On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 14:33 +0200, ext e...@okerson.com wrote:
Hi,
Faheem Pervez wrote:
You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
already violating the GPL.
Dave Neary wrote:
I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
that the GPL
Oops. Forgot to CC him.
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 14:33 +0200, ext e...@okerson.com wrote:
Hi,
Faheem Pervez wrote:
You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
already violating the GPL.
Dave Neary wrote:
I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to
Dave Neary schrieb:
Hi,
Faheem Pervez wrote:
You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
already violating the GPL.
I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
Google's
jarmo.ti...@nokia.com wrote:
BTW I think flasher is the only closed source tool we have in maemo
development environment. Or at least I do not know any other binary only tool
:).
I think gcc/uclibc toolchain for initfs development would qualify but it
is much worse here, we even don't
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: ext Frantisek Dufka [mailto:duf...@seznam.cz]
Sent: 02 July, 2009 09:46
Fremantle and Diablo released
jarmo.ti...@nokia.com wrote:
BTW I think flasher is the only closed source tool we have
in maemo development environment. Or at least I do not know
any
You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
already violating the GPL.
On 7/2/09, jarmo.ti...@nokia.com jarmo.ti...@nokia.com wrote:
And I do not
belive we have any plans to release toolchain for initfs development for
Diablo anymore.
Cheers,
//Jarmo
(Well, s/you/Nokia/)
On 7/2/09, Faheem Pervez tripp...@gmail.com wrote:
You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
already violating the GPL.
On 7/2/09, jarmo.ti...@nokia.com jarmo.ti...@nokia.com wrote:
And I do not
belive we have any plans to release toolchain for
Hi,
Faheem Pervez wrote:
You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
already violating the GPL.
I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
Google's changes to the Linux kernel and
Hi,
I'm certainly far from being a licensing expert. But there is a
paragraph on a page at the busybox site which does make it clear wrt
busybox and releasing source: http://www.busybox.net/license.html
I see a /mnt/initfs/bin/busybox but I don't see the source available
for the busybox 1.00
Hi,
Faheem Pervez wrote:
You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
already violating the GPL.
Dave Neary wrote:
I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
Google's changes
Dave Neary wrote:
I've seen people say that Nokia doesn't even distribute the initfs
tools. If that's the case, there wouldn't be any GPL violation.
Let's move detailed discussion back to the bug report.
Quick and hopefully correct summary is that Nokia is distributing
modified uclibc (EABI
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: ext Frantisek Dufka [mailto:duf...@seznam.cz]
Sent: 02 July, 2009 15:54
To: Dave Neary
Cc: Faheem Pervez; maemo-developers@maemo.org; Tikka Jarmo
(Nokia-D/Helsinki)
Subject: Re: closed tools, Re: Maemo Flasher-3.5 Tool Beta for
Fremantle and Diablo
12 matches
Mail list logo
