However, I think asking all 76 people in lib/CREDITS should be ok. Not
that I believe this is practicable...
maybe it's worthwhile to do this. 10 people probably account for 90 percent of
the code anyway. if the big contributors agree then we could easily remove
code from people who complain
> However, I think asking all 76 people in lib/CREDITS should be ok. Not
> that I believe this is practicable...
maybe it's worthwhile to do this. 10 people probably account for 90 percent of
the code anyway. if the big contributors agree then we could easily remove
code from people who
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:15:39AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Well, we could at least create detailed instructions on how to build the
beast, can't we?
sure ...
In any case, I even like the idea of providing Windows users with a working
LyX and cause a little pain at the same time ;-}
heh
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:15:39AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Well, we could at least create detailed instructions on how to build the
> beast, can't we?
sure ...
> In any case, I even like the idea of providing Windows users with a working
> LyX and cause a little pain at the same time ;-}
I have been looking at the possibilities of having native versions of
lyx/qt on mac os x and win32. What are the kind of arrangements that
trolltech can make to provide us with a free license to provide
binaries? Are these things supposed to `just work'? Has anybody tried
to get an evaluation
On Monday 06 January 2003 11:49 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I have been looking at the possibilities of having native versions of
lyx/qt on mac os x and win32. What are the kind of arrangements that
trolltech can make to provide us with a free license to provide
binaries? Are these things
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:15:53PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Don't I remember Matthias Ettrich saying something about this, way back when?
17 Nov 2000 plus/minus a few days.
(In the course of that enormous thread a year or so ago that was initiated by
John's discovery that Matthias and
at the bottom:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-develm=102747986224859w=2
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Don't I remember Matthias Ettrich saying something about this,
Angus way back when? (In the course of that enormous thread a year or
Angus so ago that was initiated by John's discovery that Matthias and
Angus Kalle Dalheimer were playing
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Finally, we have to know whether we would have the right to distribute
it.
I think it is possible for non-commercial apps if you distribute it under
their license.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/licensing/qpl.html
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:38:17PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus As I recall it, he said contact me and I'll arrange for some
Angus licences...
I had something like that in mind. It would be nice first if somebody
with access to win32 or macosx could get the grip on an evaluation
Ruurd Reitsma just emailed me that he compiled the qt version under windows
this weekend using the qt2 windows version.
Don't know what he did to get it running though.
He should be putting it online somewhere tomorrow and drop an email to the
list...
Ed.
Edwin Leuven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Ruurd Reitsma just emailed me that he compiled the qt version under windows
| this weekend using the qt2 windows version.
| Don't know what he did to get it running though.
| He should be putting it online somewhere tomorrow and drop an email to the
|
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:51:13PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Then we need to see he changes he did to the distribution to make this
work. We might include some of that.
He sent patches a while back.
Legally I don't think we have the right to add another exception to the
license,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 07:02:51PM +, John Levon wrote:
He sent patches a while back.
Legally I don't think we have the right to add another exception to the
license, though.
I lean to the same side.
However, I think asking all 76 people in lib/CREDITS should be ok. Not
that I believe
JL Legally I don't think we have the right to add another exception
JL to the license, though. So I don't think we could distribute it
JL (though it would be weird for a contributor to accept the xforms
JL exception, as they must, but not a Qt one...)
As long as there is no reasonable Qt-related
I have been looking at the possibilities of having native versions of
lyx/qt on mac os x and win32. What are the kind of arrangements that
trolltech can make to provide us with a free license to provide
binaries? Are these things supposed to `just work'? Has anybody tried
to get an evaluation
On Monday 06 January 2003 11:49 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I have been looking at the possibilities of having native versions of
> lyx/qt on mac os x and win32. What are the kind of arrangements that
> trolltech can make to provide us with a free license to provide
> binaries? Are these
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:15:53PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Don't I remember Matthias Ettrich saying something about this, way back when?
17 Nov 2000 plus/minus a few days.
> (In the course of that enormous thread a year or so ago that was initiated by
> John's discovery that Matthias
at the bottom:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel=102747986224859=2
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Don't I remember Matthias Ettrich saying something about this,
Angus> way back when? (In the course of that enormous thread a year or
Angus> so ago that was initiated by John's discovery that Matthias and
Angus> Kalle Dalheimer
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Finally, we have to know whether we would have the right to distribute
> it.
I think it is possible for non-commercial apps if you distribute it under
their license.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/licensing/qpl.html
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:38:17PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> As I recall it, he said "contact me and I'll arrange for some
> Angus> licences"...
>
> I had something like that in mind. It would be nice first if somebody
> with access to win32 or macosx could get the grip on an
Ruurd Reitsma just emailed me that he compiled the qt version under windows
this weekend using the qt2 windows version.
Don't know what he did to get it running though.
He should be putting it online somewhere tomorrow and drop an email to the
list...
Ed.
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Ruurd Reitsma just emailed me that he compiled the qt version under windows
| this weekend using the qt2 windows version.
>
| Don't know what he did to get it running though.
>
| He should be putting it online somewhere tomorrow and drop an email to the
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:51:13PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Then we need to see he changes he did to the distribution to make this
> work. We might include some of that.
He sent patches a while back.
Legally I don't think we have the right to add another exception to the
license,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 07:02:51PM +, John Levon wrote:
> He sent patches a while back.
>
> Legally I don't think we have the right to add another exception to the
> license, though.
I lean to the same side.
However, I think asking all 76 people in lib/CREDITS should be ok. Not
that I
JL> Legally I don't think we have the right to add another exception
JL> to the license, though. So I don't think we could distribute it
JL> (though it would be weird for a contributor to accept the xforms
JL> exception, as they must, but not a Qt one...)
As long as there is no reasonable
28 matches
Mail list logo
