of the current document, rather than a sub-section of the appendix (i.e.
each new section in the previous document creates a new appendix in the
current document).
I've uploaded a couple PDFs so you can see the effect.
An example previously written document is:
http://www.pongle.net/~tim/lyx
Hello,
I am writing a text with the class report (koma-script).
I am having the following problem:
When I add an appendix all
numerations will have a ending point added.
I found the problem with the option pointednumbers in koma script.
(see p. 47:
This is inconsistent and wrong. The 1996 Duden says (R4): Bei der
Abschnittsgliederung *mit Ziffern und Buchstaben* steht der Punkt nach
römischen und arabischen Zahlen und nach Großbuchstaben. i.e. the dot
has to be after numbers *and* letters, if there is an appendix. I cannot
find this
which not desired at all.
This was written also at:
http://www.komascript.de/node/604#comment-1416
appendix. But if you change something in the lyx document and compile
again, the change should become effective.
I try. If not I'd rather switch off than having also doted captions.
Greetings,
Tim
When creating a table, if I choose both ³Longtable² and ³Rotate table 90
degrees² then I get an error message when compiling. Either of the options
work independently, but not together...
I use
ERT: \begin{landscape}
TABLE
ERT
\end{landscape}
Which works well.
I cannot help you here as I don't have the file. I assume the reason is
one of your strange preamble hacks. To find the reason, copy the file
and remove everything except of one text line. If you then still have
problems, remove the preamble stuff step by step until you found the
problematic
continuation
of the current document, rather than a sub-section of the appendix (i.e.
each new section in the previous document creates a new appendix in the
current document).
I've uploaded a couple PDFs so you can see the effect.
An example previously written document is:
http://www.pongle.
Hello,
I am writing a text with the class "report (koma-script)".
I am having the following problem:
When I add an appendix all
numerations will have a ending point added.
I found the problem with the option "pointednumbers" in koma script.
(see p. 47:
This is inconsistent and wrong. The 1996 Duden says (R4): "Bei der
Abschnittsgliederung *mit Ziffern und Buchstaben* steht der Punkt nach
römischen und arabischen Zahlen und nach Großbuchstaben." i.e. the dot
has to be after numbers *and* letters, if there is an appendix. I cannot
find this
han having also doted captions.
Greetings,
Tim
When creating a table, if I choose both ³Longtable² and ³Rotate table 90
degrees² then I get an error message when compiling. Either of the options
work independently, but not together...
I use
ERT: \begin{landscape}
TABLE
ERT
\end{landscape}
Which works well.
Hi!
However there are some problems that I need to fix (I use Book as document
class, Lyx 1.4.3):
I never used book class...
1. The bookmarks to some sections such as Acknowledgement, Glossary etc
point to wrong pages.
How?
Like one or two section before that?
Put in a page beak before
Hi!
However there are some problems that I need to fix (I use Book as document
class, Lyx 1.4.3):
I never used book class...
1. The bookmarks to some sections such as Acknowledgement, Glossary etc
point to wrong pages.
How?
Like one or two section before that?
Put in a page beak before
Hi!
However there are some problems that I need to fix (I use Book as document
class, Lyx 1.4.3):
I never used book class...
1. The bookmarks to some sections such as Acknowledgement, Glossary etc
point to wrong pages.
How?
Like one or two section before that?
Put in a page beak before
until recently, I did not know that it was possible to scale tables in
LyX with the graphicx package. I've added something on how to do it to
the Wiki: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Tables#toc17
Very nice. Thank you.
I tried to get this work with long tables but it doesn't work
I get the following
until recently, I did not know that it was possible to scale tables in
LyX with the graphicx package. I've added something on how to do it to
the Wiki: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Tables#toc17
Very nice. Thank you.
I tried to get this work with long tables but it doesn't work
I get the following
until recently, I did not know that it was possible to scale tables in
LyX with the graphicx package. I've added something on how to do it to
the Wiki: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Tables#toc17
Very nice. Thank you.
I tried to get this work with long tables but it doesn't work
I get the following
it as a real bug report.
Thanks,
--Tim
Cheers,
Charles
that doesn't work right is the italicization of the
superscript---I guess latex2rtf doesn't ignore the text within the \text
command (which it doesn't understand), it just puts it in wholesale.
Thanks,
--Tim
it as a real bug report.
Thanks,
--Tim
Cheers,
Charles
that doesn't work right is the italicization of the
superscript---I guess latex2rtf doesn't ignore the text within the \text
command (which it doesn't understand), it just puts it in wholesale.
Thanks,
--Tim
l file it as a real bug report.
Thanks,
--Tim
>
> Cheers,
> Charles
ng this out!
The one thing that doesn't work right is the italicization of the
superscript---I guess latex2rtf doesn't ignore the text within the \text
command (which it doesn't understand), it just puts it in wholesale.
Thanks,
--Tim
and then open the file with OpenOffice to see what
I'm talking about.
Best,
--Tim
lyx_trial.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission of papers.
Try
and then open the file with OpenOffice to see what
I'm talking about.
Best,
--Tim
lyx_trial.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission of papers.
Try
and then open the file with OpenOffice to see what
I'm talking about.
Best,
--Tim
lyx_trial.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
> Tim Holy wrote:
> > At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
> > and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
> >
Hello,
some days ago I had a problem with backreferencing from the bibliography
[1]. I solved it putting a \ before problematic characters like or
#. No I have discovered that when running ps2pdf or displaying a
postscript the \ will be printed in the URL. Another user has also
reported the
Hello,
some days ago I had a problem with backreferencing from the bibliography
[1]. I solved it putting a \ before problematic characters like or
#. No I have discovered that when running ps2pdf or displaying a
postscript the \ will be printed in the URL. Another user has also
reported the
Hello,
some days ago I had a problem with backreferencing from the bibliography
[1]. I solved it putting a "\" before problematic characters like "&" or
"#". No I have discovered that when running ps2pdf or displaying a
postscript the "\" will be printed in the URL. Another user has also
Hannan Sadar schrieb:
Sorry, i forgot to write that i am using linux, gentoo.
Maybe this one helps also on Gentoo:
http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/Lyx?highlight=%28lyx%29#head-e91362dc38ed518ba87c76e55326b217620dfcb2
With Lyx = 1.5.x it shouldn't be a problem, AFAIK.
Hannan Sadar schrieb:
Sorry, i forgot to write that i am using linux, gentoo.
Maybe this one helps also on Gentoo:
http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/Lyx?highlight=%28lyx%29#head-e91362dc38ed518ba87c76e55326b217620dfcb2
With Lyx = 1.5.x it shouldn't be a problem, AFAIK.
Hannan Sadar schrieb:
Sorry, i forgot to write that i am using linux, gentoo.
Maybe this one helps also on Gentoo:
http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/Lyx?highlight=%28lyx%29#head-e91362dc38ed518ba87c76e55326b217620dfcb2
With Lyx >= 1.5.x it shouldn't be a problem, AFAIK.
. It should have checked for such problems...
Regards,
Tim
Tim Michelsen schrieb:
I believe that there is also an option to export as rtf.
Not in my 1.4.3on Ubuntu Lyx-Qt.
What program is used for that export? Maybe I missed to install it...
You need latex2rtf at http://latex2rtf.sourceforge.net/
I did install it and reconfigured it. But the RTF
. It should have checked for such problems...
Regards,
Tim
Tim Michelsen schrieb:
I believe that there is also an option to export as rtf.
Not in my 1.4.3on Ubuntu Lyx-Qt.
What program is used for that export? Maybe I missed to install it...
You need latex2rtf at http://latex2rtf.sourceforge.net/
I did install it and reconfigured it. But the RTF
m using JabRef. It should have checked for such problems...
Regards,
Tim
Tim Michelsen schrieb:
I believe that there is also an option to export as rtf.
Not in my 1.4.3on Ubuntu Lyx-Qt.
What program is used for that export? Maybe I missed to install it...
You need latex2rtf at http://latex2rtf.sourceforge.net/
I did install it and reconfigured it. But the RTF
Urtzi Jauregi schrieb:
Hi everybody,
Since I upgraded to Ubuntu Feisty (7.04), whenever I input a special
character in math mode, I just get the name of the character, not the
rendered character itself.
I have no problems with the same setting although I had to install it
via Gdebi
not
present.
Could anyone using Ubuntu reproduce this?
Thanks for your help.
Tim
the package latex-xft-fonts is no longer a dependency of lyx in
debian and ubuntu. You have to install it. You could also use the
inofficial 1.4.4 deb in the download section of the wiki, where
latex-xft-fonts is still a dependency.
Don't you think that this should be reported as a bug of the
’ text to the end of each item in the
bibliography, as a list of section numbers. This can
only work properly if there is a blank line after
each \bibitem.
I have a empty line after each bibtex entry.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Tim
Urtzi Jauregi schrieb:
Hi everybody,
Since I upgraded to Ubuntu Feisty (7.04), whenever I input a special
character in math mode, I just get the name of the character, not the
rendered character itself.
I have no problems with the same setting although I had to install it
via Gdebi
not
present.
Could anyone using Ubuntu reproduce this?
Thanks for your help.
Tim
the package latex-xft-fonts is no longer a dependency of lyx in
debian and ubuntu. You have to install it. You could also use the
inofficial 1.4.4 deb in the download section of the wiki, where
latex-xft-fonts is still a dependency.
Don't you think that this should be reported as a bug of the
’ text to the end of each item in the
bibliography, as a list of section numbers. This can
only work properly if there is a blank line after
each \bibitem.
I have a empty line after each bibtex entry.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Tim
Urtzi Jauregi schrieb:
Hi everybody,
Since I upgraded to Ubuntu Feisty (7.04), whenever I input a special
character in math mode, I just get the name of the character, not the
rendered character itself.
I have no problems with the same setting although I had to install it
via Gdebi
not
present.
Could anyone using Ubuntu reproduce this?
Thanks for your help.
Tim
the package latex-xft-fonts is no longer a dependency of lyx in
debian and ubuntu. You have to install it. You could also use the
inofficial 1.4.4 deb in the download section of the wiki, where
latex-xft-fonts is still a dependency.
Don't you think that this should be reported as a bug of the
’ text to the end of each item in the
bibliography, as a list of section numbers. This can
only work properly if there is a blank line after
each \bibitem.
I have a empty line after each bibtex entry.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Tim
is not quite
3. I think ODF will have many fewer limitations, at least
soon (TM), than RTF
4. ODF/ODT is a standardized format which is used by a vast number of
FOSS programs by now.
How can we do that?
Just file a bug request?
Regards,
Tim
Hello,
I still use Word for the final spell check of my documents. After the
LyX spell checker run and proof-reading everything, I just copy the
whole text into an empty word document and look for suspicious red and
green lines.
How to you do this?
I can't copy anything from Lyx to another
is not quite
3. I think ODF will have many fewer limitations, at least
soon (TM), than RTF
4. ODF/ODT is a standardized format which is used by a vast number of
FOSS programs by now.
How can we do that?
Just file a bug request?
Regards,
Tim
Hello,
I still use Word for the final spell check of my documents. After the
LyX spell checker run and proof-reading everything, I just copy the
whole text into an empty word document and look for suspicious red and
green lines.
How to you do this?
I can't copy anything from Lyx to another
is not quite
3. I think ODF will have many fewer limitations, at least
soon (TM), than RTF
4. ODF/ODT is a standardized format which is used by a vast number of
FOSS programs by now.
How can we do that?
Just file a bug request?
Regards,
Tim
Hello,
I still use Word for the final spell check of my documents. After the
LyX spell checker run and proof-reading everything, I just copy the
whole text into an empty word document and look for suspicious red and
green lines.
How to you do this?
I can't copy anything from Lyx to another
Tobias Krause schrieb:
just now I realized that there is a similar problem with cross
references: if there is a e.g. a , directly after a cross reference to
a picture it looks like the attached picture... (Event better to see in
the second attached picture, where the footnote is complete)
It
Tobias Krause schrieb:
just now I realized that there is a similar problem with cross
references: if there is a e.g. a , directly after a cross reference to
a picture it looks like the attached picture... (Event better to see in
the second attached picture, where the footnote is complete)
It
Tobias Krause schrieb:
just now I realized that there is a similar problem with cross
references: if there is a e.g. a "," directly after a cross reference to
a picture it looks like the attached picture... (Event better to see in
the second attached picture, where the footnote is complete)
Another unique selling point of Word is the language checker (spell and
grammar), which is an order of magnitude better than aspell, ispell and
everything else I have seen so far. For a publisher this might be a
strong argument, as submitted documents already contain significantly
fewer
Another unique selling point of Word is the language checker (spell and
grammar), which is an order of magnitude better than aspell, ispell and
everything else I have seen so far. For a publisher this might be a
strong argument, as submitted documents already contain significantly
fewer
Another unique selling point of Word is the language checker (spell and
grammar), which is an order of magnitude better than aspell, ispell and
everything else I have seen so far. For a publisher this might be a
strong argument, as submitted documents already contain significantly
fewer
Micha Feigin schrieb:
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there
a lyx way?
If you are using Bibtex the just write
Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU
Micha Feigin schrieb:
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there
a lyx way?
If you are using Bibtex the just write
Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU
Micha Feigin schrieb:
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there
a lyx way?
If you are using Bibtex the just write
Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU
to a label in doc2, and then
select View - PDF (pdflatex). An internal cross-reference works just fine,
but the cross-document one does not.
Am I missing something, or is this a bug?
Thanks in advance for taking the time to look into this.
Best,
--Tim
doc1.lyx
Description: application/lyx
doc2.lyx
control (having files named main_ver1.lyx,
main_ver2.lyx, suppl_ver1.lyx, suppl_ver2.lyx, etc) and that might require
some thought about how to migrate all the cross-references over to a file
with a different name.
Best,
--Tim
On Friday 04 May 2007, John Pye wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
Hello
to a label in doc2, and then
select View - PDF (pdflatex). An internal cross-reference works just fine,
but the cross-document one does not.
Am I missing something, or is this a bug?
Thanks in advance for taking the time to look into this.
Best,
--Tim
doc1.lyx
Description: application/lyx
doc2.lyx
control (having files named main_ver1.lyx,
main_ver2.lyx, suppl_ver1.lyx, suppl_ver2.lyx, etc) and that might require
some thought about how to migrate all the cross-references over to a file
with a different name.
Best,
--Tim
On Friday 04 May 2007, John Pye wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
Hello
oss-reference from doc1 points to a label in doc2, and then
select View -> PDF (pdflatex). An internal cross-reference works just fine,
but the cross-document one does not.
Am I missing something, or is this a bug?
Thanks in advance for taking the time to look into this.
Best,
--Tim
doc1
e manual version control (having files named main_ver1.lyx,
main_ver2.lyx, suppl_ver1.lyx, suppl_ver2.lyx, etc) and that might require
some thought about how to migrate all the cross-references over to a file
with a different name.
Best,
--Tim
On Friday 04 May 2007, John Pye wrote:
at
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general
and post that Url
Thank you very much,
Tim
The easiest with LyX is to check Document-Settings-Literature-Sectioned
Bibliography (which uses the bibtopic package). Then copy all the further
readings to a bibtex file further.bib, and insert a second bibtex inset which
points to this database, and select contents-all entries in the bibtex
at
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general
and post that Url
Thank you very much,
Tim
The easiest with LyX is to check Document-Settings-Literature-Sectioned
Bibliography (which uses the bibtopic package). Then copy all the further
readings to a bibtex file further.bib, and insert a second bibtex inset which
points to this database, and select contents-all entries in the bibtex
at
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general
and post that Url
Thank you very much,
Tim
The easiest with LyX is to check Document->Settings->Literature->Sectioned
Bibliography (which uses the bibtopic package). Then copy all the further
readings to a bibtex file further.bib, and insert a second bibtex inset which
points to this database, and select contents->all entries in the
Hello,
I want to put a section with further readings in my annex.
I should contain a list of literature, weblinks etc. for interested
readers. It is not the same as the reference list which contains the
text citations.
What experiences do you have with such lists and how do you handle them?
Hello,
I want to put a section with further readings in my annex.
I should contain a list of literature, weblinks etc. for interested
readers. It is not the same as the reference list which contains the
text citations.
What experiences do you have with such lists and how do you handle them?
Hello,
I want to put a section with "further readings" in my annex.
I should contain a list of literature, weblinks etc. for interested
readers. It is not the same as the reference list which contains the
text citations.
What experiences do you have with such lists and how do you handle
for your help,
Tim
ToolsPreferencesPathsLyXServer pipe: Tell LyX where you want it. And
then make sure you enter the same thing into JabRef.
WOW, nice!
Did I overlook it in the documentation?
I will check the wiki and put this there.
Thanks Greetings,
Timmie
for your help,
Tim
ToolsPreferencesPathsLyXServer pipe: Tell LyX where you want it. And
then make sure you enter the same thing into JabRef.
WOW, nice!
Did I overlook it in the documentation?
I will check the wiki and put this there.
Thanks Greetings,
Timmie
)
Thanks for your help,
Tim
Tools>Preferences>Paths>LyXServer pipe: Tell LyX where you want it. And
then make sure you enter the same thing into JabRef.
WOW, nice!
Did I overlook it in the documentation?
I will check the wiki and put this there.
Thanks & Greetings,
Timmie
Hello
clicking Insert - Citation,...?
Why do you consider this as slow?
ALT+E - Z, then select or search for the citation - OK.
Isn't that fast enough?
optional step: type the first letter to speedup this operation.
Down arrow until your desired citation is selected.
And don't forget the search function in the very dialog.
Hello
clicking Insert - Citation,...?
Why do you consider this as slow?
ALT+E - Z, then select or search for the citation - OK.
Isn't that fast enough?
optional step: type the first letter to speedup this operation.
Down arrow until your desired citation is selected.
And don't forget the search function in the very dialog.
Hello
clicking Insert -> Citation,...?
Why do you consider this as slow?
ALT+E - Z, then select or search for the citation -> OK.
Isn't that fast enough?
optional step: type the first letter to speedup this operation.
Down arrow until your desired citation is selected.
And don't forget the search function in the very dialog.
FWIW, there seems to be a reply-to-list extension coming for T-bird, but
it may not go gold until T-bird 3.0 is out
(http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/114-thunderbird-+-reply-to-list-...-here-it-comes.html,
http://alumnit.ca/wiki/index.php?page=ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension).
Yep, I'd
FWIW, there seems to be a reply-to-list extension coming for T-bird, but
it may not go gold until T-bird 3.0 is out
(http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/114-thunderbird-+-reply-to-list-...-here-it-comes.html,
http://alumnit.ca/wiki/index.php?page=ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension).
Yep, I'd
FWIW, there seems to be a reply-to-list extension coming for T-bird, but
it may not go gold until T-bird 3.0 is out
(http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/114-thunderbird-+-reply-to-list-...-here-it-comes.html,
http://alumnit.ca/wiki/index.php?page=ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension).
Yep, I'd
-June/000920.html
Regards thanks in advance,
Tim
Mate Wierdl schrieb:
Is this something you guys want?
However, my real question concerns the content of this message. In
addition to a list of pages that have changed, I'm considering including
the actual changes to the wiki pages (like a diff
Hi,
The question has been asked several times already.
My apoligies. Ideed, this time I forgot to look at the archive.
Well, it seems that Lyx users already decided on this topic.
Regards,
Timmie
401 - 500 of 693 matches
Mail list logo
