On 2024-02-03 09:01:40 (+0800), Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
On 2024-02-02 at 10:26:55 UTC-0500 (Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:26:55 +0100)
Kai Bojens via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on
On 2024-02-02 23:08:54 (+0800), Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop wrote:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
The team here says that DMARC means there will never be alignment on
an SRS forwarder domain because the
Hellow Kai,
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 16:26 +0100, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
> Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
>
> > We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
> > implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
>
> Skip SRS and implement ARC for
Bill Cole via mailop skrev den 2024-02-03 02:01:
Telling the next hops that they need to parse ARC and trust your system
instead of just checking SPF is a choice that one can make, yes.
there is nothing to tell, its trustness or not
maillist arc trustness: yes
direct to mx trustness: no
in
On 2024-02-02 at 10:26:55 UTC-0500 (Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:26:55 +0100)
Kai Bojens via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
> On 1/29/2024 3:20 AM, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
>
> > A very experienced spam filter person, who worked at a not-for-profit
> > spam filtering company and two of the major mailbox providers once
> > told me that the biggest challenge with their job was that there were
> > messages that
On 1/29/2024 3:20 AM, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
A very experienced spam filter person, who worked at a not-for-profit
spam filtering company and two of the major mailbox providers once
told me that the biggest challenge with their job was that there were
messages that some recipients
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
Skip SRS and implement ARC for forwarded e-mails. This should solve all
these problems.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, Scott Undercofler via mailop wrote:
I'm replying on list for visibility. The issue you’re seeing is
directly related to SMTP smuggling which was discussed on list ad
nauseam about a month ago. The servers at shaw are configured to
reject non-RFC bare linefeeds. Can you
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
The team here says that DMARC means there will never be alignment on an
SRS forwarder domain because the envelope-from /must /match the mail-from.
What we're wondering is,
On 02.02.2024 at 01:52 Hugh E Cruickshank via mailop wrote
> We are experiencing a problem with mail delivery to Shaw.ca. Since January
> 18th messages have been bounced with: 552 5.2.0 Message contains bare CR and
> is violating 822.bis section 2.3. We have tried to contact postmas...@shaw.ca
Am 02.02.24 um 04:03 schrieb Lou Katz via mailop:
Wound up way back in my archive and responded to an old, dead issue.
If only the issue were as dead as it is old... SPF is a PITA that stays.
:-)
Hans-Martin
___
mailop mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
