about MSVC support for C++11 (I guess he knows better than me). The message was really meant for you: if you introduce C++11 features

Re: Minimum compiler version

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > I thought we always wanted to support as many compilers as reasonably > possible in order to allow newcomers to easily compile LyX and to let > them contribute. Does it make sense to still support Qt 4.5, but to > require the last version of the Microsoft compiler

Re: Minimum compiler version

Am 24.10.2015 um 07:11 schrieb Peter Kümmel : > Am 23.10.2015 um 21:27 schrieb Stephan Witt: >>> See >>> and subsequent messages. The only concrete example was Jean-Marc's OSX >>> 10.7 computer, although in

Re: Minimum compiler version

Le 23/10/2015 17:55, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I wonder to still see auto_ptr: https://travis-ci.org/syntheticpp/lyx Which old compiler you wanna support? Peter Dear Peter, See and subsequent messages. The only concrete

Minimum compiler version

I wonder to still see auto_ptr: https://travis-ci.org/syntheticpp/lyx Which old compiler you wanna support? Peter

Re: Minimum compiler version

Am 23.10.2015 um 20:55 schrieb Guillaume Munch: Le 23/10/2015 17:55, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I wonder to still see auto_ptr: https://travis-ci.org/syntheticpp/lyx Which old compiler you wanna support? Peter Dear Peter, See

Re: Minimum compiler version

Am 23.10.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Guillaume Well, I probably can wake you from your dreams of C++11 quickly when I try compiling your C++11 features with MSVC2010... Vincent

Re: Minimum compiler version

Am 23.10.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Guillaume Well, I probably can wake you from your dreams of C++11 quickly when I try compiling your C++11 features with MSVC2010... There is MSVC 2015, which is nearly C++11/14 feature complete. So is there any good reason not to

Re: Minimum compiler version

Am 23.10.2015 um 21:27 schrieb Stephan Witt: See and subsequent messages. The only concrete example was Jean-Marc's OSX 10.7 computer, although in this case there is a straightfoward fix according to Google. Note, I've to

Re: Minimum compiler version

Am 23.10.2015 um 21:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: support of MSVC2010. I think I don't need to tell Peter about MSVC support for C++11 (I guess he knows better than me). The message was really meant for you: if you introduce C++11 features that cannot compile on MSVC, you will meet

Re: Minimum compiler version

Le 23/10/2015 20:34, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 23-10-2015 om 21:22 schreef Guillaume Munch: Le 23/10/2015 20:16, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 23-10-2015 om 20:55 schreef Guillaume Munch: Le 23/10/2015 17:55, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I wonder to still see auto_ptr:

Re: Minimum compiler version

Op 23-10-2015 om 20:55 schreef Guillaume Munch: Le 23/10/2015 17:55, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I wonder to still see auto_ptr: https://travis-ci.org/syntheticpp/lyx Which old compiler you wanna support? Peter Dear Peter, See

Re: Minimum compiler version

Le 23/10/2015 20:16, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 23-10-2015 om 20:55 schreef Guillaume Munch: Le 23/10/2015 17:55, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I wonder to still see auto_ptr: https://travis-ci.org/syntheticpp/lyx Which old compiler you wanna support? Peter Dear Peter, See

Re: Minimum compiler version

Am 23.10.2015 um 20:55 schrieb Guillaume Munch : > Le 23/10/2015 17:55, Peter Kümmel a écrit : >> I wonder to still see auto_ptr: >> >> https://travis-ci.org/syntheticpp/lyx >> >> Which old compiler you wanna support? >> >> Peter >> > > > Dear Peter, > > > See

Re: Minimum compiler version

Le 23/10/2015 20:27, Stephan Witt a écrit : Am 23.10.2015 um 20:55 schrieb Guillaume Munch : Le 23/10/2015 17:55, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I wonder to still see auto_ptr: https://travis-ci.org/syntheticpp/lyx Which old compiler you wanna support? Peter Dear Peter, See

Re: Minimum compiler version

Le 23/10/2015 20:22, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Le 23/10/2015 20:16, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 23-10-2015 om 20:55 schreef Guillaume Munch: Le 23/10/2015 17:55, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I wonder to still see auto_ptr: https://travis-ci.org/syntheticpp/lyx Which old compiler you wanna

Re: Minimum compiler version

Op 23-10-2015 om 21:22 schreef Guillaume Munch: Le 23/10/2015 20:16, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 23-10-2015 om 20:55 schreef Guillaume Munch: Le 23/10/2015 17:55, Peter Kümmel a écrit : I wonder to still see auto_ptr: https://travis-ci.org/syntheticpp/lyx Which old compiler you