with the
Google Summer of Code that this would be at the top of the list of things to do.
Jerry
--
Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D.
Jules Doris Stein Research to Prevent Blindness Professor
Director, The laboratory of Visual Computational Neuroscience
Director, Center for Excellence in Computational
ope with all the talk on the developers' list recently with the
Google Summer of Code that this would be at the top of the list of things to do.
Jerry
> --
> Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D.
> Jules & Doris Stein Research to Prevent Blindness Professor
> Director, The laboratory of
On Jan 25, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jerry wrote:
It has frequently been suggested on this list that, currently, the best way
to get a LyX file into Microsoft Word is to export from LyX to LyXHMTM and
then to open that XHTML file with Word. I have Word 2011 for OS X
On Jan 25, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jerry wrote:
It has frequently been suggested on this list that, currently, the best way
to get a LyX file into Microsoft Word is to export from LyX to LyXHMTM and
then to open that XHTML file with Word. I have Word 2011 for OS X
On Jan 25, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
>> It has frequently been suggested on this list that, currently, the best way
>> to get a LyX file into Microsoft Word is to export from LyX to LyXHMTM and
>> then to open that XHTML file with Word. I ha
. What a mess.
True - even though commercial, could you please report back if you find a
usable solution, as hee
are quite a few users fighting regul;arly with conversion issues.
Of course.
Jerry
. So my question is, is the newer version just a better-integrated
version of MathType or did Microsoft make their own? I gather that they are not
compatible with one another.
Jerry
. What a mess.
True - even though commercial, could you please report back if you find a
usable solution, as hee
are quite a few users fighting regul;arly with conversion issues.
Of course.
Jerry
. So my question is, is the newer version just a better-integrated
version of MathType or did Microsoft make their own? I gather that they are not
compatible with one another.
Jerry
t;>> there was also
>>> offered a manual conversion of anything that their software did not
>>> convert, for an
>>> additional fee per megabyte over a certain level of file size. What a mess.
>
> True - even though commercial, could you please report back if you find a
> usable solution, as hee
> are quite a few users fighting regul;arly with conversion issues.
Of course.
Jerry
t has paralleled Word on
Windows. So my question is, is the newer version just a better-integrated
version of MathType or did Microsoft make their own? I gather that they are not
compatible with one another.
Jerry
On Jan 24, 2013, at 1:42 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/01/13 01:02, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
On 22/01/13 23:37, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
Also, I played
On Jan 24, 2013, at 1:42 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/01/13 01:02, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
On 22/01/13 23:37, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
Also, I played
On Jan 24, 2013, at 1:42 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 24/01/13 01:02, Jerry wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>>
>> On 22/01/13 23:37, Jerry wrote:
>>>>>
>
On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/01/13 23:37, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
Also, I played with pandoc a while back and its conversion of a very
simple LyX file to
Word
On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/01/13 23:37, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
Also, I played with pandoc a while back and its conversion of a very
simple LyX file to
Word
On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 22/01/13 23:37, Jerry wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, I played
, but the results were not
as usable as via xhtml. So I would suggest to try the route via xhtml.
How did you get from XHTML - docx? Pandoc (according to the first paragraph of
the user's manual) does not accept XHTML input files.
Jerry
You should try both converters (the build in and eLyXe
, but the results were not
as usable as via xhtml. So I would suggest to try the route via xhtml.
How did you get from XHTML - docx? Pandoc (according to the first paragraph of
the user's manual) does not accept XHTML input files.
Jerry
You should try both converters (the build in and eLyXe
it thought was a damaged converted file. (But what _doesn't_
>> cause LibreOffice to
>> crash?)
>
> I also tried to go the LyX -> LaTeX -> docx route, but the results were not
> as usable as via xhtml. So I would suggest to try the route via xhtml.
How did you get from X
On Jan 18, 2013, at 6:15 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 21:17:28 -0700, Jerry said:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I am the primary author of eLyXer.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
Thanks for that tip. I
On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:44 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
On 18/01/13 09:10, Rainer M Krug wrote:
On 18/01/13 05:17, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I am the primary author of eLyXer.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net
On Jan 18, 2013, at 6:15 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 21:17:28 -0700, Jerry said:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I am the primary author of eLyXer.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
Thanks for that tip. I
On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:44 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
On 18/01/13 09:10, Rainer M Krug wrote:
On 18/01/13 05:17, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I am the primary author of eLyXer.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net
On Jan 18, 2013, at 6:15 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 21:17:28 -0700, Jerry said:
>>
>> On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jerry,
>>>
>>> I am the primary author of eLyXer.
>>>
>>> O
On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:44 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> On 18/01/13 09:10, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> On 18/01/13 05:17, Jerry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jerry,
>>>>
>>>> I am
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I am the primary author of eLyXer.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
Thanks for that tip. I checked it out. It's just a Python thing so it works
fine on OS X, and LyX picked it up
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I am the primary author of eLyXer.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
Thanks for that tip. I checked it out. It's just a Python thing so it works
fine on OS X, and LyX picked it up
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> I am the primary author of eLyXer.
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Jerry <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
> Thanks for that tip. I checked it out. It's just a Python thing so it works
> fine on
;
this will include math.
I know that LyX - Word is a frequent topic on this list so I'm not necessarily
looking for a complete rehashing of the topic--only why LyXHTML - Word fails.
Jerry
On Jan 16, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
Jerry wrote:
It has frequently been suggested on this list that, currently, the best
way to get a LyX file into Microsoft Word is to export from LyX to LyXHMTM
and then to open that XHTML file with Word. I have Word 2011 for OS X
;
this will include math.
I know that LyX - Word is a frequent topic on this list so I'm not necessarily
looking for a complete rehashing of the topic--only why LyXHTML - Word fails.
Jerry
On Jan 16, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
Jerry wrote:
It has frequently been suggested on this list that, currently, the best
way to get a LyX file into Microsoft Word is to export from LyX to LyXHMTM
and then to open that XHTML file with Word. I have Word 2011 for OS X
oking for a complete rehashing of the topic--only why LyXHTML -> Word fails.
Jerry
On Jan 16, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
>
>> It has frequently been suggested on this list that, currently, the best
>> way to get a LyX file into Microsoft Word is to export from LyX to LyXHMTM
>> and then to open that XHTML file with Word. I
that this is relevant. Without knowing anything about Qt, I'll guess
that scrolling lists are not how the main content is LyX is drawn.
Jerry
that this is relevant. Without knowing anything about Qt, I'll guess
that scrolling lists are not how the main content is LyX is drawn.
Jerry
t of hidden items in QListView when using scrollTo [QTBUG-21804]
>
> regards Uwe
>
I doubt that this is relevant. Without knowing anything about Qt, I'll guess
that scrolling lists are not how the main content is LyX is drawn.
Jerry
Not sure what the Windows scrolling problem was but the much-discussed (at
least on the developers' list) OS X scrolling problem remains--laggy, sluggish,
jerky, jumpy, slow, and aggravating.
Jerry
Not sure what the Windows scrolling problem was but the much-discussed (at
least on the developers' list) OS X scrolling problem remains--laggy, sluggish,
jerky, jumpy, slow, and aggravating.
Jerry
the devs for the good work, and best regards!
>>
>> Olivier.
>>
>
> I also experienced the scrolling problem (Windows Vista) and you're right, it
> is no longer there in LyX 2.0.5.
>
> Andrew
Not sure what the Windows scrolling problem was but the much-discussed (at
least on the developers' list) OS X scrolling problem remains--laggy, sluggish,
jerky, jumpy, slow, and aggravating.
Jerry
On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
I just tried a quick experiment with pandoc, saving a 3.5 page LyX document
(article class) of mostly lorem ipsum as LaTeX and then using pandoc to
convert that to .docx
On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
I just tried a quick experiment with pandoc, saving a 3.5 page LyX document
(article class) of mostly lorem ipsum as LaTeX and then using pandoc to
convert that to .docx
On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Jerry <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
>> I just tried a quick experiment with pandoc, saving a 3.5 page LyX document
>> (article class) of mostly lorem ipsum as LaTeX and then using
How did it fail?
I'm currently working with the pandoc OS X packager on a problem with the
installer.
Jerry
On Aug 3, 2012, at 10:26 AM, UD wrote:
I tried it a couple of times (lyx -- anything or Latex -- anything. It
failed with files that presented no problems
to either Lyx or Texworks
How did it fail?
I'm currently working with the pandoc OS X packager on a problem with the
installer.
Jerry
On Aug 3, 2012, at 10:26 AM, UD wrote:
I tried it a couple of times (lyx -- anything or Latex -- anything. It
failed with files that presented no problems
to either Lyx or Texworks
How did it fail?
I'm currently working with the pandoc OS X packager on a problem with the
installer.
Jerry
On Aug 3, 2012, at 10:26 AM, UD wrote:
> I tried it a couple of times (lyx --> anything or Latex --> anything. It
> failed with files that presented no problems
>
to ODT or docx using pandoc?
Jerry
to ODT or docx using pandoc?
Jerry
to this one (and how many
before?):
The thread is "Anyone convert LyX to ODT or docx using pandoc?"
Jerry
with extended use. However, this combination does result in a
misplaced cursor at times.
Thanks everyone.
Jerry
* Although this is the line that I recall pasting into Preferences, the line
that is there now is
\force_paint_single_char 0. Maybe the program changed it. In any case,
changing 0 to 1
with extended use. However, this combination does result in a
misplaced cursor at times.
Thanks everyone.
Jerry
* Although this is the line that I recall pasting into Preferences, the line
that is there now is
\force_paint_single_char 0. Maybe the program changed it. In any case,
changing 0 to 1
with extended use. However, this combination does result in a
misplaced cursor at times.
Thanks everyone.
Jerry
* Although this is the line that I recall pasting into Preferences, the line
that is there now is
\force_paint_single_char "0". Maybe the program changed it. In any case,
changing
...).
Best regards,
Olivier
50% = 1 processor out of two? I have a two-processor Mac and scrolling takes
100% of one processor.
Jerry
Jerry
...).
Best regards,
Olivier
50% = 1 processor out of two? I have a two-processor Mac and scrolling takes
100% of one processor.
Jerry
Jerry
n smaller
> areas ...).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Olivier
50% = 1 processor out of two? I have a two-processor Mac and scrolling takes
100% of one processor.
Jerry
text document.f
Jerry
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
On 04.01.2012 22:39, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:46 AM, James Sutherland wrote:
[...]
FWIW, I have been noticing this issue on my Mac as well with LyX 2.0.2
(binary installation) and Mac OSX 10.7.2. It has occurred for me
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:13 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
I've prepared a LyX-package with Qt-4.8.0 and the upload is here:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0svn%2Bqt4.8.0-cocoa.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0svn%2Bqt4.8.0
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
On 04.01.2012 22:39, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:46 AM, James Sutherland wrote:
[...]
FWIW, I have been noticing this issue on my Mac as well with LyX 2.0.2
(binary installation) and Mac OSX 10.7.2. It has occurred for me
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:13 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
I've prepared a LyX-package with Qt-4.8.0 and the upload is here:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0svn%2Bqt4.8.0-cocoa.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0svn%2Bqt4.8.0
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> On 04.01.2012 22:39, Jerry wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:46 AM, James Sutherland wrote:
> [...]
>>>
>>> FWIW, I have been noticing this issue on my Mac as well with LyX 2.0.2
>>> (binary inst
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:13 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> I've prepared a LyX-package with Qt-4.8.0 and the upload is here:
>>
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0svn%2Bqt4.8.0-cocoa.dmg
>> http://dl.dr
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 04.01.2012 um 01:28 schrieb Jerry:
To check if this is the culprit one may add the following line to your
preferences file:
\force_paint_single_char false
On a Mac this is the file ~/Library/Application
Support/LyX-2.0/preferences
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:46 AM, James Sutherland wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday, January 02, 2012 10:12:47 PM Jerry wrote:
I'm evaluating LyX for a major project and am mightily impressed
* 2.1svn, 4.8.0 Carbon, 23 Sekunden
* 2.1svn, 4.6.3 Carbon, 22 Sekunden
All tests I've made with \force_paint_single_char true and false.
No real difference.
You can see it yourself - there is no performance gain or loss on my system
(Macbook Pro OS X 10.6.8).
Jerry, may I ask you
in 2.0.2. (See detailed post of scroll tests by me.)
Jerry
screenfuls. This is because text rendering is so slow (or not buffered) that it
skips many screenfuls and gives the appearance that it has scrolled rapidly.
Try scrolling on any native program such as TextEdit or Preview and you will
see vastly more useful scrolling.
Jerry
and 2.0.2 using the
special preference file line.
Subjectively, for me, the somewhat slower difference for 2.1svn puts the
experience back into painful regime, but it is still better than 2.0.2
without the special preference file line.
Jerry
Do the developers monitor this list? Or does someone need to file a bug report
for the slow scrolling problem?
Jerry
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 05.01.2012 um 05:16 schrieb Jerry:
Do the developers monitor this list?
I think so.
Or does someone need to file a bug report for the slow scrolling problem?
Perhaps. But ATM there is no problem description to reproduce it, AFAICS
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 04.01.2012 um 01:28 schrieb Jerry:
To check if this is the culprit one may add the following line to your
preferences file:
\force_paint_single_char false
On a Mac this is the file ~/Library/Application
Support/LyX-2.0/preferences
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:46 AM, James Sutherland wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday, January 02, 2012 10:12:47 PM Jerry wrote:
I'm evaluating LyX for a major project and am mightily impressed
* 2.1svn, 4.8.0 Carbon, 23 Sekunden
* 2.1svn, 4.6.3 Carbon, 22 Sekunden
All tests I've made with \force_paint_single_char true and false.
No real difference.
You can see it yourself - there is no performance gain or loss on my system
(Macbook Pro OS X 10.6.8).
Jerry, may I ask you
in 2.0.2. (See detailed post of scroll tests by me.)
Jerry
screenfuls. This is because text rendering is so slow (or not buffered) that it
skips many screenfuls and gives the appearance that it has scrolled rapidly.
Try scrolling on any native program such as TextEdit or Preview and you will
see vastly more useful scrolling.
Jerry
and 2.0.2 using the
special preference file line.
Subjectively, for me, the somewhat slower difference for 2.1svn puts the
experience back into painful regime, but it is still better than 2.0.2
without the special preference file line.
Jerry
Do the developers monitor this list? Or does someone need to file a bug report
for the slow scrolling problem?
Jerry
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 05.01.2012 um 05:16 schrieb Jerry:
Do the developers monitor this list?
I think so.
Or does someone need to file a bug report for the slow scrolling problem?
Perhaps. But ATM there is no problem description to reproduce it, AFAICS
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 04.01.2012 um 01:28 schrieb Jerry:
>>>
>>> To check if this is the culprit one may add the following line to your
>>> preferences file:
>>> \force_paint_single_char false
>>> On a Mac this is
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:46 AM, James Sutherland wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jerry <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > On Monday, January 02, 2012 10:12:47 PM Jerry wrote:
> >> I'm evaluating LyX fo
2.1svn, 4.8.0 Cocoa, 23 Sekunden
> * 2.1svn, 4.8.0 Carbon, 23 Sekunden
> * 2.1svn, 4.6.3 Carbon, 22 Sekunden
>
> All tests I've made with \force_paint_single_char true and false.
> No real difference.
>
> You can see it yourself - there is no performance gain or loss on my system
&
file. My
tests done later showed that its presence or absence had a factor of 2 on
scrolling speed in 2.0.2. (See detailed post of scroll tests by me.)
Jerry
ppear_ to be scrolling fast, it skips _many_
screenfuls. This is because text rendering is so slow (or not buffered) that it
skips many screenfuls and gives the appearance that it has scrolled rapidly.
Try scrolling on any native program such as TextEdit or Preview and you will
see vastly more useful scrolling.
Jerry
No misplaced cursor.
This scroll rate is between what I measured for 2.0.0 and 2.0.2 using the
special preference file line.
Subjectively, for me, the somewhat slower difference for 2.1svn puts the
experience back into "painful" regime, but it is still better than 2.0.2
without the special preference file line.
Jerry
Do the developers monitor this list? Or does someone need to file a bug report
for the slow scrolling problem?
Jerry
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 05.01.2012 um 05:16 schrieb Jerry:
>
>> Do the developers monitor this list?
>
> I think so.
>
>> Or does someone need to file a bug report for the slow scrolling problem?
>
> Perhaps. But ATM there is no
On Jan 2, 2012, at 8:57 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Is the document that you are editing exceptionally huge?
No—it is only a few paragraphs of e.g. lorem ipsum or whatever. Adding a few
equations doesn't seem to make any difference; if anything, it might make
scrolling faster
On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
snip
Hi Jerry,
I reported the very same sysmptoms a few weeks ago but until now it seems I
was the only person to see it, although I could see it on 2 machines
(different OS versions of windows, different CPU different graphic cards). So
: incomplete type ‘QString’ used in nested name
specifier
make[5]: *** [docstring.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
Jerry
On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday, January 02, 2012 10:12:47 PM Jerry wrote:
I'm evaluating LyX for a major project and am mightily impressed.
However, there is one problem that stands out: Scrolling the main
LyX window is excruciatingly slow. I'm using LyX 2.0.2
placement for long lines should be one consequence.)
I've added the line that you suggest and the scrolling is improved--much like
or exactly like 2.0.1 scrolling that I commented on earlier in this thread. And
I see no problem with an incorrectly placed cursor.
Jerry
Stephan
On Jan 2, 2012, at 8:57 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Is the document that you are editing exceptionally huge?
No—it is only a few paragraphs of e.g. lorem ipsum or whatever. Adding a few
equations doesn't seem to make any difference; if anything, it might make
scrolling faster
On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
snip
Hi Jerry,
I reported the very same sysmptoms a few weeks ago but until now it seems I
was the only person to see it, although I could see it on 2 machines
(different OS versions of windows, different CPU different graphic cards). So
: incomplete type ‘QString’ used in nested name
specifier
make[5]: *** [docstring.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
Jerry
On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday, January 02, 2012 10:12:47 PM Jerry wrote:
I'm evaluating LyX for a major project and am mightily impressed.
However, there is one problem that stands out: Scrolling the main
LyX window is excruciatingly slow. I'm using LyX 2.0.2
placement for long lines should be one consequence.)
I've added the line that you suggest and the scrolling is improved--much like
or exactly like 2.0.1 scrolling that I commented on earlier in this thread. And
I see no problem with an incorrectly placed cursor.
Jerry
Stephan
On Jan 2, 2012, at 8:57 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
> Is the document that you are editing exceptionally huge?
No—it is only a few paragraphs of e.g. "lorem ipsum" or whatever. Adding a few
equations doesn't seem to make any difference; if anything, it might make
201 - 300 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
