Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-06 Thread Marcello Nuccio
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:52:31PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: you get _nothing_ because we can't raise an iconified dialog. Mozilla does it. I have Gnome+Sawfish, but I think it's possible with any WM. -- "Intelligence is the ability to avoid doing work, yet get the work done" -- Linus

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-06 Thread Stephan Witt
Marcello Nuccio wrote: On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:52:31PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: you get _nothing_ because we can't raise an iconified dialog. Mozilla does it. I have Gnome+Sawfish, but I think it's possible with any WM. This depends on the used toolkit. Yes, you can raise and

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Stephan" == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan Marcello Nuccio wrote: On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:52:31PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: you get _nothing_ because we can't raise an iconified dialog. Mozilla does it. I have Gnome+Sawfish, but I think it's possible with any WM.

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-06 Thread Marcello Nuccio
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:52:31PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > you get _nothing_ because we can't raise an iconified dialog. Mozilla does it. I have Gnome+Sawfish, but I think it's possible with any WM. -- "Intelligence is the ability to avoid doing work, yet get the work done" -- Linus

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-06 Thread Stephan Witt
Marcello Nuccio wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:52:31PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > you get _nothing_ because we can't raise an iconified dialog. > > Mozilla does it. I have Gnome+Sawfish, but I think it's possible with > any WM. > This depends on the used toolkit. Yes, you can

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> Marcello Nuccio wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:52:31PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: >> >> > you get _nothing_ because we can't raise an iconified dialog. >> >> Mozilla does it. I have Gnome+Sawfish, but I think it's

Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread Nicolas SABOURET
Hi ! In lyx 1.1.6, all sub-windows (e.g., latex-preamble, math-panel, characters-layout ...) are on top of the main LyX window. However, this was not the case in previous version and I prefered it before. Is it possible to go back to the previous version (secondary windows NOT on top of the

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread John Levon
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: Hi ! In lyx 1.1.6, all sub-windows (e.g., latex-preamble, math-panel, characters-layout ...) are on top of the main LyX window. However, this was not the case in previous version and I prefered it before. Is it possible to go back to the

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, John Levon wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: Hi ! In lyx 1.1.6, all sub-windows (e.g., latex-preamble, math-panel, characters-layout ...) are on top of the main LyX window. However, this was not the case in previous version and I prefered it

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread Nicolas SABOURET
Allan Rae wrote: The GUII xforms dialogs are all now TRANSIENT dialogs so your window manager will decide what happens with them. Window Maker for example keeps transient dialogs above the main window. Well, the thing is, I use E at work and fvwm at home, and I have this problem on both

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: Allan Rae wrote: The GUII xforms dialogs are all now TRANSIENT dialogs so your window manager will decide what happens with them. Window Maker for example keeps transient dialogs above the main window. Well, the thing is, I use E at work

Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread Nicolas SABOURET
Hi ! In lyx 1.1.6, all sub-windows (e.g., latex-preamble, math-panel, characters-layout ...) are on top of the main LyX window. However, this was not the case in previous version and I prefered it before. Is it possible to go back to the previous version (secondary windows NOT on top of the

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread John Levon
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: > Hi ! > > In lyx 1.1.6, all sub-windows (e.g., latex-preamble, math-panel, > characters-layout ...) are on top of the main LyX window. However, this > was not the case in previous version and I prefered it before. > > Is it possible to go back to

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: > > > Hi ! > > > > In lyx 1.1.6, all sub-windows (e.g., latex-preamble, math-panel, > > characters-layout ...) are on top of the main LyX window. However, this > > was not the case in previous version and I

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread Nicolas SABOURET
Allan Rae wrote: > > The GUII xforms dialogs are all now TRANSIENT dialogs so your window > manager will decide what happens with them. Window Maker for example > keeps transient dialogs above the main window. > Well, the thing is, I use E at work and fvwm at home, and I have this problem on

Re: Sub-windows on top

2001-02-05 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: > Allan Rae wrote: > > > > The GUII xforms dialogs are all now TRANSIENT dialogs so your window > > manager will decide what happens with them. Window Maker for example > > keeps transient dialogs above the main window. > > > > Well, the thing is, I